Splenic flexure mobilization for sigmoid and low anterior resections in the minimally invasive era: How often and at what cost?

BACKGROUND: Splenic flexure mobilization (SFM) increases left colonic reach for a better vascularized and tension-free anastomosis. Open SFM is challenging due to anatomic position. Minimally invasive SFM improves visualization and minimizes splenic traction. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all sigmoid and low anterior resections (LAR) by a colorectal surgical group over 10-year period. We analyzed indications, surgical methods and perioperative outcomes of open and MIS SFM cohorts. RESULTS: 793 patients were included; 122 (15.5%) open, 671 (84.5%) MIS (60% laparoscopic-assisted (LA), 40% hand-assisted (HA)). Overall, indications were cancer (56%), diverticulitis (31%), and other benign diseases (13%). Compared to MIS, open cases had more complex disease (45% vs. 18%, p < 0.01), with fewer SFM performed (40% vs. 86%, p < 0.01), required more frequent diversion (30% vs. 21%, p = 0.02) and were complicated by higher leak/abscess (7% vs. 3%, p = 0.06) and reoperation rates (10% vs. 6%, p = 0.11). 1% of SFM required conversion (LA to HA 0.5%, MIS to open 0.5%). There were no open SFM complications. There were 26 (5%) MIS SFM complications; bleeding (18; 12 splenic capsular tears (0 splenectomy/splenorraphy), 6 mesenteric) and organ injury (bowel (3), pancreatic (4), renal (1)). CONCLUSIONS: Our SFM rate was high in the MIS group, with a low overall complication rate. Of note, the anastomotic leak/abscess rate was 3%, and may be related to the high SFM rate. It is the authors' opinion that a major advantage of MIS is to facilitate SFM, hence SFM is more likely to be performed with these methods compared to open procedures.

Plasma and wound fluid levels of eight proangiogenic proteins are elevated after colorectal resection.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal resection is associated with 3-5 wk long elevations in the plasma levels of at least 11 proangiogenic proteins that may stimulate tumor angiogenesis post-surgery. The increases during the first week after surgery may be related to the acute inflammatory response; the cause(s) of the week 2-5 increases is unknown. The wounds are a possible source because of the important role that angiogenesis plays in the healing process. The main hypothesis of the study is that wound fluid levels of the proteins studied will be elevated well beyond plasma levels which, in turn, are elevated from preoperative baseline levels. AIM: To determine plasma and wound fluid levels of 8 proangiogenic proteins after colorectal resection for cancer and benign pathology. METHODS: Blood and wound fluid samples were taken simultaneously on postoperative (postop) day 1, 3, and later time points until wound drain removal in 35 colorectal cancer patients and 31 benign disease patients undergoing colorectal resection in whom closed wound drains had been placed in either the pelvis or the subcutaneous space of the abdominal incision. Postop plasma levels were compared to preop plasma and postop wound fluid levels (separate analyses for cancer and benign groups). RESULTS: Sixty-six colorectal disease patients were studied (35 cancer, 31 benign pathology). Most patients underwent minimally invasive surgery (open surgery in 11% of cancer and 6% of benign patients). The majority in the cancer group had rectal resections while in the benign group sigmoid or right colectomy predominated. Plasma levels of all 8 proteins were significantly elevated from baseline (P < 0.05) at all post-operative time points in the cancer group and at 90% of time points (29/32) in the benign group. Wound levels of all 8 proteins were 3-106 times higher (P < 0.05) than plasma levels at 87-90 percent of postop time points; of note, wound levels were more than 10 times higher at 47-50% of time points. CONCLUSION: Plasma protein levels were elevated for 3 weeks after surgery; wound fluid levels were much greater than corresponding blood levels. Healing wounds may be the source of the plasma increases.

Plasma levels of the proangiogenic protein CXCL16 remains elevated for 1 month after minimally invasive colorectal cancer resection.

BACKGROUND: Inflammation-induced endothelial precursor cell recruitment and angiogenesis are thought to be associated with CXCL16-CXCR6 pair activity. This study's main purpose was to determine plasma CXCL16 levels after minimally invasive colorectal resection (MICR) for colorectal cancer (CRC); an adjunct study assessed wound fluid (WF) and plasma CXCL16 levels in a separate group of CRC patients. METHODS: CRC patients who had MICR and for whom plasma was available in a tissue bank were eligible. Plasma samples were collected preoperatively from all patients. Samples were also collected on postoperative days (POD) 1 and 3 and at various late postoperative time points (POD 7-34). In a separate study, blood and intra-abdominal wound fluid (WF) samples were collected from CRC MICR patients (pts). Samples were stored at - 80 °C. CXCL16 levels were determined via ELISA. The Wilcoxon signed-rank and Mann and Whitney tests were used for analysis. RESULTS: Main study: 86 CRC pts. were included. The mean preoperative plasma CXCL16 level was 2.36 ± 0.57 ng/ml. Elevated mean plasma levels (p <  0.0001 × first 4 time points) were noted on POD 1 (2.82 ± 0.81, n = 86), POD 3 (3.12 ± 0.77, n = 82), POD 7-13 (3.28 ± 0.88, n = 64), POD 14-20 (3.03 ± 0.62, n = 24), POD 21-27 (3.06 ± 0.67, n = 20, p = 0.0003), and POD 28-34 (3.17 ± 0.43, n = 11, p = 0.001) vs. preop levels. WF study: In the adjunct study, plasma and WF CXCL16 levels were determined for 23 CRC MICR pts. WF levels at all time points were significantly elevated over plasma levels. CONCLUSION: Plasma CXCL16 levels were elevated for 4 weeks after minimally invasive colorectal resection for cancer. Also, WF CXCL16 levels were 3-10 times greater than the corresponding plasma concentrations. The source of the late plasma elevations may be the healing wound. Increased plasma CXCL16 levels may promote tumor angiogenesis in the first month after MICR.

Plasma interleukin-8 levels are persistently elevated for 1 month after minimally invasive colorectal resection for colorectal cancer.

Minimally invasive colorectal resection (MICR) for colorectal cancer (CRC) is associated with elevated levels of seven proangiogenic proteins that persist for 2-4 weeks after surgery. The proangiogenic plasma may promote tumor growth postoperatively in patients with residual cancer. To the best of our knowledge, the impact of surgery on interleukin 8 (IL-8) levels is unknown. The aim of the present study was to evaluate plasma IL-8 levels after MICR for CRC. Patients with CRC enrolled in an institutional review board-approved plasma/data bank who underwent MICR were eligible. Blood samples were taken preoperatively (preop) and at multiple postoperative (postop) time points, and were stored at -80°C. Only patients for whom preop, postop day (POD) 1, POD 3 and at least 1 late postop plasma samples (POD7-34) available were enrolled. Clinical, demographical and pathological data were collected. IL-8 levels were determined via ELISA and results were reported as the mean and ± standard deviation. The Wilcoxon signed rank test was used for analysis with P<0.05 used as the significance threshold. A total of 73 CRC patients (colon, 62%; rectal, 38%) who underwent MICR (laparoscopic-assisted, 60%; hand-assisted, 40%) were studied. The mean preop IL-8 level was 20.4±10.6 pg/ml. Significant elevations in plasma IL-8 levels were noted compared with preop levels on POD1 (43.1±38.6; n=72; P<0.0001), POD 3 (33.0±30.1; n=71; P<0.0001), POD7-13 (29.9±21.9; n=50; P<0.0001), POD14-20 (33.1±18.3; n=24; P=0.002), and for the POD21-27 time point (24.0±9.2; n=16; P=0.002). In conclusion, plasma IL-8 levels were significantly elevated from baseline for 4 weeks after MICR for CRC. In conjunction with the other proangiogenic MICR-associated blood compositional changes, increased IL-8 levels may promote tumor angiogenesis and growth postop.

Technique of last resort: characteristics of patients undergoing open surgery in the laparoscopic era.

BACKGROUND: The utilization rates for minimally invasive colorectal resection techniques (MICR) continue to increase. In some centers MICR methods are the preferred approach, however, open methods continue to be utilized for select patients. In this study, the profile and short-term outcomes of open colorectal resection (CR) and MICR patients are determined and compared. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients who underwent elective CR over 11 years at two institutions was performed. The MICR group contained both laparoscopic-assisted and hand-assisted cases. The past medical and surgical histories, indications, operations performed, and short-term outcomes were assessed. The Charlson co-morbidity index (CMI) was used to assess risk. RESULTS: During the study period 1080 patients underwent CR (Open, 141; MICR, 939). As judged by the CMI, there were more high-risk patients (score ≥2) in the Open group (34.38%) versus MICR (22.11%) p = 0.0029. Significantly more open patients had prior abdominal surgery and specifically CRs (Open, 15.60% vs. MICR, 2.13%, p < 0.001). Intraoperative transfusion (Open 25.7%; MICR 6.8%, p < 0.001) and diversion (25.53 vs. 11.50%, p < 0.001) were more common in the Open group. Not surprisingly, recovery of bowel function and length of stay were longer for the Open group. The overall complication rate was also higher for the Open patients (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: When MICR is the procedure of choice, patients selected for Open CR are higher risk and more complex as judged by the CMI and past operative history. Not surprisingly, this translates into a longer length of stay, higher rates of transfusion, diversion, and complications. This disparity in patients undergoing CRs makes direct comparison of MICR and Open resection outcomes not reasonable.