Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Cancer Radiother ; 11(3): 111-6, 2007 May.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17218137

ABSTRACT

AIMS: The head and neck tumors are most often associated with a precarious nutritional status. Radiotherapy increases the risk of denutrition because of its secondary effects on the secretory and sensorial mucous membranes. The purpose of our retrospectively study was to evaluate the interest of a precocious and regular nutritional therapy on the ability to maintain the nutritional status of the patient during the radiotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The fifty-two patients included in the survey have been classified retrospectively in two different groups based on their observance to the nutritional therapy: group 1 "good observance", group 2 "bad observance". RESULTS: The 31 patients of group 1 have lost an average of 1.9 kg by the end of the irradiation, whereas the 21 patients of group 2 have lost an average of 6.1 kg (p<0.001). The almost stability in weight of patients in group 1 was linked to a lower frequency of breaks in the radiotherapy (6 vs 33% p=0.03) and in a decrease in grade of inflammatory mucous membranes (10% of grade 3 in group 1 vs 52% in group 2, p=0.006). The quantity of calories ingested in form of nutritional supplements was greater in group 1 and consequently enabled patients to stabilized their weight (1200 calories in group 1 versus 850 calories in group 2, p<0.005). CONCLUSIONS: The given nutritional advice and the prescription of adapted nutritional supplements consequently allowed limiting efficiently the weight lost during the irradiation and the grade of mucositis. The systematization of a precocious nutritional therapy for patients irradiated for head and neck tumors seems absolutely essential.


Subject(s)
Head and Neck Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Nutrition Therapy , Body Weight , Energy Intake , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Mucositis/prevention & control , Prospective Studies
2.
Bull Cancer ; 88(10): 1007-18, 2001 Oct.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11713036

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: The "Standards, Options and Recommendations" (SOR) project, started in 1993, involves a collaboration between the Federation of the French Cancer Centres (FNCLCC), the 20 French Regional Cancer Centres, some French public university and general hospitals and private Clinics and medical scientific societies. Its main objective is the development of clinical practice guidelines to improve the quality of health care and outcome for cancer patients. The methodology is based on a literature review followed by a critical appraisal by a multidisciplinary group of experts to produce the draft guidelines which are then validated by specialists in cancer care delivery. OBJECTIVES: To develop clinical practice guidelines for hospital catering for cancer patient using the methodology developed by the Standards, Options and Recommendations project. METHODS: Data were identified by a literature search of Medline and the reference lists of experts in the groups. After the guidelines were drafted, they were validated by independent reviewers. RESULTS: The main recommendations are: 1) While taking into consideration the specific needs of cancer patients, the dietician is responsible for the hygiene, the sanitary quality of alimentation, the equilibrium and nutritional quality of the hospital catering. 2) Ordering and distribution of meals, and clearing up afterwards contribute to the quality of hospital catering and the personnel who do this should have time and be willing to listen to the patients. 3) The ordering of meals should be adapted to individual patient's requirements and must take into account the patient's medication. 4) The method of transporting the food chosen by the institution (cold or warm method) should be respected. The personnel responsible should receive regular and specific training to use the method correctly. 5) The intake of patients with nutritional follow-up should be reliably and reproducibly evaluated by the personnel after every meal. 6) Patient satisfaction should be assessed once a year and the results of this assessment used to improve the quality of hospital catering. 7) The dietician is the interface between the accounts department, the medical wards, the hospital catering department and the patients.


Subject(s)
Dietetics , Food Service, Hospital/standards , Neoplasms/complications , Nutritional Physiological Phenomena , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Adult , Aged , Humans , Hygiene , Middle Aged , Patient Satisfaction , Quality Control
3.
Bull Cancer ; 87(12): 917-26, 2000 Dec.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11174122

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: The "Standards, Options and Recommendations" (SOR) project, started in 1993, is a collaboration between the Federation of the French Cancer Centres (FNCL CC), the 20 French Cancer Centres and specialists from French Public Universities, General Hospitals and Private Clinics. The main objective is the development of clinical practice guidelines to improve the quality of health care and outcome for cancer patients. The methodology is based on literature review and critical appraisal by a multidisciplinary group of experts, with feed-back from specialists in cancer care delivery. OBJECTIVES: To develop clinical practice guidelines according to the definitions of Standards, Options and Recommendations for the dietetic consultation for cancer patient. METHODS: Data have been identified by literature search wing Medline and the expert groups personal reference lists. Once the guidelines were defined, the document was submitted for review to 74 independent reviewers, and to the medical committees of the 20 French Cancer Centres. RESULTS: The main recommendations for the referral of cancer patients for dietary advice are: I) in oncology, there are 3 types of dietetic consultation: diagnostic, preventive and therapeutic; 2) the following cancer patients must have a dietetic consultation: i) those with, or at risk of malnutrition, ii) those without malnutrition but in need of counseling and iii) those at risk of treatment-related nutritional side effects; 3) a nutritional assessment is standard at the time of the first dietetic consultation. Patients must be given individualized and written advice; 4) the dietetic opinion and advice should be brought to the attention of medical staff to facilitate a multidisciplinary approach to cancer treatment; 5) patient's relatives should be involved in the dietetic management; 6) the efficacy of dietetic advice can be assessed by monitoring weight, gastrointestinal signs and patient satisfaction.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms/complications , Nutrition Assessment , Nutrition Disorders/diet therapy , Adult , Humans , Nutrition Disorders/diagnosis , Nutrition Disorders/prevention & control , Patient Education as Topic , Professional Practice/standards
4.
Bull Cancer ; 86(10): 843-54, 1999 Oct.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10572235

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: The "Standards, Options and Recommendations" (SOR) project, started in 1993, is a collaboration between the Federation of the French Cancer Centres (FNCLCC), the 20 French Cancer Centres and specialists from French Public Universities, General Hospitals and Private Clinics. The main objective is the development of clinical practice guidelines to improve the quality of health care and outcome for cancer patients. The methodology is based on literature review and critical appraisal by a multidisciplinary group of experts, with feedback from specialists in cancer care delivery. OBJECTIVE: To develop clinical practice guidelines according to the definitions of Standards, Options and Recommandations for the nutritional management of the head and neck cancer patients. METHODS: Data have been identified by literature search using Medline and the expert groups personal reference lists. Once the guidelines were defined, the document was submitted for review to 121 independent reviewers, and to the medical committees of the 20 French Cancer Centres. RESULTS: The main recommendations for the nutritional management of head and neck cancer patients are that: 1) Nutritional management prevents undernutrition, improves quality of life, reduces adverse effects of the treatment and prevents treatment delay; 2) The nutritional management of the head and neck cancer patient must be done before, during and after cancer treatment; 3) Before treatment, the weight of the patient must be assessed: 10% of weight loss in 6 months requires to an urgent nutritional intervention; 4) During radiation therapy, feeding should be adapted to various characteristics such as swallowing mechanism, side effects of the treatment, age; 5) During chemotherapy, nutrition must be checked and assessed at each cycle; 6) During surgery, enteral feeding must be stopped and nasogastric feeding progressively introduced starting on day 1 post-operatively. The quality of feed must be adequate during all the healing period. Close surveillance of fever and regurgitation allows regular review of the amount and nature of enteral feed to be given; 7) The patients are given individualised and written advice at the end of treatment and the nutritional follow-up must be planned.


Subject(s)
Head and Neck Neoplasms/therapy , Nutritional Support , Age Factors , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Body Weight , Counseling , Deglutition/radiation effects , Enteral Nutrition , Feeding Methods , Fever/prevention & control , Follow-Up Studies , Head and Neck Neoplasms/drug therapy , Head and Neck Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Head and Neck Neoplasms/surgery , Humans , Multicenter Studies as Topic , Nutrition Assessment , Nutrition Disorders/prevention & control , Nutritional Sciences/education , Patient Education as Topic , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Quality of Life , Treatment Outcome , Vomiting/prevention & control , Weight Loss
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...