Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Curr Biol ; 23(16): 1601-5, 2013 Aug 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23910657

ABSTRACT

Humans vary in acuity to many odors [1-4], with variation within olfactory receptor (OR) genes contributing to these differences [5-9]. How such variation also affects odor experience and food selection remains uncertain [10], given that such effects occur for taste [11-15]. Here we investigate ß-ionone, which shows extreme sensitivity differences [4, 16, 17]. ß-ionone is a key aroma in foods and beverages [18-21] and is added to products in order to give a pleasant floral note [22, 23]. Genome-wide and in vitro assays demonstrate rs6591536 as the causal variant for ß-ionone odor sensitivity. rs6591536 encodes a N183D substitution in the second extracellular loop of OR5A1 and explains >96% of the observed phenotypic variation, resembling a monogenic Mendelian trait. Individuals carrying genotypes for ß-ionone sensitivity can more easily differentiate between food and beverage stimuli with and without added ß-ionone. Sensitive individuals typically describe ß-ionone in foods and beverages as "fragrant" and "floral," whereas less-sensitive individuals describe these stimuli differently. rs6591536 genotype also influences emotional associations and explains differences in food and product choices. These studies demonstrate that an OR variant that influences olfactory sensitivity can affect how people experience and respond to foods, beverages, and other products.


Subject(s)
Food Preferences , Genetic Variation , Norisoprenoids/metabolism , Odorants/analysis , Receptors, Odorant/genetics , Smell , Adult , Female , Food , Genome-Wide Association Study , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Receptors, Odorant/metabolism , Young Adult
2.
Curr Biol ; 23(16): 1596-600, 2013 Aug 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23910658

ABSTRACT

Humans vary in their ability to smell numerous odors [1-3], including those associated with food [4-6]. Odor sensitivity is heritable [7-11], with examples linking genetic variation for sensitivity to specific odors typically located near olfactory receptor (OR) genes [12-16]. However, with thousands of aromas and few deorphaned ORs [17, 18], there has been little progress toward linking variation at OR loci to odor sensitivity [19, 20]. We hypothesized that OR genes contain the variation that explains much of the differences in sensitivity for odors, paralleling the genetics of taste [21, 22], which affect the flavor experience of foods [23-25]. We employed a genome-wide association approach for ten food-related odors and identified genetic associations to sensitivity for 2-heptanone (p = 5.1 × 10(-8)), isobutyraldehyde (p = 6.4 × 10(-10)), ß-damascenone (p = 1.6 × 10(-7)), and ß-ionone (p = 1.4 × 10(-31)). Each locus is located in/near distinct clusters of OR genes. These findings increase the number of olfactory sensitivity loci to nine and demonstrate the importance of OR-associated variation in sensory acuity for food-related odors. Analysis of genotype frequencies across human populations implies that variation in sensitivity for these odors is widespread. Furthermore, each participant possessed one of many possible combinations of sensitivities for these odors, supporting the notion that everyone experiences their own unique "flavor world."


Subject(s)
Genetic Variation , Odorants/analysis , Receptors, Odorant/genetics , Smell , Adult , Female , Food , Genome-Wide Association Study , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Receptors, Odorant/metabolism , Young Adult
3.
Public Underst Sci ; 18(2): 189-98, 2009 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19579683

ABSTRACT

In year two of a three-year project, New Zealand mothers of children aged 10 and under were interviewed to examine the social, cultural and spiritual dimensions of biotechnology. Ten focus groups were conducted and used "sustainable biotechnology" as a center-point for discussion, concentrating on four different biotechnology scenarios. The findings of the research were consistent with year one and with findings on the general public throughout the world. Further insights revealed in year two suggested that women saw their and future generations' quality of life as intimately intertwined with the health of the environment, making the environment particularly important. Because of this, anything that had potentially negative consequences on the ecosystem was perceived to pose a threat to the woman, her family and future generations. The need for strict controls to be put in place by regulatory and research authorities was therefore seen as an important step in allaying her fears. True partnership and participation was seen as critical, since it would only be by such means that mothers would feel they were in control of the safety of their own children.


Subject(s)
Biotechnology , Culture , Mothers/psychology , Quality of Life , Social Perception , Adult , Female , Focus Groups , Forecasting , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Humans , Incidence , Middle Aged , New Zealand , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...