[Study on efficacy, recurrence rate and related risk factors between ablation index and contact force guided radiofrequency ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in elderly patients].

Objective: To compare the efficacy, safety and recurrence rate between ablation index (AI) and contact force (CF) guided radiofrequency ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in elderly patients. Methods: Elderly patients (age ≥60 years) with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation who received radiofrequency ablation for the first time at Department of Cardiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital from April 2018 to April 2019 were enrolled. Patients were divided into 2 groups: AI-group (n=40) and CF group (n=37) depending on their ablation methods. Follow-up was performed until 1 year post the procedure, and efficacy related indexes like first-pass pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) rate, ablation duration, operation duration and major complications were compared between 2 groups. The recurrence rates between 2 groups and related risk factors after radiofrequency ablation were analyzed. Results: A total of 77 patients [mean age (68.5±6.4) years, 40 were male] were enrolled at last. In AI guided patients, frequency of first-pass PVI rate was higher [52.5%(21 cases) vs 29.7%(3 cases), P=0.011] with a shorter ablation duration [(24.5±1.7) min vs (33.7±2.2) min, P<0.001] and operation duration [(136.6±6.1) min vs (139.7±7.4) min, P=0.048] compared with CF guided group. At 1 year follow-up, AI group showed an amendatory recurrence rate in Kaplan-Meier analysis (22.5% vs 40.5%,log-rank P=0.048). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that CF guided ablation (HR=3.272,95%CI:1.319-8.114,P=0.011), enlarged anteroposterior diameter of the left atrium (HR=4.233,95%CI:1.511-11.862,P=0.006) and complicated with coronary heart disease (HR=4.829,95%CI:1.399-16.666,P=0.013) were independent risk factors for recurrence of atrial fibrillation in elderly patients. Conclusions: Compared with CF guided ablation, radiofrequency ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in elderly patients guided by AI showed a higher first-pass PVI rate, shorter procedure duration of both ablation time and total operation time, meanwhile a lower recurrence rate. Further analysis revealed that different ablation alternation (AI or CF), enlarged anteroposterior diameter of left atrium, and complicated with coronary heart disease are independent risk factors for recurrence after radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation in elderly patients.

[Clinical outcomes of opening coronary chronic total occlusion lesions with the assistance of BridgePoint devices].

Objective: To investigate the safety, efficacy and prognosis of antegrade dissection re-entry (ADR) with the assistance of BridgePoint devices in opening coronary chronic total occlusion (CTO). Methods: A total of 87 consecutive patients, who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention using BridgePoint devices from April 2016 to December 2018 in Xijing Hospital, were included in this study. General information of the selected patients, features of CTO lesions and intraoperative parameters were recorded. Short-term outcomes including technical success rate (defined as achieving TIMI 3 blood flow with residual stenosis<30%), surgical success rate (defined as no major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) occured while hospitalized), complications, and MACE during hospitalization were observed. MACE included death, recurrent myocardial infarction, target vascular reconstruction (TVR) and cardiac tamponade. Patients were followed up by outpatient or telephone visits at 30 days and 6, 12, 24 and 36 months after discharge. Results: Eighty-seven patients, aged (61±10) years with J-CTO scores (2.49±0.52) were included, and 75(86%) were male. Six patients underwent direct ADR with BridgePoint system, and all were successful. Eighty-one patients underwent rescue ADR using BridgePoint devices, and 62 of them were successful. The success rate of ADR with BridgePoint devices was 78.2% (68/87). Nine out of the 19 failed cases succeeded after the application of rescue antegrade/retrograde technique. The technical success rate was 88.5% (77/87). Coronary perforation occurred in 2 cases (2.3%), one case was treated with covered stent and the other case with tamponade was treated with pericardiocentesis. One patient developed periprocedural myocardial infarction, and one patient suffered from sudden death, and one patient had cardiac tamponade. In-hospital MACE occurred in 3 (3.4%) patients. The surgical success rate was 85.1% (74/87).The procedure time was (175±72)minutes and the amount of contrast used was (449±155)ml. During a follow-up of 17(11, 26) months, the incidence of MACE within 30 days was 4.7% (4/86), while 10.5% (9/86) within 6 months, 17.4% (15/86) within 17 months. Conclusion: Opening CTO with the assistance of BridgePoint devices is feasible and safe, with high success rate and satisfactory outcome.