Epidemiology of electrical burns and its impact on quality of life - the developing world scenario.

BACKGROUND: Electrical burns are devastating injuries and can cause deep burns with significant morbidity and delayed sequelae. Epidemiological data regarding the etiology, socioeconomic differences and geographic variation are necessary to assess the disease burden and plan an effective preventive strategy. These severe injuries often lead to amputations and thus hamper quality of life in the long term. AIM: To identify the population at maximum risk of sustaining electrical burns. We also studied the impact of electrical burns on these patients in terms of quality of life as well as return to work. METHODS: The study was conducted at a tertiary referral teaching hospital over a period of eighteen months. All patients with a history of sustaining electrical burns and satisfying the inclusion criteria were included in the study. All relevant epidemiological parameters and treatment details were recorded. The patients were subsequently followed up at 3 mo, 6 mo and 9 mo. The standardized Brief Version of the Burn Specific Health Scale (BSHS-B) was adopted to assess quality of life. Statistical analysis was conducted using IBM SPSS statistics (version 22.0). A P value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: A total of 103 patients were included in the study. The mean age of the patients was 31.83 years (range 18-75 years). A significant majority (91.3%) of patients were male. The mean total body surface area (TBSA) in these patients was 21.1%. In most of the patients (67%), the injury was occupation-related. High voltage injuries were implicated in 72.8% of patients. Among the 75 high voltage burn patients, 31 (41%) required amputation. The mean number of surgeries the patients underwent in hospital was 2.03 (range 1 to 4). The quality of life parameters amongst the patients sustaining high voltage electrical burns were poorer when compared to low voltage injuries at all follow-up intervals across nine domains. In eight of these domains, the difference was statistically significant. Similarly, the scores among the amputees were poorer when compared to non-amputees. The difference was statistically significant in six domains. CONCLUSION: Electrical burns remain a problem in the developing world. Most injuries are occupation-related. The quality of life in patients with high voltage burns and amputees remains poor. Work resumption was almost impossible for amputees. These patients could not regain pre-injury status. Steps should be taken to create awareness and to implement an effective preventive strategy to safeguard against electrical injuries.

Laparoscopic-Assisted Uterus Retrieval From Live Organ Donors for Uterine Transplant: Our Experience of Two Patients.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To report the first ever laparoscopic-assisted live donor uterus retrieval in 2 patients for uterus transplant. DESIGN: Case study (Canadian Task Force classification III). SETTING: Galaxy CARE Laparoscopy Institute, Pune, India. PATIENTS: Two patients with absolute uterine factor infertility with their mothers as donors. INTERVENTIONS: In vitro fertilization and uterine transplant. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A 12-member team was formed, and approval for transplant was obtained from the institutional review board. Pretransplant, in vitro fertilization for both patients was done. Two consecutive uterine transplants were done on 2 successive days. Vessels were harvested laparoscopically in both donors. Uterus and harvested vessels were retrieved by a small abdominal incision to prevent injury and infection. The uterus was transplanted in the recipients by end to side anastomosis of the harvested vessels to external iliac vessels, followed by anchoring of supports of the donor uterus to those of the recipients. Surgical intra- and postoperative parameters, postoperative investigations, and follow-up data of 6 months were measured. Operative time for laparoscopic donor surgery was 4 hours. Bench surgery took 45 minutes. Recipient surgery time was 4 hours. There were no intraoperative or immediate postoperative complications. Both the recipients started menstruating after 34 days and 48 days, respectively, and have had 6 cycles of menses at regular intervals. Uterine artery Doppler showed good flow in both patients. Hysteroscopy-guided cervical biopsies were used as a method of surveillance of graft rejection after uterine transplant. Office hysteroscopy was done after 2 months in both patients, and hysteroscopy-guided endometrial and cervical biopsies were taken. Minimal slough was seen on the endometrium in the patient with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome, which was removed. Repeat hysteroscopy after 10 days showed a healthy endometrium. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic-assisted uterus donor retrieval is feasible and affords all the advantages of a minimally invasive technique, thereby reducing the morbidity of the procedure. It helps in better dissection of the vessels, shortens the operative time, and helps to minimize tissue handling of the harvested uterus and vessels.

Laparoscopic-Assisted Uterus Retrieval From Live Organ Donors for Uterine Transplant.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: The authors present the first ever laparoscopic-assisted uterus retrieval in a live donor for uterus transplant. DESIGN: A step-by-step surgical demonstration. SETTING: Galaxy CARE Laparoscopy Institute, Pune, India. PATIENTS: Two patients, ages 21 and 26 years, with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome and Asherman syndrome, respectively, with their mothers as donors. INTERVENTIONS: A 12-member team was formed. After a review of the available literature on uterine transplant, a protocol was formulated and submitted to the Institutional Review Board (IRB). Approval from the Institutional Review Board was obtained. Thorough screening of the candidates was done. Two consecutive uterine transplants were done on 2 successive days. Vessels were harvested laparoscopically in both donors. Uterus was retrieved through a small abdominal incision, to prevent any injury to the uterus and harvested vessels. Uterus was transplanted in the recipients by end-to-side anastomosis of the harvested vessels to the external iliac vessels, followed by anchoring of supports of the donor uterus to those of the recipients. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Surgical intra- and postoperative parameters, postoperative investigations, and follow-up data of 4 months. The operative time for laparoscopic donor surgery was 4 hours. Bench surgery took 45 minutes. The recipient surgery was completed in 4 hours. There were no intraoperative or immediate postoperative complications. Both recipients started menstruating after 34 days and 48 days, respectively, and have had 3 cycles of menses at regular intervals to date. After discharge, follow-up cervical biopsies at 3 weekly intervals showed no signs of rejection. Uterine artery Doppler ultrasound showed good flow in both patients. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic-assisted donor retrieval is feasible and affords all advantages of a minimally invasive technique. It helps in better dissection of vessels, shortens the operative time, and helps minimize tissue handling, thereby reducing the morbidity of the procedure.