Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Iran J Pathol ; 17(4): 427-434, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36532638

ABSTRACT

Background & Objective: The TSH reference range's validity affects the thyroid dysfunction diagnosis. The primary objective of this study is to determine the reference range, which is established according to age and region. Methods: The data were collected retrospectively from people over the age of one who visited Motahari Clinic for routine health checkups between August 2017 and October 2019. TSH, T4, T3, personal drug usage, and thyroid history were collected. After excluding subjects with thyroid diseases and outliers, 1392 participants were analyzed. Hormone intervals of men and women ≥1 year old have been determined using the non-parametric method. Results: The non-disease subjects' TSH, T3, and T4 reference ranges were 0.64 to 5.94 lU/mL, 0.91 to 2.47 ng/dL, and 5.53 to 12.48 g/dL, respectively. According to this range, total thyroid dysfunction prevalence in our study in children was 8.94%. There was no significant difference between TSH, T4 level, and gender in the non-disease population (P=0.46 and 0.13, respectively), but there was a statistical difference between sex and T3 (P =0.03). Our study also illustrates that for subjects under 18 years old and older, the hormones (TSH, T3, T4) concentration are statistically different (P≤0.001). Conclusion: We found a statistically difference between hormone values younger and older than age 18 (P=≤0.01); therefore, it is not appropriate to use the same reference range for children younger than age 18 and adults. There was male predominance in the population aged1-18 years old.

2.
PLoS One ; 17(1): e0262774, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35061827

ABSTRACT

Recent studies on burnout (BO) have included both individual and situational factors, referred to as job-person fit (JPF). The present study aimed to evaluate the prevalence rate of BO in the hospital staff working at a tertiary referral hospital in southwest Iran and then to highlight the importance of the person in the context of his/her work life. This cross-sectional study was conducted in 2020 on all hospital staff using a three-part questionnaire comprised of personal and work-situational factors, the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), and the Psychological Empowerment Scale (PES). The partial least squares (PLS) path modelling and the neural network (NN) model were used to identify the significant variables within the BO dimensions. A total of 358 staff completed the questionnaire and were recruited for the study. Emotional exhaustion (EE) was seen in 137 medical staff (38.3%) and depersonalization (DP) was observed in 75 individuals (20.1%). Thinking about job change was the most important factor positively correlated with EE. Positive stress and work experience were among the most significant factors negatively associated with PA and DP, respectively. The hospital staff experienced BO in a way comparable to the national results. Work-situational and personal variables interacted with the three dimensions of BO in the hospital staff. More experienced staff also felt more accomplished and successful, resulting in the identification of a decreased level of DP and elevated PA.


Subject(s)
Burnout, Professional/epidemiology , Job Satisfaction , Personnel, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Tertiary Care Centers/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Burnout, Professional/etiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Educational Status , Female , Humans , Iran/epidemiology , Least-Squares Analysis , Male , Marital Status , Models, Statistical , Occupational Stress/epidemiology , Occupational Stress/etiology , Personnel Turnover/statistics & numerical data , Personnel, Hospital/psychology , Surveys and Questionnaires
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...