ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The reconstruction of surgical defects in high-tension anatomical regions is challenging due to the ischemia and subsequent necrosis associated with tension closure. Research on new flaps capable of closing these defects exerting less tension would be a tremendous advancement in dermatological surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, retrospective study that used 2 new flaps-the bishop and the sigma ones-to repair surgical defects in high-tension regions such as the scalp, lower extremities, and the nasal pyramid. The bishop flap was used in 9 patients, 5 of whom exhibited their lesion in the nasal pyramid, 2 in the legs and another 2 in the scalp. The sigma flap was used in 6 patients, 5 of whom exhibited scalp lesions and 1 leg lesion. RESULTS: Uneventful and excellent results were obtained in all 15 patients due to infection, dehiscence, or necrosis. CONCLUSIONS: Both the bishop and the sigma flaps are a good alternative to repair surgical defects in high-tension regions such as the scalp, lower extremities, or the nasal pyramid.
Subject(s)
Ear Diseases , Pain , Humans , Ear, External , Syndrome , Ear Diseases/diagnosis , Ear Diseases/etiologySubject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Head and Neck Neoplasms/pathology , Skin Neoplasms/pathology , Scalp/pathology , Neoplasm Staging , Follow-Up Studies , Retrospective StudiesSubject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Head and Neck Neoplasms/pathology , Skin Neoplasms/pathology , Scalp/pathology , Neoplasm Staging , Follow-Up Studies , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
ANTECEDENTES Y OBJETIVOS: La complejidad del tratamiento de la hidradenitis supurativa (HS) hace necesario un abordaje multidisciplinar, y con este fin diseñamos un comité quirúrgico para su abordaje. Este estudio describe las características clínicas de los pacientes evaluados y los resultados de las técnicas quirúrgicas realizadas. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Presentamos un estudio descriptivo transversal que recoge 104 pacientes que fueron evaluados en nuestro comité desde setiembre de 2015 hasta julio de 2018. RESULTADOS: En nuestra serie, el 46% de los pacientes con HS evaluados recibieron tratamiento quirúrgico. La mayoría fueron varones (73%), sin antecedentes familiares de HS (63%), exfumadores o fumadores (76%). El fenotipo clínico predominante fue el tipo III (41%), con presencia de patología grave en la mayor parte de los casos (36% con Hurley II y 46% con Hurley III). Las áreas anatómicas más afectadas fueron las axilas (51,9%) y las ingles (41,3%); mientras que las intervenidas con mayor frecuencia fueron la axilar (38,3%), seguida de la glútea (23,4%). Entre los tratamientos médicos, el más usado fue la combinación de rifampicina con clindamicina. El destechamiento (deroofing) se posicionó como la técnica quirúrgica más empleada entre los pacientes intervenidos (hasta en un 48%). En cuanto al resultado posquirúrgico global: un 63,4% obtuvo un resultado satisfactorio, un 20% recidivó y un 12% presentó dehiscencia de la herida quirúrgica. CONCLUSIONES: Dada nuestra experiencia, recomendamos la instauración de comités multidisciplinares para mejorar la comunicación entre los diferentes especialistas, así como individualizar el tratamiento y mejorar el seguimiento de los pacientes con HS
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The complexity of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) treatment calls for a multidisciplinary approach. We therefore created a multidisciplinary team to manage surgical care. This study aimed to describe the clinical characteristics of the patients we evaluated and the outcomes of the surgical techniques used. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Descriptive cross-sectional study of 104 patients evaluated by our surgical case management team between September 2015 and July 2018. RESULTS: Surgery was used to treat 46% of the patients with HS who were evaluated. Most were men (73%) with no family history of HS (63%) and smokers or former smokers (76%). Gluteal HS comprised the largest phenotype group (41%) and the majority of cases were serious (Hurley stage II, 36%; stage III, 46%). The anatomical regions with the largest number of lesions were the axillae (51.9%) and the groin (41.3%). Surgery was most often performed in the axilla (38.3%), followed by the gluteus (23.4%). The most common drug treatment was a combination of rifampicin and clindamycin, Deroofing was the technique used most often (in 48% of the patients who underwent surgery). Postoperative outcomes were assessed as satisfactory overall in 63.4% of the cases. The HS lesion recurred in 20% and 12% developed wound dehiscence. CONCLUSIONS: Our experience leads us to recommend forming multidisciplinary teams to improve communication between specialists, provide tailored treatment for the patient with HS, and improve follow-up
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Hidradenitis Suppurativa/surgery , Severity of Illness Index , Follow-Up Studies , Cross-Sectional StudiesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The complexity of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) treatment calls for a multidisciplinary approach. We therefore created a multidisciplinary team to manage surgical care. This study aimed to describe the clinical characteristics of the patients we evaluated and the outcomes of the surgical techniques used. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Descriptive cross-sectional study of 104 patients evaluated by our surgical case management team between September 2015 and July 2018. RESULTS: Surgery was used to treat 46% of the patients with HS who were evaluated. Most were men (73%) with no family history of HS (63%) and smokers or former smokers (76%). Gluteal HS comprised the largest phenotype group (41%) and the majority of cases were serious (Hurley stage II, 36%; stage III, 46%). The anatomical regions with the largest number of lesions were the axillae (51.9%) and the groin (41.3%). Surgery was most often performed in the axilla (38.3%), followed by the gluteus (23.4%). The most common drug treatment was a combination of rifampicin and clindamycin, Deroofing was the technique used most often (in 48% of the patients who underwent surgery). Postoperative outcomes were assessed as satisfactory overall in 63.4% of the cases. The HS lesion recurred in 20% and 12% developed wound dehiscence. CONCLUSIONS: Our experience leads us to recommend forming multidisciplinary teams to improve communication between specialists, provide tailored treatment for the patient with HS, and improve follow-up.
