Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 11 de 11
Filter
1.
EGEMS (Wash DC) ; 6(1): 5, 2018 May 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29881763

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: Patient reported outcomes (PROs) are one means of systematically gathering meaningful subjective information for patient care, population health, and patient centered outcomes research. However, optimal data management for effective PRO applications is unclear. CASE DESCRIPTION: Delivery systems associated with the Health Care Systems Research Network (HCSRN) have implemented PRO data collection as part of the Medicare annual Health Risk Assessment (HRA). A questionnaire assessed data content, collection, storage, and extractability in HCSRN delivery systems. FINDINGS: Responses were received from 15 (83.3 percent) of 18 sites. The proportion of Medicare beneficiaries completing an HRA ranged from less than 10 to 42 percent. Most sites collected core HRA elements and 10 collected information on additional domains such as social support. Measures for core domains varied across sites. Data were collected at and prior to visits. Modes included paper, clinician entry, patient portals, and interactive voice response. Data were stored in the electronic health record (EHR) in scanned documents, free text, and discrete fields, and in summary databases. MAJOR THEMES: PRO implementation requires effectively collecting, storing, extracting, and applying patient-reported data. Standardizing PRO measures and storing data in extractable formats can facilitate multi-site uses for PRO data, while access to individual PROs in the EHR may be sufficient for use at the point of care. CONCLUSION: Collecting comparable PRO data elements, storing data in extractable fields, and collecting data from a higher proportion of eligible respondents represents an optimal approach to support multi-site applications of PRO information.

3.
Osteoporos Int ; 28(5): 1733-1744, 2017 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28210776

ABSTRACT

We constructed a Markov microsimulation model among hypothetical cohorts of community-dwelling elderly osteoporotic Japanese women without prior hip or vertebral fractures over a lifetime horizon. Compared with weekly oral alendronate for 5 years, denosumab every 6 months for 5 years is cost-saving or cost-effective at a conventionally accepted threshold. INTRODUCTION: The objective of the study was to examine the cost-effectiveness of subcutaneous denosumab every 6 months for 5 years compared with weekly oral alendronate for 5 years in Japan. METHODS: We calculated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios [ICERs] (2016 US dollars [$] per quality-adjusted life year [QALY]), using a Markov microsimulation model among hypothetical cohorts of community-dwelling osteoporotic Japanese women without prior hip or vertebral fractures at various ages of therapy initiation (65, 70, 75, and 80 years) over a lifetime horizon from three perspectives: societal, healthcare sector, and government. RESULTS: Denosumab was cost-saving compared with alendronate at ages 75 and 80 years from any of the three perspectives. The ICERs of denosumab compared with alendronate were $25,700 and $5000 per QALY at ages 65 and 70 years from a societal perspective and did not exceed a willingness-to-pay of $50,000 per QALY from the other two perspectives. In deterministic sensitivity analyses, results were sensitive to changes in the effectiveness of denosumab for reducing hip fracture and clinical vertebral fracture and the rate ratio of non-persistence with denosumab compared to alendronate. In probabilistic sensitivity analyses, the probabilities of denosumab being cost-effective compared with alendronate were 89-100% at a willingness-to-pay of $50,000 per QALY. CONCLUSIONS: Among community-dwelling elderly osteoporotic women in Japan, denosumab every 6 months for 5 years is cost-saving or cost-effective at a conventionally accepted threshold of willingness-to-pay at all ages examined, compared with weekly alendronate for 5 years. This study provides insight to clinicians and policymakers regarding the relative economic value of osteoporosis treatments in elderly women.


Subject(s)
Alendronate/economics , Bone Density Conservation Agents/economics , Denosumab/economics , Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal/drug therapy , Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal/economics , Administration, Oral , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Alendronate/administration & dosage , Alendronate/therapeutic use , Bone Density Conservation Agents/administration & dosage , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Denosumab/administration & dosage , Denosumab/therapeutic use , Drug Administration Schedule , Drug Costs/statistics & numerical data , Female , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Independent Living , Injections, Subcutaneous , Japan/epidemiology , Markov Chains , Models, Econometric , Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal/epidemiology , Osteoporotic Fractures/economics , Osteoporotic Fractures/epidemiology , Osteoporotic Fractures/prevention & control , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Sensitivity and Specificity
4.
Osteoporos Int ; 28(2): 585-595, 2017 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27726000

ABSTRACT

We developed a Markov microsimulation model among hypothetical cohorts of community-dwelling US white women without prior major osteoporotic fractures over a lifetime horizon. At ages 75 and 80, adding 1 year of exercise to 5 years of oral bisphosphonate therapy is cost-effective at a conventionally accepted threshold compared with bisphosphonates alone. INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to examine the cost-effectiveness of the combined strategy of oral bisphosphonate therapy for 5 years and falls prevention exercise for 1 year compared with either strategy in isolation. METHODS: We calculated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios [ICERs] (2014 US dollars per quality-adjusted life year [QALY]), using a Markov microsimulation model among hypothetical cohorts of community-dwelling US white women with different starting ages (65, 70, 75, and 80) without prior history of hip, vertebral, or wrist fractures over a lifetime horizon from the societal perspective. RESULTS: At ages 65, 70, 75, and 80, the combined strategy had ICERs of $202,020, $118,460, $46,870, and $17,640 per QALY, respectively, compared with oral bisphosphonate therapy alone. The combined strategy provided better health at lower cost than falls prevention exercise alone at ages 70, 75, and 80. In deterministic sensitivity analyses, results were particularly sensitive to the change in the opportunity cost of participants' time spent exercising. In probabilistic sensitivity analyses, the probabilities of the combined strategy being cost-effective compared with the next best alternative increased with age, ranging from 35 % at age 65 to 48 % at age 80 at a willingness-to-pay of $100,000 per QALY. CONCLUSIONS: Among community-dwelling US white women ages 75 and 80, adding 1 year of exercise to 5 years of oral bisphosphonate therapy is cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay of $100,000 per QALY, compared with oral bisphosphonate therapy only. This analysis will help clinicians and policymakers make better decisions about treatment options to reduce fracture risk.


Subject(s)
Accidental Falls/prevention & control , Bone Density Conservation Agents/therapeutic use , Diphosphonates/therapeutic use , Exercise Therapy/economics , Osteoporotic Fractures/prevention & control , Accidental Falls/economics , Administration, Oral , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Bone Density Conservation Agents/administration & dosage , Bone Density Conservation Agents/economics , Combined Modality Therapy , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Diphosphonates/administration & dosage , Diphosphonates/economics , Drug Costs/statistics & numerical data , Female , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Japan , Markov Chains , Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal/drug therapy , Osteoporotic Fractures/economics , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Sensitivity and Specificity
5.
Inj Prev ; 14(4): 266-71, 2008 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18676787

ABSTRACT

Systematic evidence reviews support the efficacy of physical activity programs and multifactorial strategies for fall prevention. However, community settings in which fall prevention programs occur often differ substantially from the research settings in which efficacy was first demonstrated. Because of these differences, alternative approaches are needed to judge the adequacy of fall prevention activities occurring as part of standard medical care or community efforts. This paper uses the World Health Organization Innovative Care for Chronic Conditions (ICCC) framework to rethink how fall prevention programs might be implemented routinely in both medical and community settings. Examples of innovative programs and policies that provide fall prevention strategies consistent with the ICCC framework are highlighted, and evidence where available is provided on the effects of these strategies on processes and outcomes of care. Finally, a "no wrong door" approach to fall prevention and management is proposed, in which older adults who are found to be at risk of falls in either a medical or community setting are linked to a standard fall risk evaluation across three domains (physical activity, medical risks, and home safety).


Subject(s)
Accidental Falls/prevention & control , Aged , Attitude to Health , Chronic Disease , Evidence-Based Medicine/methods , Health Services for the Aged/standards , Humans , Leadership , Quality Indicators, Health Care , World Health Organization
6.
J Am Coll Cardiol ; 38(4): 969-76, 2001 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11583866

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to determine whether patient characteristics collected at presentation can identify which patients benefit from immediate coronary angiography and revascularization. BACKGROUND: Risk stratification may offer a method for identifying which patients with unstable angina or non-Q-wave myocardial infarction (NQMI) are likeliest to benefit from invasive management strategies. METHODS: The analysis was based on data from a randomized controlled trial that enrolled 1,473 patients presenting with unstable angina or NQMI who were randomly assigned to an early invasive or early conservative (medical) management strategy. We constructed a risk-stratification score for each patient based on adjusted odds ratios for clinical variables likely to predict adverse outcomes. We stratified all trial subjects by their risk scores and studied the rates of death or myocardial infarction (MI) of the early invasive management strategy in each stratum. RESULTS: The final multivariate model included older age, ST segment depression on presentation, history of complicated angina before presentation, and elevation in baseline creatine kinase-MB fraction. Although patients with a higher risk score had an increased rate of death or MI within 42 days and 365 days (p < 0.001) in both management strategies, early invasive management for patients in the high and very high risk categories was associated with a lower rate of death or MI within 42 days compared with conservative management. No such benefit was seen in patients in the larger group of patients in the very low, low or moderate risk categories (p = 0.03 for the interaction between risk category and management assignment). CONCLUSIONS: Risk stratification may be an effective method for identifying those patients with unstable angina or NQMI most likely to benefit from early invasive management. Selective use of early invasive management can have a substantial impact in reducing morbidity and mortality in higher risk patients, but may not be warranted in lower risk patients.


Subject(s)
Angina, Unstable/epidemiology , Angina, Unstable/therapy , Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary , Coronary Artery Bypass , Myocardial Infarction/epidemiology , Myocardial Infarction/therapy , Aged , C-Reactive Protein/analysis , Coronary Angiography , Female , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Risk Assessment , Troponin I/analysis
7.
Fertil Steril ; 75(6): 1185-93, 2001 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11384647

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To compare in vitro maturation of cumulus-free oocytes in glucose-free medium (P1) and standard medium (TC199). DESIGN: Prospective, cohort study. SETTING: Assisted reproductive technology program. PATIENT(S): One hundred eight patients undergoing ICSI. INTERVENTION(S): Germinal vesicle-stage or metaphase I--stage oocytes were allocated to culture with P1 or TC199. Metaphase II oocytes were fixed for immunofluorescence analysis or fluorescence in situ hybridization at 24 or 48 hours (or both). Media were compared by performing conditional logistic regression analysis that controlled for egg-specific factors. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Proportion of mature oocytes and appearance of normal spindle-chromosome cytoarchitecture. RESULT(S): At 24 hours, more P1 oocytes than TC199 oocytes reached metaphase II (59.7% vs. 44.9%). At 48 hours, 71.7% of P1 oocytes and 61.0% of TC199 oocytes reached metaphase II, but this difference was not significant. Metaphase II oocytes in P1 were 34.3% more likely than those in TC199 to have a bipolar spindle with aligned chromosomes. Compared with oocytes at the germinal vesicle stage at 0 hour, those at metaphase I at 0 hour were more likely to progress to metaphase II (72.6% vs. 46.1% at 24 hours; 84.1% vs. 60.6% at 48 hours). CONCLUSION(S): P1 is superior to TC199 for in vitro maturation of granulosa-free human oocytes.


Subject(s)
Oocytes/physiology , Adult , Cells, Cultured , Cellular Senescence/drug effects , Cellular Senescence/physiology , Chromosomes/ultrastructure , Cohort Studies , Culture Media/pharmacology , Female , Humans , Metaphase , Oocytes/drug effects , Oocytes/ultrastructure , Prospective Studies , Spindle Apparatus/ultrastructure , Time Factors
8.
J Gen Intern Med ; 15(11): 776-81, 2000 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11119169

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Guidelines for oral anticoagulation after deep venous thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE) have recommended that patients be anticoagulated for at least 3 months after hospital discharge. We sought to determine whether this recommendation was being followed and what patient characteristics predict a shorter than recommended duration of therapy. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study using linked health care claims data. SETTING: Routine clinical practice. PATIENTS: Five hundred seventy-three members of New Jersey's Medicaid or Pharmacy Assistance for the Aged and Disabled programs aged 65 years and older who were hospitalized for DVT or PE between January 1, 1991 and June 30, 1994. RESULTS: Of the 573 patients, 129 (23%) filled prescriptions covering less than 90 days of oral anticoagulant therapy. In multivariate models, African-American race was associated with an increased risk of a shorter than recommended duration of therapy (odds ratio [OR], 1.87; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.14 to 3.08), but age and gender were not. Patients who used anticoagulants in the year prior to admission were less likely to have a short duration of therapy (OR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.12 to 0.78), than were patients with PE (OR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.38 to 0.88). CONCLUSIONS: Nearly a quarter of those anticoagulated following DVT or PE received therapy for less than the recommended length of time after hospital discharge, with African Americans more likely to have a shorter than recommended course of treatment. Further research is needed to evaluate the causes of shorter than recommended duration of therapy and racial disparities in anticoagulant use.


Subject(s)
Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Patient Compliance , Pulmonary Embolism/drug therapy , Venous Thrombosis/drug therapy , Black or African American , Aged , Drug Utilization , Female , Humans , Male , Odds Ratio , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Retrospective Studies
9.
J Gen Intern Med ; 15(10): 702-9, 2000 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11089713

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Throughout the 1990s, the Joint National Committee on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure recommended initial antihypertensive therapy with a thiazide diuretic or a beta-blocker based on evidence from randomized, controlled trials, unless an indication existed for another drug class. The committee also recommended beta-blockers in hypertensive patients with a history of myocardial infarction (MI), and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF). Our objective was to determine whether prescribing practices for older hypertensive patients are consistent with evidence-based guidelines. METHODS: We examined prescription patterns from January 1, 1991 through December 31, 1995 for 23,748 patients 65 years or older with a new diagnosis of hypertension from the New Jersey Medicaid program and that state's Pharmacy Assistance for the Aged and Disabled program (PAAD). We linked drug use data with information on demographic variables and comorbid medical conditions. RESULTS: During the study period, calcium channel blockers were the most commonly prescribed initial therapy for hypertension (41%), followed by ACE inhibitors (24%), thiazide diuretics (17%), and beta-blockers (10%). Eliminating patients with diabetes mellitus, CHF, angina, or history of MI did not substantially affect these results. Overall, initial use of a thiazide declined from 22% in 1991 to 10% in 1995, while initial use of a calcium channel blocker increased from 28% to 43%, despite publication during these years of studies demonstrating a benefit of thiazides in older patients. Only 15% of older hypertensive patients with a history of MI received beta-blockers. CONCLUSIONS: Prescribing practices for older hypertensive patients are not consistent with evidence-based guidelines. Interventions are needed to encourage evidence-driven prescribing practices for the treatment of hypertension.


Subject(s)
Antihypertensive Agents , Drug Utilization Review , Evidence-Based Medicine , Hypertension/drug therapy , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Medicaid , New Jersey , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , United States
10.
Ann Intern Med ; 132(10): 780-7, 2000 May 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10819700

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: 3-Hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor (statin) therapy has proven efficacy in reducing the rate of coronary and cerebrovascular events in patients 75 years of age or younger with a history of myocardial infarction. However, in patients older than 75 years of age, the efficacy and potential cost-effectiveness of statins are unknown. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the incremental cost-effectiveness of statin therapy compared with usual care in patients 75 to 84 years of age with previous myocardial infarction. DESIGN: Cost-effectiveness analysis. DATA SOURCES: Published data from cohort studies. TARGET POPULATION: Patients 75 to 84 years of age with a history of myocardial infarction. TIME HORIZON: Lifetime. PERSPECTIVE: Societal. INTERVENTION: Statin therapy. OUTCOME MEASURES: Life expectancy, quality-adjusted life expectancy, and incremental cost-effectiveness. RESULTS OF BASE-CASE ANALYSIS: The incremental cost-effectiveness of statin therapy compared with usual care in patients 75 to 84 years of age with previous myocardial infarction was $18800 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). RESULTS OF SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS: On the basis of a probabilistic sensitivity analysis, there is a 75% chance that statin therapy costs less than $39800 per QALY compared with usual care. If the cost of statin therapy and efficacy of statin therapy at reducing myocardial infarction were set to their most favorable values, statin therapy cost $5400 per QALY; if cost and efficacy were set to their least favorable values, statin therapy cost $97800 per QALY. CONCLUSIONS: The cost-effectiveness ratios of statin therapy in older patients with previous myocardial infarction are reasonable under a wide variety of assumptions about drug efficacy, drug cost, and rates of cardiac and cerebrovascular events. Pending results of randomized, controlled trials of secondary prevention in patients in this age group, statin therapy seems to be as cost-effective as many routinely accepted medical interventions in this setting.


Subject(s)
Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors/economics , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Myocardial Infarction/economics , Myocardial Infarction/prevention & control , Stroke/economics , Stroke/prevention & control , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cost of Illness , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Humans , Life Expectancy , Markov Chains , Myocardial Infarction/etiology , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Sensitivity and Specificity , Stroke/etiology
11.
J Am Geriatr Soc ; 47(2): 145-50, 1999 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9988284

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have suggested suboptimal use of cardiac medications for secondary prevention after myocardial infarction (MI) and atrial fibrillation (AF), especially among older people. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether patients older than 75 years are less likely than those aged 65 to 74 to be prescribed medications with evidence-based indications, including angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for left ventricular dysfunction (LVD) and/or diabetes mellitus (DM), aspirin and/or beta-blockers for those with a history of MI, and warfarin for chronic AF. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Twenty-nine hospitals, predominantly tertiary-care institutions. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 407 patients randomized to ventricular or dual-chamber pacing from February 26, 1993, to September 30, 1994, in the Pacemaker Selection in the Elderly (PASE) trial. MEASUREMENTS: A review of the patient's medical history and a physical exam at study enrollment, three follow-up timepoints, and a study closeout. RESULTS: Patients older than 75 years with LVD and/or DM were less likely to be prescribed ACE inhibitors (OR = .56 (0.31-1.00)); patients older than 75 with a history of MI were less likely to be taking aspirin (OR = .43 (0.19-.95)), and patients older than 75 with AF were less likely to be prescribed warfarin (OR = .18 (0.05-.61)). Patients older than 75 years of age with any or all of the conditions studied were less likely to be prescribed indicated medications than those ages 65 to 74 (OR = .35 (0.18-.70)), after controlling for between-group differences in comorbidity, gender, and number of noncardiac medications. CONCLUSION: Older age is a significant independent negative correlate of evidence-based cardiac medication use in this cohort. Causes for this finding need to be explored.


Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy , Cardiovascular Agents/therapeutic use , Frail Elderly , Myocardial Infarction/drug therapy , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cardiovascular Agents/adverse effects , Combined Modality Therapy , Comorbidity , Diabetes Mellitus/drug therapy , Drug Therapy, Combination , Drug Utilization , Female , Humans , Male , Pacemaker, Artificial , Retrospective Studies , Single-Blind Method , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/drug therapy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...