Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
BJR Case Rep ; 5(2): 20180094, 2019 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31501703

ABSTRACT

This case describes a fit and well 17-year-old male who underwent surgical resection of a longstanding, painless, right lateral neck swelling. Believed to be either a vascular malformation, ranula or enlarged sublingual gland from pre-operative MR studies, histopathological examination of the mass revealed it as normal thyroid tissue. Post-operative imaging confirmed the absence of any remaining thyroid tissue. Hypothyroidism was confirmed with subsequent thyroid function tests. Interestingly, a "thyroid storm" which presented unknowingly during the surgical removal of the lesion did not trigger suspicion that thyroid tissue was being handled at the time. Normal, ectopic thyroid tissue in the lateral neck is rare but should be considered a differential diagnosis for neck lumps, particularly if it also presents as an intraoral swelling, as in this case. The presence of the orthotopic thyroid gland should be confirmed with diagnostic imaging prior to surgical excision of unknown neck masse.

2.
Heart Lung Circ ; 16(2): 103-6, 2007 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17314067

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: We set out to find a policy for the management of the pneumonectomy space which would minimise risk and be acceptable to all the surgeons. We believe this will reduce opportunities for error, be welcomed by nursing staff, and improve adherence to protocols. METHODS: We sought evidence in the scientific and educational literature. Finding no sure guidance, we audited our own experience of two policies, with the emphasis on minimising risk. RESULTS: There was no evidence from randomised trials. There was no cohesive advice in the text books. Our data indicated that it was improbable that randomised controlled trial (RCT) would have the power to find the evidence. Unable to establish the best strategy, we chose what appeared to be the lowest risk management policy. CONCLUSIONS: It is instructive that such a fundamental question should be unanswered. We have adopted a low risk and well established strategy--an unclamped underwater seal drain--but have no evidence base other than clinical experience. This is illustrative of much of what we do in clinical surgical practice. Avoiding major risk is often more important than proving small differences in benefit.


Subject(s)
Drainage/methods , Pneumonectomy , Postoperative Care , Humans , Mediastinal Emphysema/diagnostic imaging , Mediastinal Emphysema/etiology , Mediastinum/diagnostic imaging , Medical Audit , Pneumonectomy/adverse effects , Radiography , Retrospective Studies , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...