Development of novel visual detection methodology for Salmonella in meat using saltatory rolling circle amplification.

AIM: The aim of this study was to develop a saltatory rolling circle amplification (SRCA) assay for rapid, simple and visual detection of Salmonella in meat. METHODS AND RESULTS: Saltatory rolling circle amplification assay was established using simple PCR primers targeting the invA gene of Salmonella enterica. The specificity of the SRCA assay was determined using 28 Salmonella and 15 non-Salmonella strains. The analytical sensitivity of the developed SRCA, conventional and real-time PCR assays were 70 fg, 7 pg and 700 fg S. enterica DNA per tube, respectively. The limit of detection (LoD) of the SRCA assay was 40 CFU per gram of meat without enrichment and 4 CFU per gram after including 6 h brief enrichment step. The detection limits of 40 CFU per gram and 4 CFU per gram of meat were achieved within 165 min and 9 h, respectively (including DNA extraction). To assess the real-world relevance of the SRCA assay, it was used to screen Salmonella from the field pork samples (n = 82). The same samples were also tested with culture (ISO 6579: 2002) method, conventional and real-time PCR assays. Using the developed assay with 6-h enrichment step, it could give accurate results as that of the culture method. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study showed that the SRCA assay is a rapid, simple, sophisticated equipment-free and user-friendly method for accurate detection of Salmonella in meat foods. To our information, this is the first study to deploy SRCA assay for screening foods for Salmonella. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: The developed SRCA assay is cost-effective, easy-to-perform and equipment-free; therefore, it has the potential to replace other molecular detection methods for regular screening of Salmonella in foods in field laboratories.

Genome-wide gene expression pattern underlying differential host response to high or low pathogenic H5N1 avian influenza virus in ducks.

The differences in the influenza viral pathogenesis observed between different pathogenic strains are associated with distinct properties of virus strains and the host immune responses. In order to determine the differences in the duck immune response against two different pathogenic strains, we studied genome-wide host immune gene response of ducks infected with A/duck/India/02CA10/2011 and A/duck/Tripura/103597/2008 H5N1 viruses using custom-designed microarray. A/duck/India/02CA10/2011 is highly pathogenic virus (HP) to ducks, whereas A/duck/Tripura/103597/2008 is a low pathogenic (LP) virus strain. Comparative lung tissue transcriptome analysis of differentially expressed genes revealed that 686 genes were commonly expressed, 880 and 1556 genes are expressed uniquely to infection with HP and LP virus, respectively. The up-regulation of chemokines (CCL4 and CXCR4) and IFN-stimulated genes (IFITM2, STAT3, TGFB1 and TGFB3) was observed in the lung tissues of ducks infected with HP virus. The up-regulation of other immune genes (IL17, OAS, SOCS3, MHC I and MHC II) was observed in both infection conditions. The expression of important antiviral immune genes MX, IFIT5, IFITM5, ISG12, ß-defensins, RSAD2, EIF2AK2, TRIM23 and SLC16A3 was observed in LP virus infection, but not in HP virus infection. Several immune-related gene ontology terms and pathways activated by both the viruses were qualitatively similar but quantitatively different. Based on these findings, the differences in the host immune response might explain a part of the difference observed in the viral pathogenesis of high and low pathogenic influenza strains in ducks.