Critical pathway for deceased donors: An analysis in three regions of Colombia / Ruta crítica de donantes fallecidos: un análisis de tres regiones en Colombia

Introduction. The critical pathway for deceased donation offers a methodical framework for guiding the donation process. It not only serves to assess performance but also to identify areas of potential improvement. Therefore, the identification and selection of potential organ donors (POD) is a key process. This study aims to describe the critical pathway for deceased donation in a cohort of POD in three regions (CRT1, CRT2, and CRT5) of Colombia. Methods. We retrospectively reviewed data of POD assessed from January 2022 to December 2022. General characteristics of POD, diagnosis, contraindication causes, and organ procurement were described. Analysis was conducted using the Chi-squared test for categorical variables and the Mann-Whitney test for quantitative variables. Results. Within the cohort of 1451 assessed POD, 441 (30.3%) were diagnosed with brain death. Among potential donors after brain death, 198 (44.9%) were eligible donors (medically suitable). Of these, 157 donors (79.3%) became actual donors (undergoing operative incision for organ recovery), with 147 (93,6 %) having at least one organ recovered (actual donors with organ recovery). Ultimately, 411 utilized organs were utilized. Additionally, there were observed differences in the characteristics of donors from different regions. Conclusion. This study reports the critical pathway for deceased donation in a cohort of POD in three regions of Colombia. This provides useful information and helps to gain insight and understanding into the process of organ donation and organ procurement in order to take actions that could improve the donation rates.

Introducción. La ruta crítica de donantes fallecidos permite un enfoque sistemático para la donación de riñón, y, proporciona una herramienta para evaluar el rendimiento de áreas de mejora potencial. La selección de posibles donantes de órganos (PDO) es un proceso clave. El objetivo de este estudio fue describir la ruta crítica para la donación de fallecidos en una cohorte de PDO en tres regiones de Colombia. Métodos. Estudio retrospectivo de PDO evaluados durante 2022. Se describieron las características generales de los PDO, el diagnóstico y las causas de contraindicación. El análisis se llevó a cabo utilizando la prueba de Chi-cuadrado para las variables categóricas y la prueba de Mann-Whitney para las variables cuantitativas. Resultados. Entre los 1451 POD evaluados, 441 (30,3 %) fueron diagnosticados con muerte cerebral. De los posibles donantes después de la muerte cerebral, 198 (44,9 %) fueron donantes elegibles (adecuados desde el punto de vista médico). Entre ellos, 157 donantes (79,3 %) fueron donantes reales (en quienes se realizó una incisión operatoria con la intención de recuperar órganos) y 147 (93,6 %) tuvieron al menos un órgano recuperado (donantes reales con recuperación de órganos). Finalmente, se identificaron 411 órganos utilizados. Conclusión. Este estudio reporta la ruta crítica para la donación de fallecidos en una cohorte de POD en tres regiones de Colombia. Esto proporciona información útil, ayuda a obtener conocimientos y comprender el proceso de donación y obtención de órganos, para tomar medidas que puedan mejorar las tasas de donación.

Understanding the dynamics of deceased organ donation and utilization in Colombia / Examen de la dinámica de la donación y utilización de órganos de personas fallecidas en Colombia / Entendendo a dinâmica da doação e do aproveitamento de órgãos de pessoas falecidas na Colômbia

[ABSTRACT]. Objective. To obtain a comprehensive overview of organ donation, organ utilization, and discard in the entire donation process in Colombia. Methods. A retrospective study of 1 451 possible donors, distributed in three regions of Colombia, evaluated in 2022. The general characteristics, diagnosis, and causes of contraindication for potential donors were described. Results. Among the 1 451 possible donors, 441 (30.4%) fulfilled brain death criteria, constituting the potential donor pool. Families consented to organ donation in 141 medically suitable cases, while 60 instances utilized legal presumption, leading to 201 eligible donors (13.9%). Of those, 160 (11.0%) were actual donors (in whom operative incision was made with the intent of organ recovery or who had at least one organ recovered). Finally, we identified 147 utilized donors (10.1%) (from whom at least one organ was transplanted). Statistically significant differences were found between age, sex, diagnosis of brain death, and donor critical pathway between regions. A total of 411 organs were transplanted from 147 utilized donors, with kidneys being the most frequently procured and transplanted organs, accounting for 280 (68.1%) of the total. This was followed by 85 livers (20.7%), 31 hearts (7.5%), 14 lungs (3.4%), and 1 pancreas (0.2%). The discard rate of procured deceased donors was 8.1%. Conclusions. About one-tenth of donors are effectively used for transplantation purposes. Our findings high- light areas of success and challenges, providing a basis for future improvements in Colombia.

[RESUMEN]. Objetivo. Presentar una descripción integral de la donación, utilización y descarte de órganos en todo el proceso de donación en Colombia. Métodos. Estudio retrospectivo de 1 451 donantes posibles, distribuidos en tres regiones de Colombia, que fueron evaluados en el 2022. Se describen las características generales, el diagnóstico y las causas de contraindicación de los donantes potenciales. Resultados. De los 1 451 donantes posibles, 441 (30,4%) cumplían con los criterios de muerte encefálica y constituyeron el conjunto de donantes potenciales. Las familias consintieron la donación de órganos en 141 casos aptos desde el punto de vista médico, mientras que en 60 casos se recurrió a la presunción legal, con lo que se llegó a 201 donantes aptos (13,9%). De estos, 160 (11,0%) fueron donantes reales (en los que se les practicó una incisión quirúrgica para la extracción de órganos o se obtuvo al menos un órgano). En última instancia, hubo 147 donantes utilizados (10,1%) (de los que se trasplantó al menos un órgano). Se observaron diferencias estadísticamente significativas entre las regiones en cuanto a edad, sexo, diagnóstico de muerte encefálica y vía crítica del donante. Se trasplantaron un total de 411 órganos procedentes de 147 donantes utilizados; los riñones fueron los órganos obtenidos y trasplantados con mayor frecuencia, ya que supusieron 280 (68,1%) del total de órganos, seguidos del hígado (85, 20,7%), el corazón (31 , 7,5%), los pulmones (14, 3,4%) y el páncreas (1, 0,2%). La tasa de descarte de los donantes fallecidos disponibles fue del 8,1%. Conclusiones. Aproximadamente una décima parte de los donantes son utilizados, de hecho, para realizar trasplantes. Estos datos destacan las áreas en las que se han obtenido buenos resultados y aquellas en las que se presentan desafíos, lo cual proporciona una base para futuras mejoras en Colombia.

[RESUMO]. Objetivo. Obter uma visão geral e abrangente da doação, do aproveitamento e do descarte de órgãos em todo o processo de doação na Colômbia. Métodos. Estudo retrospectivo de 1 451 possíveis doadores em três regiões da Colômbia que foram avalia- dos em 2022. Foram descritas as características gerais, o diagnóstico e os motivos para a contraindicação de potenciais doadores. Resultados. Dentre os 1 451 possíveis doadores, 441 (30,4%) preencheram os critérios de morte encefálica, formando o grupo de potenciais doadores. Em 141 casos considerados clinicamente aptos, as famílias con- sentiram com a doação de órgãos, e em 60 casos utilizou-se o princípio da presunção legal, resultando em 201 doadores elegíveis (13,9%). Desses, 160 (11,0%) foram doadores efetivos (ou seja, doadores nos quais foi feita uma incisão cirúrgica com a intenção de remover um órgão ou pessoas com pelo menos um órgão removido). Por fim, foram identificados 147 doadores utilizados (10,1%) (ou seja, que doaram pelo menos um órgão que foi transplantado). Foram encontradas diferenças estatisticamente significantes entre idade, sexo, diagnóstico de morte encefálica e itinerário crítico de doação entre as regiões. Um total de 411 órgãos foram transplantados de 147 doadores utilizados. Os rins foram os órgãos mais frequentemente removidos e transplantados, representando 280 (68,1%) do total, seguido de 85 fígados (20,7%), 31 corações (7,5%), 14 pulmões (3,4%) e 1 pâncreas (0,2%). A taxa de descarte de doadores falecidos com órgãos removidos foi de 8,1%. Conclusões. Cerca de um décimo dos doadores são efetivamente usados para fins de transplante. Nossos achados destacam áreas de sucesso e desafios, oferecendo uma base para futuras melhorias na Colômbia.

Understanding the dynamics of deceased organ donation and utilization in Colombia.

Objective: To obtain a comprehensive overview of organ donation, organ utilization, and discard in the entire donation process in Colombia. Methods: A retrospective study of 1 451 possible donors, distributed in three regions of Colombia, evaluated in 2022. The general characteristics, diagnosis, and causes of contraindication for potential donors were described. Results: Among the 1 451 possible donors, 441 (30.4%) fulfilled brain death criteria, constituting the potential donor pool. Families consented to organ donation in 141 medically suitable cases, while 60 instances utilized legal presumption, leading to 201 eligible donors (13.9%). Of those, 160 (11.0%) were actual donors (in whom operative incision was made with the intent of organ recovery or who had at least one organ recovered). Finally, we identified 147 utilized donors (10.1%) (from whom at least one organ was transplanted). Statistically significant differences were found between age, sex, diagnosis of brain death, and donor critical pathway between regions. A total of 411 organs were transplanted from 147 utilized donors, with kidneys being the most frequently procured and transplanted organs, accounting for 280 (68.1%) of the total. This was followed by 85 livers (20.7%), 31 hearts (7.5%), 14 lungs (3.4%), and 1 pancreas (0.2%). The discard rate of procured deceased donors was 8.1%. Conclusions: About one-tenth of donors are effectively used for transplantation purposes. Our findings highlight areas of success and challenges, providing a basis for future improvements in Colombia.

Relación entre la compatibilidad del HLA y la pérdida del injerto en trasplante renal de donante cadavérico: Un análisis por propensity score matching en Colombia / Relationship between HLA compatibility and graft loss in renal transplant from a deceased donor: An analysis by propensity score matching in Colombia

Introducción. En Colombia, solo un 24 % de los pacientes en lista recibieron un trasplante renal, la mayoría de donante cadavérico. Para la asignación de órganos se considera el HLA A-B-DR, pero la evidencia reciente sugiere que el HLA A-B no está asociado con los desenlaces del trasplante. El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar la relevancia del HLA A-B-DR en la sobrevida del injerto de los receptores de trasplante renal. Métodos. Estudio de cohorte retrospectivo que incluyó pacientes trasplantados renales con donante cadavérico en Colombiana de Trasplantes, desde 2008 a 2023. Se aplicó un propensity score matching (PSM) para ajustar las covariables en grupos de comparación por compatibilidad y se evaluó la relación del HLA A-B-DR con la sobrevida del injerto renal por medio de la prueba de log rank y la regresión de Cox. Resultados. Se identificaron 1337 pacientes transplantados renales, de los cuales fueron mujeres un 38,7 %, con mediana de edad de 47 años y de índice de masa corporal de 23,8 kg/m2. Tras ajustar por PSM las covariables para los grupos de comparación, la compatibilidad del HLA A-B no se relacionó significativamente con la pérdida del injerto, con HR de 0,99 (IC95% 0,71-1,37) para HLA A y 0,75 (IC95% 0,55-1,02) para HLA B. Solo la compatibilidad por HLA DR fue significativa para pérdida del injerto con un HR de 0,67 (IC95% 0,46-0,98). Conclusión. Este estudio sugiere que la compatibilidad del HLA A-B no influye significativamente en la pérdida del injerto, mientras que la compatibilidad del HLA DR sí mejora la sobrevida del injerto en trasplante renal con donante cadavérico

Introduction. In Colombia, only 24% of patients on the waiting list received a renal transplant, most of them from cadaveric donors. HLA A-B-DR is considered for organ allocation, but recent evidence suggests that HLA A-B is not associated with transplant outcomes. The objective of this study was to evaluate the relevance of HLA A-B-DR on graft survival in kidney transplant recipients. Methods. Retrospective cohort study that included kidney transplant recipients with a cadaveric donor in Colombiana de Trasplantes from 2008 to 2023. A propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to adjust the covariates in comparison groups for compatibility, and the relationship of HLA A-B-DR with kidney graft survival was evaluated using the log rank test and Cox regression. Results. A total of 1337 kidney transplant patients were identified; of those, 38.7% were female, with median age of 47 years, and BMI 23.8 kg/m2. After adjusting the covariates with PSM for the comparison groups, HLA A-B matching was not significantly related to graft loss, with HR of 0.99 (95% CI 0.71-1.37) and 0.75 (95% CI 0.55-1.02), respectively. Only HLA DR matching was significant for graft loss with an HR of 0.67 (95% CI 0.46-0.98). Conclusions. This study suggests that HLA A-B matching does not significantly influence graft loss, whereas HLA DR matching does improve graft survival in renal transplantation with a cadaveric donor.

Understanding the dynamics of deceased organ donation and utilization in Colombia / Examen de la dinámica de la donación y utilización de órganos de personas fallecidas en Colombia / Entendendo a dinâmica da doação e do aproveitamento de órgãos de pessoas falecidas na Colômbia

ABSTRACT Objective. To obtain a comprehensive overview of organ donation, organ utilization, and discard in the entire donation process in Colombia. Methods. A retrospective study of 1 451 possible donors, distributed in three regions of Colombia, evaluated in 2022. The general characteristics, diagnosis, and causes of contraindication for potential donors were described. Results. Among the 1 451 possible donors, 441 (30.4%) fulfilled brain death criteria, constituting the potential donor pool. Families consented to organ donation in 141 medically suitable cases, while 60 instances utilized legal presumption, leading to 201 eligible donors (13.9%). Of those, 160 (11.0%) were actual donors (in whom operative incision was made with the intent of organ recovery or who had at least one organ recovered). Finally, we identified 147 utilized donors (10.1%) (from whom at least one organ was transplanted). Statistically significant differences were found between age, sex, diagnosis of brain death, and donor critical pathway between regions. A total of 411 organs were transplanted from 147 utilized donors, with kidneys being the most frequently procured and transplanted organs, accounting for 280 (68.1%) of the total. This was followed by 85 livers (20.7%), 31 hearts (7.5%), 14 lungs (3.4%), and 1 pancreas (0.2%). The discard rate of procured deceased donors was 8.1%. Conclusions. About one-tenth of donors are effectively used for transplantation purposes. Our findings highlight areas of success and challenges, providing a basis for future improvements in Colombia.

RESUMEN Objetivo. Presentar una descripción integral de la donación, utilización y descarte de órganos en todo el proceso de donación en Colombia. Métodos. Estudio retrospectivo de 1 451 donantes posibles, distribuidos en tres regiones de Colombia, que fueron evaluados en el 2022. Se describen las características generales, el diagnóstico y las causas de contraindicación de los donantes potenciales. Resultados. De los 1 451 donantes posibles, 441 (30,4%) cumplían con los criterios de muerte encefálica y constituyeron el conjunto de donantes potenciales. Las familias consintieron la donación de órganos en 141 casos aptos desde el punto de vista médico, mientras que en 60 casos se recurrió a la presunción legal, con lo que se llegó a 201 donantes aptos (13,9%). De estos, 160 (11,0%) fueron donantes reales (en los que se les practicó una incisión quirúrgica para la extracción de órganos o se obtuvo al menos un órgano). En última instancia, hubo 147 donantes utilizados (10,1%) (de los que se trasplantó al menos un órgano). Se observaron diferencias estadísticamente significativas entre las regiones en cuanto a edad, sexo, diagnóstico de muerte encefálica y vía crítica del donante. Se trasplantaron un total de 411 órganos procedentes de 147 donantes utilizados; los riñones fueron los órganos obtenidos y trasplantados con mayor frecuencia, ya que supusieron 280 (68,1%) del total de órganos, seguidos del hígado (85, 20,7%), el corazón (31 , 7,5%), los pulmones (14, 3,4%) y el páncreas (1, 0,2%). La tasa de descarte de los donantes fallecidos disponibles fue del 8,1%. Conclusiones. Aproximadamente una décima parte de los donantes son utilizados, de hecho, para realizar trasplantes. Estos datos destacan las áreas en las que se han obtenido buenos resultados y aquellas en las que se presentan desafíos, lo cual proporciona una base para futuras mejoras en Colombia.

RESUMO Objetivo. Obter uma visão geral e abrangente da doação, do aproveitamento e do descarte de órgãos em todo o processo de doação na Colômbia. Métodos. Estudo retrospectivo de 1 451 possíveis doadores em três regiões da Colômbia que foram avaliados em 2022. Foram descritas as características gerais, o diagnóstico e os motivos para a contraindicação de potenciais doadores. Resultados. Dentre os 1 451 possíveis doadores, 441 (30,4%) preencheram os critérios de morte encefálica, formando o grupo de potenciais doadores. Em 141 casos considerados clinicamente aptos, as famílias consentiram com a doação de órgãos, e em 60 casos utilizou-se o princípio da presunção legal, resultando em 201 doadores elegíveis (13,9%). Desses, 160 (11,0%) foram doadores efetivos (ou seja, doadores nos quais foi feita uma incisão cirúrgica com a intenção de remover um órgão ou pessoas com pelo menos um órgão removido). Por fim, foram identificados 147 doadores utilizados (10,1%) (ou seja, que doaram pelo menos um órgão que foi transplantado). Foram encontradas diferenças estatisticamente significantes entre idade, sexo, diagnóstico de morte encefálica e itinerário crítico de doação entre as regiões. Um total de 411 órgãos foram transplantados de 147 doadores utilizados. Os rins foram os órgãos mais frequentemente removidos e transplantados, representando 280 (68,1%) do total, seguido de 85 fígados (20,7%), 31 corações (7,5%), 14 pulmões (3,4%) e 1 pâncreas (0,2%). A taxa de descarte de doadores falecidos com órgãos removidos foi de 8,1%. Conclusões. Cerca de um décimo dos doadores são efetivamente usados para fins de transplante. Nossos achados destacam áreas de sucesso e desafios, oferecendo uma base para futuras melhorias na Colômbia.

Is Non-Adherence Associated with Adverse Outcomes in Kidney Transplant Recipients? The Role of Non-Adherence as a Risk and Predictor Factor for Graft Loss and Death.

Introduction:  Non-adherence in kidney transplants is diversely defined. Immunosuppression non-adherence (INA) is the most used definition and has been associated with graft loss and acute rejection. But INA assesses only one fraction of adherence. Therefore, we analyzed the association of a holistic non-adherence definition with transplant outcomes and compared its prediction performance with other definitions. Methods:  We retrospectively included 739 kidney recipients between 2019 and 2021. We evaluated holistic non-adherence (HNA), suboptimal-immunosuppressor levels (SIL), appointment non-adherence (ANA), procedure non-adherence (PNA) and INA. The main outcomes were graft loss, graft rejection, and mortality. A backward logistic regression was performed estimating adjusted and un-adjusted odds ratio (OR) for each outcome. Finally, we compared the non-adherence definitions' prediction for the main outcomes using the area under the curve. Results: HNA was present in 28.7% of patients. Non-adherent patients had an adjusted OR of 2.66 (1.37-5.15) for mortality, 6.44 for graft loss (2.71-16.6), and 2.28 (1.15-4.47) for graft rejection. INA and PNA presented a moderate discrimination for graft loss and HNA and ANA mild-to-moderate discrimination for graft loss and death. Conclusion: Holistic non-adherence was associated with worst outcomes in kidney recipients and had a significant prediction performance for graft loss and mortality.

Prevalence and Modifiable Factors for Holistic Non-Adherence in Renal Transplant Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Introduction: In renal transplant recipients, compliance with medical therapy is vital. Non-adherence is considered a risk factor for worst outcomes in kidney recipients, with attributed outcomes of 64% for graft loss and 80% for late acute rejection. Most literature defines adherence as self-based immunosuppression compliance but does not consider other relevant factors such as consult and procedure compliance. Therefore, this study aims to describe adherence prevalence in kidney transplant recipients and the factors related to non-adherence. Methods: This cross-sectional study included 1030 renal transplant patients followed by Colombiana de Trasplantes between January 2019 and July 2021. Sociodemographic and clinical variables were obtained based on clinical records. The mental-health group diagnosed holistic adherence in a semi-structured interview. The diagnosis considered medication intake failure, frequency and number of failures to medical controls or other procedures, suspicious non-adherence behaviors, and serum levels of immunosuppressants. A bivariate followed a descriptive analysis, and a forward logistic regression was performed for non-adherence. Results: Patients had a median of 47 years, and 58.1% were male. Non-adherence was presented in 30.7% of patients. The non-adherence patients were younger, with a higher prevalence of males, single, divided transplant care, had a longer time after transplantation, psychopathological diagnosis, and more reinforcement education by only nursing. Older age and multidisciplinary reinforcement education were protective factors. On the other hand, poor social support, psychopathology diagnosis, and longer time after transplant presented as non-adherence risk factors. Conclusion: Holistic non-adherence was diagnosed in approximately one-third of renal transplant recipients. Its definition included more than just medication non-compliance and could identify more non-adherent patients. Notably, there is a need to consider the related factors in the health follow-up and encourage future research in modifiable factor interventions aiming to increase adherence and achieve better outcomes for renal transplant patients.

Predicting 5-year survival after kidney transplantation in Colombia using the survival benefit estimator tool.

INTRODUCTION: A complex relationship between donor and recipient characteristics influences kidney transplant (KT) success. A tool developed by Bae S. et al. (Survival Benefit Estimator, SBE) helps estimate post-KT survival. We aim to evaluate the predictive performance of the SBE tool in terms of 5-year patient survival after a kidney transplant. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of all deceased-donor KT recipients between January 2009 to December 2021. A descriptive analysis of clinical and sociodemographic characteristics was performed. The SBE online tool was used to calculate the predicted patient survival (PPS) and the survival benefit at five years post-KT. Comparisons between predictive vs. actual patient survival were made using quintile subgroups. Three Cox regression models were built using PPS, EPTS, and KDPI. RESULTS: A total of 1145 recipients were evaluated. Mortality occurred in 157 patients. Patient survival was 86.2%. Predictive survival for patients if they remained on the waiting list was 70.6%. The PPS was 89.3%, which results in a survival benefit (SB) of 18.7% for our population. Actual survival rates were lower than the predicted ones across all the quintiles. In unadjusted analysis, PPS was a significant protective factor for mortality (HR 0.66), whereas EPTS (HR 8.9) and KDPI (HR 3.25) scores were significant risk factors. The discrimination of KDPI, PPS, and EPTS scores models were 0.59, 0.65, and 0.66, respectively. CONCLUSION: SBE score overestimated actual survival rates in our sample. The discrimination power of the score was moderate, although the utility of this tool may be limited in this specific population.

Comparison of Three Glomerular Filtration Rate Estimating Equations with 24-Hour Urine Creatinine Clearance Measurement in Potential Living Kidney Donors.

Background: The accuracy of the measurement of renal function in potential living kidney donors (PLKD) is essential. The direct measurement of glomerular filtration rate (mGFR) has been considered the "gold standard." The estimated GFR (eGFR) with 24-hour urinary creatinine clearance (CrCl) is frequently used because of its availability. We aim to evaluate the correlation and agreement of eGFR using serum-based creatinine formulas (Cockcroft-Gault, MDRD, and CKD-EPI) and the eGFR based on 24-hour urinary CrCl to evaluate kidney function in PLKD. Methods: We evaluated the kidney function in 799 PLKD using 24-hour urinary CrCl method and compared the correlation and agreement with the eGFR based on creatinine formulas (Cockcroft-Gault, MDRD, and CKD-EPI). We calculated the mean bias (difference), precision (SD of this difference), accuracy, and performed Bland-Altman plots. Results: A total of 799 PLKD were analyzed. The age of the PLKD ranged from 18 to 73 years. Weak to mild correlation was observed between 24-hour urinary CrCl and all formulas (ranged from 0.31 to 0.49). The three equations underestimated the GFR. Using the Bland-Altman graphic, we observed that the CKD-EPI was the least scattered and most precise; however, mean bias and the interval range (limits of agreement) of all formulas were too big to assume equivalence between 24-hour urinary CrCl method and eGFR based on creatinine. Results of mean bias were similar when comparing the three equations in patients with CrCl GFR <60. However, the accuracy of all formulas was better for the female group and the youngest individuals (≤40 years old). Conclusion: In this PLKD cohort, of all the three equations, the CKD-EPI was the least scattered and most precise. However, the correlation and the level of agreement between the three equations and 24-hour urinary CrCl were too low to assume the equivalence.

Factors Associated with Hemodialysis Vascular Access Failure: A retrospective study in Colombia

Introduction: Vascular access (VA) remains a major source of morbidity for hemodialysis patients (HD). Few data sources adequately capture longitudinal patency of the VA. This study aimed to evaluate VA failure and its related factors in HD patients. Methods: A retrospective cohort study of 985 incident hemodialysis patients treated in clinics of BRCS in Colombia, from January 1rst ,2016, until December 3 of the same year, was done. The cohort's enrollment was on day 1 of HD, and with follow-up for up to 15 months. Association among a group of independent variables and time to failure of the VA was performed, and adjusted by baseline variables using a Cox regression model. Results: A total of 985 patients were included in the study, requiring 1774 procedures of vascular access during follow-up. The mean age was 61 ± 15.6 years. At day 1, 15 % were dialyzing with an arteriovenous fistula (AVF) or AVG; and at day 90, this proportion had increased to 70 %. The rate of vascular access procedure was 1.95 per patients-year, 95 % CI 1.86-2.04. The rate of vascular access failure was 0.66 per patients-year, 95 % CI 0.61-0.72. Risk factors for failure in AVF/AVG were age > 65 (p= 0.008), diabetes (p=0.019), female sex (p=0.002) rural housing (p<0.0001) and higher hemoglobin (p=0.021). Conclusions: Vascular access failure and the requirement for procedures associated with it are frequent in the dialysis population. Several risk factors, some of them modifiable, are related to vascular access failure.

Introducción: El acceso vascular (AV) sigue siendo una fuente importante de morbilidad para los pacientes en hemodiálisis (HD). Pocas fuentes de datos capturan adecuadamente la permeabilidad longitudinal del AV. Este estudio tiene como objetivo evaluar la falla del AV y los factores relacionados en pacientes en HD. Métodos: Se realizó un estudio de cohorte retrospectivo de 985 pacientes incidentes a hemodiálisis tratados en clínicas de BRCS en Colombia, entre el 1ro de enero de 2016, al 31 de diciembre de 2016. La incepción de la cohorte fue el día 1 de HD y con un seguimiento de hasta 15 meses. Se realizó la asociación entre un grupo de variables independientes y el tiempo hasta la falla del AV, asimismo se ajustó por variables basales mediante un modelo de regresión de Cox. Resultados: Se incluyeron en el estudio un total de 985 pacientes que requirieron 1774 procedimientos de AV durante el seguimiento. La edad media fue de 61 ± 15,6 años. En el día 1, el 15 % se dializaba con una fístula arteriovenosa (FAV) o injerto arteriovenoso (IAV); y al día 90, esta proporción había aumentado al 70 %. La tasa de procedimiento de acceso vascular fue de 1,95 por paciente-año, IC 95 % 1,86-2,04. La tasa de falla del AV fue de 0,66 por paciente-año, IC del 95 %: 0,61-0,72. Los factores de riesgo para falla del AV en FAV/IAV fueron edad > 65 años (p= 0,008), diabetes (p= 0,019), sexo femenino (p= 0,002), vivienda rural (p<0,0001) y hemoglobina elevada (p=0,021). Conclusión: La falla del acceso vascular y el requerimiento de procedimientos asociados a ella, son frecuentes en la población en diálisis. Varios factores de riesgo, algunos de ellos modificables, están relacionados con la falla del acceso vascular.

Resultados en receptores de trasplante renal de donantes cadavéricos con infección por SARS-CoV-2: Una serie de casos en un centro de trasplante en Colombia / Results in kidney transplant recipients from cadaveric donors with SARS-CoV-2 infection: A case series in a transplant center in Colombia

Introducción. La pandemia por COVID-19 ha causado la muerte de 6,5 millones de personas en el mundo y la donación de órganos se ha visto ampliamente afectada, reflejándose en una disminución importante en el número de trasplantes. Colombia no ha sido ajena a dicha problemática. Ante este desafío, el Instituto Nacional de Salud ha permitido tomar donantes cadavéricos con reacción en cadena de la polimerasa con transcripción reversa (RT-PCR) positiva para Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), sin enfermedad activa. El objetivo de este estudio fue describir una serie de pacientes trasplantados de riñón con donantes cadavéricos con RT-PCR SARS-CoV-2 positivo y sus principales desenlaces clínicos. Métodos. Serie de casos de pacientes que fueron llevados a trasplante renal con donante cadavérico con SARS-CoV-2 positivo, sin enfermedad activa, entre mayo y agosto de 2022. Se recolectaron las variables demográficas y clínicas y se evaluó la infección y la mortalidad asociada a SARS-CoV-2 en un mes de seguimiento. Resultados. Un total de 5 receptores de trasplante renal con 5 donantes cadavéricos SARS-CoV-2 positivos fueron evaluados. No se presentó mortalidad ni pérdida del injerto renal. Se registraron dos casos de función retardada del injerto y un caso de rechazo agudo. Ninguno de los pacientes presentó RT-PCR SARS-CoV-2 positiva en el seguimiento posterior al trasplante. Conclusión. Con nuestra serie de casos mostramos que el trasplante de riñón proveniente de donante cadavérico con prueba positiva para RT-PCR SARS-CoV-2, sin evidencia de enfermedad COVID-19 activa, es un procedimiento seguro y una estrategia eficaz para aumentar el número de donantes en pandemia

Introduction. Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic have caused the death of 6.5 million of people worldwide. The organ donation was extremely affected reflecting in the number of transplants. Colombia has not been immune to this problem. Facing this challenge, the National Institute of Health (Instituto Nacional de Salud, INS) allowed to assign cadaveric donors with reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) positive without COVID-19. We aim to describe a case series of kidney transplant patients with RT-PCR SARS-CoV-2 positive cadaveric donors, and their main clinical outcomes. Methods. A case series of five patients who underwent kidney transplantation of cadaveric donors with positive RT-PCR SARS-CoV-2 during the study period from May to august of 2022. Demographics and clinical characteristics were collected from the institutional medical records, and we evaluated the mortality and infection associated with SARS-CoV-2. Results. A total of five kidney transplant recipients and five cadaveric donors with positive RT-PCR SARS-CoV-2 were described in the present study. There were not mortality reported and none of the patients had graft loss. Two cases of delayed graft function and one case of acute kidney rejection were documented. None of the patients had positive RT-PCR SARS-CoV-2 in the follow-up. Conclusion. Our series demonstrated that the kidney transplant of cadaveric donors with positive RT-PCR SARS-CoV-2 without clinical evidence of active COVID-19 disease is a safe procedure and an efficient strategy to increase donors during a pandemic

Clinical Outcomes in Living Donor Kidney Transplantation: A Single Center Experience in Latin America.

BACKGROUND: In Latin America, few reports are available about the clinical outcomes of living donor kidney transplants (LDKT). We aim to evaluate the main clinical outcomes for LDKT patients in a single center's experience. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 530 LDKT patients who underwent transplantation from August 2008 to December 2020 at Colombiana de Trasplantes. Graft survival censored for death and patient survival were determined up to 5 years post-transplantation by the Kaplan-Meier method. Vascular and urinary complications, readmission, and reintervention rates were documented. RESULTS: A total of 530 LDKT patients were analyzed. Most of the recipients were men (56%). There were 123 patients (23.2%) with a preemptive transplant. Panel reactive antibody type I and II had higher immunologic risk (>20%) in 15.9% of the patients. The donor mean age was 37.8 ± 11.5 years. Most of the donors were women (52.6%) and related to the recipient (69.1%). Multivariate analysis identified panel reactive antibody type II (P = 0.003), female donor (P = 0.001), surgical reintervention at 30 days post-transplantation (P < .01), and delayed graft function (P < .01) as risk factors for graft loss. The graft survival death-censored rates were 93.7% and 89% at 1 and 5 years, respectively. Patient survival rates were 97.0% and 94.1% at 1 and 5 years after transplantation, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The long-term graft and patient survival rates in our center are comparable to previous reports from other leading centers. The clinical outcomes from a medium-sized center can be noteworthy, although not entirely new.

The use of intraoperative mannitol during the laparoscopic nephrectomy in living kidney donor and the prevention of delayed graft function / Uso de manitol intraoperatorio durante la nefrectomía por laparoscopia en donante vivo de riñón y la prevención de función retardada del injerto

Background and objectives: The administration of mannitol during laparoscopic hand-assisted nephrectomy in the living donor has been controversial with various recommendations about it. This study aims to evaluate the effect of the intraoperative mannitol in the living kidney donor and the incidence of delayed graft function (DGF). Methods: This study was a retrospective observational study with living kidney transplant recipients and donors who underwent laparoscopic hand-assisted nephrectomy at Colombiana de Trasplantes from January 2015 to September 2019. We assessed the impact of mannitol administration in living donors on the main transplant outcomes such as DGF, urinary volume, acute rejection, and mortality at 3 months of follow-up. We performed a descriptive analysis of demographics and clinical variables in our cohort. Results: A total of 367 recipients were evaluated. The incidence of DGF was 5.9% without mannitol versus 6.2% with mannitol (p = 0.99). The acute rejection episodes (12.2% without mannitol versus 4.7% with mannitol) had a trend difference between the comparative groups, but it was still not significant in the bivariate analysis (p = 0.06). The mortality rate in the recipient was not significant (p = 0.69). The mean serum creatinine did not have significant differences at 1 and 3 months of follow-up comparing both groups. Conclusion: The use of mannitol in living donors does not have a significant impact on the incidence of DGF in kidney recipients. A trend of association between mannitol administration and reduced acute rejection episodes was observed, though it was not statistically significant.

Antecedentes y objetivo: La administración de manitol durante la nefrectomía laparoscópica en el donante vivo ha sido discutida con diversas recomendaciones. El objetivo es evaluar la administración de manitol intraoperatorio en el donante vivo de riñón y la incidencia de función retardada del injerto en el receptor. Métodos: Estudio observacional retrospectivo con receptores de riñón y donantes vivos que tuvieron nefrectomía laparoscópica en Colombiana de Trasplantes entre enero de 2015 a septiembre de 2019. Evaluamos el impacto de administrar manitol en los principales desenlaces del trasplante: función retardada del injerto, volumen urinario, rechazo agudo y mortalidad del receptor a los 3 meses post-trasplante. Se realizó un análisis descriptivo de las características demográficas y clínicas. Resultados: Se evaluaron 367 receptores con una incidencia de función retardada del injerto de 5.9% sin manitol versus 6.2% con manitol (p = 0,99), el rechazo agudo (12,2% sin manitol versus 4,7% con manitol) tuvo una tendencia de diferencia entre ambos grupos no significativa (p = 0,06) y la mortalidad del receptor tampoco mostró diferencias significativas (p = 0,69). La media de creatinina sérica al mes y 3 meses no tuvo diferencias significativas en los grupos. Conclusión: El uso de manitol en los donantes vivos de riñón no impactó significativamente la incidencia de función retardada del injerto en los receptores de trasplante. Se encontró una tendencia de asociación en la administración de manitol intraoperatorio y la reducción de los episodios de rechazo agudo al tercer mes post-trasplante en los receptores. No obstante, esta tendencia no tuvo la suficiente relevancia estadística.

Risk Factors for Urologic Complications After Kidney Transplantation and Impact in Graft Survival.

Background and Purpose: Kidney transplantation (KT) is the best therapy for chronic kidney disease (CKD). Major urologic complications (MUCs) are the second etiology associated to morbidity and graft loss following KT, after rejection episodes. The objective of this study was to estimate the incidence, risk factors and impact on graft survival associated to urological complications in KT patients. Patients and Methods: A retrospective cohort based on electronic patient files of kidney transplant recipients from Colombiana de Trasplantes was created for the period August 2008 to September 2019. Initiation of follow-up was defined as the date of transplantation up to 3 years post-transplantation. Incidence of ureteral stenosis, ureteral obstruction, and ureteral leak was measured. A logistic regression multivariate model was adjusted to determine the associated factors to MUCs (yes/no). Patient and graft survival time were analyzed using a Kaplan-Meier method. Results: A total of 1584 KT patients were included in the cohort. MUCs were present in 195 (12.6%) KT patients. We found that dialysis duration (OR: 1.004; p = 0.02) remained significant for the incidence of MUCs in KT patients of deceased donors. Probability of graft and patient survival at 3 years of follow-up was 90.5% and 85.5%, respectively. No significant difference was found on graft and patient survival in KT patients with or without MUCs. Conclusion: MUCs are frequent complications for KT. We did not observe significant differences in graft or patient survival according to the presence of MUCs. The identification of MUCs and risk factors may guide transplant teams for future surgical and clinical decisions.

Rechazo crónico mediado por anticuerpos

Contexto el rechazo crónico mediado por anticuerpos (cABMR, chronic antibody-mediated rejection) se considera una de las principales causas de disfunción crónica del injerto. Objetivo profundizar en la comprensión de los mecanismos que la ocasionan para diseñar tratamientos efectivos, dado que es muy poco lo que se ha avanzado en el tratamiento de esta patología. Metodología en esta revisión narrativa de la literatura, presentamos los factores de riesgo relacionados con la disfunción crónica del injerto, haciendo énfasis en la fisiopatología, el diagnóstico y el tratamiento del cABMR. Resultados el factor de riesgo más relevante para el desarrollo de disfunción crónica del injerto es el desarrollo de anticuerpos donante específicos (DSA) y ABMR. Para el diagnóstico de cABMR activo, se requieren los criterios de Banff 2017 (los tres deben estar presentes: Evidencia histológica de lesión tisular crónica, evidencia de inflamación actual en el endotelio vascular ocasionada por anticuerpos y evidencia serológica de DSA. El cABMR no tiene un tratamiento efectivo. Conclusiones dado que cABMR no tiene un tratamiento efectivo, es importante disminuir la exposición a los factores de riesgo y hacer un diagnóstico y un tratamiento oportuno de los eventos agudos de lesión renal que contribuyen a la progresión de disfunción crónica del injerto.

Context Chronic antibody-mediated rejection (cABMR) is considered one of the main causes of chronic graft. Objective To review the mechanisms that cause cABMR to design effective treatments, since it is very little what has been advanced in it treatment of this pathology. Methodology In this narrative review of the literature, we present the risk factors related to the chronic dysfunction of the injection, emphasizing the pathophysiology the diagnosis and treatment of cABMR. Results The most relevant risk factor for the development of chronic graft dysfunction is the development of specific donor antibodies (DSA) and ABMR. For the diagnosis of active cABMR, the criteria of Banff 2017 are required (three must be present: histological evidence of chronic tissue injury, evidence of current inflammation in the vascular endothelium caused by antibodies and serological evidence of DSA. The cABMR does not have an effective treatment. Conclusions Since cABMR does not have an effective treatment, it is important reduce exposure to risk factors and carry out a diagnosis and treatment of the acute events of kidney injury that contribute to the progression of chronic injection dysfunction.

Embolización transcatéter del injerto renal en pacientes con síndrome de intolerancia: reporte de tres casos en un grupo de trasplantes

Introducción el síndrome de intolerancia es un proceso inflamatorio que ocurre hasta en un tercio de los pacientes con pérdida del injerto. Cuando no se obtiene una mejoría de los síntomas con el manejo médico, se indica la realización de nefrectomía del riñón trasplantado, sin embargo, este es un procedimiento invasivo que puede estar asociado a mayor morbilidad y mortalidad. Dada la fragilidad de estos pacientes, se plantea la embolización transcatéter del injerto como una alternativa válida y menos invasiva para el tratamiento de este síndrome. Objetivo describir el uso de la embolización transcatéter como tratamiento al síndrome de intolerancia del injerto. Presentación del caso se reportan tres casos clínicos de pacientes con sintomatología de entre 15 y 20 días de evolución, consistentes en dolor y tumefacción sobre riñón trasplantado y otros signos y síntomas reportados fueron fiebre, hiporexia, pérdida de peso y hematuria macroscópica. Se describe la evolución de los síntomas que en ninguno de los casos expuestos tuvieron mejoría con el ajuste inmunosupresor, descartando en todos los casos etiología infecciosa y estableciéndose así la sospecha síndrome de intolerancia del injerto. Los pacientes fueron manejados con embolización transcatéter de la arteria del riñón trasplantado y el éxito del tratamiento se definió por la resolución de los síntomas. Discusión y conclusión entre las primeras 24-48 horas posprocedimiento, los pacientes presentaron una evolución satisfactoria y, finalmente, egreso. La embolización transcatéter del injerto es una alternativa segura a la nefrectomía del trasplante y que es menos invasiva para el tratamiento del síndrome de intolerancia del injerto.

Background The renal graft intolerance syndrome is an inflammatory process that occurs in one third of the kidney transplant patients with graft loss. If medical treatment for intolerance graft syndrome is not effective, there is an indication of graft nephrectomy. However, graft nephrectomy has higher morbidity and mortality compared to non-invasive techniques. Due to a high fragility in kidney transplant patients, the renal arterial embolization has become a useful minimally invasive therapeutic option for intolerance graft syndrome. Objective We aim to describe the use of renal arterial embolization for renal graft intolerance syndrome. Case presentation We report three clinical cases who were admitted to the emergency department for a history of twenty days of graft pain and swelling. These patients had fever, hyporexia, weight loss and macroscopic hematuria. None of the cases had clinical improvement with immunosuppression adjustment and a diagnosis of renal graft intolerance syndrome was made dismissing infection. Patients were treated with renal arterial embolization and its procedure success were determined as the symptom's resolution. Discussion and conclusion After 24- and 48-hours post-embolization, patients were successfully recovered and discharged in the hospital. Renal graft arterial embolization is a safe and non-invasive alternative to graft nephrectomy to treat renal intolerance syndrome.

Risk factors for graft loss and death among kidney transplant recipients: A competing risk analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Kidney transplantation is the best therapeutical option for CKD patients. Graft loss risk factors are usually estimated with the cox method. Competing risk analysis could be useful to determine the impact of different events affecting graft survival, the occurrence of an outcome of interest can be precluded by another. We aimed to determine the risk factors for graft loss in the presence of mortality as a competing event. METHODS: A retrospective cohort of 1454 kidney transplant recipients who were transplanted between July 1, 2008, to May 31, 2019, in Colombiana de Trasplantes, were analyzed to determine risk factors of graft loss and mortality at 5 years post-transplantation. Kidney and patient survival probabilities were estimated by the competing risk analysis. The Fine and Gray method was used to fit a multivariable model for each outcome. Three variable selection methods were compared, and the bootstrapping technique was used for internal validation as split method for resample. The performance of the final model was assessed calculating the prediction error, brier score, c-index and calibration plot. RESULTS: Graft loss occurred in 169 patients (11.6%) and death in 137 (9.4%). Cumulative incidence for graft loss and death was 15.8% and 13.8% respectively. In a multivariable analysis, we found that BKV nephropathy, serum creatinine and increased number of renal biopsies were significant risk factors for graft loss. On the other hand, recipient age, acute cellular rejection, CMV disease were risk factors for death, and recipients with living donor had better survival compared to deceased-donor transplant and coronary stent. The c-index were 0.6 and 0.72 for graft loss and death model respectively. CONCLUSION: We developed two prediction models for graft loss and death 5 years post-transplantation by a unique transplant program in Colombia. Using a competing risk multivariable analysis, we were able to identify 3 significant risk factors for graft loss and 5 significant risk factors for death. This contributes to have a better understanding of risk factors for graft loss in a Latin-American population. The predictive performance of the models was mild.

Telemedicina para seguimiento de pacientes renales trasplantados durante la pandemia por COVID-19

Contexto: la pandemia por COVID-19 generó la reestructuración de los servicios de salud en el mundo. La teleconsulta ofrece el acceso a la atención en salud a distancia como estrategia de mitigación a la propagación del virus y como una forma flexible de telemedicina. Objetivo: describir los resultados de atención en salud por modalidad de teleconsulta en pacientes trasplantados durante el inicio de la pandemia por COVID-19. Metodología: estudio descriptivo de corte transversal que describe la experiencia del uso de la teleconsulta en el inicio de la pandemia por COVID-19 en un centro de trasplante de órganos en Colombia. La información fue obtenida mediante la recolección directa de la atención en el mes de abril de 2020 y a través del envío de un cuestionario electrónico, estructurado para los pacientes atendidos por teleconsulta. Resultados: un total de 1139 pacientes con trasplante renal fueron valorados en la modalidad de teleconsulta. Alrededor del 50 % de los pacientes atendidos vivían fuera de áreas metropolitanas (n = 564) y un total de 292 (de 800 contactados) respondieron la encuesta enviada con una media de edad de 48 años. Los pacientes presentaron altos porcentajes de satisfacción con el modelo de teleconsulta (n = 278, lo que equivale al 94 %). Se presentaron dos casos sospechosos de COVID-19, los cuales fueron negativos al realizar la prueba de PCR-RT. Conclusiones: la teleconsulta es una herramienta útil en la mitigación de la emergencia sanitaria, con un alto potencial que genera mayor acceso y oportunidad de atención en salud, presentando altos índices de aceptación.

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic led to the restructuring of health services around the world. Teleconsultation offers access to remote health care and a mitigation strategy. Purpose: Describe the results of a teleconsultation program in a transplant center at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic. Methodology: Descriptive cross-sectional study describing the experience of the use of teleconsultation during the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic at an organ transplant center in Colombia. The information was obtained by directly collecting the total number of patients treated during April 2020 and by sending a structured electronic questionnaire to the patients involved in the care. Results: A total of 1139 renal transplant patients were assessed by teleconsultation. The geographical distribution of patients in metropolitan areas and outside the metropolitan area were similar (n=575 and n=564, respectively). Of the total, 292 patients responded to the survey sent with an average age of 48 years. The patients had high satisfaction with the teleconsultation model (n=278, 94%). There were 2 suspected cases of COVID-19, which were negative when performing the PCR-RT test. Conclusions: Teleconsultation is a useful tool in the mitigation of the health emergency, with a high potential, which generates greater access and health care opportunity, presenting high acceptance rates.

Guía de práctica clínica para la prevención primaria y secundaria y diagnóstico temprano de cáncer gástrico / Clinical practice guide for primary and secondary prevention and early diagnosis of gastric cancer

Resumen Objetivo: Generar recomendaciones basadas en la evidencia, para la prevención primaria y secundaria, el tratamiento de las lesiones preneoplásicas y el diagnóstico temprano del cáncer gástrico en población adulta, con el propósito de reducir la carga de la enfermedad. Materiales y métodos: El grupo desarrollador estuvo integrado por profesionales de la salud y tomadores de decisiones. Se construyeron preguntas clínicas contestables y se realizó la graduación de los desenlaces. Se elaboró la búsqueda de la información en MEDLINE; EMBASE y CENTRAL, siendo actualizada el 18 de octubre de 2018. La pesquisa también abarcó otras fuentes de información como la Revista Colombiana de Gastroenterología y la lectura en "bola de nieve" de las referencias incluidas. Se contactó a expertos en la materia con el objetivo de identificar estudios relevantes no publicados. Para la construcción de las recomendaciones, se realizó un consenso acorde con los lineamientos propuestos por la metodología GRADE, sopesando los beneficios, los efectos adversos derivados de la intervención, las preferencias de los pacientes y el potencial impacto de las intervenciones sobre los costos. Resultados: Se presenta la versión corta de la "Guía de práctica clínica para la prevención primaria, secundaria y diagnóstico temprano de cáncer gástrico", junto con su evidencia de soporte y respectivas recomendaciones. Conclusiones: Como recomendación central para la implementación, se recomienda erradicar la infección por H. pylori en los pacientes con o sin factores de riesgo, como estrategia de prevención de las condiciones precursoras de cáncer gástrico. La Guía deberá actualizarse en tres años.

Abstract Objetive: Generate recommendations for primary and secondary prevention, treatment of gastric preneoplastic lesions, and early diagnosis of gastric cancer in the adult population, to increase the detection of gastric cancer in early stages. Material and methods: The developer group was made up of health professionals, decision-makers, and a representative of the patients. Answerable clinical questions were constructed and outcomes were graded. The search for information in MEDLINE was carried out; EMBASE and CENTRAL, being updated on October 18, 2018. The search also covered other sources of information such as the Colombian Journal of Gastroenterology and the "snowball" reading of the references included. Experts in the field were contacted to identify studies. For the construction of the recommendations, a consensus was made according to the guidelines proposed by the GRADE methodology, weighing the benefits, the adverse effects derived from the intervention, the preferences of the patients, and the potential impact of the interventions on costs. Results: The short version of the "Clinical practice guidelines for the primary, secondary, and early diagnosis of gastric cancer" is presented together with its supporting evidence and respective recommendations. Conclusions: As a central recommendation for implementation, it is recommended to eradicate H. pylori infection in patients with or without risk factors in whom it is detected to prevent gastric cancer precursor conditions. The Guide will need to be updated in three years.

Safety and Intraoperative Results in Live Kidney Donors with Vascular Multiplicity After Hand-Assisted Laparoscopy Living Donor Nephrectomy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Vascular multiplicity is the most frequent anatomic variation in kidney donors. Despite concerns about risks, these allografts are increasingly used to overcome the shortage of kidney donors. The safety and clinical outcomes in living kidney donors were evaluated with vascular multiplicity after hand-assisted laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy (HALDN). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data from all living kidney donors who underwent HALDN from 2008 to 2021 was retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into two groups as single (SRV) and multiple renal vessels (MRV), and a comparative analysis was done. The primary outcomes include operating room time (ORT), days of hospital stay, estimated blood loss, complications, conversion, and re-operations. RESULTS: MRV were present in 166 out of 612 donors (27.1%). Among those, 10 (1.6%) donors had simultaneous multiple arteries and veins. Additionally, the prevalence of artery and vein multiplicity was 21.8% (n = 134) and 3.5% (n = 22), respectively. Warm ischemia time was significantly different among the two groups but not clinically important. The number of conversions to open technique, the mean ORT, the median blood loss, and days of hospital stay were similar between the SRV and MRV groups, without significant differences. According to the modified Clavien-classification system, no differences were found in the complication rates between the two groups (p = 0.29). Complication rates were 3.3% and 3.6% for the SRV and MRV groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: HALDN is a procedure with safe intraoperative results, even with vascular multiplicity. The presence of multiple renal arteries or veins has no negative impact on the outcome of the donor after living donor nephrectomy.