Control hospitalario de la diabetes y de la hiperglucemia: una auditoría en hospitales españoles / Inpatient management of diabetes and hyperglycemia: an audit of Spanish hospitals

Objetivos Evaluación de la calidad de la asistencia a los pacientes con diabetes mellitus ingresados en España. Métodos Estudio transversal que incluyó a 1.193 (26,7%) pacientes con diabetes tipo 2 o hiperglucemia de un total de 4.468 pacientes ingresados en los servicios de medicina interna de 53 hospitales (España). Se recogieron datos demográficos, adecuación de la monitorización de la glucemia capilar, tratamiento administrado durante el ingreso y terapia recomendada al alta. Resultados La edad mediana fue de 80 años (74-87), 561 (47%) pacientes eran mujeres, con un índice de Charlson de 4 (2-6) puntos, siendo clasificados frágiles 742 (65%). La mediana de glucemia al ingreso fue de 155 (119-213) mg/dL. Al tercer día de ingreso el número de glucemias capilares en objetivo (80-180mg/dL) fue de 792/1.126 (70,3%) en el predesayuno, 601/1.083 (55,4%) en la precomida, 591/1.073 (55,0%) en la precena y 317/529 (59,9%) durante la noche. Se observó hipoglucemia en 35 (0,9%) pacientes. El tratamiento durante el ingreso fue realizado con insulina en escala móvil en 352 (40,5%) pacientes, insulina basal y análogos de insulina rápida en 434 (50%) y dieta exclusivamente en 101 (9,1%). Un total de 735 (61,6%) pacientes disponían de un valor reciente de HbA1c. En el alta se incrementó el uso de iSGLT2 (30,1 vs. 21,6%; p<0,001) y el uso de insulina basal (25,3 vs. 10,1%; p<0,001). Conclusiones Existe un excesivo uso de insulina en escala móvil, una deficiente información de los valores de HbA1c y una prescripción aún deficiente de tratamientos con beneficio cardiovascular al alta (AU)

Objectives Evaluation of the quality of care for patients with diabetes mellitus admitted to hospitals in Spain. Methods Cross-sectional study in one day that included 1193 (26.7%) patients with type 2 diabetes or hyperglycemia out of 4468 patients admitted to the internal medicine departments of 53 hospitals in Spain. We collected demographic data, adequacy of capillary glycemic monitoring, treatment administered during admission, and recommended therapy at discharge. Results The median age of the patients was 80 years (74-87), of which 561 (47%) were women, with a Charlson index of 4 points (2-6), and 742 (65%) were fragile. Median blood glucose on admission was 155mg/dL (119-213). On the third day, the number of capillary blood glucose levels in target (80-180mg/dL) was pre-breakfast 792/1126 (70.3%), pre-lunch 601/1083 (55.4%), pre-dinner 591/1073 (55.0%) and night 317/529 (59.9%). A total of 35 patients (0.9%) were suffering from hypoglycemia. Treatment during hospitalization was performed with sliding scale insulin in 352 (40.5%) patients, with basal insulin and rapid insulin analogs in 434 (50%), or with diet exclusively in 101 (9.1%). A total of 735 (61.6%) patients had a recent HbA1c value. At the time of discharge, the use of iSGLT2 increased significantly (30.1% vs. 21.6%; p<0.001), as well as the use of basal insulin (25.3% vs. 10.1%; p<0.001). Conclusions There is an excessive use of insulin on a sliding scale as well as deficient information on HbA1c values and an even deficient prescription at the discharge of treatments with cardiovascular benefit (AU)

Inpatient management of diabetes and hyperglycaemia: an audit of Spanish hospitals.

OBJECTIVES: Evaluation of quality of care for patients with diabetes mellitus admitted to hospitals in Spain. METHODS: Cross-sectional study in one day that included 1193 (26.7%) patients with type 2 diabetes or hyperglycaemia out of a total of 4468 patients admitted to the internal medicine departments of 53 hospitals in Spain. We collected demographic data, adequacy of capillary glycaemic monitoring, treatment administered during admission, and recommended therapy at discharge. RESULTS: The median age of the patients was 80 years [74-87], of which 561 (47%) were women, with a Charlson index of 4 points [2-6], and 742 (65%) were fragile. Median blood glucose on admission was 155 mg/dl [119-213]. On the third day, the number of capillary blood glucose levels in target (80-180 mg/dl) at pre-breakfast was 792/1126 (70.3%), pre-lunch 601/1083 (55.4%), pre-dinner 591/1073 (55.0%), and at night 317/529 (59.9%). A total of 35 patients (0.9%) were suffering from hypoglycemia. Treatment during hospitalization was performed with sliding scale insulin in 352 (40.5%) patients, with basal insulin and rapid insulin analogues in 434 (50%), or with diet exclusively in 101 (9.1%). A total of 735 (61.6%) patients had a recent HbA1c value. At discharge, the use of SGLT2i increased significantly (30.1% vs. 21.6%; p < 0.001), as did the use of basal insulin (25.3% vs. 10.1%; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: There is an excessive use of sliding scale insulin as well as insufficient information on HbA1c values and prescription upon discharge of treatments with cardiovascular benefit.

Embolia pulmonar en los pacientes muy ancianos. Un reto diagnóstico / Pulmonary embolism in very elderly patients. A diagnostic challenge

Introducción: El diagnóstico de embolia pulmonar supone un reto. Su presentación comparte manifestaciones clínicas con otras entidades. En los pacientes muy ancianos (MA≥80 años) el reto aumenta por la comorbilidad asociada comparando con controles más jóvenes (CO<80 años). Objetivo: Describir la incidencia de embolia pulmonar en pacientes muy ancianos en nuestro medio, identificar diferencias en manifestaciones clínicas, comorbilidad y parámetros analíticos entre subgrupos (MA/CO). Método: Estudio casos-controles de base hospitalaria. Revisión de las embolias pulmonares diagnosticadas, en nuestro centro, mediante angiografía pulmonar por tomografía computarizada entre 2013 y 2016. Resultados: Incluimos 413 pacientes (124 MA). La edad mediana fue 72 años [RIQ 58-81]. La tríada típica de presentación fue poco frecuente y no mostró diferencias entre subgrupos. Los principales síntomas de presentación fueron: disnea (73,4% MA vs. 63,7% CO; p=0,055), dolor torácico (26,6% vs. 39,5%; p=0,013) y tos/hemoptisis (31,1% vs. 18,9%; p=0,021). Presentaron mayor comorbilidad los MA (4,88+/-2,55 vs. 2,89+/-2,85; p=0,0001). Conclusión: Un 30% de las embolias pulmonares fueron en MA. La forma de presentación típica fue infrecuente. Se detectaron diferencias significativas en síntomas individuales, comorbilidad y parámetros de laboratorio en comparación con pacientes más jóvenes

Background: Diagnosing pulmonary embolisms can be challenging, given that its presentation shares clinical manifestations with other conditions. For patients 80 years of age or older, the healthcare challenge increases due to associated comorbidity when compared with younger patients (<80 years). Objective: The aim of our study was to report the incidence of pulmonary embolism in elderly patients in our setting and identify differences in the clinical manifestations, comorbidity and laboratory parameters between these 2 groups of patients. Method: We conducted a hospital-based, case-control study to review the pulmonary embolisms diagnosed in our centre using computed tomography pulmonary angiography between 2013 and 2016. Results: The study included 413 patients, 124 of whom were 80 years of age or older, with a median age of 72 years (IQR, 58-81). The typical presentation triad was uncommon and showed no differences between subgroups. The main symptoms presented by these groups were dyspnoea (73.4% vs. 63.7% for the elderly and younger groups, respectively; P=.055), chest pain (26.6% vs. 39.5%; P=.013) and cough/haemoptysis (31.1% vs. 18.9%; P=.021). The elderly group had more comorbidity (4.88+/-2.55 vs. 2.89+/-2.85; P=.0001). Conclusion: Thirty percent of the pulmonary embolisms occurred in the elderly group. The typical presentation form was uncommon. We detected significant differences in individual symptoms, comorbidity and laboratory parameters compared with the younger patients

Pulmonary embolism in very elderly patients. A diagnostic challenge. / Embolia pulmonar en los pacientes muy ancianos. Un reto diagnóstico.

BACKGROUND: Diagnosing pulmonary embolisms can be challenging, given that its presentation shares clinical manifestations with other conditions. For patients 80 years of age or older, the healthcare challenge increases due to associated comorbidity when compared with younger patients (<80 years). OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to report the incidence of pulmonary embolism in elderly patients in our setting and identify differences in the clinical manifestations, comorbidity and laboratory parameters between these 2 groups of patients. METHOD: We conducted a hospital-based, case-control study to review the pulmonary embolisms diagnosed in our centre using computed tomography pulmonary angiography between 2013 and 2016. RESULTS: The study included 413 patients, 124 of whom were 80 years of age or older, with a median age of 72 years (IQR, 58-81). The typical presentation triad was uncommon and showed no differences between subgroups. The main symptoms presented by these groups were dyspnoea (73.4% vs. 63.7% for the elderly and younger groups, respectively; P=.055), chest pain (26.6% vs. 39.5%; P=.013) and cough/haemoptysis (31.1% vs. 18.9%; P=.021). The elderly group had more comorbidity (4.88±2.55 vs. 2.89±2.85; P=.0001). CONCLUSION: Thirty percent of the pulmonary embolisms occurred in the elderly group. The typical presentation form was uncommon. We detected significant differences in individual symptoms, comorbidity and laboratory parameters compared with the younger patients.