Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Am J Cardiol ; 148: 53-59, 2021 06 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33617813

ABSTRACT

Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is a relatively rare but well-known cause of acute coronary syndrome in women. The role of sexual hormones has been related to the pathophysiology of SCAD. However, clinical features, angiographic findings, management and outcomes of SCAD women in relation to menopause status remain unknown. The Spanish multicenter prospective SCAD registry (NCT03607981), included 318 consecutive patients with SCAD. All coronary angiograms were analyzed in a centralized Corelab. In this substudy, 245 women were classified according to their menopause state (pre-menopausal and post-menopausal). In-hospital outcomes were analyzed: 148 patients (60.4%) were post-menopausal. These patients were older (57 [52 to 66] vs 49 [44 to 54] years, p <0.01) and had more often hypertension (49% vs 27%, p <0.01) and dyslipidemia (46% vs 25%, p <0.01). Post-menopausal women showed more often previous history of acute coronary syndrome, including previous SCAD (9% vs 3%, p = 0.046), and presented less frequently as ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction on admission, compared with premenopausal women (34% vs 49%, p = 0.014). On the other hand, premenopausal women showed more often proximal and multisegment involvement (24% vs 7%, and 32% vs 18%, respectively, both p <0.01). Post-menopausal women were more often managed conservatively (85% vs 71%, p <0.01) and presented less frequently left ventricular dysfunction (both, p <0.01). There were no differences between groups in terms of in-hospital stay or mortality, new acute myocardial infarction, unplanned coronary angiography or heart failure. In conclusion, post-menopausal women with SCAD show different clinical and angiographic characteristics compared with pre-menopausal SCAD patients. Initial treatment strategy was different between groups, though in-hospital outcomes did not significantly differ (NCT03607981).


Subject(s)
Acute Coronary Syndrome/epidemiology , Coronary Vessel Anomalies/epidemiology , Menopause , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/epidemiology , Vascular Diseases/congenital , Acute Coronary Syndrome/physiopathology , Acute Coronary Syndrome/therapy , Adult , Aged , Conservative Treatment , Coronary Angiography , Coronary Vessel Anomalies/diagnostic imaging , Coronary Vessel Anomalies/physiopathology , Coronary Vessel Anomalies/therapy , Female , Humans , Hyperlipidemias/epidemiology , Hypertension/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , Postmenopause , Premenopause , Registries , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/physiopathology , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/therapy , Spain/epidemiology , Vascular Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Vascular Diseases/epidemiology , Vascular Diseases/physiopathology , Vascular Diseases/therapy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...