Cerebrospinal Fluid Output as a Risk Factor of Chronic Hydrocephalus After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.

BACKGROUND: Chronic shunt-dependent hydrocephalus is a well-known complication of subarachnoid hemorrhage. Although the risk factors have been extensively investigated, most fail to predict permanent shunt dependency. It is unknown whether the volume of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) from external ventricular drainage and the daily volume of drainage during the acute hydrocephalus phase (first 72 hours) can predict shunt dependency. We aimed to determine whether CSF output during the acute hydrocephalus phase is a risk factor for shunt dependency. METHODS: Patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage and hydrocephalus treated with external ventricular drainage were prospectively registered in our database between January 2017 and March 2020. Factors evaluated for predicting shunt dependency included age; sex; Hunt and Hess grade; World Federation of Neurological Surgeons grade; acute hydrocephalus; modified Fisher grade; aneurysm treatment modality; hospital length of stay; modified Rankin score; average daily overall CSF production; average CSF output for the first 24, 48, and 72 hours; external ventricular drainage days; the number of wean/clamp failures; and ventriculoperitoneal shunting. RESULTS: Univariate analysis identified Hunt and Hess grade; acute hydrocephalus at onset; external ventricular drainage; overall CSF output; average CSF output for the first 24, 48, and 72 hours; and CSF output until the first clamp as significant risk factors for shunt dependency (P < 0.001). In a multivariate logistic regression analysis, overall CSF output and average CSF output for the first 72 hours were significant risk factors for shunt dependency. CONCLUSIONS: Overall CSF output, especially during the acute hydrocephalus phase (first 72 hours), predicts the development of chronic hydrocephalus.

Women's role in neurosurgical research: is the gender gap improving?

OBJECTIVE: The percentage of women publishing high-impact neurosurgical research might be perceived as a representation of our specialty and may influence the perpetuation of the existing gender gap. This study investigated whether the trend in women taking lead roles in neurosurgical research has mirrored the increase in female neurosurgeons during the past decade and whether our most prestigious publications portray enough female role models to stimulate gender diversity among the new generation of neurosurgeons. METHODS: Two of the most prominent neurosurgical journals-Journal of Neurosurgery and Neurosurgery-were selected for this study, and every original article that was published in 2009 and 2019 in each of those journals was investigated according to the gender of the first and senior authors, their academic titles, their affiliations, and their institutions' region. RESULTS: A total of 1328 articles were analyzed. The percentage of female authors was significantly higher in Europe and Russia compared with the US and Canada (first authors: 60/302 [19.9%] vs 109/829 [13.1%], p = 0.005; and senior authors: 32/302 [10.6%] vs 57/829 [6.9%], p = 0.040). Significantly increased female authorship was observed from 2009 to 2019, and overall numbers of both first and senior female authors almost doubled. However, when analyzing by regions, female authorship increased significantly only in the US and Canada. Female authors of neurosurgical research articles were significantly less likely to hold an MD degree compared with men. Female neurosurgeons serving as senior authors were represented in only 3.6% (48/1328) of articles. Women serving as senior authors were more likely to have a female colleague listed as the first author of their research (29/97 [29.9%] vs 155/1231 [12.6%]; χ2 = 22.561, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Although this work showed an encouraging increase in the number of women publishing high-impact neurosurgical research, the stagnant trend in Europe may suggest that a glass ceiling has been reached and further advances in equity would require more aggressive measures. The differences in the researchers' profiles (academic title and affiliation) suggest an even wider gender gap. Cultural unconscious bias may explain why female senior authors have more than double the number of women serving as their junior authors compared with men. While changes in the workforce happen, strategies such as publishing specific issues on women, encouraging female editorials, and working toward more gender-balanced editorial boards may help our journals to portray a more equitable specialty that would not discourage bright female candidates.

Validation of shunt dependency prediction scores after aneurysmal spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage.

BACKGROUND: Currently available scores for predicting shunt dependency after aneurysmal spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) are limited and not widely accepted. The key purpose of this study was to validate a recently created score for shunt dependency in aSAH (SDASH) in an independent population of aSAH patients. We compared this new SDASH score based on a combination of the Hunt and Hess grade, Barrow Neurological Institute (BNI) score, and the presence or not of acute hydrocephalus with other published predictive scores. METHODS: The SDASH score, Hijdra score, BNI grading system, chronic hydrocephalus ensuing from SAH score (CHESS), Graeb score, and modified Graeb score (mGS) were calculated for a cohort of aSAH patients. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine the reliability of the SDASH score, and the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve was used to assess the discriminative ability of the model. RESULTS: In 214 patients with aSAH, 40 (18.7%) developed shunt-dependent hydrocephalus (SDHC). The AUC for the SDASH score was 0.816. The SDASH score reliably predicted SDHC in aSAH (odds ratio: 2.93, 95% CI: 1.99-4.31; p < 0.001) with no statistically significant differences being found between the SDASH score and the CHESS score (AUC: 0.816), radiological-based Graeb score (AUC: 0.742), or modified Graeb score (AUC: 0.741). However, the Hijdra score (AUC: 0.673) and BNI grading system (AUC: 0.616) showed lower predictive values than the SDASH score. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support the ability of the SDASH score to predict shunt dependency after SAH in a population independent to that used to develop the score. The SDASH score may aid in the early management of hydrocephalus in aSAH, and it does not differ greatly from other predictive scores.

Clinical predictors of adverse events during continuous video-EEG monitoring in an epilepsy unit.

Patients admitted to epilepsy monitoring units (EMUs) for diagnostic and presurgical evaluation have an increased risk of seizure-related injury, particularly in the many cases in which medication is withdrawn. The purpose of this study was to assess the prevalence of adverse events (AEs) in this setting and to analyse associated clinical factors and costs. We evaluated consecutive patients admitted to an EMU at a tertiary care hospital over a 10-year period based on a descriptive, longitudinal study. We analysed the occurrence of AEs (traumatic injury, psychiatric complications, status epilepticus, cardiorespiratory disturbances, and death), investigated potential risk factors using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis, and compared admission costs between patients with and without AEs. In total, 411 EMU admissions were studied corresponding to 352 patients (55% women; mean [SD] age: 41.7 [12.1] years). Twenty-five patients (6%) experienced an AE. The most common event was traumatic injury (n=9), followed by status epilepticus (n=8), psychiatric complications (n=7), and cardiorespiratory disturbances (n=1). On comparing patients with and without AEs, we observed that the former were more likely to experience generalized seizures (OR: 7.81; 95% CI: 3.51-12.23; p<0.001) or have more seizures overall during admission (OR: 3.2; 95% CI: 1.42-6.8; p=0.002). Patients with AEs also had longer EMU stays (6.91 [2.64] vs 5.08 [1.1]; p=0.004), longer hospital stays (8.45 [3.6] vs 5.18 [1.2]; p<0.001), and higher costs (€7277.71 [€2743.9] vs €5175.7 [€1182.5]; p<0.001). Patients with generalized seizures and more seizures during admission were at greater risk of AEs, which were associated with higher admission costs.

Growth prediction in asymptomatic meningiomas: the utility of the AIMSS score.

BACKGROUND: Management of asymptomatic meningiomas represents a challenge due to the absence of a solid consensus on which is the best management strategy. There are various known factors predicting meningiomas growth risk. However, the Asian Intracranial Meningioma Scoring System (AIMSS) is the only described score to quantify such risk thus emerging as a potential tool for management decisions. This study aims to validate this score on our series of asymptomatic meningiomas. METHOD: We performed a retrospective review of asymptomatic meningiomas diagnosed at our institution between January 2008 and October 2016 and followed by an annual cerebral Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). For each lesion, the AIMSS score was calculated thus classifying them in low (0-2), intermediate (3-6) or high risk (7-11) of rapid growth (>2cm3/year). We investigated the correlation between the expected Average Growth Rate (AGR) according to the score and the one obtained in our study. The mean growth velocity over the different risk groups was also compared. RESULTS: Overall, 69 asymptomatic meningiomas found incidentally in 46 patients were included in the study; 31 were assigned to the low-risk group, 34 to the intermediate-risk group and 4 to the high-risk group. Attending to the AGR, 0% showed rapid growth in the low-risk group, 12% in the intermediate-risk group, and 25% in the high-risk group. The mean growth velocity showed a significant difference over the different risk groups (p < 0,001). CONCLUSIONS: According to our finding, the AIMSS score is a valid tool to estimate the risk of rapid growth of asymptomatic meningiomas. It is especially useful distinguishing between low- and intermediate-risk meningiomas. This feature would allow physicians to adjust the periodicity of radiological and clinical controls. Adding more known risk factors of rapid growth to the score might improve its predictive capabilities with the high-risk group.

Hydrocephalus and intracranial hypertension in a woman from Ecuador / Hidrocefalia e hipertensión intracraneal en una mujer de Ecuador

No disponible

Combining H-FABP and GFAP increases the capacity to differentiate between CT-positive and CT-negative patients with mild traumatic brain injury.

Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) patients may have trauma-induced brain lesions detectable using CT scans. However, most patients will be CT-negative. There is thus a need for an additional tool to detect patients at risk. Single blood biomarkers, such as S100B and GFAP, have been widely studied in mTBI patients, but to date, none seems to perform well enough. In many different diseases, combining several biomarkers into panels has become increasingly interesting for diagnoses and to enhance classification performance. The present study evaluated 13 proteins individually-H-FABP, MMP-1, MMP-3, MMP-9, VCAM, ICAM, SAA, CRP, GSTP, NKDA, PRDX1, DJ-1 and IL-10-for their capacity to differentiate between patients with and without a brain lesion according to CT results. The best performing proteins were then compared and combined with the S100B and GFAP proteins into a CT-scan triage panel. Patients diagnosed with mTBI, with a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 15 and one additional clinical symptom were enrolled at three different European sites. A blood sample was collected at hospital admission, and a CT scan was performed. Patients were divided into two two-centre cohorts and further dichotomised into CT-positive and CT-negative groups for statistical analysis. Single markers and panels were evaluated using Cohort 1. Four proteins-H-FABP, IL-10, S100B and GFAP-showed significantly higher levels in CT-positive patients. The best-performing biomarker was H-FABP, with a specificity of 32% (95% CI 23-40) and sensitivity reaching 100%. The best-performing two-marker panel for Cohort 1, subsequently validated in Cohort 2, was a combination of H-FABP and GFAP, enhancing specificity to 46% (95% CI 36-55). When adding IL-10 to this panel, specificity reached 52% (95% CI 43-61) with 100% sensitivity. These results showed that proteins combined into panels could be used to efficiently classify CT-positive and CT-negative mTBI patients.

H-FABP: A new biomarker to differentiate between CT-positive and CT-negative patients with mild traumatic brain injury.

The majority of patients with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) will have normal Glasgow coma scale (GCS) of 15. Furthermore, only 5%-8% of them will be CT-positive for an mTBI. Having a useful biomarker would help clinicians evaluate a patient's risk of developing intracranial lesions. The S100B protein is currently the most studied and promising biomarker for this purpose. Heart fatty-acid binding protein (H-FABP) has been highlighted in brain injury models and investigated as a biomarker for stroke and severe TBI, for example. Here, we evaluate the performances of S100B and H-FABP for differentiating between CT-positive and CT-negative patients. A total of 261 patients with a GCS score of 15 and at least one clinical symptom of mTBI were recruited at three different European sites. Blood samples from 172 of them were collected ≤ 6 h after trauma. Patients underwent a CT scan and were dichotomised into CT-positive and CT-negative groups for statistical analyses. H-FABP and S100B levels were measured using commercial kits, and their capacities to detect all CT-positive scans were evaluated, with sensitivity set to 100%. For patients recruited ≤ 6 h after trauma, the CT-positive group demonstrated significantly higher levels of both H-FABP (p = 0.004) and S100B (p = 0.003) than the CT-negative group. At 100% sensitivity, specificity reached 6% (95% CI 2.8-10.7) for S100B and 29% (95% CI 21.4-37.1) for H-FABP. Similar results were obtained when including all the patients recruited, i.e. hospital arrival within 24 h of trauma onset. H-FABP out-performed S100B and thus seems to be an interesting protein for detecting all CT-positive mTBI patients with a GCS score of 15 and at least one clinical symptom.

Comparison of elevated intracranial pressure pulse amplitude and disproportionately enlarged subarachnoid space (DESH) for prediction of surgical results in suspected idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus.

BACKGROUND: To compare the prognostic value of pulse amplitude on intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring and disproportionately enlarged subarachnoid space hydrocephalus (DESH) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for predicting surgical benefit after shunt placement in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH). METHOD: Patients with suspected iNPH were prospectively recruited from a single centre. All patients received preoperative MRI and ICP monitoring. Patients were classified as shunt responders if they had an improvement of one point or more on the NPH score at 1 year post-surgery. The sensitivity, specificity, Youden index, and positive and negative predictive values of the two diagnostic methods were calculated. RESULTS: Sixty-four of 89 patients clinically improved at 1 year post-surgery and were classed as shunt responders. Positive DESH findings had a sensitivity of 79.4 % and specificity of 80.8 % for predicting shunt responders. Fifty-five of 89 patients had positive DESH findings: 50 of these responded to VP shunt, giving a positive and negative predictive value of 90.9 % and 61.8 %, respectively. Fifty-seven of 89 patients had high ICP pulse amplitude. High ICP pulse amplitude had a sensitivity of 84.4 %, specificity of 88 %, positive predictive value of 94.7 % and negative predictive value of 61.8 % for predicting shunt responders. CONCLUSIONS: Both positive DESH findings and high ICP pulse amplitude support the diagnosis of iNPH and provide additional diagnostic value for predicting shunt-responsive patients; however, high ICP amplitude was more accurate than positive DESH findings, although it is an invasive test.

Decompressive craniectomy for encephalitis with brain herniation: case report and review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Decompressive craniectomy (DC) has been sporadically used in cases of infectious encephalitis with brain herniation. Like for other indications of DC, evidence is lacking regarding the beneficial or detrimental effects for this pathology. METHODS: We reviewed all the cases of viral and bacterial encephalitis treated with decompressive craniectomy reported in the literature. We also present one case from our institution. These data were analyzed to determine the relation between clinical and epidemiological variables and outcome in surgically treated patients. RESULTS: Of 48 patients, 39 (81.25 %) had a favorable functional recovery and 9 (18.75 %) had a negative course. Only two patients (4 %) died after surgical treatment. A statistically significant association was found between diagnosis (viral and bacterial encephalitis) and outcome (GOS) in surgically treated patients. Viral encephalitis, usually caused by herpes simplex virus (HSV), has a more favorable outcome (92.3 % with GOS 4 or 5) than bacterial encephalitis (56.2 % with GOS 4 or 5). CONCLUSIONS: Based on this literature review, we consider that, due to the specific characteristics of infectious encephalitis, especially in case of viral infection, decompressive craniectomy is probably an effective treatment when brain stem compression threatens the course of the disease. In patients with viral encephalitis, better prognosis can be expected when surgical decompression is used than when only medical treatment is provided.