Verification of the anatomy and newly discovered histology of the G-spot complex.

OBJECTIVES: To expand the anatomical investigations of the G-spot and to assess the G-spot's characteristic histological and immunohistochemical features. DESIGN: An observational study. SETTING: International multicentre. POPULATION: Eight consecutive fresh human female cadavers. METHODS: Anterior vaginal wall dissections were executed and G-spot microdissections were performed. All specimens were stained with haematoxylin and eosin (H&E). The tissues of two women were selected at random for immunohistochemical staining. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was to document the anatomy of the G-spot. The secondary outcome measures were to identify the histology of the G-spot and to determine whether histological samples stained with H&E are sufficient to identify the G-spot. RESULTS: The anatomical existence of the G-spot was identified in all women and was in a diagonal plane. In seven (87.5%) and one (12.5%) of the women the G-spot complex was found on the left or right side, respectively. The G-spot was intimately fused with vessels, creating a complex. A large tangled vein-like vascular structure resembled an arteriovenous malformation and there were a few smaller feeding arteries. A band-like structure protruded from the tail of the G-spot. The size of the G-spot varied. Histologically, the G-spot was determined as a neurovascular complex structure. The neural component contained abundant peripheral nerve bundles and a nerve ganglion. The vascular component comprised large vein-like vessels and smaller feeding arteries. Circular and longitudinal muscles covered the G-complex. CONCLUSION: The anatomy of the G-spot complex was confirmed. The histology of the G-spot presents as neurovascular tissues with a nerve ganglion. H&E staining is sufficient for the identification of the G-spot complex.

Normal endometrial cells in Papanicolaou smears: prevalence in women with and without endometrial disease.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the prevalence of normal endometrial cells in Papanicolaou smears of women with and those without endometrial carcinoma or hyperplasia differs significantly. METHODS: Papanicolaou smears of women with biopsy-proved endometrial hyperplasia or carcinoma diagnosed between 1990 and 1998 were reviewed for the presence of normal endometrial cells. Chi-square and a power analysis were used to compare these smears with results of smears from women older than 35 years of age with tissue diagnoses other than hyperplasia or carcinoma. All Papanicolaou smears obtained within the 5 years before endometrial sampling were reviewed. Each patient had at least one smear done within the previous 12 months. Clinical information was available for all patients. RESULTS: Of the 201 women in whom endometrial hyperplasia (n = 103) or carcinoma (n = 98) was diagnosed, 4 (2%) had normal endometrial cells in otherwise negative Papanicolaou smears. Of the 289 women in the comparison group, 15 (5%) had normal endometrial cells in their Papanicolaou smears. The prevalence of normal endometrial cells did not differ significantly between the two groups (P =.071). The study had 80% power to detect a 5% or greater difference between groups. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of normal endometrial cells in Papanicolaou smears of women with endometrial carcinoma or hyperplasia does not significantly differ from that in women without these conditions. Reporting normal endometrial cells in Papanicolaou smears according to the recommendations of the Bethesda System may lead to unnecessary procedures and patient anxiety.

Small cell carcinoma versus other lung malignancies: diagnosis by fine-needle aspiration cytology.

BACKGROUND: When a diagnosis of small cell carcinoma is reached in a patient with a lung mass, a surgical treatment approach is no longer considered and chemotherapy becomes the treatment of choice. The aim of this study is to compare the diagnostic accuracy of fine-needle aspiration cytology in the diagnosis of small cell carcinoma with the diagnoses of other lung malignancies. The capacity of this technique to distinguish between these two categories is assessed. METHODS: Two hundred fifty-nine consecutive transthoracic fine needle aspirations of lung tissue from 235 patients with histologic diagnosis of malignancy were reviewed. The aspirates were performed over a 10-year period at the University of Miami/Jackson Memorial Medical Center, Miami, Florida. Two hundred and forty-two fine-needle aspirations from 221 patients yielded satisfactory smears and were included in the study. Fourteen patients were excluded. The cytologic diagnoses were classified into 5 categories: 1) small cell carcinoma (18 smears, 7%); 2) other lung malignancies (158 smears, 65%); 3) suspicious for malignancy (19 smears, 8%); 4) inflammatory process (7 smears, 3%); and 5) negative for malignancy (40 smears, 17%). RESULTS: The histologic diagnoses were divided into two groups: small cell carcinomas (29 smears, 12%), and other lung malignancies (213 smears, 88%). The efficiency of fine-needle aspiration cytology in the diagnosis of these two groups was 96% versus 88%, respectively, with an equal specificity of 100%, and a sensitivity of 67% versus 81%. Once the diagnosis of malignancy was established, fine-needle aspiration cytology was found to be highly accurate in distinguishing small cell carcinoma from other neoplasms. CONCLUSION: We conclude that fine-needle aspiration cytology of the lung is an accurate diagnostic tool for the diagnosis of lung malignancies and is an excellent technique for distinguishing small cell carcinoma from other malignant neoplasms. It can be used with confidence to select treatment modalities and to avoid unnecessary surgeries in patients with lung malignancies.

Fine-needle aspiration cytology of bone: accuracy and pitfalls of cytodiagnosis.

BACKGROUND: Fine-needle aspiration cytology has proved to be an accurate, cost-effective, and safe technique for diagnosing inflammatory and neoplastic lesions at different body sites. Its applicability in bone pathology, however, has been controversial due to a high percentage of inadequate samples and nonspecific results in the diagnosis of primary bone lesions. In this study, the diagnostic accuracy of the technique and its capacity for diagnosing primary bone lesions were assessed. In addition, the authors analyzed the diagnostic limitations with focus on specimen adequacy. METHODS: The authors reviewed 314 consecutive fine-needle aspirations of bone from 308 patients. Direct or cytospin smears from aspirated material were fixed in 95% alcohol and stained by a modified Papanicolaou technique. Ninety-seven smears (31%) initially were considered unsatisfactory and excluded from the study. A diagnosis was rendered in 217 cases (69%), which were classified into 4 categories: primary bone lesions (benign and malignant) (42%), metastatic bone tumors (37%), suspicious for malignancy (5%), and negative (16%). RESULTS: The overall accuracy was 95%. Seventy-eight percent of primary bone lesions were correctly diagnosed by cytology. All cases diagnosed as metastatic by cytology were correct. The authors encountered difficulties diagnosing fibro-osseous lesions. Thirteen percent of cases were erroneously diagnosed as "negative" or "inflammatory conditions." On review, the absence of adequate cytologic material was noted in all of them. This sampling error could have been avoided by the presence of an on-site cytopathologist. CONCLUSIONS: Fine-needle aspiration of bone is a simple, reliable, and accurate diagnostic technique that can facilitate patient management and preoperative decision-making and/or avoid unnecessary invasive procedures for patients with primary or metastatic bone lesions. However, the radiologist, cytopathologist, and orthopedic surgeon should work together for optimal results. Moreover, a definitive pathologic diagnosis should not be issued if diagnostic material is not adequate and/or clinicoradiologic information is incompatible.

Reporting normal endometrial cells in Pap smears: an outcome appraisal.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the clinical relevance of reporting the presence of normal endometrial cells in the Pap smears of women over the age of 35 years and the significance of this practice as it relates to patient management. METHODS: From January 1992 to December 1995, normal endometrial cells were reported in 206 consecutive Pap smears of women over the age of 35 years. Clinical follow-up was available for all patients, including the results of diagnostic procedures whenever performed. RESULTS: Of the 206 women with normal endometrial cells in their Pap smears, 162 presented with the chief complaint of abnormal vaginal bleeding. They were all evaluated by direct endometrial sampling, resulting in detection of 10 endometrial hyperplasias and 7 endometrial carcinomas. The remaining 44 women who were clinically asymptomatic were followed up with only routine annual gynecologic examinations for a minimum of 3 years. All had negative clinical courses. CONCLUSION: Reporting the presence of normal endometrial cells in Pap smears has little, if any, impact on subsequent patient management. Women who present with abnormal uterine bleeding are worked up for endometrial disease regardless of their Pap smear findings. In clinically asymptomatic patients, practitioners may, and in our experience often do, choose to disregard normal endometrial cells in Pap smear reports. The negative follow-up for the asymptomatic women in our study supports this practice. Therefore, reporting the presence of normal endometrial cells in Pap smears is of no clinical relevance and may, in fact, create a management dilemma for clinicians.

Cytologic characteristics of meningeal carcinomatosis: increased diagnostic accuracy using carcinoembryonic antigen and epithelial membrane antigen immunocytochemistry.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Traditionally, the diagnosis of meningeal carcinomatosis has been based on clinical suspicion and confirmed by cytologic study of cerebrospinal fluid. However, routine cytologic study may fail to detect malignant cells in a relatively large number of cases. We used immunocytochemistry in an attempt to increase the sensitivity of cytologic detection of malignant neoplasms in cerebrospinal fluid. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-eight consecutive cerebrospinal fluid specimens from patients with clinically suspected meningeal carcinomatosis were selected for this study. Immunocytochemistry for carcinoembryonic antigen and epithelial membrane antigen were used on the archival Papanicolaou-stained cerebrospinal fluid preparations. RESULTS: Of the 23 specimens from patients with proven meningeal carcinomatosis, 13 were correctly diagnosed using cytomorphologic criteria alone. The diagnosis of malignant neoplasm in 8 cytologically suspicious and 1 cytologically negative specimen was confirmed using immunocytochemistry. All cases that were negative on follow-up were also negative cytologically and immunocytochemically. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that in using common antibodies, such as carcinoembryonic antigen and epithelial membrane antigen, the sensitivity of the cytologic diagnosis of meningeal carcinomatosis increases, and that previously Papanicolaou-stained preparations are suitable for immunocytochemical studies.

Significance of intraperitoneal cytology in patients undergoing radical hysterectomy.

The incidence and prognostic significance of positive intraperitoneal cytology taken during a radical hysterectomy was reviewed. A prospective study looking at intraperitoneal cytology was conducted by using 400 consecutive radical hysterectomies from January 1988 through June 1996. All selected patients had peritoneal washings performed prior to a radical hysterectomy with pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy. A single pathologist reviewed all cytological and histologic specimens. A total of 400 patients were included in the study. Only 7 of 400 (1.8%) had positive intraperitoneal cytology. Four had squamous cell cancer and 3 had adenocarcinoma. Five had stage IB cervical cancer and the remainder were stage IIA. Three had positive nodes. Six of 7 had tumor size greater than 3 cm. Three of 7 had > 50% invasion and 2 of 7 had lymphovascular space invasion. No other risk factors were present in these specimens. Six of 7 recurred within 18 months of surgery. Recurrences were local or retroperitoneal; none were upper abdomen or intraperitoneal. The incidence of positive peritoneal cytology during radical hysterectomy is 1.8%. The cost of these cytology specimens did not offer an advantage to the current surgical-pathological factors used to determine prognosis and adjuvant therapy.