Expert guidance on the multidisciplinary management of cystinosis in adolescent and adult patients.

Cystinosis, a rare autosomal recessive lysosomal storage disorder, results in an abnormal accumulation of the amino acid cystine in multiple organs and tissues of the body. Renal symptoms typically develop in the first few months of life, with extra-renal manifestations becoming apparent over the next 10-20 years, which require coordinated multidisciplinary care. Here, we describe a consensus-based guidance to support the management of adolescents and adults living with cystinosis. The programme was led by a Steering Committee (SC) of six experts in the management of patients with cystinosis, who identified a list of 15 key questions reflecting the multi-organ effects of cystinosis. An Extended Faculty (EF) of eight additional specialists was invited to answer the questions via an online digital platform using a quasi-Delphi approach. The consolidated answers were summarized into recommendations. Where evidence was lacking, recommendations were developed using collective expert consensus. The EF was asked to agree/disagree with the clinical recommendations. The expert-agreed clinical recommendations provide guidance that considers both renal and extra-renal systems. The topics covered are advice on fertility and family planning, consideration of the nervous, muscular, ophthalmic, cardio-respiratory, endocrine, dermatological and gastrointestinal systems, as well as guidance on dental care, diet, lifestyle, and improving quality of life and psychological well-being. In summary, this work outlines recommendations and a checklist for clinicians with a vision for improving and standardizing the multidisciplinary care for patients with cystinosis.

Feasibility, long-term safety, and immune monitoring of regulatory T cell therapy in living donor kidney transplant recipients.

Short-term outcomes in kidney transplantation are marred by progressive transplant failure and mortality secondary to immunosuppression toxicity. Immune modulation with autologous polyclonal regulatory T cell (Treg) therapy may facilitate immunosuppression reduction promoting better long-term clinical outcomes. In a Phase I clinical trial, 12 kidney transplant recipients received 1-10 × 106 Treg per kg at Day +5 posttransplantation in lieu of induction immunosuppression (Treg Therapy cohort). Nineteen patients received standard immunosuppression (Reference cohort). Primary outcomes were rejection-free and patient survival. Patient and transplant survival was 100%; acute rejection-free survival was 100% in the Treg Therapy versus 78.9% in the reference cohort at 48 months posttransplant. Treg therapy revealed no excess safety concerns. Four patients in the Treg Therapy cohort had mycophenolate mofetil withdrawn successfully and remain on tacrolimus monotherapy. Treg infusion resulted in a long-lasting dose-dependent increase in peripheral blood Tregs together with an increase in marginal zone B cell numbers. We identified a pretransplantation immune phenotype suggesting a high risk of unsuccessful ex-vivo Treg expansion. Autologous Treg therapy is feasible, safe, and is potentially associated with a lower rejection rate than standard immunosuppression. Treg therapy may provide an exciting opportunity to minimize immunosuppression therapy and improve long-term outcomes.

Regulatory cell therapy in kidney transplantation (The ONE Study): a harmonised design and analysis of seven non-randomised, single-arm, phase 1/2A trials.

BACKGROUND: Use of cell-based medicinal products (CBMPs) represents a state-of-the-art approach for reducing general immunosuppression in organ transplantation. We tested multiple regulatory CBMPs in kidney transplant trials to establish the safety of regulatory CBMPs when combined with reduced immunosuppressive treatment. METHODS: The ONE Study consisted of seven investigator-led, single-arm trials done internationally at eight hospitals in France, Germany, Italy, the UK, and the USA (60 week follow-up). Included patients were living-donor kidney transplant recipients aged 18 years and older. The reference group trial (RGT) was a standard-of-care group given basiliximab, tapered steroids, mycophenolate mofetil, and tacrolimus. Six non-randomised phase 1/2A cell therapy group (CTG) trials were pooled and analysed, in which patients received one of six CBMPs containing regulatory T cells, dendritic cells, or macrophages; patient selection and immunosuppression mirrored the RGT, except basiliximab induction was substituted with CBMPs and mycophenolate mofetil tapering was allowed. None of the trials were randomised and none of the individuals involved were masked. The primary endpoint was biopsy-confirmed acute rejection (BCAR) within 60 weeks after transplantation; adverse event coding was centralised. The RTG and CTG trials are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01656135, NCT02252055, NCT02085629, NCT02244801, NCT02371434, NCT02129881, and NCT02091232. FINDINGS: The seven trials took place between Dec 11, 2012, and Nov 14, 2018. Of 782 patients assessed for eligibility, 130 (17%) patients were enrolled and 104 were treated and included in the analysis. The 66 patients who were treated in the RGT were 73% male and had a median age of 47 years. The 38 patients who were treated across six CTG trials were 71% male and had a median age of 45 years. Standard-of-care immunosuppression in the recipients in the RGT resulted in a 12% BCAR rate (expected range 3·2-18·0). The overall BCAR rate for the six parallel CTG trials was 16%. 15 (40%) patients given CBMPs were successfully weaned from mycophenolate mofetil and maintained on tacrolimus monotherapy. Combined adverse event data and BCAR episodes from all six CTG trials revealed no safety concerns when compared with the RGT. Fewer episodes of infections were registered in CTG trials versus the RGT. INTERPRETATION: Regulatory cell therapy is achievable and safe in living-donor kidney transplant recipients, and is associated with fewer infectious complications, but similar rejection rates in the first year. Therefore, immune cell therapy is a potentially useful therapeutic approach in recipients of kidney transplant to minimise the burden of general immunosuppression. FUNDING: The 7th EU Framework Programme.

Transplantation tolerance.

Although transplantation has been a standard medical practice for decades, marked morbidity from the use of immunosuppressive drugs and poor long-term graft survival remain important limitations in the field. Since the first solid organ transplant between the Herrick twins in 1954, transplantation immunology has sought to move away from harmful, broad-spectrum immunosuppressive regimens that carry with them the long-term risk of potentially life-threatening opportunistic infections, cardiovascular disease, and malignancy, as well as graft toxicity and loss, towards tolerogenic strategies that promote long-term graft survival. Reports of "transplant tolerance" in kidney and liver allograft recipients whose immunosuppressive drugs were discontinued for medical or non-compliant reasons, together with results from experimental models of transplantation, provide the proof-of-principle that achieving tolerance in organ transplantation is fundamentally possible. However, translating the reconstitution of immune tolerance into the clinical setting is a daunting challenge fraught with the complexities of multiple interacting mechanisms overlaid on a background of variation in disease. In this article, we explore the basic science underlying mechanisms of tolerance and review the latest clinical advances in the quest for transplantation tolerance.

Regulatory T cell therapy for the induction of clinical organ transplantation tolerance.

The pursuit of transplantation tolerance is the holygrail in clinical organ transplantation. It has been established that regulatory T cells (Tregs) can confer donor-specific tolerance in mouse models of transplantation. However, this is crucially dependent on the strain combination, the organ transplanted and most importantly, the ratio of Tregs to alloreactive effector T cells. The ex vivo expansion of Tregs is one solution to increase the number of alloantigen specific cells capable of suppressing the alloresponse. Indeed, ex vivo expanded, alloantigen specific murine Tregs are shown to preferentially migrate to, and proliferate in, the graft and draining lymph node. In human transplantation it has been proposed that depletion of the majority of direct pathway alloreactive T cells will be required to tip the balance in favour of regulation. Ex vivo expansion of alloantigen specific, indirect pathway human Tregs, which can cross regulate the residual direct pathway has been established. Rapid expansion of these cells is possible, whilst they retain antigen specificity, suppressive properties and favourable homing markers. Furthermore, considerable progress has been made to define which immunosuppressive drugs favour the expansion and function of Tregs. Currently a series of clinical trials of adoptive Treg therapy in combination with depletion of alloreactive T cells and short term immunosuppression are underway for human transplantation with the aim of minimizing immunosuppressive drugs and completely withdrawal.

Regulatory T cells: the cunning fox and its clinical application.

So profound is the potential for regulatory T cells (Tregs) to control unwanted immune responses that in 2008 an entire conference was dedicated to them. The underlying concept of this conference, "China Tregs 2008," was that unraveling the cellular biology of Tregs will lead to important advances for therapies in virtually all human disease processes and in transplantation. The master-switch of immune regulation is the forkhead transcription factor Foxp3; in mice, Foxp3 is a sine qua non for regulatory activity. At "China Tregs 2008," the cell signaling events leading to the expression of Foxp3 and those events downstream were explored together with presentations on how the latest knowledge of the biology of Tregs is being translated in the clinic.

Generation and expansion of human CD4+ CD25+ regulatory T cells with indirect allospecificity: Potential reagents to promote donor-specific transplantation tolerance.

BACKGROUND: Harnessing naturally arising CD4+ CD25+ regulatory T cells (Tregs) for potential adoptive cell therapy is hampered by their innate autoreactivity and their limited number. METHODS: CD4+ CD25+ Tregs were purified from peripheral blood of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) DR1*0101+ A2- individuals, and stimulated with autologous monocyte-derived dendritic cells (DCs). RESULTS: Here we show that CD4+ CD25+ Tregs specific for an HLA A2 (103-120) peptide can be selected from the peripheral blood CD4+ CD25+ T cell population of a healthy individual and detected using a tetramer comprised of HLA DRB1*0101 and the A2 peptide. The selected cells can be expanded substantially (i.e., a 1600-fold increase over a two-week period) by T-cell receptor (TCR) stimulation and high-doses of interleukin-2 (IL-2). The CD4+ CD25+Tregs with indirect allospecificity for the A2 peptide showed more potent antigen-specific suppression than polyclonal CD4+ CD25+ Tregs. CONCLUSIONS: These data may pave the way for clinical studies using CD4+ CD25+ Tregs with indirect allospecificity as therapeutic reagents for the induction of donor-specific transplantation tolerance.

Distinct effects of CD86-mediated costimulation on resting versus activated human CD4+ T cells.

CD80 and CD86 are important in the initiation of T cell immunity. Although their costimulatory function has long been appreciated, it remains unclear whether the biological significance of the two B7 isoforms resides in their different patterns and kinetics of expression or whether differences exist in their function. We have addressed this issue using HLA-DR1 transfectants co-expressing CD80, CD86, or both molecules as stimulators for naïve, memory, and activated human CD4+ T cells. Both CD80 and CD86 efficiently costimulated alloresponses by unseparated peripheral blood CD4+ T cells; however, CD86 was substantially inferior in costimulating alloresponses by separated memory T cells, and completely incompetent in costimulating three human T cell clones. Furthermore, CD80/CD86 double transfectants stimulated lower responses by the clones than cells expressing CD80 alone. That CD86 was actively inhibitory rather than merely neutral was evidenced by the increase in response to the double CD80/CD86 APC when anti-CD86 antibody was added. Furthermore, addition of anti-CTLA-4 Fab to cultures of HLA-DR1 transfectants co-expressing CD86, fully restored the proliferative response. These results indicate that CD80 and CD86 mediate distinct signals in previously activated T cells, and demonstrate that CTLA-4 ligation may dominate the outcome of CD86-mediated costimulation of activated CD4+ T cells.

Acquisition of HLA-DR and costimulatory molecules by T cells from allogeneic antigen presenting cells.

There is accumulating evidence that cell surface molecules may be transferred between cells during an encounter. The aim of these experiments was to determine whether transfer of allogeneic material to T cells could influence human alloresponses. CD4(+) cells were cocultured with M1 cell (human fibroblast) transfectants expressing HLA-DR1, CD80 and CD86 alone or in combination. Up to 95% of the allogeneic T cells became positive for HLA-DR and the appropriate costimulatory molecules after only 4 h of coculture. The phenomenon required cell contact and cell membrane fluidity because transfer was abolished by transwell separation of the M1 cells and the T cells or by pre-treatment of the APC with paraformaldehyde. Flow cytometric sorting of T cells after coculture and subsequent mixed lymphocyte assays demonstrated that the T cells that had acquired both HLA-DR and costimulatory molecules could act as potent antigen presenting cells. Finally, matured human dendritic cells were also shown to transfer these molecules to CD4(+) cells, which could then act as antigen presenting cells for unprimed T cells and for a cell line specific for an HLA-peptide complex acquired from the DCs. Taken together, these data suggest a novel pathway for the amplification of human alloresponses.

Activated CD1d-restricted natural killer T cells secrete IL-2: innate help for CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells?

CD4(+)CD25(+) and CD1d-restricted natural killer T (NKT) cells are thymus-derived self-reactive regulatory T cells that play a key role in the control of pathological immune responses. Little is known about functional cooperation between innate regulatory NKT cells and adaptive CD4(+)CD25(+) regulatory cells. Here we show that human CD4(+)Valpha24(+)Vbeta11(+) (CD4(+) NKT) cells isolated from peripheral blood by flow cytometric cell sorting secrete substantial amounts of IL-2 after stimulation with dendritic cells (DC) and alpha-Galactosylceramide. When cocultured with CD4(+)CD25(+) cells, CD4(+) NKT cells promoted moderate proliferation of CD4(+)CD25(+) cells. The proliferation of CD4(+)CD25(+) T cells was due to soluble IL-2 produced by activated CD4(+) NKT cells. The expanded CD4(+)CD25(+) cells remained anergic and retained their potent suppressive properties. These findings indicate that unlike conventional CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells, which are susceptible to CD4(+)CD25(+) regulatory cell suppression, NKT cells promote CD4(+)CD25(+) regulatory cell proliferation. These data raise the possibility that NKT cells can function as helper cells to CD4(+)CD25(+) regulatory T cells, thereby providing a link between the two naturally occurring populations of regulatory T cells.

Everolimus and basiliximab permit suppression by human CD4+CD25+ cells in vitro.

Immunosuppressive drugs are essential for the prevention of acute transplant rejection but some may not promote long-term tolerance. Tolerance is dependent on the presence and regulatory function of CD4(+)CD25(+) T cells in a number of animal models. The direct effects of immunosuppressive drugs on CD4(+)CD25(+) cells, particularly those that interfere with IL-2 signaling are uncertain. We studied the effects of the rapamycin derivative everolimus and the anti-CD25 monoclonal antibody basiliximab on the regulatory capacity of human CD4(+)CD25(+) cells in vitro. Both drugs permitted the suppression of proliferation and IFN-gamma secretion by CD4(+)CD25(-) cells responding to allogeneic and other polyclonal stimuli; CTLA-4 expression was abolished on CD4(+)CD25(+) cells without compromising their suppressive ability. Everolimus reduced IFN-gamma secretion by CD4(+)CD25(-) cells before the anti-proliferative effect: this is a novel finding. Exogenous IL-2 and IL-15 could prevent the suppression of proliferation by CD4(+)CD25(+) cells and the drugs could not restore suppression. By contrast, suppression of IFN-gamma secretion was only slightly impeded with the exogenous cytokines. Finally, CD4(+)CD25(+) cells were more resistant than CD4(+)CD25(-) cells to the pro-apoptotic action of the drugs. Together these data suggest that CD4(+)CD25(+) cells may still exert their effects in transplant patients taking immunosuppression that interferes with IL-2 signaling.

CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells do not significantly contribute to direct pathway hyporesponsiveness in stable renal transplant patients.

CD4(+)CD25(+) regulatory T cells have been shown to regulate a variety of autoimmune and allogeneic responses in mice and humans. The role of CD4(+)CD25(+) cells in regulating alloresponses in human transplant recipients remains uncertain. Previous research has demonstrated a reduced frequency of direct pathway donor-specific T cells in renal transplant recipients when compared with the frequency of T cells reactive to an HLA-matched third party. A number of mechanisms have been proposed to account for this finding; the purpose of this study was to determine whether CD4(+)CD25(+) cells play a significant role. Twelve stable renal transplant patients were investigated using limiting dilution assay (LDA) and ELISPOT for interferon-gamma to determine the effect of depleting CD4(+)CD25(+) cells on the direct pathway alloresponse. The percentage of CD4(+)CD25(+) cells in the peripheral blood of the study patients was equivalent to that of healthy controls. Furthermore, in no case did depletion of CD4(+)CD25(+) cells significantly increase the frequency of donor-specific T cells detected by LDA. This was also found with ELISPOT in all except one patient, in whom depletion revealed an increased frequency of alloreactive T cell to both donor and third party. Finally, kinetic analysis of the LDA data did not indicate regulation against donor when compared with third party. It is concluded that the action of CD4(+)CD25(+) regulatory cells is not the main mechanism of donor-specific hyporesponsiveness in the direct pathway of allorecognition.

Pathways of allorecognition: implications for transplantation tolerance.

Allorecognition occurs when the host immune system detects same-species, non-self antigens and this is the trigger for allograft rejection. Host T cells detect these 'foreign' antigens which are mostly derived from a highly polymorphic region of the genome called the major histocompatibility complex. Allorecognition can occur by two distinct, but not mutually exclusive pathways: direct and indirect. The direct pathway results from the recognition of foreign major histocompatibility molecules, intact, on the surface of donor cells. Indirect allorecognition occurs when donor histocompatibility molecules are internalised, processed, and presented as peptides by host antigen presenting cells--this is the manner in which the immune system normally sees antigen. However, in addition to antigen recognition, T cell activation requires the provision of costimulatory signals, the prerogative of bone marrow-derived, specialised antigen-presenting cells (APC). Once these have been depleted from a transplanted organ, as occurs within weeks of transplantation, the parenchymal cells of the transplant are incapable of driving direct pathway activation of recipient T cells. Alloantigen recognition on these non-professional APCs may have a tolerising effect and indeed, the frequency of T cells reactive to the direct pathway diminishes with time irrespective of whether or not chronic transplant rejection occurs. This implies that while the direct pathway plays a dominant role in acute rejection, it is unlikely to contribute to chronic rejection. Assays of T cell responses have, however, found an association between the indirect pathway and chronic rejection and animal models support a role for the indirect pathway in both acute and chronic rejection. The indirect pathway is likely to be permanently active due to traffic of recipient APCs through the graft. The challenge that this poses in the pursuit of clinical tolerance is how to induce tolerance in T cells with indirect allospecificity. The answer may lie in manipulation of the environment of the interaction between the T cell and APC. Apart from recognition without costimulation, there are other circumstances when recognition without activation can occur although the in vivo relevance is uncertain. The presence of regulatory cytokines or inhibitory surface molecules either from a distinct regulatory cell, or as a negative feedback loop may prevent activation; this could also happen without sufficient stimulatory support: the final outcome is likely to be decided by the overall balance. Furthermore, some peptides may act as antagonists to T cell activation, usually when the agonist peptide is structurally very similar. It is hoped that the careful study of these mechanisms will reveal ways of ensuring allorecognition without activation and thus donor-specific tolerance.