Employing the right annual data collection efforts to combat IPV on college campuses.

Present data collection efforts to identify and address intimate partner violence on college campuses and universities are flawed. Traditional methods utilized to report on intimate partner violence on campus, including Campus Climate Surveys and Clery Act reporting guidelines, are insufficient in that they do not capture the full scope of intimate partner violence. Inconsistent operationalization of intimate partner violence affects prevalence rates, generalizations across entities, and subsequent programing efforts. This viewpoint is a call for universities to standardize data collection efforts that accurately capture the wide range of actions and perpetrations that constitute intimate partner violence so as to prevent the further loss of student lives on campus.

Use of a Health Advocacy Model for Survivors of Interpersonal Violence.

This article examines the implementation of a health advocacy model designed for survivors of interpersonal violence (IPV) in a metropolitan area of North Texas. Using a framework influenced by motivational interviewing, solution-focused therapy, and trauma-informed care, this program engaged IPV survivors in creating health and safety goals. Goal attainment scaling was used to track progress after each health advocacy encounter. Clients could set their own goals for healthcare, self-care, and safety. The program served 419 clients and 648 goals were set by clients at the first visit. Among all goals, 89% selected goals focused on healthcare, with 47% of those selecting obtaining health insurance or coverage as a need. These results demonstrate the need for an enhanced healthcare response for this population. The remaining goals selected were self-care (7%) and safety (3%). The design of the health advocacy intervention shows promise towards filling the gaps between IPV and healthcare service delivery systems.