Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Scand J Gastroenterol ; 34(8): 808-12, 1999 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10499482

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The prognosis in familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) has improved over the past decades owing to a reduction in the prevalence of colorectal cancer, resulting from effective early screening. During the same period several polyposis registers have recorded an increasing number of deaths due to duodenal/periampullary cancer and desmoid tumours. The aim of this study was to examine the causes of death with special emphasis on duodenal/periampullary cancer. METHODS: The material consisted of 328 patients (144 females and 184 males) registered from I January 1943 to 31 December 1992 in the Danish Polyposis Register. The standard mortality rate (SMR) was calculated for known major causes of death, using the entire Danish population as background population. The attributable risk was also calculated for selected death causes. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-three patients had died, SMR being 4.98 (95% confidence limits, 4.17-5.90). There were significantly lower SMRs in the call-up group than in the proband group. The late cohort (1943-1992) had lower SMRs than the early group (1889-1942). SMR was significantly increased for death due to colorectal cancer (145), duodenal cancer (214), and ovarian cancer (30). No deaths due to desmoids were observed in the examination period. The attributable risk for colorectal cancer was 29% and for duodenal cancer only 0.6%. CONCLUSION: Colorectal cancer is the most frequent cause of death in polyposis patients, followed by duodenal/periampullary cancer, but the latter is still a rare cause of death in FAP.


Subject(s)
Adenomatous Polyposis Coli/mortality , Adenomatous Polyposis Coli/epidemiology , Cause of Death , Colorectal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Colorectal Neoplasms/mortality , Denmark/epidemiology , Duodenal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Duodenal Neoplasms/mortality , Female , Fibromatosis, Aggressive/epidemiology , Fibromatosis, Aggressive/mortality , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/epidemiology , Lung Neoplasms/mortality , Male , Ovarian Neoplasms/epidemiology , Ovarian Neoplasms/mortality , Registries
2.
Anesthesiology ; 89(1): 58-66, 1998 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9667294

ABSTRACT

UNLABELLED: BACKGROUND. This study examined the analgesic effect of local ketamine infiltration, compared with placebo and systemic ketamine, in a human model of inflammatory pain. METHODS: Inflammatory pain was induced by a burn (at 47 degrees C for 7 min; wound size, 2.5 x 5 cm) on the calf in 15 volunteers on 3 separate days with 7-day intervals. They received either (1) subcutaneous infiltration with ketamine in the burn area (local treatment) and contralateral placebo injections, or (2) subcutaneous ketamine contralateral to the burn (systemic treatment) and placebo in the burn area, or (3) placebo on both sides. The study was double-blinded and the order of the treatments was randomized. Hyperalgesia to mechanical and heat stimuli was examined by von Frey hairs and contact thermodes (3.75 and 12.5 cm2), and pain was rated using a visual analog scale (0-100). RESULTS: The burns produced significant hyperalgesia. Local ketamine infiltration reduced pain during the burn injury compared with systemic treatment and placebo (P < 0.01). Heat pain thresholds were increased by local ketamine treatment compared with placebo immediately after injection (P < 0.03), and so were the mechanical pain thresholds (P = 0.02). Secondary hyperalgesia and suprathreshold pain responses to heat and mechanical stimuli were not significantly affected by local ketamine. No difference between local ketamine and placebo could be detected 1 h and 2 h after the burn. CONCLUSIONS: Ketamine infiltration had brief local analgesic effects, but several measures of pain and hyperalgesia were unaffected. Therefore, a clinically relevant effect of peripheral ketamine in acute pain seems unlikely.


Subject(s)
Anesthetics, Dissociative/administration & dosage , Inflammation/physiopathology , Ketamine/administration & dosage , Pain/prevention & control , Administration, Cutaneous , Adult , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...