E-Cigarette Beliefs and Intentions Among U.S. Adults Before and After EVALI Outbreak.

PURPOSE: This study examined attitudes, perceived control, perceived norms, intention, and policy support before and after the peak of E-cigarette or Vaping Product Use-Associated Lung Injury (EVALI) cases among 2 independent samples of U.S. adults. DESIGN: This study used a successive independent samples design. SETTING: Data was collected through online surveys in July 2019 (n = 521) and October 2019 (n = 536). SUBJECTS: Participants were recruited through the Qualtrics Survey Panel. Eligibility criteria included: 1) 18 years or older, and 2) currently living in the U.S. MEASURES: The 2 surveys were collected from 2 separate samples examined e-cigarette attitudes, perceived control, perceived norms, intention, and policy support. ANALYSIS: Linear regressions were used to examine the association between time, attitudinal, and belief factors associated with intention and policy support. RESULTS: Participants in the October sample (n = 521) were significantly more likely to have negative attitudes towards e-cigarettes when compared to the July sample (n = 536), F(8,1047) = 52.671, p < .01, R2 = 0.287. Lower perceived social acceptance towards e-cigarettes and negative attitudes were related to higher support for restricting where e-cigarettes could be used, F(11, 1042) = 63.218, p < .010, R2 = .401. Higher perceived control over accessing e-cigarettes, but lower social acceptance of e-cigarettes and negative beliefs were associated with higher support for limiting places where e-cigarettes could be purchased, F(11,1039) = 36.200, p < .01, R2 = .277. CONCLUSION: Results indicate that EVALI cases may have had an immediate negative effect on attitudes but did not appear to decrease intention to use e-cigarettes. Results could inform future public health campaigns' programming and research. More research is needed to understand the long-term impact of EVALI on e-cigarette use.

Examining e-cigarette perspectives before and after the EVALI peak in cases.

INTRODUCTION: The use of e-cigarettes among youth and young adults has greatly increased, with national media outlets drawing attention to e-cigarette or vaping product use-associated lung injury (EVALI) hospitalizations. METHODS: U.S. adults completed an online survey where they were asked to describe their perceptions towards e-cigarettes. There were two surveys collected using separate samples, with one being before the peak of EVALI cases in Time 1: July 2019 (n = 521) and one collected after the peak of EVALI cases in Time 2: October 2019 (n = 536). RESULTS: Four themes emerged including describing e-cigarettes as appealing, unappealing, comparing them to other tobacco products, and generally having experience with e-cigarettes. Fewer participants described e-cigarettes as appealing in terms of smell, flavor, and taste in Time 2, after the peak of EVALI cases. Both samples described the harmful effects of using e-cigarettes, with a higher percent describing potential harms in Time 2. Participants in Time 2 less frequently described e-cigarettes as a good alternative to traditional cigarettes. CONCLUSIONS: Perceptions towards e-cigarettes vary among adults who use or do not use e-cigarettes; however, this study reflected an increase in awareness of the harmful effects of using e-cigarettes after the peak of EVALI cases. Additionally, results suggest that there may have been a decrease in adults who found e-cigarettes appealing. Determining perceptions towards e-cigarettes, especially after growing awareness of the harmful effects of using e-cigarettes, is useful in informing future policies and public health campaigns.