Post-COVID-19 Mental Health Distress in 13 Million Youth: A Retrospective Cohort Study of Electronic Health Records.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the impact of the SARS-CoV-2 infection on the rates of mental disorders in youth. METHOD: The study involved 7,519,465 children and 5,338,496 adolescents from the TriNetX Research Network, all without prior mental disorder histories. Among them, 290,145 children and 223,667 adolescents had SARS-CoV-2-positive tests or confirmed COVID-19 diagnoses. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to evaluate the probability of developing new mental disorders (any codes in International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) F01-F99 category and suicidal behaviors) within 2 years post infection, compared to the propensity score-matched youth who were never infected. RESULTS: Within 2 years post SARS-CoV-2 infection, children had a probability of 0.15 in acquiring new psychiatric diagnoses, compared to 0.026 for matched non-infected children; adolescents had a 0.19 probability against 0.05 for their non-infected counterparts. The hazard ratio (HR) was 6.0 (95% CI = 5.8-6.3) for children and 4.2 for adolescents (95% CI = 4.1-4.4), with children vs adolescents HR of 1.4 (95% CI = 1.36-1.51). Elevated HRs were observed for almost all subcategories of mental disorders and suicidal behaviors, with variations based on sex, severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection, and viral variants. COVID-19 was similar to other respiratory infections in increasing the rate of mental disorders in adolescents, but had a significantly higher effect on children (HR = 1.57, 95% CI =1.53-1.61). CONCLUSION: This study revealed significant mental health distress following SARS-CoV-2 infection in youth, which was more pronounced in children than in adolescents. These findings underscore the urgent need to support at-risk youth, particularly those who contracted SARS-CoV-2 at younger ages and had more severe infections. DIVERSITY & INCLUSION STATEMENT: One or more of the authors of this paper self-identifies as a member of one or more historically underrepresented racial and/or ethnic groups in science.

Pediatric attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): 2022 updates on pharmacological management.

INTRODUCTION: Pediatric attention-deficit disorder (ADHD) impacts a significant percentage of the population world-wide. Pharmacologic treatments have been shown to be safe and effective for managing symptoms. Various medication formulations exist, and new medication agents are continually approved each year. AREAS COVERED: This article offers an overview of ADHD, an overview of both stimulant and non-stimulant medication options as well as an overview of stimulant misuse. It explores the medication mechanisms of action and side effect profiles, as well as offering an in-depth summary of the novel agents recently approved and soon-to-be approved for use in youth. PubMed and Medline were utilized. Search terms included children, adolescents, ADHD, and medication. FDA package inserts were reviewed for all medications. EXPERT OPINION: New formulations of medications include an evening administered, extended, and delayed-release form of methylphenidate (DR/ER MPH), a methylphenidate pro-drug (serdexmethylphenidate) and an amphetamine patch. The availability of a new SNRI (selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor), viloxazine extended-release (VER), and the pending approval of a triple reuptake inhibitor (centanafadine) provides welcome additions to the prescriber's toolbox.

This article is a review of pharmacological treatment options for pediatric attention-deficit disorder (ADHD). It provides an overview of ADHD, an overview of the current stimulant and non-stimulant medication options as well as detailed information on the newer psychopharmacological options to assist in the education of the wide array of medication options for treatment. As ADHD is a heterogeneous illness, a wide array of medication options is helpful in the clinician's toolbox. Learning the mechanisms of action along with the side effect profile for newer medication options is the focus of this review. There are new options for patches and new combinations for long-acting and delayed-release formulations as well as new non-stimulant options which target different receptors.

Appearance Framing versus Health Framing of Health Advice: Assessing the Effects of a YouTube Channel for Adolescent Girls.

The present experimental study tested the effects of appearance framing of health advice on adolescent girls' state self-objectification, appearance anxiety, and preference for appearance-enhancing products. The stimuli consisted of informative YouTube-style videos about doing yoga, drinking water, or using sunscreen, and these videos were either appearance-framed (experimental condition) or health-framed (control condition). In total, 154 adolescent girls (Mage = 15.67, SD = 1.07) participated in the experiment. The effect of appearance-framed videos on state self-objectification scores was moderated by age, such that the effect of viewing the appearance-framed videos positively predicted state self-objectification among the younger adolescents. In addition, self-objectification mediated the effect of condition on appearance anxiety and on their appearance-enhancing product preferences, again with the predicted effects supported for the younger adolescents in the sample.

Trajectories of psychiatric diagnoses and medication usage in youth with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome: a 9-year longitudinal study.

BACKGROUND: Chromosome 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (22q11DS) is associated with high rates of psychiatric disorders, including schizophrenia in up to 30% of individuals with the syndrome. Despite this, we know relatively little about trajectories and predictors of persistence of psychiatric disorders from middle childhood to early adulthood. Accordingly, we followed youth over four timepoints, every 3 years, to assess long-term trajectories of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), anxiety, mood, and psychosis-spectrum disorders (PSDs), as well as medication usage. METHODS: Eighty-seven youth with 22q11DS and 65 controls between the ages of 9 and 15 years at the first timepoint (T1; mean age 11.88 ± 2.1) were followed for 9 years (mean age of 21.22 ± 2.01 years at T4). Baseline cognitive, clinical, and familial predictors of persistence were identified for each class of psychiatric disorders. RESULTS: Baseline age and parent-rated hyperactivity scores predicted ADHD persistence [area under curve (AUC) = 0.81]. The presence of family conflict predicted persistence of anxiety disorders (ADs) whereas parent ratings of child internalizing symptoms predicted persistence of both anxiety and mood disorders (MDs) (AUC = 0.84 and 0.83, respectively). Baseline prodromal symptoms predicted persistent and emergent PSDs (AUC = 0.83). Parent-reported use of anti-depressants/anxiolytics increased significantly from T1 to T4. CONCLUSIONS: Psychiatric, behavioral, and cognitive functioning during late childhood and early adolescence successfully predicted children with 22q11DS who were at highest risk for persistent psychiatric illness in young adulthood. These findings emphasize the critical importance of early assessments and interventions in youth with 22q11DS.

The role of appearance schematicity in the internalization of media appearance ideals: A panel study of preadolescents.

Individuals who are more strongly invested in their appearance, appearance schematics, have a tendency to engage in appearance-related comparison. Appearance schematicity consists of two components. The self-evaluative component concerns the degree to which appearance is central to self-worth, referred to as dysfunctional appearance beliefs. Motivational salience refers to the engagement in behaviors designed to enhance appearance, such as body surveillance. Based on a three-wave panel survey of 973 Flemish preadolescents (Mage = 11.15, SD = 1.13) we found that the motivational and self-evaluative components had a different impact on media internalization. For preadolescents who engaged in more body surveillance, watching television resulted in more media internalization. For preadolescents who had fewer dysfunctional appearance beliefs, watching television resulted in more media internalization. These findings suggest that appearance schematicity is an important susceptibility variable in the relationship between TV-exposure and media internalization, and emphasize the importance of investigating individual dispositions beyond gender differences.