Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Cancer Radiother ; 20(5): 357-61, 2016 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27345843

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) has shown its interest for head and neck cancer treatment. In parallel, cetuximab has demonstrated its superiority against exclusive radiotherapy. The objective of this study was to assess the acute toxicity, local control and overall survival of cetuximab associated with different IMRT modalities compared to platinum-based chemotherapy and IMRT in the ARTORL study (NCT02024035). PATIENTS AND METHOD: This prospective, multicenter study included patients with epidermoid or undifferentiated nasopharyngeal carcinoma, epidermoid carcinoma of oropharynx and oral cavity (T1-T4, M0, N0-N3). Acute toxicity, local control and overall survival were compared between groups (patients receiving cetuximab or not). Propensity score analysis at the ratio 1:1 was undertaken in an effort to adjust for potential bias between groups due to non-randomization. RESULTS: From the 180 patients included in the ARTORL study, 29 patients receiving cetuximab and 29 patients treated without cetuximab were matched for the analysis. Ten patients (34.5%) reported acute dermal toxicity of grade 3 in the cetuximab group versus three (10.3%) in the non-cetuximab group obtained after matching (P=0.0275). Cetuximab was not significantly associated with more grade 3 mucositis (P=0.2563). There were no significant differences in cutaneous or oral toxicity for patients treated with cetuximab between the different IMRT modalities (P=1.000 and P=0.5731, respectively). There was no significant difference in local relapse-free survival (P=0.0920) or overall survival (P=0.4575) between patients treated with or without cetuximab. CONCLUSION: Patients treated with cetuximab had more cutaneous toxicities, but oral toxicity was similar between groups. The different IMRT modalities did not induce different toxicity profiles.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Cetuximab/therapeutic use , Drug Eruptions/etiology , Head and Neck Neoplasms/therapy , Mucositis/etiology , Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/mortality , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/therapy , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Female , Head and Neck Neoplasms/mortality , Head and Neck Neoplasms/pathology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Propensity Score , Prospective Studies
3.
Cancer Radiother ; 9(4): 261-70, 2005 Jun.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16081023

ABSTRACT

This article reviews the concept of selectivity in peritumoral microscopic disease to be included in the Clinical Target Volume (CTV) for elective treatment for oral cavity and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma, using the local tumoral spread. The objective of the present article is to present a procedure for the delineation of the target volumes, required for an appropriate application of 3-DCRT and IMRT for head and neck cancers. These propositions are for the delineation of microscopic peritumoral target volumes when external beam irradiation is required. CTVs are illustrated on CT sections.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/radiotherapy , Mouth Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , Dose Fractionation, Radiation , Humans , Imaging, Three-Dimensional , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Mouth Neoplasms/pathology , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/pathology , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
4.
Cancer Radiother ; 6(1): 10-4, 2002 Feb.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11899675

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Evaluate the results of the treatment of small uterine cervix cancer with the association of surgery and postoperative vaginal brachytherapy, without unfavourable prognostic factors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: After radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy, 29 women (mean age: 44 years) with carcinoma < 25 mm (26 stage IB1, 3 IIA, mean size: 15 mm) were treated by post-operative prophylactic vaginal brachytherapy using low dose rate. Ovarian transposition was performed at the surgical time in 14 young women (mean age 35 years). RESULTS: The actuarial specific survival rates at 5 and 10 years were 100% and 90% respectively, with a mean follow-up 75 months. Only one local recurrence was observed. The rate of grade 1 post-operative complication was 7%. The conservation rate of the ovarian function was 85% for young women. CONCLUSION: Treatment of small volume uterine cervix cancer using first surgery and post-operative vaginal brachytherapy is a reliable therapeutic option. The results in terms of specific survival and complications are the same with those after standard association of preoperative uterovaginal brachytherapy and surgery.


Subject(s)
Brachytherapy , Hysterectomy , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/therapy , Adult , Age Factors , Combined Modality Therapy , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Lymph Node Excision , Middle Aged , Ovary/physiology , Postoperative Care , Radiotherapy Dosage , Time Factors , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/mortality , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/surgery
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...