Evaluation of the efficacy of adjuvant radiotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy in patients with salivary gland tumors.

AIMS: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) versus adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in patients with salivary gland tumors (SGTs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from patients who underwent adjuvant RT for a diagnosis of SG cancer at Ankara Atatürk Education and Research Hospital, Ankara Numune Education and Research Hospital and Ankara Bilkent City Hospital between September 01, 2009 and September 01, 2022 were analysed retrospectively. We evaluated the efficacy of RT alone versus CRT in these patients in terms of acute response, treatment tolerance, overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS). RESULTS: Fifty-five patients who underwent RT between September 14, 2009 and August 04, 2022 at Ankara Atatürk Education and Research Hospital, Ankara Numune Education and Research Hospital and Ankara Bilkent City Hospital were included in this study. Eight patients who did not meet the study criteria were excluded; thus, the analysis was performed for 47 patients. The median follow-up period was 60 months (range: 6-160 months). The median patient age was 53 years (range: 18-86 years). Thirty-nine patients (83%) had parotid tumors and eight patients (17%) had submandibular cancer. The time from surgery to RT was 48 days (range: 20-126 days). Intensity-modulated radiotherapy was administered to all patients and the median RT dose was 66 Gy (range: 52-70 Gy). Concomitant chemotherapy (CCT) (40 mg/m2 of cisplatin weekly) was administered to 13 patients (27.7%). Acute adverse events were observed in 17 patients (36.2%). Interruption of RT was noted for only six patients (12.8%), and this proportion did not differ significantly between the CRT and RT-only arms (P = 0.538). Acute side effects were observed in 17 patients (36.2%), and there were no significant relationships between acute side effects and the administration of CCT (P = 0.112). Recurrence was observed in 10 patients (21.3%). All recurrences were locoregional and no distant metastases were observed during the follow-up period. The median DFS of the patients was 48 months (range: 4-160 months), 1-year DFS was 86%, 2-year DFS was 83.5%, and 5-year DFS was 77.9%. There was no statistically significant difference in DFS between the adjuvant CRT and RT-alone arms (P = 0.114). At the date of last follow-up, 14 patients (29.8%) had died. The median OS of the patients was 58.5 months (range: 6-160 months), 1-year OS was 91.4%, 2-year OS was 86.8%, and 5-year OS was 78%. There was no statistically significant difference in OS between the adjuvant CRT and RT-only arms (P = 0.453). CONCLUSION: Stage was identified as the most important prognostic factor for DFS and OS. No significant differences in OS, DFS, or acute side effects were observed between the CRT and RT-only arms. Additional studies are needed to identify the subgroup of SGT patients for which CRT is most warranted.

From organ at risk to target organ: Dosimetric comparison of myocardial stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy between helical tomotherapy and volumetric arc therapy for refractory ventricular tachycardia.

Ventricular tachycardia (VT) is an important type of arrhythmia with a risk of sudden death. Although implanted cardiac defibrillation and radiofrequency ablation are used together with medical treatments for VT, the treatment options are limited in cases that do not respond to them. Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) applied to VT substrates in resistant cases is an emerging treatment with positive results. Such clinical results have increased the interest in this subject. However, the ideal treatment device and method have not yet been described for this therapy, which is generally applied at a single fraction using various devices and methods. Herein, treatment planning was conducted for a total of 8 patients (11 VT substrates) using the Varian TrueBeam EDGE and TomoTherapy Radixact devices at a single center, and the results were compared dosimetrically. The Wilcoxon-signed rank test was used for the statistical analysis, and mean values were expressed as medians and interquartile ranges (IQRs). In the volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and helical tomotherapy (HT) plans, the plan coverages and conformity indexes were similar; meanwhile, the homogeneity indexes were 0.10 (IQR = 0.05) and 0.07 (IQR = 0.05), respectively, and were significantly better in the HT plan (p = 0.02). The gradient indexes were 3.18 (IQR = 0.8) and 5.33 (IQR = 3.68) in the VMAT and HT plans, respectively, and were significantly better in the VMAT plan. For the organs at risk, similar doses were observed. The maximum doses for the stomach and esophagus and the mean doses for the left lung and both lungs were significantly lower in the VMAT plan. Similarly, the maximum and mean doses for the cardiac substructures and great vessels were significantly lower in the VMAT plan. More homogeneous plans were obtained in HT, while a faster dose reduction and lower critical organ dose were observed in VMAT. Reasonable myocardial SABR plans could be obtained with both techniques. The effects of the dosimetric differences on the clinical outcomes should be evaluated in prospective clinical studies.