Context-dependent responses of terrestrial invertebrates to anthropogenic nitrogen enrichment: A meta-analysis.

Anthropogenic increases in nitrogen (N) concentrations in the environment are affecting plant diversity and ecosystems worldwide, but relatively little is known about N impacts on terrestrial invertebrate communities. Here, we performed an exploratory meta-analysis of 4365 observations from 126 publications reporting on the richness (number of taxa) or abundance (number of individuals per taxon) of terrestrial arthropods or nematodes in relation to N addition. We found that the response of invertebrates to N enrichment is highly dependent on both species' traits and local climate. The abundance of arthropods with incomplete metamorphosis, including agricultural pest species, increased in response to N enrichment. In contrast, arthropods exhibiting complete or no metamorphosis, including pollinators and detritivores, showed a declining abundance trend with increasing N enrichment, particularly in warmer climates. These contrasting and context-dependent responses may explain why we detected no overall response of arthropod richness. For nematodes, the abundance response to N enrichment was dependent on mean annual precipitation and varied between feeding guilds. We found a declining trend in abundance with N enrichment in dry areas and an increasing trend in wet areas, with slopes differing between feeding guilds. For example, at mean levels of precipitation, bacterivore abundance showed a positive trend in response to N addition while fungivore abundance declined. We further observed an overall decline in nematode richness with N addition. These N-induced changes in invertebrate communities could have negative consequences for various ecosystem functions and services, including those contributing to human food production.

El aumento de las concentraciones de nitrógeno en el medio ambiente de forma antropogénica está afectando a la diversidad vegetal y a los ecosistemas de todo el mundo, pero aún se sabe relativamente poco sobre su impacto en comunidades de invertebrados terrestres. En este trabajo realizamos modelos meta-analíticos para explorar el efecto del enriquecimiento de nitrógeno en comunidades de invertebrados terrestres a escala global. Para ello, utilizamos una base de datos proveniente de 4.365 observaciones pareadas correspondientes a 126 publicaciones que estudiaron el efecto del enriquecimiento de nitrógeno en la riqueza (número de taxones) y/o abundancia (número de individuos por taxón) de artrópodos y/o nematodos. Encontramos que la respuesta de los invertebrados al enriquecimiento de nitrógeno depende en gran medida tanto de los rasgos de las especies como del clima local. La abundancia de artrópodos con metamorfosis incompleta, incluyendo especies que pueden crear plagas agrícolas, aumentó en respuesta al enriquecimiento de nitrógeno. Por el contrario, los artrópodos con metamorfosis completa o nula, incluidos polinizadores y detritívoros, mostraron una tendencia negativa de su abundancia con respecto al aumento de nitrógeno, especialmente en climas más cálidos. Además, no detectamos una respuesta general de la riqueza de artrópodos posiblemente por la variabilidad en respuestas observadas, tanto negativas como positivas. En el caso de los nematodos, la respuesta de sus abundancias al enriquecimiento de nitrógeno fue dependiente de la precipitación media anual y de su grupo trófico. En general, observamos una respuesta negativa de la abundancia de nematodos al enriquecimiento de nitrógeno en zonas secas y una tendencia positiva en zonas más húmedas, pero además los diferentes grupos tróficos estudiados presentaron diferentes respuestas. Por ejemplo, la abundancia de bacterívoros mostró una tendencia positiva en respuesta al enriquecimiento de nitrógeno bajo niveles medios de precipitación, mientras que la abundancia de fungívoros disminuyó. Además, observamos un descenso general de la riqueza de nematodos con más enriquecimiento de nitrógeno. Estos cambios inducidos por el nitrógeno en las comunidades de invertebrados podrían tener consecuencias negativas para diversas funciones y servicios de los ecosistemas, incluyendo aquellos que contribuyen a la producción de alimentos.

Sod translocation to restore habitats of the myrmecophilous butterfly Phengaris (Maculinea) teleius on former agricultural fields.

In Europe, 50%-70% of former natural grassland area has been destroyed during the past 30 years due to land use changes, losses are expected to increase in the future. Restoration is thought to reverse this situation by creating suitable abiotic conditions. In this paper, we investigate the effects of sod translocation with specific vegetation to facilitate the restoration of a former intensive agricultural field into a wet meadow. First, starting conditions were optimized including modification of the local hydrology, removal of the fertilized topsoil, application of liming, and translocation of fresh clippings as a seed source. The second part aimed at restoring the habitat for the butterfly species Phengaris (Maculinea) teleius, one of the species that was especially affected by the loss of wet meadows. This species engages in a complex myrmecophilous relationship with one host plant, Sanguisorba officinalis, and one obligate host ant, Myrmica scabrinodis. We used sod translocation to create islands of habitat to promote host plant and host ant colonization. After 4 years following the restoration, we observed that plants spread from the transplanted sods to the surroundings. The vegetation composition and structure of the transplanted sods attracted colonization of Myrmica ants into the restored areas. Following the increase in vegetation cover and height, Myrmica ant colonies further spread into the restored areas. Therefore, sod translocations can be considered an effective restoration method following topsoil removal in the process of restoring wet meadows to provide a starting point for ant colonization and plant dispersion. With these findings, this paper contributes to the evidence-based restoration of wet meadows on former agricultural fields, including complex interactions between invertebrates and their required ecological relationships.

The impacts of linear infrastructure on terrestrial vertebrate populations: A trait-based approach.

While linear infrastructures, such as roads and power lines, are vital to human development, they may also have negative impacts on wildlife populations up to several kilometres into the surrounding environment (infrastructure-effect zones, IEZs). However, species-specific IEZs are not available for the vast majority of species, hampering global assessments of infrastructure impacts on wildlife. Here, we synthesized 253 studies worldwide to quantify the magnitude and spatial extent of infrastructure impacts on the abundance of 792 vertebrate species. We also identified the extent to which species traits, infrastructure type and habitat modulate IEZs for vertebrate species. Our results reveal contrasting responses across taxa based on the local context and species traits. Carnivorous mammals were generally more abundant in the proximity of infrastructure. In turn, medium- to large-sized non-carnivorous mammals (>1 kg) were less abundant near infrastructure across habitats, while their smaller counterparts were more abundant close to infrastructure in open habitats. Bird abundance was reduced near infrastructure with larger IEZs for non-carnivorous than for carnivorous species. Furthermore, birds experienced larger IEZs in closed (carnivores: ≈130 m, non-carnivores: >1 km) compared to open habitats (carnivores: ≈70 m, non-carnivores: ≈470 m). Reptiles were more abundant near infrastructure in closed habitats but not in open habitats where abundances were reduced within an IEZ of ≈90 m. Finally, IEZs were relatively small in amphibians (<30 m). These results indicate that infrastructure impact assessments should differentiate IEZs across species and local contexts in order to capture the variety of responses to infrastructure. Our trait-based synthetic approach can be applied in large-scale assessments of the impacts of current and future infrastructure developments across multiple species, including those for which infrastructure responses are not known from empirical data.

The island rule explains consistent patterns of body size evolution in terrestrial vertebrates.

Island faunas can be characterized by gigantism in small animals and dwarfism in large animals, but the extent to which this so-called 'island rule' provides a general explanation for evolutionary trajectories on islands remains contentious. Here we use a phylogenetic meta-analysis to assess patterns and drivers of body size evolution across a global sample of paired island-mainland populations of terrestrial vertebrates. We show that 'island rule' effects are widespread in mammals, birds and reptiles, but less evident in amphibians, which mostly tend towards gigantism. We also found that the magnitude of insular dwarfism and gigantism is mediated by climate as well as island size and isolation, with more pronounced effects in smaller, more remote islands for mammals and reptiles. We conclude that the island rule is pervasive across vertebrates, but that the implications for body size evolution are nuanced and depend on an array of context-dependent ecological pressures and environmental conditions.

Combined effects of land use and hunting on distributions of tropical mammals.

Land use and hunting are 2 major pressures on biodiversity in the tropics. Yet, their combined impacts have not been systematically quantified at a large scale. We estimated the effects of both pressures on the distributions of 1884 tropical mammal species by integrating species' range maps, detailed land-use maps (1992 and 2015), species-specific habitat preference data, and a hunting pressure model. We further identified areas where the combined impacts were greatest (hotspots) and least (coolspots) to determine priority areas for mitigation or prevention of the pressures. Land use was the main driver of reduced distribution of all mammal species considered. Yet, hunting pressure caused additional reductions in large-bodied species' distributions. Together, land use and hunting reduced distributions of species by 41% (SD 30) on average (year 2015). Overlap between impacts was only 2% on average. Land use contributed more to the loss of distribution (39% on average) than hunting (4% on average). However, hunting reduced the distribution of large mammals by 29% on average; hence, large mammals lost a disproportional amount of area due to the combination of both pressures. Gran Chaco, the Atlantic Forest, and Thailand had high levels of impact across the species (hotspots of area loss). In contrast, the Amazon and Congo Basins, the Guianas, and Borneo had relatively low levels of impact (coolspots of area loss). Overall, hunting pressure and human land use increased from 1992 to 2015 and corresponding losses in distribution increased from 38% to 41% on average across the species. To effectively protect tropical mammals, conservation policies should address both pressures simultaneously because their effects are highly complementary. Our spatially detailed and species-specific results may support future national and global conservation agendas, including the design of post-2020 protected area targets and strategies.

Efectos Combinados del Uso de Suelo y la Caza en la Distribución de los Mamíferos Tropicales Resumen El uso de suelo y la caza son dos de las principales presiones ejercidas sobre la biodiversidad de los trópicos. Aun así, los impactos combinados que generan no han sido cuantificados sistemáticamente a gran escala. Estimamos los efectos de ambas presiones sobre la distribución de 1,884 especies de mamíferos tropicales al integrar mapas de distribución de las especies, mapas detallados del uso de suelo (de 1992 y 2015), datos de preferencia de hábitat específicos por especie y un modelo de presión de caza. Identificamos además las áreas en donde los impactos combinados eran mayores (puntos calientes) y menores (puntos fríos) para determinar las áreas prioritarias para la mitigación o prevención de dichas presiones. El uso de suelo fue el principal conductor de la reducción de la distribución para todas las especies de mamíferos que consideramos. Sin embargo, la presión por caza causó reducciones adicionales en la distribución de especies de gran tamaño. Juntas, el uso de suelo y la caza redujeron la distribución de las especies en un 41% (DS 30) en promedio (año 2015). El solapamiento entre los impactos fue, en promedio, sólo del 2%. El uso de suelo contribuyó más a la pérdida de la distribución (39%, en promedio) que la caza (4%, en promedio). A pesar de esto, en promedio la caza redujo la distribución de los mamíferos de gran tamaño en un 29%; por lo tanto, los grandes mamíferos perdieron una cantidad desproporcionada de área debido a la combinación de ambas presiones. El Gran Chaco, el Bosque Atlántico y Tailandia tuvieron niveles altos de impacto en todas las especies (puntos calientes de pérdida de área). Como contraste, las cuencas del Amazonas y el Congo, las Guayanas y Borneo tuvieron niveles relativamente bajos de impacto (puntos fríos de pérdida de área). En general, las presiones por caza y uso de suelo incrementaron desde 1992 a 2015 y las correspondientes pérdidas de distribución incrementaron de un 38% a un 41% en promedio para todas las especies. Para proteger de forma efectiva a los mamíferos tropicales, las políticas de conservación deberían considerar a ambas presiones de manera simultánea, pues sus efectos son altamente complementarios. Nuestros resultados espacialmente detallados y específicos para cada especie pueden respaldar las futuras agendas de conservación nacionales e internacionales, incluyendo el diseño de las estrategias y los objetivos de las áreas protegidas para después de 2020.

Worldwide insect declines: An important message, but interpret with caution.

A recent paper claiming evidence of global insect declines achieved huge media attention, including claims of "insectaggedon" and a "collapse of nature." Here, we argue that while many insects are declining in many places around the world, the study has important limitations that should be highlighted. We emphasise the robust evidence of large and rapid insect declines present in the literature, while also highlighting the limitations of the original study.

Impact of male condition on his spermatophore and consequences for female reproductive performance in the Glanville fritillary butterfly.

In butterflies, male reproductive success is highly related to the quality and the size of the spermatophore transferred to the female. The spermatophore is a capsule produced by the male during copulation, which in many species contains sperm in addition to a nuptial gift, and which is digested by the female after copulation. The nuptial gift may contribute to egg production and offspring quality, and in some cases also to female body maintenance. The production of the spermatophore, however, represents a cost for the male and, in polyandrous species, ejaculates are sometimes allocated adaptively across matings. Nonetheless, although the ecological factors affecting the reproductive success of female butterflies have been the topic of numerous studies, little information exists on the factors affecting males' contribution to reproduction, and the indirect impacts on female fecundity and fitness. We used the Glanville fritillary butterfly, Melitaea cinxia (Linnaeus, 1758) (Nymphalidae), in order to assess variation in male allocation to matings. In this species, smaller males produce smaller spermatophores, but variation in spermatophore size is not correlated with female reproductive success. We show that spermatophore size increases with male age at first mating, decreases with mating frequency and adult food-deprivation, and is not influenced by developmental food-limitation. The length of copulation period does not influence the spermatophore size nor influences the polyandrous mating behavior in this species. Male contribution to his spermatophore size is clearly influenced by his condition and adult-resource at the time of mating. Despite this variation, spermatophore size does not seem to have a direct impact on female reproductive output or mating behavior.