Is the EQ-5D-5L a responsive test to evaluate results in elective foot and ankle surgery?

PURPOSE: To analyze the responsiveness and the minimally clinical important change (MCIC) of the EuroQol (EQ) 5D-5 L score in patients that had undergone foot/ankle surgery. METHODS: Patients that underwent elective foot/ankle surgery from January 2019 to December 2020 were included. They were assessed with the EQ-5D-5L, visual analogue pain scale and Manchester Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively. The pre-post differences of all variables, Effect Size (ES) and MCIC were analyzed. RESULTS: 167 patients. All variables showed a significant pre-post improvement. The ES for EQ-index and EQ-VAS were 0.61 and 0.33 respectively. MCIC for EQ-index was 0.17 and EQ-VAS was 8.54. MOXFQ index ES was 1.46 and the MCIC was 23.8. VAS decreased from 59.4 to 26.62. CONCLUSION: The EQ-5D-5L is a sensitive test to detect changes after elective foot and ankle surgery with good responsiveness relative to the ES values in the EQ-index. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Reproducibility of Bartonícek and Haraguchi classifications of the posterior malleolus fractures.

BACKGROUND: Two of the most commonly used classifications for the posterior malleolus fracture are Haraguchi and Bartonícek. Both classifications are based on the morphology of the fracture. This study makes an inter- and intra-observer agreement analysis of the mentioned classifications. METHODS: 39 patients with ankle fractures who met inclusion criteria were selected. All the fractures were analyzed and classified twice by each of the 20 observers using Bartonícek and Haraguchi's classifications, with a window period of at least 30 days between the two rounds. RESULTS: Analysis was made by Kappa coefficient (ƙ). The global intraobserver value was ƙ = 0.627 in the Bartonícek classification and ƙ = 0.644 in the Haraguchi one. The first round global interobserver ƙ = 0.589 (0.574-0.604) on the Bartonícek classification and ƙ = 0.534 (0.517-0.551) on the Haraguchi one. Second round coefficients were ƙ = 0.601 (0.585-0.616) and ƙ = 0.536 (0.519-0.554), respectively. The best agreement was when there was involvement of the posteromedial malleolar zone with ƙ = 0.686 and ƙ = 0.687 in Haraguchi II and ƙ = 0.641 and ƙ = 0.719 in Bartonícek III. No differences were observed in Kappa values when an experience-based analysis was made. CONCLUSION: Bartonícek and Haraguchi classifications of the posterior malleolus fracture have both substantial intraobserver agreement but moderate to substantial agreement in interobserver analysis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Halving the usage of rigid-soled postoperative shoes does not affect outcomes in forefoot reconstruction surgery.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative shoes are commonly used after forefoot surgery. This study's aim was to demonstrate that reducing rigid-soled shoe time to 3 weeks neither compromises functional outcomes nor does it produce complications. METHODS: Prospective cohort study: 6 weeks versus 3 weeks of rigid postoperative shoe (100 and 96 patients respectively), after forefoot surgery with stable osteotomies. Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) and pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) were studied preoperative and one year postoperative. Radiological angles were also assessed after removing the rigid shoe and at 6 months. RESULTS: The MOXFQ index and pain VAS depicted similar results in each group (group A: 29.8 and 25.7; group B: 32.7 and 23.7) with no differences between them (p = .43 Vs. p = .58). Moreover, no differences were reported in their differential angles (HV differential-angle p = .44, IM differential-angle p = .18) or in their complication rate. CONCLUSION: In forefoot surgery with stable osteotomies, shortening the postoperative shoe time to 3 weeks, neither impairs clinical results nor the initial correction angle.

A new suture fixation technique for the Akin Osteotomy of the Proximal Phalanx: You don't need any implant.

BACKGROUND: Various fixation methods have been described for Akin osteotomy, based on using metal implants or transosseous sutures. The aim of this study was to evaluate radiological outcomes and complications of closing wedge Akin osteotomy based on a crossed suture configuration of the joint capsule rather than using implants. The null hypothesis is that a crossed suture has comparable radiological results to other techniques, with no additional complications. METHODS: It's a retrospective study. Patients who underwent Akin osteotomy fixed either with implant or joint capsule suture between 2015 and 2018 were included. Distal articular set angle corrections in pre- and postoperative anteroposterior foot x-rays were calculated by 2 observers. Complications, such as pain, infection, non-union and need of surgery revision, was compared at 1 year follow-up. RESULTS: 89 patients, 30 in the implant group and 59 in the suture group. Mean distal articular set angle corrections were 6.43 (SD 5.54) and 7.36 (SD 5.48) degrees in the implant and suture groups, respectively, without statistically significant differences (p 0.454). Complications were 2 local pain and 1 wound infection cases in the suture and implant groups, respectively (p 0.138, p 0.197). CONCLUSION: Akin osteotomy with suture fixation yields comparable radiological results to metal implant fixation methods without increasing the associated complications.

Proximal Medial Gastrocnemius Release: Surgical Technique.

Proximal medial gastrocnemius release (PMGR) is a technique that is performed to relieve tension in the Achilles-calcaneus-plantar system when a biomechanical overload is present1-3. One of the main indications for this technique is recalcitrant plantar fasciitis. This procedure may also be useful in second-rocker metatarsalgia or midportion Achilles tendinitis4. It is considered to be an easy and safe method for achieving good results5-7. Description: PMGR is performed with the patient in the prone position. A thigh tourniquet is not utilized. We prefer to use spinal anesthesia, but local anesthesia could be applied along with sedation. A posteromedial incision is made on or just below the posterior knee crease. The crural fascia is divided, and the proximal insertion of the medial gastrocnemius is identified. Performing the "hook maneuver" with a curved dissector is helpful at this step. Only the white fibers are sectioned in order to allow for a lengthening of the muscular fibers that is completed with forceful ankle dorsiflexion. After proper hemostasis has been achieved, the subcutaneous layer and skin are closed, leaving the fascia open. Alternatives: Nonoperative treatment should be the first option, including analgesics, insoles, heel cups, calf-stretching, injections, and extracorporeal shock wave therapy8. Some authors have also suggested that application of a walking cast for 3 to 6 weeks should be attempted9,10. Once all of these treatment options have failed, operative treatment is appropriate. Historically, open plantar fasciotomy was offered to patients with recalcitrant plantar fasciitis, and this treatment continues to be a surgical option. Other procedure, like the Strayer, Vulpius, or Baumann techniques, involve the calf system and are called "gastrocnemius recession." However, these techniques act in the more distal aspect of the calf system compared with PMGR. Rationale: PMGR offers patients with recalcitrant plantar fasciitis rapid recovery and good results. This procedure obviates the complications associated with plantar fasciotomy, in which the medial aspect of the proximal plantar fascia is divided to relieve the overload. A plantar fasciotomy (either open or endoscopic11) risks lateral column overload12 or a painful flatfoot if >50% of the fascia is divided. A long recovery period following plantar fasciotomy has also been described7. On the other hand, other procedures have been utilized to lengthen the Achilles-calcaneus-plantar system to an even greater extent. Techniques like the Silfverskiöld (i.e., medial and lateral proximal gastrocnemius release) or Strayer (i.e., division of the distal aspect of the gastrocnemius fascia) technique present a higher rate of complications (up to 38%), specifically nerve injuries13,14. We consider these procedures (classified as gastrocnemius recession procedures) more properly indicated for patients with neurological diseases or with an equinus contracture. The medial gastrocnemius is the more powerful of the 2 bellies. Releasing the medial head alone offers a robust decrease in tension and is safer than approaching the lateral head of the gastrocnemius15. At the same time, this technique provides a quick recovery for the patient. PMGR can also help those patients with other clinical signs related to gastrocnemius tightness, such as calf cramps and pain or repeated muscle injuries. Moreover, it can be effective in patients with second-rocker metatarsalgia or midportion Achilles tendinitis1,16. Expected Outcomes: PMGR has a reported rate of satisfaction of >80%. Most patients undergoing this procedure experience substantial pain relief within the first 2 to 3 months6,17. PMGR is an outpatient procedure with a short operative time and a rapid return to recreational and labor activities. The complication rate is low, and the most common complications are calf hematomas and delayed wound healing. The present article demonstrates a reduction in pain and good functional results. An improvement in the perception of health-related quality of life, especially in the physical and pain domains of the Short Form-36 questionnaire, was also observed. Important Tips: The prone position allows for direct access to the proximal medial head of the gastrocnemius. Preferably, perform PMGR without a tourniquet in order to assure proper hemostasis. Keep the ankle joint free at the end of operating table because ankle dorsiflexion is a helpful maneuver at some stages in this procedure. Digital (index finger) dissection should be performed among the medial head of the gastrocnemius, the hamstrings, and the posterior aspect of the proximal tibia. The hook maneuver, performed with use of a blunt dissector, is helpful to identify all of the white fibers. Only white fibers should be divided. The surgeon must also make sure to cut the more anterior part of the aponeurosis that is hidden by red fibers. After cutting the white fibers, forceful ankle dorsiflexion is required to obtain full lengthening of the muscle. Proper hemostasis should be achieved to prevent formation of a calf hematoma. Advise the patient to do calf-stretches as soon as pain permits in order to prevent a contracting muscle scar. Acronyms & Abbreviations: PMGR = proximal medial gastrocnemius releaseESWT = extracorporeal shock wave therapySD = standard deviation.

Clinical And Plantar Fascial Morphologic Changes After Proximal Medial Gastrocnemius Release Treatment of Recalcitrant Plantar Fasciitis.

BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been used as a diagnostic and prognostic instrument to evaluate the results of conservative treatment for plantar fasciitis. However, there are scarce data available relative to changes in the plantar fascia after operative treatment. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the imaging changes in patients with recalcitrant plantar fasciitis treated operatively by means of proximal medial gastrocnemius release. METHODS: Thirteen patients with recalcitrant plantar fasciitis were studied with MRI preoperatively and 1 year after operative treatment. Quantitative (plantar fascia thickness) and qualitative variables (hyperintensity in the plantar fascia, insertional calcaneus bone edema, a plantar fascia tear, and the presence of perifascial collections) were assessed by 2 musculoskeletal radiologists. Clinical results were also measured with American Orthopaedic Ankle & Society (AOFAS), visual analog scale (VAS) pain, and 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) scales. RESULTS: The mean plantar fascia thickness was 6.59 mm preoperatively and 6.37 mm postoperatively (P = .972). No statistically significant differences were found in any of the qualitative variables on comparing the pre- and postoperative periods. Patients reported clinical improvements in pain VAS, AOFAS measurement, and the physical subdomains of the SF-36 scale. CONCLUSION: Quantitative and qualitative variables assessed for the plantar fascia on MRI did not show any significant change after medial gastrocnemius release despite clear clinical improvement. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, perspective cohort study.

Barbed Sutures in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Are They Really Useful? A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Bidirectional barbed sutures (BBSs) have recently been investigated in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The contrasting results from the scarce literature suggest that BBSs are safe, save time and money, and give results comparable to traditional sutures. The purpose of the study is to test the real effect of BBSs on closure time in TKA and assess the functional results as well as the complications related to them. It was a randomized controlled trial. Eighty-five patients undergoing primary TKA were assigned to receive traditional closure with Vicryl (V-group) or with BBSs (Q-group). The exclusion criteria were significant coronal deformity, flexion contracture, or the need for stem and/or augmentation. The closure time for the capsule and that for the subcutaneous layer were registered separately. Intraoperative incidences were recorded. The follow-up was up to 1 month, during which the range of motion (ROM), superficial or deep infection, and wound dehiscence were assessed. There was a significant reduction in the capsule layer (27 seconds; p = 0.02) and global time closure (51 seconds; p = 0.01) in the Q-group. No differences were found in the subcutaneous layer (24 seconds; p = 0.055). There were more intraoperative suture breakages in the Q-group, mainly in the subcutaneous layer (p < 0.001). No differences in terms of dehiscence, infection, and ROM were observed at the 1-month follow-up. BBSs allow for slightly faster wound closure than Vicryl during a TKA. However, the differences observed have minimal clinical repercussions. Moreover, no differences in the infection rate (deep or superficial), dehiscence, or ROM were found.

Proximal Medial Gastrocnemius Release Versus Open Plantar Fasciotomy for the Surgical Treatment in Recalcitrant Plantar Fasciitis.

BACKGROUND: Plantar fasciitis is a common cause of foot pain. If conservative treatment fails, there is no consensus as to the best surgical management for recalcitrant plantar fasciitis (RPF). The aim of this study was to compare the results obtained from proximal medial gastrocnemius release (PMGR) with those obtained from open plantar fasciotomy (OPF) in terms of pain, satisfaction, health-related quality of life, and American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) score. METHODS: This is a prospective randomized trial conducted between 2012 and 2016. Patients with RPF for at least 9 months were included. Diagnosis was clinically made. The exclusion criteria were neuropathic heel pain; a history of previous foot fracture, surgery, or deformity; rheumatoid arthritis; or the need for long-term analgesic administration. After ruling out other conditions with magnetic resonance or ultrasound imaging, patients were randomized to be operated on with OPF or PMGR independently of the Silfverskjold test. Follow-up was carried out for up to 1 year. The AOFAS, visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, SF-36, and Likert scale for satisfaction were used to evaluate the results obtained. The analysis was done with 21 patients in the OPF group and 15 in the PMGR group. The demographic data (age, sex, body mass index, duration of symptoms, and positivity to the Silfverskjold test) of the groups were comparable. RESULTS: No differences were found in terms of the AOFAS (P = .24), VAS (P = .14), or any item of the SF-36. Satisfaction was very good in 85.8% of the PMGR group and 89.5% of the OPF group (P = .27). Faster recovery was observed in the PMGR group. CONCLUSION: OPF and PMGR provided good results for patients with RPF. Neither was superior to the other relative to pain, AOFAS score, satisfaction, or the SF-36. We recommend PMGR as the first option in RPF surgical management in order to avoid potential biomechanical complications related to OPF. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I, therapeutic randomized controlled trial.

Arthroscopic reduction of a locked patellar dislocation: a new less invasive technique.

Patellar dislocation is a condition that is often reduced by itself or through closed manipulation from a trained professional. In this case of a traumatic lateral patellar dislocation, the patella was caught through the rupture in the lateral retinaculum, as is seen in Boutonniere-like lesions. Reduction of the dislocated patella was obtained by arthroscopic reduction.Level of evidence V.

Relationship of Plantar Fascia Thickness and Preoperative Pain, Function, and Quality of Life in Recalcitrant Plantar Fasciitis.

BACKGROUND: The measurement of plantar fascia thickness has been advocated as a diagnostic and prognostic instrument in patients with plantar fasciitis, but there are no data relative to it in recalcitrant plantar fasciitis. The aim of the study is to evaluate the correlation between plantar fascia thickness and pain, functional score, and health perception in patients with this condition. METHODS: Thirty-eight feet were studied with ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging to measure plantar fascia thickness. The visual analogue scale (VAS), American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society Hindfoot Score (AOFAS), and SF-36 were then recorded for each patient. The relationship between the fascia and these scores was analyzed to evaluate the correlation of thickness with pain, functional level, and health perception of patients. RESULTS: In patients with recalcitrant plantar fasciitis, plantar fascia thickness did not correlate with pain (VAS), AOFAS, or any item of the SF-36. CONCLUSION: The thickness of the plantar fascia in patients with recalcitrant plantar fasciitis did not correlate with its clinical impact, and thus, we believe it should not be used in treatment planning. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, case series.

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of acute complex proximal humeral fractures: Influence of greater tuberosity healing on the functional outcomes.

PURPOSE: To investigate the influence of greater tuberosity healing on the functional outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) for the treatment of acute complex proximal humeral fractures (PHFs), and to investigate the influence of patient- and surgery-related factors in the healing of the greater tuberosity. METHODS: Retrospective study including 41 consecutive PHFs treated using RSA with minimum 2-year follow-up. In all the cases, tuberosities were reattached with a standardized technique. All the patients were assessed at the last follow-up with constant score. Body mass index, surgery delay, comorbidities, polyethylene size, glenosphere size, overhanging of glenosphere, and scapular notch were recorded, and their influence in final constant score and in greater tuberosity healing was analyzed. RESULTS: Mean final constant score was of 60.7 points (standard deviation (SD) = 9.9). Greater tuberosity healed in proper position in 68% of the cases. There were no significant differences in constant score between patients with (mean = 61; SD = 9.5) and without (mean = 61; SD = 11.3) the healing of greater tuberosity. All patients scored above 90° in forward elevation. Scapular notch was reported in 14.6% of the cases. Age significantly affected the constant score ( p = 0.008). Comorbidities significantly interfered with greater tuberosity healing ( p = 0.03). There was one reoperation after dislocation. CONCLUSION: In spite of expecting good functional outcome with low complication rate after RSA for acute PHFs, the influence of greater tuberosity healing on shoulder function could not be demonstrated. The presence of comorbidities, but not age or gender, negatively influenced the healing of the greater tuberosity.

Corticosteroid Injection for the Treatment of Morton's Neuroma: A Prospective, Double-Blinded, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of corticosteroid injection for the treatment of Morton's neuroma is unclear. In addition, most of the studies related to it are case-control or retrospective case series. The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness between corticosteroid injection associated with local anesthetic and local anesthetic alone (placebo control group) for the treatment of Morton's neuroma. METHODS: Forty-one patients with a diagnosis of Morton's neuroma were randomized to receive 3 injections of either a corticosteroid plus a local anesthetic or a local anesthetic alone. The patients and the researcher who collected data were blinded to the treatment groups. The visual analog scale for pain and the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Score (metatarsophalangeal/interphalangeal score) were obtained at baseline, after each injection, and at 3 and 6 months after the last injection. RESULTS: There were no significant between-group differences in terms of pain and function improvement at 3 and 6 months after treatment completion in comparison with baseline values. At the end of the study, 17 (48.5%) patients requested surgical excision of the neuroma: 7 (44%) in the experimental group and 10 (53%) in the control group ( P = 1.0). CONCLUSION: The injection of a corticosteroid plus a local anesthetic was not superior to a local anesthetic alone in terms of pain and function improvement in patients with Morton's neuroma. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I, randomized controlled trial.

Which immobilization is better for distal radius fracture? A prospective randomized trial.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to determine whether an above-elbow cast (AEC) is better than a below-elbow cast (BEC) at maintaining the initial reduction in the orthopaedic management of a distal radius fracture (DRF). METHODS: It is a prospective randomized study carried out in a single emergency trauma department. There were 72 patients older than 55 years of age (55-96) with a distal radius fracture treated orthopaedically. They were randomized into two groups: group B (AEC 32 patients) and group A (BEC 40 patients). Randomization was done by a computer program. Four subgroups were constituted according to the instability criteria: subgroup 4 the most instable fractures. Main outcome was reduction loss from initial reduction to cast removal: it was measured using the volar tilt, radial tilt and radial length on plain radiographs. RESULTS: No differences were observed between group A and B when analysed globally (volar tilt loss p = 0.89 radial tilt loss p = 0.08 ulnar variance p = 0.19). Subgroups analysis revealed less radial tilt reduction loss in group A in patients within subgroup 3 (p = 0.02) and 4 (p = 0.003). DISCUSSION: Results are in contrast to what was expected. Limiting prono-supination AEC is supposed to better maintain initial fracture reduction. Effect of pronation and supination as well as distraction of brachioradialis muscle could have been overestimated until now. CONCLUSION: The above-elbow cast is not better than the below-elbow cast in terms of loss reduction. However, the below-elbow cast more efficiently controls radial tilt reduction.

Preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis in prosthetic joint infections: not a concern for intraoperative cultures.

BACKGROUND: Culture negative prosthetic joint infections (PJI) still remain an issue even with the advantages of the new diagnostic tools for PJI. This is why some orthopedic surgeons have reservations relative to the use of preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis when a PJI is suspected. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the influence of preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis on intraoperative cultures. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An enhanced diagnostic protocol for PJI (Zimmerli criteria) was used for the inclusion criteria in order to collect all PJI that were seen in a university hospital. Patients were prospectively randomized into two groups. The control group received the classical preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis. The study group did not receive prophylaxis prior to surgery. RESULTS: There were 14 patients in each group. They correspond to 13 total hip arthroplasty infections, 12 total knee arthroplasty infections and 3 reverse shoulder prosthesis infections. There were 10 patients in the study group and 10 patients in the control group with at least one positive microbiological criterion (P > 0.05). There were 4 patients in each group with a culture negative PJI (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis does not affect intraoperative cultures in suspected or confirmed PJI. Therefore it is essential to deliver antibiotic prophylaxis in any patient in which a prosthesis is to be implanted in order to protect the prosthesis from infection.