Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Front Immunol ; 11: 586669, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33117400

ABSTRACT

C-reactive protein (CRP) binds to several species of bacterial pathogens including Streptococcus pneumoniae. Experiments in mice have revealed that one of the functions of CRP is to protect against pneumococcal infection by binding to pneumococci and activating the complement system. For protection, however, CRP must be injected into mice within a few hours of administering pneumococci, that is, CRP is protective against early-stage infection but not against late-stage infection. It is assumed that CRP cannot protect if pneumococci got time to recruit complement inhibitor factor H on their surface to become complement attack-resistant. Since the conformation of CRP is altered under inflammatory conditions and altered CRP binds to immobilized factor H also, we hypothesized that in order to protect against late-stage infection, CRP needed to change its structure and that was not happening in mice. Accordingly, we engineered CRP molecules (E-CRP) which bind to factor H on pneumococci but do not bind to factor H on any host cell in the blood. We found that E-CRP, in cooperation with wild-type CRP, was protective regardless of the timing of administering E-CRP into mice. We conclude that CRP acts via two different conformations to execute its anti-pneumococcal function and a model for the mechanism of action of CRP is proposed. These results suggest that pre-modified CRP, such as E-CRP, is therapeutically beneficial to decrease bacteremia in pneumococcal infection. Our findings may also have implications for infections with antibiotic-resistant pneumococcal strains and for infections with other bacterial species that use host proteins to evade complement-mediated killing.


Subject(s)
C-Reactive Protein , Complement Factor H/metabolism , Pneumococcal Infections/immunology , Animals , C-Reactive Protein/chemistry , C-Reactive Protein/immunology , C-Reactive Protein/metabolism , Disease Models, Animal , Humans , Male , Mice , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Protein Conformation , Protein Engineering , Streptococcus pneumoniae
2.
J Immunol Methods ; 443: 26-32, 2017 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28167277

ABSTRACT

C-reactive protein (CRP) is an evolutionarily conserved protein, a component of the innate immune system, and an acute phase protein in humans. In addition to its raised level in blood in inflammatory states, CRP is also localized at sites of inflammation including atherosclerotic lesions, arthritic joints and amyloid plaque deposits. Results of in vivo experiments in animal models of inflammatory diseases indicate that CRP is an anti-pneumococcal, anti-atherosclerotic, anti-arthritic and an anti-amyloidogenic molecule. The mechanisms through which CRP functions in inflammatory diseases are not fully defined; however, the ligand recognition function of CRP in its native and non-native pentameric structural conformations and the complement-activating ability of ligand-complexed CRP have been suggested to play a role. One tool to understand the structure-function relationships of CRP and determine the contributions of the recognition and effector functions of CRP in host defense is to employ site-directed mutagenesis to create mutants for experimentation. For example, CRP mutants incapable of binding to phosphocholine are generated to investigate the importance of the phosphocholine-binding property of CRP in mediating host defense. Recombinant CRP mutants can be expressed in mammalian cells and, if expressed, can be purified from the cell culture media. While the methods to purify wild-type CRP are well established, different purification strategies are needed to purify various mutant forms of CRP if the mutant does not bind to either calcium or phosphocholine. In this article, we report the methods used to purify pentameric recombinant wild-type and mutant CRP expressed in and secreted by mammalian cells.


Subject(s)
C-Reactive Protein/isolation & purification , Chromatography, Affinity , Chromatography, Gel , Chromatography, Ion Exchange , Mutation , Animals , Anion Exchange Resins/chemistry , Binding Sites , C-Reactive Protein/biosynthesis , C-Reactive Protein/chemistry , C-Reactive Protein/genetics , Calcium/metabolism , Cell Line , Cloning, Molecular , Ethanolamines/chemistry , Humans , Mutagenesis, Site-Directed , Phosphorylcholine/metabolism , Protein Binding , Protein Conformation , Recombinant Proteins/isolation & purification , Structure-Activity Relationship , Transfection
3.
Infect Immun ; 83(5): 1845-52, 2015 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25690104

ABSTRACT

The mechanism of action of C-reactive protein (CRP) in protecting mice against lethal Streptococcus pneumoniae infection is unknown. The involvement of the phosphocholine (PCh)-binding property of CRP in its antipneumococcal function previously has been explored twice, with conflicting results. In this study, using three different intravenous sepsis mouse models, we investigated the role of the PCh-binding property of CRP by employing a CRP mutant incapable of binding to PCh. The ability of wild-type CRP to protect mice against infection was found to differ in the three models; the protective ability of wild-type CRP decreased when the severity of infection was increased, as determined by measuring mortality and bacteremia. In the first animal model, in which we used 25 µg of CRP and 10(7) CFU of pneumococci, both wild-type and mutant CRP protected mice against infection, suggesting that the protection was independent of the PCh-binding activity of CRP. In the second model, in which we used 25 µg of CRP and 5 × 10(7) CFU of pneumococci, mutant CRP was not protective while wild-type CRP was, suggesting that the protection was dependent on the PCh-binding activity of CRP. In the third model, in which we used 150 µg of CRP and 10(7) CFU of pneumococci, mutant CRP was as protective as wild-type CRP, again indicating that the protection was independent of the PCh-binding activity of CRP. We conclude that both PCh-dependent and PCh-independent mechanisms are involved in the CRP-mediated decrease in bacteremia and the resulting protection of mice against pneumococcal infection.


Subject(s)
C-Reactive Protein/metabolism , Phosphorylcholine/metabolism , Pneumococcal Infections/immunology , Sepsis/immunology , Streptococcus pneumoniae/immunology , Animals , Bacterial Load , C-Reactive Protein/genetics , Disease Models, Animal , Male , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Mutant Proteins/genetics , Mutant Proteins/metabolism , Protein Binding , Sepsis/microbiology , Survival Analysis
4.
Mediators Inflamm ; 2014: 319215, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24948846

ABSTRACT

C-reactive protein (CRP) performs two recognition functions that are relevant to cardiovascular disease. First, in its native pentameric conformation, CRP recognizes molecules and cells with exposed phosphocholine (PCh) groups, such as microbial pathogens and damaged cells. PCh-containing ligand-bound CRP activates the complement system to destroy the ligand. Thus, the PCh-binding function of CRP is defensive if it occurs on foreign pathogens because it results in the killing of the pathogen via complement activation. On the other hand, the PCh-binding function of CRP is detrimental if it occurs on injured host cells because it causes more damage to the tissue via complement activation; this is how CRP worsens acute myocardial infarction and ischemia/reperfusion injury. Second, in its nonnative pentameric conformation, CRP also recognizes atherogenic low-density lipoprotein (LDL). Recent data suggest that the LDL-binding function of CRP is beneficial because it prevents formation of macrophage foam cells, attenuates inflammatory effects of LDL, inhibits LDL oxidation, and reduces proatherogenic effects of macrophages, raising the possibility that nonnative CRP may show atheroprotective effects in experimental animals. In conclusion, temporarily inhibiting the PCh-binding function of CRP along with facilitating localized presence of nonnative pentameric CRP could be a promising approach to treat atherosclerosis and myocardial infarction. There is no need to stop the biosynthesis of CRP.


Subject(s)
C-Reactive Protein/metabolism , Cardiovascular Diseases/blood , Gene Expression Regulation , Animals , Atherosclerosis/metabolism , Complement Activation , Humans , Ligands , Mice , Mice, Transgenic , Myocardial Infarction/metabolism , Myocardial Infarction/pathology , Oxygen/metabolism , Phosphorylcholine/metabolism , Protein Conformation , Reperfusion Injury/metabolism
5.
J Biol Chem ; 287(51): 43116-25, 2012 Dec 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23139417

ABSTRACT

Human C-reactive protein (CRP) protects mice from lethal Streptococcus pneumoniae infection when injected into mice within the range of 6 h before to 2 h after the administration of pneumococci. Because CRP binds to phosphocholine-containing substances and subsequently activates the complement system, it has been proposed that the antipneumococcal function of CRP requires the binding of CRP to phosphocholine moieties present in pneumococcal cell wall C-polysaccharide. To test this proposal experimentally, in this study, we utilized a new CRP mutant incapable of binding to phosphocholine. Based on the structure of CRP-phosphocholine complexes, which showed that Phe(66), Thr(76), and Glu(81) formed the phosphocholine-binding pocket, we constructed a CRP mutant F66A/T76Y/E81A in which the pocket was blocked by substituting Tyr for Thr(76). When compared with wild-type CRP, mutant CRP bound more avidly to phosphoethanolamine and could be purified by affinity chromatography using phosphoethanolamine-conjugated Sepharose. Mutant CRP did not bind to phosphocholine, C-polysaccharide, or pneumococci. Mutant CRP was free in the mouse serum, and its rate of clearance in vivo was not faster than that of wild-type CRP. When either 25 µg or 150 µg of CRP was administered into mice, unlike wild-type CRP, mutant CRP did not protect mice from lethal pneumococcal infection. Mice injected with mutant CRP had higher mortality rates than mice that received wild-type CRP. Decreased survival was due to the increased bacteremia in mice treated with mutant CRP. We conclude that the phosphocholine-binding pocket on CRP is necessary for CRP-mediated initial protection of mice against lethal pneumococcal infection.


Subject(s)
C-Reactive Protein/chemistry , C-Reactive Protein/metabolism , Phosphorylcholine/metabolism , Pneumococcal Infections/microbiology , Pneumococcal Infections/prevention & control , Streptococcus pneumoniae/physiology , Animals , Bacteremia/blood , Bacteremia/microbiology , Bacteremia/pathology , Binding Sites , C-Reactive Protein/isolation & purification , CHO Cells , Cricetinae , Humans , Male , Mice , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Models, Molecular , Mutant Proteins/isolation & purification , Mutant Proteins/metabolism , Phosphatidylethanolamines , Pneumococcal Infections/blood , Protein Subunits/chemistry , Protein Subunits/isolation & purification , Protein Subunits/metabolism , Survival Analysis
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...