Factores condicionantes de sedación en pacientes geriátricos y oncológicos atendidos en el domicilio / Determining factors in the sedation of geriatric and oncology patients treated at home

Introducción. La sedación, como medida terapéutica utilizada en el ámbito de los Cuidados Paliativos, sigue presentando para muchos profesionales dificultad en su manejo e indicaciones. Es muy variada la bibliografía existente en este sentido, muchas veces exclusiva de los pacientes oncológicos. Nuestro objetivo es analizar las características de los pacientes atendidos por un Equipo de Soporte para Atención Domiciliaria que precisaron sedación frente a los no sedados, para determinar posibles factores condicionantes de la misma que puedan ayudar en la toma de decisiones. Método. Estudio analítico prospectivo realizado en el sector sanitario de Barbastro (Huesca) desde septiembre del año 2007 hasta febrero del año 2011. La población a estudio fueron los pacientes derivados al Equipo de Soporte para Atención Domiciliaria de Barbastro. Variables principales. Edad, sexo, antecedentes médicos, síntomas, Barthel previo y actual, Karnofsky, cuidador principal, fármacos previos, fármacos tras intervención, sedación sí/no. Resultado. Requirieron sedación el 16,6% (n=106) de los casos (N=638). Los pacientes sedados fueron más jóvenes, sin diferencias por sexo. Un 83% fueron oncológicos. La presencia de metástasis no mostró diferencias respecto a la necesidad de sedación. Los pacientes sedados presentaron un mayor declive funcional, determinado mediante un descenso en el índice de Barthel y un peor Karnofsky. Los pacientes sedados mostraron una mayor frecuencia de síntomas no controlados, con excepción de agitación psicomotriz, hecho determinado por las medicaciones usadas pre y postintervención. Conclusiones. La presencia de enfermedad oncológica, con existencia de declive funcional marcado, clínica no controlada y necesidad de determinadas medicaciones para el control de la sintomatología pueden determinar la necesidad de sedación al final del proceso, por encima de otros factores como la comorbilidad del paciente (AU)

Introduction. Sedation, used as a therapeutic measure in the field of Palliative Care, continues to present difficulties for many professionals in its management and indications. Is varied existing literature in this regard, often exclusive cancer patients. Our objective is to analyse the characteristics of patients attended by a Home Care Support Team who required sedation compared to non-sedated patients, for possible determining factors for its use that could help in decision-making. Method. A prospective analytical study conducted in Barbastro (Huesca) from September 2007 to February 2011. The study population are patients referred to the Home Care Support Team of Barbastro. Main variables. Age, sex, medical history, symptoms, previous and current Barthel, Karnofsky, primary caregiver, previous drugs, drugs after intervention, sedation yes/no. Results. Required sedation 16.6% (n=106) of the cases (N=638). Sedated patients were younger, with no differences in sex, and the large majority (83%) were oncology patients. The presence of metastases showed no differences in need for sedation. Sedated patients have an increased functional impairment, determined by Barthel index decreased and a worse Karnofsky. Sedated patients showed increased frequency of uncontrolled symptoms, except psychomotor agitation, a fact determined by the medications used pre- and post-intervention. Conclusions. The presence of neoplastic disease, marked with existence of functional decline, and uncontrolled clinical need for certain medications to control symptoms may determine the need for sedation at the end of the process, above other factors such as patient comorbidity (AU)

[Determining factors in the sedation of geriatric and oncology patients treated at home]. / Factores condicionantes de sedación en pacientes geriátricos y oncológicos atendidos en el domicilio.

INTRODUCTION: Sedation, used as a therapeutic measure in the field of Palliative Care, continues to present difficulties for many professionals in its management and indications. Is varied existing literature in this regard, often exclusive cancer patients. Our objective is to analyse the characteristics of patients attended by a Home Care Support Team who required sedation compared to non-sedated patients, for possible determining factors for its use that could help in decision-making. METHOD: A prospective analytical study conducted in Barbastro (Huesca) from September 2007 to February 2011. The study population are patients referred to the Home Care Support Team of Barbastro. MAIN VARIABLES: Age, sex, medical history, symptoms, previous and current Barthel, Karnofsky, primary caregiver, previous drugs, drugs after intervention, sedation yes/no. RESULTS: Required sedation 16.6% (n=106) of the cases (N=638). Sedated patients were younger, with no differences in sex, and the large majority (83%) were oncology patients. The presence of metastases showed no differences in need for sedation. Sedated patients have an increased functional impairment, determined by Barthel index decreased and a worse Karnofsky. Sedated patients showed increased frequency of uncontrolled symptoms, except psychomotor agitation, a fact determined by the medications used pre- and post-intervention. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of neoplastic disease, marked with existence of functional decline, and uncontrolled clinical need for certain medications to control symptoms may determine the need for sedation at the end of the process, above other factors such as patient comorbidity.