Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Nurs Open ; 10(3): 1556-1564, 2023 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36266743

ABSTRACT

AIM: To investigate the ability of critical care nurses to identify pressure injury and incontinence-associated dermatitis and analyse the possible influencing factors. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. METHODS: This study was conducted at 24 hospitals across 12 provinces in China. A self-made electronic questionnaire was used. Nurses identified and judged injuries according to the information provided. RESULTS: The average identification score for pressure injury and incontinence-associated dermatitis was 9.00 ± 3.51 points, and only 2.16% of nurses scored ≥16 points. The average correct identification rate for pressure injury and incontinence-associated dermatitis was 45%. The correct identification rate for stage 1 pressure injury was the highest, while those for stage 3, stage 4, deep tissue pressure injury and unstageable pressure injury were all lower than 50%; incontinence-associated dermatitis was also easily misjudged. Nurses' educational backgrounds, professional titles, job positions, hospital levels and learning frequency were the factors that affected their ability to identify pressure injury and incontinence-associated dermatitis.


Subject(s)
Crush Injuries , Dermatitis , Fecal Incontinence , Nurses , Pressure Ulcer , Urinary Incontinence , Humans , Pressure Ulcer/etiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Fecal Incontinence/complications , Urinary Incontinence/complications , Critical Care , Dermatitis/etiology
2.
Clin Nurse Spec ; 35(4): 188-198, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34077160

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to design a quantitative evaluation of the promotion plan for clinical nurse specialists in China. DESIGN: The evaluation indexes were selected and established by inquiring 22 experts and using the analytic hierarchy process. The promotion plan was sent to 22 specialized nurses. The reference value was established by comparing the results from predictions made by experts and the self-evaluation of specialized nurses. METHODS: This study used the Delphi method and mixed qualitative and quantitative methods, which not only determined the entry of the promotion plan but also calculated its weight, and obtained the baseline score through a small range of empirical studies. RESULTS: This promotion plan included basic promotion conditions, 5 primary indicators, 15 secondary indicators, and 61 tertiary indicators and was designed by experts who had a high degree of authority in this field. The self-evaluation results of 19 specialist nurses showed a reference value of 30 points per 3 years using the promotion plan. For clinical nursing managers, it is a management tool to evaluate specialist nurses, which can provide a basis for the promotion of specialist nurses. CONCLUSIONS: The promotion plan for clinical nurse specialists in China formed by this research is quantifiable, scientific, and instructive.


Subject(s)
Career Mobility , Delphi Technique , Nurse Clinicians , China , Humans , Tertiary Care Centers
3.
Nurs Crit Care ; 26(5): 386-396, 2021 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33522036

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Delirium affects up to 80% of patients in intensive care units (ICUs) and is associated with higher mortality, physical dependence, and health care costs. The 2018 pain, agitation, delirium, immobility, and sleep guideline recommended ABCDEF care bundle for delirium prevention and management. However, limited information is available regarding the adoption of the care bundle in ICUs in Mainland China. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To assess the current implementation of the ABCDEF care bundle for delirium prevention as reported by ICU nurses in Mainland China. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study was conducted. METHODS: A cross-sectional online survey using a validated questionnaire about the practices of the ABCDEF care bundle was conducted among 334 registered nurses in 167 ICUs of 65 cities in Mainland China. RESULTS: Almost 50% of the sampled ICU nurses were unaware of the ABCDEF care bundle, though 86.83% of the surveyed ICUs implemented pain assessments and 95.51% implemented sedation assessments. Nearly half (46.41%) of the surveyed ICUs performed routine spontaneous awaking trials, with 21.26% performing them daily. Spontaneous breathing trials were performed in 38.32% of the surveyed ICUs. Only 47% of the surveyed ICUs routinely monitored patients for delirium. About one-third (38.35%) of the surveyed ICUs were supported by specialist teams that implemented the mobilization programmes. Most ICUs restricted the duration of family visits per day (<0.5 hour: 61.67%; 0.5-2 hours: 23.65%; >2 hours: 3.29%) and only 28.14% of the surveyed ICUs employed dedicated staff to support the families. CONCLUSIONS: Although most of the surveyed ICUs implemented pain and sedation assessments, many of them did not implement structured delirium assessments. Early mobilization programmes and family participation should be encouraged. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Promoting the uses of a reliable delirium assessment tool such as Confusion Assessment Method for Intensive Care Unit patients, building an early mobilization team, and engaging family caregivers in the care plan may contribute to improved patients' clinical outcomes.


Subject(s)
Delirium , Patient Care Bundles , Critical Care , Cross-Sectional Studies , Delirium/prevention & control , Humans , Intensive Care Units
4.
Intensive Crit Care Nurs ; 45: 85-90, 2018 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29158024

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To prepare the Simplified Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System (TISS-28) to measure nursing workload in Intensive Care Units in Guangdong Province of China. METHODS: A non-experimental descriptive study was conducted in the intensive care units in the Province. TISS-28, TISS-76, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II) were all measured. RESULTS: There were significant positive correlations between TISS-28 and APACHE II (n=91, r=0.432, p<0.001), TISS-76 scores (n=83, r=0.764, p<0.001). A significant difference was found between the mean TISS-28 score in the first day of the intensive care stay and the last day (30.76±6.86 vs 24.67±5.48, p<0.001). A significant intra-class correlation was found between TISS-28 scores collected by the researcher and research associates (ICC=0.959, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The reliability and validity of TISS-28 were shown in Chinese intensive care units. It is a practical tool for estimating the nursing workload and providing opportunities to compare the data between intensive care units in different facilities. The TISS-28 Chinese version is recommended to guide the allocation of nursing manpower in Chinese intensive care units.


Subject(s)
Critical Illness/nursing , Psychometrics/instrumentation , Psychometrics/methods , Therapeutics/classification , APACHE , Adult , Aged , China , Female , Humans , Intensive Care Units/organization & administration , Intensive Care Units/statistics & numerical data , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Male , Middle Aged , Reproducibility of Results , Severity of Illness Index , Therapeutics/standards , Translating , Workload/statistics & numerical data
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...