Prevalence of Myofascial Trigger Points in Isolated Idiopathic Cervical Dystonia: A Possible Contributor to Pain, Movement and Disability.

BACKGROUND: Myofascial trigger points (TrPs) are hypersensitive points located in a tight band of muscle that, when palpated, produce not only local pain but also referred (distant) pain. The role of TrPs in patients with cervical dystonia (CD) has not been investigated. OBJECTIVE: To identify the presence of TrPs in patients with isolated idiopathic CD and their association with pain. METHODS: Thirty-one patients (74.2% women; age: 61.2 years, SD: 10.1 years) participated. TrPs were explored in the sternocleidomastoid, upper trapezius, splenius capitis, levator scapulae, anterior scalene, suboccipital, and infraspinatus muscles. Clinical features of CD were documented as well as the presence of pain. The severity of dystonia and its consequences were assessed using the Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS). RESULTS: The mean number of TrPs for each patient was 12 (SD:3), with no differences between patients with pain (n = 20) and those without pain (n = 11). Active TrPs were only found in patients with pain (mean: 7.5, SD:4). Latent TrPs were found in both groups but were more prevalent (P < 0.001) in patients without pain (mean: 11, SD:3.5) than in those with pain (mean: 5, SD:3.5). The number of active TrPs or latent TrPs was positively associated with the TWSTRS disability subscale and the TWSTRS total score. The number of active, but not latent, TrPs was associated with worse scores on the TWSTRS pain subscale. CONCLUSION: Active TrPs were present in patients with CD reporting pain, while latent TrPs were present in all CD patients, irrespective of their pain status. The numbers of active/latent TrPs were associated with disability. TrPs could act as pain generators in CD and also contribute to the involuntary muscle contractions characteristic of dystonia.

Cognitive dysfunction characteristics of multiple sclerosis with aging.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to investigate the characteristics of cognitive impairment in older people with multiple sclerosis (MS). METHODS: Cross-sectional study that included participants that were examined with a common and comprehensive neuropsychological protocol. The subjects were matched by sociodemographic variables and the following groups were generated for comparisons: young MS versus healthy controls (HC) (n = 246), old MS versus HC (n = 198), young MS vs old MS (n = 226), MS vs Alzheimer's disease (AD)(n = 70), and MS vs Parkinson's disease (PD) (n = 62). The ICCoDiMS criteria were used to define cognitive impairment in MS. RESULTS: Cognitive impairment was more frequent in young than old patients (70.8 % vs 52.2 %). Attention and speed processing is the most frequent cognitive domain impaired in MS (54.9 % of young MS vs 32.7 % of old MS). The frequency of impairment in attention/processing speed (54.9 % vs 32.7 %) and episodic memory (27.9 % vs 14.3) was higher in the young group than in the old group. There were no statistically significant differences in the distribution of impairment in executive function (46.0 % vs 35.3 %), visuospatial (17.9 % vs 9.5 %), and language (12.4 % vs 17.7 %). In those patients meeting the criteria for cognitive impairment, young MS patients showed lower performance in attention/processing speed tests. Conversely, old MS patients showed lower performance in episodic memory, verbal fluency, and planning. There were no differences in the correlations between SDMT and other neuropsychological tests in young and old patients, which suggests similar cognitive processes underlying SDMT performance in both groups. There were differences between old MS and prodromal AD, especially in episodic memory, while the cognitive profile of old MS was largely shared with PD. CONCLUSIONS: Our study found that the cognitive profile of MS is defined by a characteristic impairment in attention and processing speed, which is present during the lifespan. The impairment in processing speed is less prominent in old age, whereas the impairment of other cognitive functions becomes more relevant. These findings suggest potential differences in the pathophysiological processes associated with cognitive impairment between young and old ages that warrant further investigation.

Sensitization-Associated Symptoms and Neuropathic-like Features in Patients with Cervical Dystonia and Pain.

Background: This exploratory study evaluated the presence of sensitization-associated and neuropathic-like symptoms and identified their association with pressure sensitivity, pain, and disability in patients with cervical dystonia (CD). Methods: Thirty-one patients with CD (74.2% women, age: 61.2 years, SD 10.1) participated. Data collected included clinical variables, the Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS), the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI), the Self-administered Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs (S-LANSS), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), as well as widespread pressure pain thresholds (PPTs). Results: Patients with CD with pain (n = 20, 64.5%) showed higher scores on the TWSTRS disability subscale and the CSI (p < 0.001), and lower PPTs (p < 0.05). Fifteen patients (15/31, 48%) showed sensitization-associated symptoms (CSI ≥ 40), whereas five of the patients with pain (5/20, 25%) exhibited neuropathic-like symptoms (S-LANSS ≥ 12). The CSI and S-LANSS were positively associated with the TWSTRS, HADS-A and HADS-D, and negatively associated with PPTs. HADS-D and S-LANSS explained 72.5% of the variance of the CSI (r2: 0.725), whereas CSI explained 42.3% of the variance of the S-LANSS (r2: 0.423). Conclusions: Pain is an important source of disability in CD, and may be a consequence of different mechanisms, including sensitization.

Four-tract probabilistic tractography technique for target selection in essential tremor treatment with magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound.

OBJECTIVES: Magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) thalamotomy is a novel, minimally invasive ablative treatment for essential tremor (ET). The use of a four-tract probabilistic tractography technique, targeting the intersection between the dentato-rubro-thalamic tracts (both decussating and non-decussating), while evaluating the corticospinal tract and the medial lemniscus, may obtain immediate clinical results with reduced adverse events. Our aim is to present our experience with the four-tract technique for patients undergoing ET treatment with MRgFUS. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of a prospective database of consecutive patients undergoing ET treatment in a single center from February 2022 to February 2023. Procedural parameters were collected, and tremor improvement was assessed with the Clinical Rating Scale for Tremor (CRST) at baseline and at 3 and 6 months. Adverse events were also reported. RESULTS: Forty-three patients (median age, 72 years [interquartile range, 66-76]; 22 females) were evaluated. Tremor improved significatively in all CRST subsections at 3 months, including the CRST part A + B treated hand tremor (22 [19-27] vs 4 [2-7], p < 0.001) and CRST part C (16 [13-19] vs 3 [1-4], p < 0.001). Differences persisted significant at 6 months. Adverse events were few (4.1% of paresthesias and 12.5% of objective gait disturbance at follow-up) and recorded as mild. The median number of sonications was 7 [6-8] and mean operative time 68.7 ± 24.2 min. CONCLUSION: Our data show support for the feasibility and benefits of systematic targeting approach with four-tract probabilistic tractography for treating ET using MRgFUS. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: An approach with four-tract probabilistic tractography for treating essential tremor (ET) patients with magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound decreases interindividual variability with good clinical outcomes, low number of sonications, few adverse effects, and short procedure times. KEY POINTS: • The optimal target for the treatment of essential tremor with MR-guided focused ultrasound remains unknown. • Four-tract probabilistic tractography is a feasible technique that reduces interindividual variability, with good clinical results, few side effects, and short operative time. • The four-tract tractography approach can be performed using different MRI scanners and post-processing software in comparison with the initial description of the technique.

Validation of the European Cross-Cultural Neuropsychological Test Battery (CNTB) for the assessment of mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer's disease and Parkinson's disease.

Background: The Cross-Cultural Neuropsychological Test Battery (CNTB) is a novel test battery specifically designed to reduce the impact of multiculturality in cognitive assessment. Objective: We aimed to validate the CNTB in Spaniards in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD), including patients at mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and mild dementia stages, and Parkinson's disease with MCI (PD-MCI). Methods: Thirty patients with AD-MCI, 30 with AD-dementia (AD-D), and 30 with PD-MCI were recruited. Each clinical group was compared against a healthy control group (HC) with no differences in sex, age, or years of education. Intergroup comparisons, ROC analysis, and cut-off scores were calculated. Results: AD-MCI scored lower than HC in those subtests associated with episodic memory and verbal fluency. AD-D also showed lower scores in executive functions and visuospatial tests. Effect sizes for all the subtests were large. PD-MCI showed lower performance than HC in memory and executive functions, particularly on error scores, with large effect sizes. Comparing AD-MCI and PD-MCI, AD-MCI had lower memory scores, while PD-MCI showed the worst performance in executive functions. CNTB showed appropriate convergent validity with standardized neuropsychological tests measuring the same cognitive domains. We obtained similar cut-off scores to previous studies performed in other populations. Conclusions: The CNTB showed appropriate diagnostic properties in AD and PD, including those stages with mild cognitive impairment. This supports the utility of the CNTB for the early detection of cognitive impairment in AD and PD.

Levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel in advanced Parkinson's disease: long-term results from COSMOS.

BACKGROUND: While immediate benefits of levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel (LCIG) are evident in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD), long-term LCIG effects require further study. OBJECTIVES: We explored long-term LCIG on motor symptoms, nonmotor symptoms (NMS), and LCIG treatment settings in patients with advanced PD (APD). METHODS: Data were obtained (medical records and patient visit) from COSMOS, a multinational, retrospective, cross-sectional post-marketing observational study in patients with APD. Patients were stratified into 5 groups based on LCIG treatment duration at the patient visit, from 1-2 to > 5 years LCIG. Between-group differences were assessed for changes from baseline in LCIG settings, motor symptoms, NMS, add-on medications, and safety. RESULTS: Out of 387 patients, the number of patients per LCIG group was: > 1- ≤ 2 years LCIG (n = 156); > 2- ≤ 3 years LCIG (n = 80); > 3- ≤ 4 years LCIG (n = 61); > 4- ≤ 5 years LCIG (n = 30); > 5 years LCIG (n = 60). Baseline values were similar; data reported are changes from the baseline. There were reductions in "off" time, dyskinesia duration, and severity across LCIG groups. Prevalence, severity, and frequency of many individual motor symptoms and some NMS were reduced amongst all LCIG groups, with few differences between groups. Doses for LCIG, LEDD and LEDD for add-on medications were similar across groups both at LCIG initiation and patient visit. Adverse events were similar across all LCIG groups and consistent with the established safety profile of LCIG. CONCLUSIONS: LCIG may provide sustained, long-term symptom control, while potentially avoiding increases in add-on medication dosages. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03362879. Number and date: P16-831, November 30, 2017.

Multi-Disease Validation of the RUDAS for Cognitive Screening in Alzheimer's Disease, Parkinson's Disease, and Multiple Sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: The Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment Scale (RUDAS) is a cognitive test with favorable diagnostic properties for detecting dementia and a low influence of education and cultural biases. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to validate the RUDAS in people with Alzheimer's disease (AD), Parkinson's disease (PD), and multiple sclerosis (MS). METHODS: We enrolled one hundred and fifty participants (60 with AD, 30 with PD, 60 with MS, and 120 healthy controls (HC)). All clinical groups completed a comprehensive neuropsychological battery, RUDAS, and standard cognitive tests of each disorder: MMSE, SCOPA-COG, and Symbol Digit Modalities Test. Intergroup comparisons between clinical groups and HC and ROC curves were estimated. Random Forest algorithms were trained and validated to detect cognitive impairment using RUDAS and rank the most relevant scores. RESULTS: The RUDAS scores were lower in patients with AD, and patients with PD and MS showed cognitive impairment compared to healthy controls. Effect sizes were generally large. The total score was the most discriminative, followed by the memory score. Correlations with standardized neuropsychological tests were moderate to high. Random Forest algorithms obtained accuracies over 80-90% using the RUDAS for diagnosing AD and cognitive impairment associated with PD and MS. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest the RUDAS is a valid test candidate for multi-disease cognitive screening tool in AD, PD, and MS.

Validation of the cross-cultural dementia screening test in Alzheimer's disease and Parkinson's disease.

Objective: The Cross-Cultural Dementia (CCD) is a new screening tool to evaluate cognitive impairment based on a cross-cultural perspective to reduce the bias of education, and language and cultural differences. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic properties of the CCD in Spaniards for the assessment of patients with Alzheimer's disease in mild cognitive impairment (AD-MCI) and mild dementia stages (AD-D) and patients with mild cognitive impairment associated with Parkinson's disease (PD-MCI). Methods: Sixty participants with AD (50% MCI) and thirty with PD-MCI were enrolled. Each clinical group was compared against a healthy control group (HC) with the same number of participants and no significant differences in age, education, and sex. A comprehensive neuropsychological test battery and CCD were completed. Intergroup comparisons, ROC curves, and cut-off scores were calculated for the study of diagnostic properties. Results: Intergroup differences were found in accordance with the cognitive profile of each clinical condition. Memory measures (Objects test) were especially relevant for the classification between AD and HC. Memory and executive function scores (Sun-Moon and Dots tests) were useful in the case of PD-MCI and HC. Furthermore, CCD described differences in executive functions and speed scores comparing AD-MCI and PD-MCI. Correlations between standardized neuropsychological tests and CCD measures supported the convergent validity of the test. Conclusion: CCD showed good discrimination properties and cut-off scores for dementia and extended its application to a sample of prodromal stages of AD and PD with mild cognitive impairment.

Depression in Alzheimer's Disease: A Delphi Consensus on Etiology, Risk Factors, and Clinical Management.

Background: Alzheimer's disease (AD) and other forms of dementia are among the most common causes of disability in the elderly. Dementia is often accompanied by depression, but specific diagnostic criteria and treatment approaches are still lacking. This study aimed to gather expert opinions on dementia and depressed patient management to reduce heterogeneity in everyday practice. Methods: Prospective, multicenter, 2-round Modified Delphi survey with 53 questions regarding risk factors (11), signs and symptoms (7), diagnosis (8), and treatment (27) of depression in dementia, with a particular focus on AD. The questionnaire was completed by a panel of 37 expert physicians in neurodegenerative diseases (19 neurologists, 17 psychiatrists, and 1 geriatrician). Results: Consensus was achieved in 40 (75.5%) of the items: agreement in 33 (62.3%) and disagreement in 7 (13.2%) of them. Among the most relevant findings, depression in the elderly was considered an early sign (prodromal) and/or a dementia risk factor, so routine cognitive check-ups in depressed patients should be adopted, aided by clinical scales and information from relatives. Careful interpretation of neuropsychological assessment must be carried out in patients with depression as it can undermine cognitive outcomes. As agreed, depression in early AD is characterized by somatic symptoms and can be differentiated from apathy by the presence of sadness, depressive thoughts and early-morning awakening. In later-phases, symptoms of depression would include sleep-wake cycle reversal, aggressive behavior, and agitation. Regardless of the stage of dementia, depression would accelerate its course, whereas antidepressants would have the opposite effect. Those that improve cognitive function and/or have a dual or multimodal mode of action were preferred: Duloxetine, venlafaxine/desvenlafaxine, vortioxetine, tianeptine, and mirtazapine. Although antidepressants may be less effective than in cognitively healthy patients, neither dosage nor treatment duration should differ. Anti-dementia cholinesterase inhibitors may have a synergistic effect with antidepressants. Exercise and psychological interventions should not be applied alone before any pharmacological treatment, yet they do play a part in improving depressive symptoms in demented patients. Conclusions: This study sheds light on several unresolved clinical challenges regarding depression in dementia patients. Further studies and specific recommendations for this comorbid patient population are still needed.

Focus on Depression in Parkinson's Disease: A Delphi Consensus of Experts in Psychiatry, Neurology, and Geriatrics.

Major and minor forms of depression are significant contributors to Parkinson's disease morbidity and caregiver burden, affecting up to 50% of these patients. Nonetheless, symptoms of depression are still underrecognized and undertreated in this context due to scarcity of evidence and, consequently, consistent clinical guideline recommendations. Here, we carried out a prospective, multicentre, 2-round modified Delphi survey with 49 questions about the aetiopathological mechanisms of depression in Parkinson's disease (10), clinical features and connections with motor and nonmotor symptoms (10), diagnostic criteria (5), and therapeutic options (24). Items were assessed by a panel of 37 experts (neurologists, psychiatrists, and a geriatrist), and consensus was achieved in 81.6% of them. Depressive symptoms, enhanced by multiple patient circumstances, were considered Parkinson's disease risk factors but not clinical indicators of motor symptom and disease progression. These patients should be systematically screened for depression while ruling out both anhedonia and apathy symptoms as they are not necessarily linked to it. Clinical scales (mainly the Geriatric Depression Scale GDS-15) can help establishing the diagnosis of depression, the symptoms of which will require treatment regardless of severity. Efficacious and well-tolerated pharmacological options for Parkinson's comorbid depression were selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (especially sertraline), dual-action serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (venlafaxine, desvenlafaxine, and duloxetine), multimodal (vortioxetine, bupropion, mirtazapine, and tianeptine), and anti-Parkinsonian dopamine agonists (pramipexole, ropinirole, and rotigotine). Tricyclic antidepressants and combining type B monoamine oxidase inhibitors with serotonergic drugs have serious side effects in these patients and therefore should not be prescribed. Electroconvulsive therapy was indicated for severe and drug-refractory cases. Cognitive behavioural therapy was recommended in cases of mild depression. Results presented here are useful diagnostic and patient management guidance for other physicians and important considerations to improve future drug trial design.

MNCD: A New Tool for Classifying Parkinson's Disease in Daily Clinical Practice.

Background and objective: Parkinson's disease (PD) is a clinically heterogeneous disorder in which the symptoms and prognosis can be very different among patients. We propose a new simple classification to identify key symptoms and staging in PD. Patients and Methods: Sixteen movement disorders specialists from Spain participated in this project. The classification was consensually approved after a discussion and review process from June to October 2021. The TNM classification and the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) were considered as models in the design. Results: The classification was named MNCD and included 4 major axes: (1) motor symptoms; (2) non-motor symptoms; (3) cognition; (4) dependency for activities of daily living (ADL). Motor axis included 4 sub-axes: (1) motor fluctuations; (2) dyskinesia; (3) axial symptoms; (4) tremor. Four other sub-axes were included in the non-motor axis: (1) neuropsychiatric symptoms; (2) autonomic dysfunction; (3) sleep disturbances and fatigue; (4) pain and sensory disorders. According to the MNCD, 5 stages were considered, from stage 1 (no disabling motor or non-motor symptoms with normal cognition and independency for ADL) to 5 (dementia and dependency for basic ADL). Conclusions: A new simple classification of PD is proposed. The MNCD classification includes 4 major axes and 5 stages to identify key symptoms and monitor the evolution of the disease in patients with PD. It is necessary to apply this proof of concept in a properly designed study.

Experiencia clínica en el tratamiento de las fluctuaciones motoras en la enfermedad de Parkinson. Consenso Delphi de un grupo / Clinical experience in the treatment of motor fluctuations in Parkinsons disease. Delphi consensus of a group of experts in movement disorders

INTRODUCCIÓN: Las fluctuaciones motoras son una de las complicaciones más frecuentes en la enfermedad de Parkinson y su tratamiento sigue siendo complejo. Por ello, desde el Grupo de Trastornos del Movimiento de la Asociación Madrileña de Neurología presentamos nuestra experiencia clínica en el tratamiento de estas complicaciones, con la intención de que sea de utilidad en la toma de decisiones en la práctica clínica diaria. DESARROLLO: Se elaboraron 19 preguntas a partir de una revisión bibliográfica y una encuesta abierta respondida por los miembros de dicho grupo. Dichas cuestiones se debatieron en dos fases, utilizando la metodología Delphi. Considerando los resultados de la encuesta, el ajuste de la dosis de levodopa y los agonistas dopaminérgicos son la opción con mejor relación eficacia/tolerabilidad en el tratamiento de las fluctuaciones motoras. La rotigotina es útil en las fluctuaciones motoras asociadas a gastroparesia, y la apomorfina subcutánea intermitente, en pacientes con off impredecible. El efecto adverso más relevante asociado a los agonistas dopaminérgicos es el trastorno del control de impulsos. Los inhibidores de la catecol-O-metiltransferasa son útiles en las fluctuaciones motoras de inicio, especialmente en el wearing off. Los inhibidores de la monoaminooxidasa son fármacos, en general, bien tolerados y útiles en las fluctuaciones motoras. En caso de que estas medidas no resulten eficaces, se deben indicar terapias de segunda línea de manera individualizada. CONCLUSIÓN: El perfil clínico del paciente con enfermedad de Parkinson es primordial para decidir la terapia más adecuada en el tratamiento de las fluctuaciones motora

INTRODUCTION. Motor fluctuations are one of the most common complications of Parkinsons disease and their treatment is still a complex matter. Therefore, from the Neurology Movement Disorders Group we present our clinical experience in the treatment of these complications, with the intention of it being useful in decision-making in daily clinical practice. DEVELOPMENT. Nineteen questions were developed based on a literature review and an open survey answered by members of this group. These issues were discussed in two phases, using the Delphi methodology. Considering the results of the survey, levodopa dose adjustment and dopamine agonists are the option with the best efficacy/tolerability ratio in the treatment of motor fluctuations. Rotigotine is useful in the motor fluctuations associated with gastroparesis, and intermittent subcutaneous apomorphine has positive effects in patients with unpredictable off periods. The most relevant adverse effect associated with dopamine agonists is impulse control disorder. Catechol-O-methyltransferase inhibitors are useful in the initial stages of motor fluctuations, especially in wearing off. Monoamine oxidase inhibitors are generally drugs that are well-tolerated and useful in motor fluctuations. If these measures are not effective, second-line treatments should be indicated on a case-by-case basis. CONCLUSION. The clinical profile of patients with Parkinson's disease is paramount in deciding the most appropriate therapy for the treatment of motor fluctuations

Familial multiple sclerosis and association with other autoimmune diseases.

Objectives: Autoimmune diseases (AID) follow a complex, probably polygenic, pattern of inheritance and often cluster in families of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). Our objective was to analyze family patterns and characteristics in families including more than one patient with MS. Materials and Methods: We analyzed personal and family history of neurological, systemic, and autoimmune diseases in 84 MS patients from 40 different families. Families were classified in two groups: families with cases of MS in at least two different generations (15 families) and families in which cases of MS belonged to only one generation (25 families). Results: The two previously established groups presented different clinical patterns and frequency of association with another AID. In one group, the second generation displayed a higher annual relapse rate than the first generation, higher frequency of progressive forms of MS, and more patients with another AID in addition to MS. Relapsing-remitting forms of MS (RRMS) were more frequent in the other group. Conclusions: Families that include more than one MS patient may show two distinct patterns. This finding seems important for the compression and analysis of genetic information on MS.

Validation of the Lille's Apathy Rating Scale in Very Mild to Moderate Dementia.

OBJECTIVE: Apathy is one of the most common and disabling syndromes of dementia and presents at all stages of the disease. Comprehensive and structured methods to assess apathy in dementia are still needed. Lille's Apathy Rating Scale (LARS) has shown good psychometric properties for apathy evaluation in Parkinson disease but has not been validated in dementia. The aim of this study was to validate the LARS in a cohort of patients with very mild to moderate dementia. METHODS: 101 patients with cognitive impairment (Clinical Dementia Rating ≤ 2) and 50 healthy subjects were recruited. Patient diagnoses included 43 individuals with Alzheimer disease, 41 frontotemporal dementia, and 17 primary progressive aphasia. In addition to LARS, the following assessments were administered: Clinical Dementia Rating, Interview for Deterioration in Daily Living Activities in Dementia, Functional Activities Questionnaire, Frontal Behavioral Inventory, Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI), and Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. RESULTS: Internal consistency for LARS (Cronbach's alpha) was 0.940. Test-retest intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was 0.940 and inter-rater ICC was 0.987. The correlation among LARS and NPI apathy scores (concurrent validity) was 0.834. Receiver operating characteristic analysis estimated an area under the curve of 0.987. The optimal cutoff point was -10. Although total LARS score was influenced by the presence of depression, this disorder was independent with respect to apathy. CONCLUSION: LARS is reliable and valid for detecting and quantifying apathy in patients with dementia, even in very early stages of the disease.

Visual and statistical analysis of ¹8F-FDG PET in primary progressive aphasia.

PURPOSE: Diagnosing progressive primary aphasia (PPA) and its variants is of great clinical importance, and fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) may be a useful diagnostic technique. The purpose of this study was to evaluate interobserver variability in the interpretation of FDG PET images in PPA as well as the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of the technique. We also aimed to compare visual and statistical analyses of these images. METHODS: There were 10 raters who analysed 44 FDG PET scans from 33 PPA patients and 11 controls. Five raters analysed the images visually, while the other five used maps created using Statistical Parametric Mapping software. Two spatial normalization procedures were performed: global mean normalization and cerebellar normalization. Clinical diagnosis was considered the gold standard. RESULTS: Inter-rater concordance was moderate for visual analysis (Fleiss' kappa 0.568) and substantial for statistical analysis (kappa 0.756-0.881). Agreement was good for all three variants of PPA except for the nonfluent/agrammatic variant studied with visual analysis. The sensitivity and specificity of each rater's diagnosis of PPA was high, averaging 87.8 and 89.9% for visual analysis and 96.9 and 90.9% for statistical analysis using global mean normalization, respectively. In cerebellar normalization, sensitivity was 88.9% and specificity 100%. CONCLUSION: FDG PET demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy for the diagnosis of PPA and its variants. Inter-rater concordance was higher for statistical analysis, especially for the nonfluent/agrammatic variant. These data support the use of FDG PET to evaluate patients with PPA and show that statistical analysis methods are particularly useful for identifying the nonfluent/agrammatic variant of PPA.

Clinical course of primary progressive aphasia: clinical and FDG-PET patterns.

Primary progressive aphasia (PPA) may be the onset of several neurodegenerative diseases. This study evaluates a cohort of patients with PPA to assess their progression to different clinical syndromes, associated factors that modulate this progression, and patterns of cerebral metabolism linked to different clinical evolutionary forms. Thirty-five patients meeting PPA criteria underwent a clinical and neuroimaging (18)F-Fluorodeoxyglucose PET evaluation. Survival analysis was performed using time from clinical onset to the development of a non-language symptom or deficit (PPA-plus). Cerebral metabolism was analyzed using Statistical Parametric Mapping. Patients classified into three PPA variants evolved to atypical parkinsonism, behavioral disorder and motor neuron disease in the agrammatic variant; to behavioral disorder in the semantic; and to memory impairment in the logopenic. Median time from the onset of symptoms to PPA-plus was 36 months (31-40, 95 % confidence interval). Right laterality, and years of education were associated to a lower risk of progression, while logopenic variant to a higher risk. Different regions of hypometabolism were identified in agrammatic PPA with parkinsonism, motor neuron disease and logopenic PPA-plus. Clinical course of PPA differs according to each variant. Left anterior temporal and frontal medial hypometabolism in agrammatic variant is linked to motor neuron disease and atypical parkinsonism, respectively. PPA variant, laterality and education may be associated to the risk of progression. These results suggest the possibility that clinical and imaging data could help to predict the clinical course of PPA.

Validation of a Spanish version of the Lille apathy rating scale for Parkinson's disease.

INTRODUCTION: To date, no rating scales for detecting apathy in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients have been validated in Spanish. For this reason, the aim of this study was to validate a Spanish version of Lille apathy rating scale (LARS) in a cohort of PD patients from Spain. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: 130 PD patients and 70 healthy controls were recruited to participate in the study. Apathy was measured using the Spanish version of LARS and the neuropsychiatric inventory (NPI). Reliability (internal consistency, test-retest, and interrater reliability) and validity (construct, content, and criterion validity) were measured. RESULTS: Interrater reliability was 0.93. Cronbach's α for LARS was 0.81. The test-retest correlation coefficient was 0.97. The correlation between LARS and NPI scores was 0.61. The optimal cutoff point under the ROC curve was -14, whereas the value derived from healthy controls was -11. The prevalence of apathy in our population tested by LARS was 42%. CONCLUSIONS: The Spanish version of LARS is a reliable and useful tool for diagnosing apathy in PD patients. Total LARS score is influenced by the presence of depression and cognitive impairment. However, both disorders are independent identities with respect to apathy. The satisfactory reliability and validity of the scale make it an appropriate instrument for screening and diagnosing apathy in clinical practice or for research purposes.

Evaluation of the new consensus criteria for the diagnosis of primary progressive aphasia using fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography.

BACKGROUND: New consensus criteria have been proposed to classify primary progressive aphasia (PPA) into three variants: agrammatic, semantic, and logopenic. Some studies have subsequently addressed the usefulness of these criteria, with controversial results. We aimed to determine the correlation between the clinical diagnosis according to the new criteria and brain topography in (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET). METHODS: Patients meeting the PPA criteria were prospectively recruited in a single center during a period of 18 months. They were clinically classified according to the new criteria and underwent FDG-PET. The cerebral metabolism of each patient was compared to a healthy control group using statistical parametric mapping. The expected variant according to the analysis of PET imaging was compared with the clinical diagnosis using the consensus criteria. RESULTS: 32 patients were included. 90% of them fulfilled the consensus criteria and could be classified into one of the three clinical variants. The correlation with the cerebral metabolism was high: the kappa index was 0.91 in the agrammatic variant, 0.71 in the semantic variant, and 0.74 in the logopenic variant. CONCLUSIONS: A high correlation with the diagnosis obtained using FDG-PET was found. However, an overdiagnosis of the logopenic variant was observed. These results support the use of the new criteria, but some modifications or complementary studies may still be necessary.

Levodopa infusion improves impulsivity and dopamine dysregulation syndrome in Parkinson's disease.

BACKGROUND: Impulsivity and dopamine dysregulation syndrome are frequent complications of treatment in Parkinson's disease (PD). METHODS: We assessed the effect of jejunal levodopa infusion (JLI) on behavioral symptoms in 8 PD patients with motor complications and severe impulsivity and dopamine dysregulation syndrome (DDS), which had not be controlled before by adjusting oral medications. The infusion was delivered during 15 hours (daily dose 1007.2 ± 302.5 mg) and stopped at night time. Patients were reassessed after 25 ± 9 weeks of treatment with a stable dose of jejunal l-dopa. RESULTS: Off periods and dyskinesias decreased by 27% and 20,7% respectively, compared to baseline. DDS and all types of impulse control disorders (ICDs) improved in all patients, with nearly complete symptom resolution. Punding improved in all 5 patients but disappeared completely in only 1. CONCLUSIONS: Our experience suggests that l-dopa infusion has a positive effect on both motor complications and behavioral disorders. This treatment approach deserves further controlled studies.

Levodopa en el tratamiento de la enfermedad de Parkinson: mitos y realidades / Levodopa in the treatment of Parkinson’s disease: myths and realties

Durante los últimos años hemos sido testigos de una utilización preferente de agonistas dopaminérgicos (AD) como tratamiento de la enfermedad de Parkinson (EP), con la intención de retrasar en lo posible el desarrollo de fluctuaciones y discinesias. Sin embargo, la levodopa continúa siendo el fármaco antiparkinsoniano más eficaz y, probablemente, el que mejora un mayor número de síntomas de la enfermedad. En este artículo se ha realizado una revisión exhaustiva de la literatura por parte de un grupo de neurólogos expertos y miembros del Grupo de Trastornos del Movimiento de la Sociedad Española de Neurología sobre los beneficios y riesgos del tratamiento con levodopa en pacientes con EP. La principal conclusión de este artículo es que la levodopa continúa siendo el tratamiento más eficaz para la EP. Aunque el riesgo y la incidencia de desarrollar discinesias se mantiene en un nivel menor en el grupo tratado inicialmente con AD, el número de pacientes que desarrollan discinesias incapacitantes es muy bajo en todos los estudios y similar para los AD y la levodopa, y las escalas de calidad de vida son también similares en ambos grupos, lo que cuestiona el impacto que estas complicaciones motoras tienen sobre la calidad de vida de los pacientes con EP. A la vista de estos resultados, deberíamos plantearnos si está justificado privar a los pacientes del buen control de los síntomas que proporciona la levodopa por el temor a que desarrollen discinesias o fluctuaciones motoras leves que no van a mermar su calidad de vida. A ello hay que añadir la posibilidad de que desarrollen efectos secundarios graves, que son más frecuentes con el uso de AD (AU)

In recent years we have witnessed a growing tendency to opt for the use of dopamine agonists (DA) as treatment for Parkinson’s disease (PD), with the aim of delaying as far as possible the development of fluctuations and dyskinesias. Yet, levodopa continues to be the most effective antiparkinson drug and is probably the one that improves the greatest number of symptoms of the disease. This article reports on the results of a comprehensive review of the literature dealing with the benefits and risks of levodopa treatment in patients with PD which was conducted by a group of expert neurologists and members of the Spanish Neurology Society’s Movement Disorder Group. The main conclusion reached in this article is that levodopa continues to be the most effective treatment for PD. Although the risk and incidence of developing dyskinesias remains at a lower level in the group initially treated with DA, the number of patients who develop disabling dyskinesias is very low in all the studies and is similar for DA and for levodopa. Scores on the quality of life scales are also similar in the two groups, which casts some doubt on the impact that these motor complications have on the quality of life of patients with PD. In view of these findings, we should consider whether there is any real justification for depriving patients of the good control of their symptoms offered by levodopa owing to the fear of developing dyskinesias or mild motor fluctuations that are not really going to have any negative effect on their quality of life. There is also the possibility of their developing severe side effects, which are more frequent with the use of DA (AU)