ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Cytotoxic drugs (CDs) are hazardous in nature. But it is necessary for the treatment in cancer patients. The healthcare professionals (HCPs) act as a facilitator through which the manufactured CDs reach the patient. However, safe handling of CDs becomes a primary concern not only for the recipients but also for the HCPs. METHODS: On Ethics committee approval, a prospective- interventional study was conducted among HCPs who are involved in handling of CDs in Oncology department of tertiary care hospital. The participants were screened for their eligibility criteria & 73 HCPs were recruited. The initial data was collected from the HCPs through interview & questionnaires. Later the participants were trained by oncology-pharmacist (7-8 months) for safe handling of CDs. After the training the participants were tested again through interview & questionnaires. RESULTS: 73 participants, (75%) nurses & (25%) physicians were included in the study. Among these participants, only 32.87% underwent training on reconstitution whereas 67.12% of the participants didn't undergo any training. The increase in mean score of KAP after the training was observed to be 3.44 ± 4.32, 1.23 ± 1.51 and 1.3 ± 1.01 respectively. CONCLUSION: The study concludes that mandatory requirement of training for HCPs using SOP's by qualified oncology-pharmacist to minimize the hazardous effects of CDs. It also highlights the improvisation techniques for handling of CDs will enhance the safety profile of HCPs & the patients, which helps in refining the quality of pharmaceutical and health care services provided in the cancer care settings.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents , Pharmacists , Humans , Tertiary Care Centers , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Prospective Studies , Health Personnel , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Attitude of Health PersonnelABSTRACT
Introduction: Blood transfusion is a remedial intercession and a fundamental fragment of Current medical services framework. As indicated by the WHO the bonding is an action of moving blood or blood-items taken from a giver into the vasculature and in this manner the flowing blood of the recipient, done by embeddings an IV Needle/Catheter in the patient and followed by use of blood or the blood-items. In any case, the dangers of non-irresistible difficulties have gotten more obvious. These nonirresistible complexities called as adverse transfusion reactions (ATRs) can either be intense in nature or follow a postponed course. Transfusion reaction is any unanticipated impact that happens in a patient during or subsequent to accepting blood and the blood-items. These can be agreed as intense transfusion responses, happening inside 24 hours of transfusion and deferred bonding responses happens inside the space of days or long periods of bonding. Intense and moderate responses can be additionally classified as insusceptible interceded and non-immune-intervened. Methodology: The prospective and observational study was carried at Department of Pediatric Oncology & Thalassemia unit for a period of 6 months. The population required for the study includes patients undergoing blood transfusions. Results: In study data out of 83 units, 61 units of PCV was transfused (73.49%), 6 units of Platelet was transfused (7.22%), 14 units of Whole Blood was transfused (16.86%), 1 units of Fresh Frozen Plasma was transfused (1.20%), and 1 units of RBC was transfused (1.20%). The chance of an ADR occurrence with every transfusion is 0.4. The P value is less than .05 so it is statically significant. It is positively correlated, having a high impact on the number of transfusion and rate of incidence of ADR. Conclusion: While a Blood transfusion is given for unavoidable situation the important factors to be kept under consideration are ADR following transfusion which can be the common complication observed. The study also concludes that the rate of incidence of ADR is increased significantly as the number of transfusion increases.
ABSTRACT
Background: Cancer is a disease that is inevitably treated using chemotherapy, but the cytotoxic drugs used in the treatment have the potency to cause adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Thus, supportive therapy plays an essential role in managing the untoward effects of the cancer drugs in patients. This highlights the importance of medication adherence in managing the disease, mitigating and preventing the occurrence of chemotherapy-induced ADR without compromising the health status of the cancer population. Objective: To assess the adherence to chemotherapy and supportive therapy and to evaluate type and degree of causality of ADRs observed in cancer patients. Methods: On ethics committee approval, a 6-month observational study was conducted among recruited cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy in a tertiary care hospital. Morisky Medication Adherence Measurement Scale-8 was employed to assess the medication adherence, and ADR causality was determined using Naranjo ADR Probability Scale. Results: Ninety cancer patients participated in the study, out of which females were 61.11%. Chemotherapy adherence in comparison to supportive drugs was observed to be more (21.11%). Twelve different combination of ADR were reported in the subjects with variability in the degree of causality assessment. Conclusion and Relevance: The distinction of adherence to the medication used in cancer management with marked level of ADR was well depicted in the study, implicating the necessity of prudent symbiotic practice of an oncology pharmacist, patient, and physician relationship in optimizing the quality of life of cancer patients by imparting vigilant efforts in medication adherence.
