[Does medication abuse in patients with chronic migraine influence the effectiveness of preventive treatment with topiramate?]. / ¿El abuso de farmacos en pacientes con migraña cronica influye en la efectividad del tratamiento preventivo con topiramato?

INTRODUCTION: Patients with chronic migraine (CM) and medication abuse are difficult to treat, and have a greater tendency towards chronification and a poorer quality of life than those with other types of headache. AIM: To evaluate whether the presence of medication abuse lowers the effectiveness of topiramate. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A series of patients with CM were grouped according to whether they met abuse criteria or not. They were advised to stop taking the drug that they were abusing. Treatment was adjusted to match their crises and preventive treatment with topiramate was established from the beginning. The number of days with headache and intense migraine in the previous month and at four months of treatment was evaluated. RESULTS: In all, 262 patients with CM criteria were selected and 167 (63.7%) of them fulfilled abuse criteria. In both groups there was a significant reduction in the number of days with headache/month and number of migraine attacks/month at the fourth month of treatment with topiramate. The percentage of reduction in the number of days with headache/month in CM without abuse was 59.3 ± 36.1%, and with abuse, 48.7 ± 41.7% (p = 0.0574). The percentage of reduction in the number of days with intense migraine/month in CM without abuse was 61.2%, and with abuse, 50% (p = 0.0224). Response rate according to the number of days with headache/month in CM without abuse was 69%, and with abuse, 57%. Response rate according to the number of intense migraines/month in CM without abuse was 76.8%, and in CM with abuse, 61% (p = 0.0097). CONCLUSIONS: Topiramate was effective in patients with CM with and without medication abuse, although effectiveness is lower in the latter case.

TITLE: El abuso de farmacos en pacientes con migraña cronica influye en la efectividad del tratamiento preventivo con topiramato?Introduccion. Los pacientes con migraña cronica (MC) y abuso de medicacion son dificiles de tratar y tienen peor calidad de vida que otros pacientes con migrañas. Objetivo. Valorar si la presencia de abuso de farmacos disminuye la efectividad del topiramato. Pacientes y metodos. Una serie de pacientes con MC fueron agrupados segun presentasen criterios de abuso o no abuso de farmacos. Se les aconsejo la supresion del farmaco del cual abusaban. Se ajusto el tratamiento de sus crisis y se inicio tratamiento preventivo desde el principio con topiramato. Se valoro el numero dias con cefalea y migrañas intensas en el mes previo y al cuarto mes de tratamiento. Resultados. Fueron seleccionados 262 pacientes con criterios de MC, y de ellos 167 (63,7%) cumplieron criterios de abuso. En ambos grupos hubo una reduccion significativa del numero de dias con cefalea/mes y numero de crisis de migraña/mes al cuarto mes de tratamiento con topiramato. Porcentaje de reduccion de dias con cefalea/mes en MC sin abuso, 59,3 ± 36,1%; y con abuso, 48,7 ± 41,7% (p = 0,0574). Porcentaje de reduccion de migrañas intensas/mes en MC sin abuso, 61,2%; y con abuso, 50% (p = 0,0224). Tasa de respondedores segun numero de dias con cefalea/mes en MC sin abuso, 69%; y con abuso, 57%. Tasa de respondedores segun numero de migrañas intensas/mes en MC sin abuso, 76,8%; y en MC con abuso, 61% (p = 0,0097). Conclusiones. El topiramato fue efectivo en pacientes con MC sin y con abuso de farmacos, aunque con menor efectividad en estos ultimos.

[A study to compare independent groups of patients with episodic migraine who were treated preventively with flunarizine or nadolol]. / Estudio comparativo de grupos independientes de pacientes con migrana episodica tratados preventivamente con flunaricina o nadolol.

INTRODUCTION. Flunarizine, with level of evidence A, and nadolol, with evidence level C, would be indicated as preventive treatment of migraine. Yet, no previous studies have been conducted to compare the effectiveness of the two drugs. AIM. To compare the effectiveness parameters in independent groups of patients treated preventively with one of the pharmaceuticals from the study, the same protocol being applied in both cases. PATIENTS AND METHODS. The subjects selected for the study were patients with episodic migraine (according to 2004 International Headache Society criteria) who had undergone preventive treatment for the first time, with flunarizine (5 mg/day) or nadolol (20-40 mg/day). The main effectiveness variables (reduction in the number of seizures at four months of treatment and responder rates) were analysed. RESULTS. The study included 227 patients who intended to receive treatment: 155 with flunarizine (80.5% females; mean age: 38.3 ± 12.1 years) and 72 with nadolol (63.8% females; mean age: 37.1 ± 12.0 years). The mean number of seizures prior to treatment was 6.09 ± 2.6 in the flunarizine group and 5.1 ± 1.7 in the nadolol group (p = 0.0079); at four months of treatment it was 2.61 ± 2.4 in the flunarizine group and 2.77 ± 2.4 in the nadolol group (p = NS). Percentage of reduction of migraines: 55.2% with flunarizine and 50.4% with nadolol (p = NS). The responder rate was 69% with flunarizine and 67% with nadolol (p = NS). The excellent response rate (reduction in the number of seizures by 75% or more) was 52.2% with flunarizine and 36.1% with nadolol (p = 0.0077). Percentage of adverse side effects: 48.3% with flunarizine and 25% with nadolol (p = 0.0009). The satisfaction rate was similar in both groups, 68%. CONCLUSIONS. Both flunarizine and nadolol proved to be effective in the preventive treatment of episodic migraine. Flunarizine is used more often in our milieu and was less well tolerated.

[Patients with headache and medication abuse. Indicators of response to ambulatory treatment]. / Pacientes con cefalea y abuso de medicación. Indicadores de respuesta al tratamiento ambulatorio.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with headache and medication abuse (HMA) are difficult to treat, have a greater tendency towards chronification and a poorer quality of life than those with other types of headache. AIM. To evaluate the indicators showing that these patients are responding to ambulatory treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From a series of patients with migraine, we selected those who satisfied HMA criteria according to the appendix of the 2006 International Classification of the Headache Disease (ICHD-2) and who had never previously undergone treatment. As outpatients, they were advised to stop taking the drug that they were abusing. The treatment of their seizures was adjusted with the most efficient drugs and preventive treatment was started from the outset with topiramate or flunarizine. Patients were grouped according to whether they continued with HMA or not. Comparisons were made between the number of days with headache during the previous month and after four months of treatment and the persistence of abuse. RESULTS: HMA criteria were met by 178 patients (mean age 40.9; 88.7% females). Results showed that 68.5% (122 patients) responded and no longer met HMA criteria after treatment. The treatment used for their seizures (triptans, nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, analgesics) and preventive treatment (topiramate or flunarizine) were similar in both groups. The average number of days with headache prior to treatment was 18.52 in the group that responded and 20.87 (p = 0.0263) in the group that did not respond to treatment. In the group of responders 7.3% dropped out of preventive treatment compared with 35% (p = 0.0001) in the group of non-responders. CONCLUSIONS: A higher number of days with headache during the previous month and withdrawing from preventive treatment were indicators of a bad progression.

[Application of a clinical pathway for the treatment of transient ischaemic attacks: implementation strategies and appraisal at two years]. / Aplicación de una vía clínica para el tratamiento del accidente isquémico transitorio: estrategias de implantación y evaluación a los dos años.

INTRODUCTION: Management of cerebral vascular pathologies by means of clinical pathways allows us to make cost effective use of resources, to enhance health care quality and to obtain a greater degree of satisfaction in patients. AIMS: To assess the efficiency of applying a clinical pathway designed for the treatment of transient ischemic attacks (TIA) by monitoring a series of indicators that enable us to detect existing problems, to introduce any corrections that are needed and to draw conclusions that can be useful in the future. PATIENTS AND METHODS: To this end, a clinical pathway was drawn up with the general agreement of the members of our service and the different professionals involved in caring for these patients. Analyses were performed to study the data from 1998 to 2001, prior to implementation of the pathway, and from 2002 and 2003, which were the first years in which it was being applied. Altogether 1,433 patients with a diagnosis of TIA were hospitalised during this period, 554 of whom were admitted during the years 2002 and 2003. RESULTS: Of this group, the pathway was initially applied in 123 cases and 62 completed it. The mean stay in hospital was reduced from 9.2 days in 2000 to 5.7 days in 2003. The mean stay of patients who fulfilled all the requirements of the pathway was only 2.9 days. As far as the survey on satisfaction is concerned, 97% of patients said they were satisfied or very satisfied with the care they had received. CONCLUSIONS: The application of a clinical pathway in the treatment of TIA resulted in a high degree of satisfaction among the patients who were treated and a notable reduction in the mean stay in hospital.

[Sexual dysfunction management in multiple sclerosis]. / Abordaje de la disfunción sexual en la esclerosis múltiple.

INTRODUCTION: Sexual dysfunction is a frequent disorder associated to multiple sclerosis, that contributes to the worsening of life quality of these patients. AIM: To ascertain how it is managed in a demyelinating disease unit. PATIENTS AND METHODS: It was done an anonymous poll to multiple sclerosis patients in a demyelinating disease unit. The following variables were analysed: age, sex, marital status, education degree, sexual dysfunction, vesical dysfunction, gait disturbances and duration of illness. RESULTS: 67 of 97 patients answered. 74.6% females. Average age was 43.7 years. Average developing time was 11.3 years. 58% of the patients had vesical dysfunction. 43% had sexual dysfunction. There was relation with statistical significance between sexual and vesical dysfunction but not among the rest of variables. 63% of the patients with sexual dysfunction had never talked about this problem with their doctors. That the patient talked about sexual dysfunction was related with the fact that the neurologist asked for or not, and if sexual dysfunction was an important problem for the patient. The neurologist had asked for dysfunction sexual symptoms to 30% of the patients, and this was more frequent if the patient was male and if he or she had gait disturbances. CONCLUSIONS: Sexual dysfunction is a frequent and important problem for patients with multiple sclerosis. According to our results, this problem is raised up in an insufficient manner as much for patients as for neurologists.

Abordaje de la disfunción sexual en la esclerosis múltiple / Sexual dysfunction management in multiple sclerosis

Introducción. La disfunción sexual es un trastorno frecuente asociado a la esclerosis múltiple (EM) y contribuye al empeoramiento de la calidad de vida de estos pacientes. Objetivo. Valorar cómo se aborda este tema en una unidad de enfermedades desmielinizantes. Pacientes y métodos. Encuesta de respuesta anónima a pacientes con EM de una unidad de enfermedades desmielinizantes. Variables analizadas: edad, sexo, estado civil, nivel de escolarización, disfunción sexual, disfunción vesical, trastornos de la marcha y tiempo de evolución. Análisis bivariante y regresión logística. Resultados. Respondieron 67 de 97 pacientes. El 74,6% eran mujeres. Edad media: 43,7 años. Tiempo medio de evolución: 11,3 años. El 58% tenía disfunción vesical. La disfunción sexual estaba presente en el 43% de los pacientes. Observamos relación estadísticamente significativa entre la disfunción sexual y la disfunción vesical, pero no con el resto de las variables analizadas. El 63% de los pacientes con disfunción sexual no había comentado nunca este problema con el neurólogo. Las variables que se relacionan de forma independiente con que el paciente hable con el especialista de disfunción sexual son que se le interrogue a este respecto y que sea un problema importante en relación con su enfermedad. El neurólogo había preguntado por síntomas de disfunción sexual al 30% de los pacientes y el hecho de preguntar se relacionó con que el paciente fuera varón y con que tuviera trastornos en la marcha. Conclusión. La disfunción sexual es un problema frecuente e importante para los pacientes con EM. Según nuestros resultados, se aborda de manera insuficiente

Introduction. Sexual dysfunction is a frequent disorder associated to multiple sclerosis, that contributes to the worsening of life quality of these patients. Aim. To ascertain how it is managed in a demyelinating disease unit. Patients and methods. It was done an anonymous poll to multiple sclerosis patients in a demyelinating disease unit. The following variables were analysed: age, sex, marital status, education degree, sexual dysfunction, vesical dysfunction, gait disturbances and duration of illness. Results. 67 of 97 patients answered. 74.6% females. Average age was 43.7 years. Average developing time was 11.3 years. 58% of the patients had vesical dysfunction. 43% had sexual dysfunction. There was relation with statistical significance between sexual and vesical dysfunction but not among the rest of variables. 63% of the patients with sexual dysfunction had never talked about this problem with their doctors. That the patient talked about sexual dysfunction was related with the fact that the neurologist asked for or not, and if sexual dysfunction was an important problem for the patient. The neurologist had asked for dysfunction sexual symptoms to 30% of the patients, and this was more frequent if the patient was male and if he or she had gait disturbances. Conclusions. Sexual dysfunction is a frequent and important problem for patients with multiple sclerosis. According to our results, this problem is raised up in an insufficient manner as much for patients as for neurologists