The role of anatomy demonstrators: A surgical trainees' perspective.

Core Surgical Trainees (CST) in the London (UK) Postgraduate School of Surgery receive clinical anatomy teaching in their first year of training, and, in their second year, give 30 sessions of anatomy teaching to medical and other students. This study set out to investigate the role of demonstrators from the perspective of the trainees. A focus group was convened to ascertain trainees' perspectives on demonstrating anatomy and to identify problems and improvement strategies to optimize their ability to enhance students' learning. A questionnaire was formulated and all second-year CST (n = 186-from two cohorts) in the London Postgraduate School of Surgery were invited. A total of 109 out of 186 trainees completed the questionnaire. A high percentage (98%) of trainees that completed the questionnaire responded that demonstrating was an invaluable part of their training. Sixty-two per cent responded that anatomy teaching they received in their first year of core surgical training helped them in their teaching role and 80% responded that it helped them prepare for surgical training. The study also revealed the need for improved communication between trainees and the London Postgraduate School of Surgery/Medical Schools/National Health Service Trusts to address issues such as trainees' perceived difficulty in fulfilling their teaching session requirement. The stakeholders have acknowledged and addressed the outcomes to improve the experience for both surgical trainees and students. The results indicate that anatomy demonstrating delivers important benefits to early surgical trainees, in addition to those received by the students that they teach. Clin. Anat. 31:409-416, 2018. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

How patients manage gastrointestinal symptoms after pelvic radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Approximately 13,000 patients undergo pelvic radiotherapy annually in the UK. It is not clear how frequently patients develop a permanent change in bowel habit after pelvic radiotherapy that affects their quality of life because the measures of gastrointestinal toxicity used in trials in the past have generally been inadequate. It has been suggested that patients who are symptomatic are only rarely referred to a gastroenterologist and it is not known how patients manage their symptoms. METHODS: Patients who had completed radiotherapy for pelvic cancer at least 1 year previously were invited to answer 30 structured questions in a face-to-face interview to determine the frequency of gastrointestinal symptoms and what orthodox, dietary and complementary therapies they used to deal with them. They were also asked to score the effectiveness of the measures they had taken. RESULTS: One hundred and seven patients were recruited [35 males; median age, 65 years (range, 35-80 years); 72 females; median age, 67.5 years (range, 31-87 years)]. Eight had been treated for a gastrointestinal primary tumour, 34 for a urological tumour and 65 for gynaecological tumours. Eighty-seven patients (81%) described new-onset gastrointestinal problems starting after radiotherapy. These symptoms affected the quality of life in 56 patients (52%). Significant effects on the quality of life were caused by diarrhoea or constipation (n = 53), faecal leakage (n = 19), abdominal, rectal or perineal pain (n = 14) and rectal bleeding (n = 6). Fifty-nine patients had seen a doctor for their symptoms (86% found this helpful), 12 had seen a dietician or nurse (50% found this helpful) and 14 had seen alternative practitioners (88% found this helpful). Dietary manipulation generally did not improve symptoms, except in a small group of patients (14/15) who avoided raw vegetables to great benefit. CONCLUSIONS: At least 1 year after pelvic radiotherapy, gastrointestinal symptoms which have an adverse effect on the quality of life may be more common than generally reported. Patients found that advice from doctors and alternative practitioners was equally valuable. Dietary manipulation was generally unhelpful for gastrointestinal symptoms after pelvic radiotherapy, although the role of eliminating raw vegetables may benefit from further evaluation.