Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 16 de 16
Filter
Add more filters










Publication year range
3.
Neurologia (Engl Ed) ; 36(7): 531-536, 2021 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34099423

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic has had an impact on ischaemic stroke management, with a reported decrease in hospital admissions, and even disruptions in healthcare and increased in-hospital mortality. However, there is a lack of evidence on the impact of the pandemic on functional prognosis. The aim of this study is to analyse the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on the 3-month functional outcomes of patients hospitalised due to acute ischaemic stroke in Aragon (Spain). METHODS: We reviewed the data of all patients admitted due to ischaemic stroke to any hospital in our regional healthcare system between 30 December 2019 and 3 May 2020. We compared modified Rankin Scale scores and mortality at 3 months in patients hospitalised before and after the declaration of a state of emergency due to the COVID-19 pandemic. RESULTS: In total, 318 patients with acute ischaemic stroke met our inclusion criteria. No differences were observed between periods in global or specific characteristics, with the exception of a higher proportion of patients older than 80 years during the first period (42.2% vs 29.0%, P = .028). In the comparative analysis, we found no significant differences in mortality (12.3 vs 7.9, P = .465) or in the proportion of patients with modified Rankin Scale scores ≤ 2 (57.7% vs 57.1%, P = .425) at 3 months. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the first study to analyse the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on the 3-month functional outcomes of patients with ischaemic stroke. In our region, there has been no increase in rates of mortality or disability at 3 months in patients admitted due to ischaemic stroke during the pandemic.


Subject(s)
Brain Ischemia , COVID-19 , Ischemic Stroke , Stroke , Brain Ischemia/epidemiology , Humans , Pandemics , Prognosis , SARS-CoV-2 , Stroke/epidemiology , Treatment Outcome
4.
Rev. neurol. (Ed. impr.) ; 72(11): 377-383, Jun 1, 2021. tab
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-227881

ABSTRACT

Introducción: La adhesión al tratamiento preventivo oral (TPO) en la migraña se ve frecuentemente comprometida. El objetivo fue conocer el grado de adhesión al TPO en pacientes con migraña a los tres meses. Pacientes y métodos: Estudio multicéntrico observacional de pacientes diagnosticados de migraña episódica o crónica (criterios de la Clasificación Internacional de Cefaleas, tercera edición) en los que se iniciaba TPO. Se recogieron datos demográficos (edad, género, nivel estudios, estado civil) y de enfermedad (número de ataques, puntuación en las escalas Headache Impact Test-6 y Migraine Disability Assessment Scale). A los tres meses se pasó la escala de Morisky Green, que diferencia niveles de adhesión: excelente (0), moderada (1-2) y baja (3-4). Resultados: Participaron 100 pacientes, un 87% mujeres de 42 ± 13 años, el 14% con migraña crónica. El 53,2% comenzaba su primer TPO. Se iniciaron betabloqueantes en el 23,2%, antidepresivos tricíclicos en el 35,4%, flunaricina en el 21,2%, neuromoduladores en el 19,2% y antihipertensivos en el 1%. El 56% presentaba discapacidad grave y el 79,5%, impacto muy grave. La adhesión a los tres meses fue excelente en el 41,8%, moderada en el 28,6% y baja en el 29,6%. El motivo más frecuente de discontinuación fueron los efectos adversos (44%). Se encontró una relación significativa entre adhesión excelente y estado civil soltero (p = 0,046), y entre adhesión baja y efectos adversos (p = 0,009). No se encontraron diferencias significativas entre los TPO empleados y el grado de adhesión ni con el resto de variables estudiadas. Conclusiones: Aunque nuestros resultados son mejores que los publicados en la bibliografía, consideramos que la adhesión terapéutica en nuestro medio es baja y es prioritario educar a nuestros pacientes en este sentido.(AU)


Introduction: Adherence to oral preventive treatment (OPT) in migraine is often compromised. The aim was to determine the degree of adherence to OPT in migraine patients at three months. Patients and methods: We conducted a multicentre observational study of patients diagnosed with episodic or chronic migraine (criteria of the International Headache Classification, third edition) in whom OPT was initiated. Demographic data (age, gender, educational level, marital status) and disease data (number of attacks, Headache Impact Test-6 and Migraine Disability Assessment Scale scores) were collected. At three months, the Morisky-Green scale was administered, which differentiates levels of adherence: excellent (0), moderate (1-2) and low (3-4). Results: Altogether 100 patients participated in the study: 87% women aged 42 ± 13 years, 14% with chronic migraine; 53.2% of them were beginning their first OPT. Beta-blockers were initiated in 23.2%, tricyclic antidepressants in 35.4%, flunarizine in 21.2%, neuromodulators in 19.2% and antihypertensives in 1%. Severe disability was observed in 56%, and the impact was very severe in 79.5%. Adhesion at three months was excellent in 41.8%, moderate in 28.6% and low in 29.6%. The most frequent reason for discontinuing was the occurrence of adverse effects (44%). A significant relationship was found between excellent adherence and being single (p = 0.046), and between low adherence and adverse effects (p = 0.009). No significant differences were found between the OPT used and the degree of adherence or the other variables studied. Conclusions: Although our results are better than those published in the literature, we consider that therapeutic adherence in our setting is low and educating our patients in this regard is a priority.(AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Migraine Disorders/drug therapy , Patient Compliance , Treatment Adherence and Compliance , Headache , Neurology , Nervous System Diseases , Migraine Disorders/epidemiology
5.
Rev Neurol ; 72(11): 377-383, 2021 Jun 01.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34042166

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Adherence to oral preventive treatment (OPT) in migraine is often compromised. The aim was to determine the degree of adherence to OPT in migraine patients at three months. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a multicentre observational study of patients diagnosed with episodic or chronic migraine (criteria of the International Headache Classification, third edition) in whom OPT was initiated. Demographic data (age, gender, educational level, marital status) and disease data (number of attacks, Headache Impact Test-6 and Migraine Disability Assessment Scale scores) were collected. At three months, the Morisky-Green scale was administered, which differentiates levels of adherence: excellent (0), moderate (1-2) and low (3-4). RESULTS: Altogether 100 patients participated in the study: 87% women aged 42 ± 13 years, 14% with chronic migraine; 53.2% of them were beginning their first OPT. Beta-blockers were initiated in 23.2%, tricyclic antidepressants in 35.4%, flunarizine in 21.2%, neuromodulators in 19.2% and antihypertensives in 1%. Severe disability was observed in 56%, and the impact was very severe in 79.5%. Adhesion at three months was excellent in 41.8%, moderate in 28.6% and low in 29.6%. The most frequent reason for discontinuing was the occurrence of adverse effects (44%). A significant relationship was found between excellent adherence and being single (p = 0.046), and between low adherence and adverse effects (p = 0.009). No significant differences were found between the OPT used and the degree of adherence or the other variables studied. CONCLUSIONS: Although our results are better than those published in the literature, we consider that therapeutic adherence in our setting is low and educating our patients in this regard is a priority.


TITLE: Grado de cumplimiento terapéutico a los tres meses en pacientes con migraña.Introducción. La adhesión al tratamiento preventivo oral (TPO) en la migraña se ve frecuentemente comprometida. El objetivo fue conocer el grado de adhesión al TPO en pacientes con migraña a los tres meses. Pacientes y métodos. Estudio multicéntrico observacional de pacientes diagnosticados de migraña episódica o crónica (criterios de la Clasificación Internacional de Cefaleas, tercera edición) en los que se iniciaba TPO. Se recogieron datos demográficos (edad, género, nivel estudios, estado civil) y de enfermedad (número de ataques, puntuación en las escalas Headache Impact Test-6 y Migraine Disability Assessment Scale). A los tres meses se pasó la escala de Morisky Green, que diferencia niveles de adhesión: excelente (0), moderada (1-2) y baja (3-4). Resultados. Participaron 100 pacientes, un 87% mujeres de 42 ± 13 años, el 14% con migraña crónica. El 53,2% comenzaba su primer TPO. Se iniciaron betabloqueantes en el 23,2%, antidepresivos tricíclicos en el 35,4%, flunaricina en el 21,2%, neuromoduladores en el 19,2% y antihipertensivos en el 1%. El 56% presentaba discapacidad grave y el 79,5%, impacto muy grave. La adhesión a los tres meses fue excelente en el 41,8%, moderada en el 28,6% y baja en el 29,6%. El motivo más frecuente de discontinuación fueron los efectos adversos (44%). Se encontró una relación significativa entre adhesión excelente y estado civil soltero (p = 0,046), y entre adhesión baja y efectos adversos (p = 0,009). No se encontraron diferencias significativas entre los TPO empleados y el grado de adhesión ni con el resto de variables estudiadas. Conclusiones. Aunque nuestros resultados son mejores que los publicados en la bibliografía, consideramos que la adhesión terapéutica en nuestro medio es baja y es prioritario educar a nuestros pacientes en este sentido.


Subject(s)
Medication Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Migraine Disorders/prevention & control , Administration, Oral , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Time Factors
6.
Neurologia ; 36(7): 531-536, 2021 Sep.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38620471

ABSTRACT

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic has had an impact on ischaemic stroke management, with a reported decrease in hospital admissions, and even disruptions in healthcare and increased in-hospital mortality. However, there is a lack of evidence on the impact of the pandemic on functional prognosis. The aim of this study is to analyse the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on the 3-month functional outcomes of patients hospitalised due to acute ischaemic stroke in Aragon (Spain). Materil and methods: We reviewed the data of all patients admitted due to ischaemic stroke to any hospital in our regional healthcare system between 30 December 2019 and 3 May 2020. We compared modified Rankin Scale scores and mortality at 3 months in patients hospitalised before and after the declaration of a state of emergency due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Results: In total, 318 patients with acute ischaemic stroke met our inclusion criteria. No differences were observed between periods in global or specific characteristics, with the exception of a higher proportion of patients older than 80 years during the first period (42.2% vs. 29.0%, P=.028). In the comparative analysis, we found no significant differences in mortality (12.3 vs. 7.9, P=.465) or in the proportion of patients with modified Rankin Scale scores ≤ 2 (57.7% vs. 57.1%, P=.425) at 3 months. Conclusion: To our knowledge, this is the first study to analyse the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on the 3-month functional outcomes of patients with ischaemic stroke. In our region, there has been no increase in rates of mortality or disability at 3 months in patients admitted due to ischaemic stroke during the pandemic.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...