In Vitro Evaluation of Cell Compatibility of Dental Cements Used with Titanium Implant Components.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the biocompatibility of five dental cement compositions after directly exposing human gingival fibroblast (HGF) and MC3T3-E1 preosteoblast cells to cement alone and cement applied on commercially pure titanium (cpTi) specimens. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nanostructurally integrated bioceramic (NIB), resin (R), resin-modified glass ionomer (RMGIC), zinc oxide eugenol (ZOE), and zinc phosphate (ZP) compositions were prepared according to the respective manufacturer's instructions. Samples were prepared in cylindrical Teflon molds or applied over the entire surface of polished cpTi discs. All samples were cured for 0.5, 1, 12, or 24 hours post-mixing. Direct contact testing was conducted according to ISO 10993 by seeding 6-well plates at 350,000 cells/well. Plates were incubated at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2 for 24 hours before individually plating samples and cpTi control discs. Plates were then incubated for an additional 24 hours. Microtetrazolium (MTT) cell viability assays were used to measure sample cytotoxicity. RESULTS: For samples that cured for 24 hours prior to direct contact exposure, only NIB and ZP cements when cemented on cpTi demonstrated cell viability percentages above the minimum biocompatibility requirement (≥70%) for both the investigative cell lines. R, RMGIC, and ZOE cements exhibited moderate to severe cytotoxic effects on both cell lines in direct contact and when cemented on cpTi specimens. For HGF cells, ZOE cemented-cpTi specimens exhibited significantly decreased cytotoxicity, whereas RMGIC cemented-cpTi specimens exhibited significantly increased cytotoxicity. CONCLUSIONS: Despite previous studies that showed enhanced cpTi corrosion activity for fluoride-containing compositions (NIB and ZP), there was no significant difference in cytotoxicity between cement alone and cemented-cpTi. In general, the MC3T3-E1 preosteoblast cells were more sensitive than HGF cells to cement composition. Ultimately, cement composition played a significant role in maintaining host cell compatibility. Results of this work help illustrate the impact of different cement formulations on host cell health and emphasize the need for understanding material properties when selecting certain formulations of dental cements, which can ultimately influence the survival of dental implant systems.

Can Dental Cement Composition Affect Dental Implant Success?

Cement-retained restorations on dental implants are a well-established method to replace missing teeth. However, undetected residual cement left during crown cementation procedures encourages microorganism growth, and it has been identified as a risk factor for peri-implant disease. Currently, there is no official guidance for dental cement selection, and the increasing variety of available compositions intensifies the complexity of the clinicians' decision process. The present study aimed to evaluate the in vitro host and bacterial cellular response to four different commercial dental cements as well as their effects on cement surface morphology. Disk specimens (n = 3) of bioceramic, zinc phosphate, resin-modified glass ionomer, and resin cements were exposed to host (murine pre-osteoblasts, human gingival fibroblasts, and undifferentiated human macrophages) and oral bacterial (Streptococcus mutans, Streptococcus salivarius, Streptococcus sanguinis, and Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans) cells. Results indicated that oral bacteria degraded the cement surface, but bacterial viability was not significantly affected by the presence of dental cement. Conversely, the biocompatibility and morphology of host cells were severely impacted by the cement composition. Only the bioceramic cement achieved >70% viability for all cell lines investigated. Within the limitations of this study, the results indicated the importance of considering the biological interactions of a dental cement composition during selection as it played a significant role in the host cellular response and the degree of surface degradation due to bacterial attack.