Critical care transportation by paramedics: a cross-sectional survey.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to gather data from paramedics practicing in the critical care transport setting to guide development of the education, training, and clinical practices for certification as a critical care paramedic. METHODS: A paper survey of 1991 randomly selected nationally registered (NREMT) paramedics was conducted. Nine paramedics with residences in small US Pacific Island territories were not included in the survey. RESULTS: We received 610 responses (30.6%). Respondents that stated that they provided critical care transport services reported using pediatric skills and equipment the most and intracranial pressure monitoring the least. Paramedics served as the primary provider for pediatric patients (72.5%), 12-lead electrocardiogram (66.3%), intravenous infusion pump (76.7%), mechanical ventilator (66.9%), central line management (63.1%), and chest tube management (63.3%). Paramedics served in a team member capacity most often with neonatal isolette (71.8%), intra-aortic balloon pump (79.2%), and ICP monitoring (64.9%). The majority provided ground critical care transport (249) compared to 44 rotor-wing and 6 fixed-wing. Sixteen respondents reported serving as primary providers on combinations of ground, rotor-, and fixed-wing services. CONCLUSIONS: Paramedics reported being the primary provider on the critical care transport team and performing skills while using equipment and administering medications that exceeded their education and training as paramedic and, at times, without the benefit of any additional education or training. National appreciation of this reality should spur development of standardized education, licensing or certification, and continuing education to prepare paramedics for their role as critical care medical providers.

The relationship between physician practice characteristics and physician adoption of electronic health records.

BACKGROUND: Health information technologies, such as electronic health records (EHRs), can potentially improve patient safety in our health care system. The potential advantages include increased quality and more efficiency in the care of patients. Adoption of EHRs has been slow despite these advantages and a national call for EHR implementation. PURPOSES: This article explores factors associated with the adoption of EHR systems using organizational theory to derive hypotheses as to why physicians would adopt EHRs. METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: : A survey was administered to all office-based physicians in Nebraska and South Dakota using a modified Dillman technique between July and November 2007. The main outcome variable measured physician EHR adoption status at three levels: not planning to use an EHR, planning to use an EHR, and using an EHR. Factors associated with EHR status were analyzed using a multinomial logistic regression. FINDINGS: Approximately 30% of physicians reported using an EHR in his or her practice. Physicians adopting EHRs were younger and had access to internal health information technologies support. In addition, working in an independent practice decreased the likelihood of physicians using and adopting EHRs. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: This research provides further evidence of the barriers impeding EHR adoption. One such barrier includes the lack of access to internal information technology support staff versus having to outsource for technical support services. From a resource dependency perspective, barriers illustrated by this example may place undue dependencies on physicians if they pursue an EHR system. By addressing these barriers, physicians may be in a better position to adopt EHR system into his or her practice.