Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Clin Orthop Relat Res ; 482(2): 375-383, 2024 Feb 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37606954

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Infection remains a serious clinical concern in patients with open fractures, despite timely antibiotic administration and surgical debridement. Soft tissue and periosteal stripping may alter local tissue homeostasis and antibiotic pharmacokinetics in the injured limb. The tissue (interstitial) concentration of intravenously administered antibiotics at an open fracture site has not been characterized using direct sampling techniques. QUESTION/PURPOSE: We performed this study to evaluate the concentration and pharmacokinetics of intravenously delivered cefazolin at an open fracture site after surgical debridement. METHODS: Twelve patients with an open fracture distal to the knee who presented at a regional Level I trauma center were approached for enrollment in this nonrandomized, observational study. Of the 12 patients, eight adults (one female, seven male) with a median age of 32 years (range 23 to 51 years) were enrolled and underwent successful sample collection for analysis. Three patients had incomplete datasets because of equipment malfunction and one elected not to participate. Seven patients had open tibia fractures, and one patient had an open fibula fracture associated with a closed tibia fracture. There were six Gustilo-Anderson Type II injuries and two Type IIIA injuries. Empiric antibiotics were administered in the prehospital setting or in the emergency department according to institutional protocol. When patients were taken to the operating room, a 2-g intravenous dose of cefazolin was administered. After surgical debridement, fracture stabilization, and wound closure, a microdialysis catheter was placed transdermally into the injury zone (within 5 cm of the fracture site) and a second catheter was placed in the contralateral uninjured (control) limb. Additional doses of cefazolin were administered every 8 hours postoperatively. Baseline and periodic interstitial fluid and whole blood (plasma) samples were collected in the operating room and at prespecified times for 24 hours postoperatively. Free cefazolin in the interstitial fluid and plasma samples were analyzed by ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography using C 18 column separation with quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry detection. Data from the second postoperative dose of cefazolin were used to characterize pharmacokinetic parameters through a noncompartmental analysis using time-concentration curves of free cefazolin and assuming first-order elimination. For pharmacodynamic analyses, the modal cefazolin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of Staphylococcus aureus (1 µg/mL) was used. RESULTS: With the samples available, no difference was observed in the median free cefazolin exposure over 24 hours ( f area under the curve [AUC] 0→24hrs ) between injured limbs (352 µg∙hr/mL [IQR 284 to 594 µg∙hr/mL]) and uninjured limbs (341 µg∙hr/mL [IQR 263 to 438 µg∙hr/mL]; p = 0.64). The median time to achieve the maximum concentration of free cefazolin ( f T max ) for injured limbs was delayed (2.7 hours [IQR 2.2 to 3.1 hours]) compared with control limbs (1.7 hours [IQR 1.2 to 2.0 hours]; p = 0.046). The time to the maximum concentration for plasma was not different from that of control limbs (p = 0.08). The time the cefazolin concentration was above the modal S. aureus MIC (T > MIC) in the injured and control limbs over 24 hours was 100% (IQR 100% to 100%) and 100% (IQR 97% to 100%), respectively. CONCLUSION: These preliminary findings suggest that current prophylactic cefazolin dosing regimens result in successful antibiotic delivery to the traumatized limb in moderately severe open fractures. Although cefazolin delivery to open-fracture wound beds was delayed compared with healthy tissues, the cefazolin concentration was sustained above the European Union Committee Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing modal MIC for S. aureus , demonstrating a high likelihood of a prophylactic antimicrobial environment at an open fracture site with this empiric antimicrobial regimen. Importantly, patients in this analysis had Gustilo-Anderson Types II and IIIA injuries. Further research with a larger patient cohort is needed to determine whether antibiotic delivery to traumatized soft tissues in patients with higher-grade open fractures (Gustilo-Anderson Types IIIB and IIIC) demonstrates similar pharmacokinetic characteristics. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, therapeutic study.


Subject(s)
Fractures, Open , Tibial Fractures , Adult , Humans , Male , Female , Young Adult , Middle Aged , Cefazolin , Fractures, Open/complications , Surgical Wound Infection/etiology , Staphylococcus aureus , Treatment Outcome , Retrospective Studies , Anti-Bacterial Agents , Tibial Fractures/surgery , Tibial Fractures/complications , Lower Extremity
2.
Injury ; 50(12): 2203-2214, 2019 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31591007

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Extremity tourniquet (TNK) application is an effective means of achieving compressible hemorrhage control in the emergency prehospital and clinical trauma setting. Modern United States military medical doctrine recommends TNK use to prevent lethal hemorrhage from extremity injury, followed by systemic prophylactic antibiotics to prevent wound infection. Because tissue pharmacokinetics of prophylactic antimicrobials during and after TNK-induced limb ischemia are largely unknown, this study was conducted to empirically determine the relationship between TNK application time and soft tissue antibiotic exposure in order to guide medical personnel in the management of extremity trauma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Hind limbs of anesthetized male Sprague Dawley rats were exsanguinated, and ischemia maintained by a pneumatic cuff placed at the level of the mid femur on one limb; the non-ischemic contralateral limb served as comparison tissue. Systemic prophylactic antibiotics (cefazolin, moxifloxacin, or ertapenem) were administered intravenously before or after TNK release following 2 or 4 h of ischemia with subsequent re-dosing every 12 h for 3 days. Free antibiotic in the interstitial fluid (ISF) of the tibialis anterior muscle of both hind limbs was recovered via microdialysis during ischemia and over three periods during reperfusion: immediately following TNK release, at 24 h post TNK release, and at 72 h post TNK release. Plasma and ISF free drug concentrations were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography. RESULTS: Tourniquet application prevented delivery of prophylactic antibiotics into distal soft tissue for the duration of ischemia, and caused a profound reduction in skeletal muscle drug exposure for up to 72 h following TNK release. A progressive decline in tissue antibiotic exposure during reperfusion was observed as TNK times increased from 2 h to 4 h. The timing and severity of reduced drug distribution in post-ischemic skeletal muscle varied substantially among the three antibiotic classes evaluated. CONCLUSIONS: Prolonged tourniquet application can significantly reduce distribution of prophylactic antibiotics into soft tissue during and after ischemia, potentially impairing prophylaxis of extremity wound infection. Our findings support the examination of alternative approaches to wound infection prophylaxis under conditions of delayed casualty evacuation when occlusive hemorrhage control measures are utilized.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Hemorrhage , Hemostatic Techniques/instrumentation , Hindlimb , Reperfusion Injury , Soft Tissue Injuries , Tourniquets/adverse effects , Animals , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacokinetics , Antibiotic Prophylaxis/methods , Duration of Therapy , Hemorrhage/etiology , Hemorrhage/prevention & control , Hindlimb/blood supply , Hindlimb/injuries , Humans , Rats , Rats, Sprague-Dawley , Reperfusion Injury/etiology , Reperfusion Injury/prevention & control , Soft Tissue Injuries/complications , Soft Tissue Injuries/therapy , Tissue Distribution
3.
Injury ; 49(10): 1763-1773, 2018 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30104015

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Dakin's solution (buffered sodium hypochlorite) has been used as a topical adjunct for the treatment of invasive fungal infections in trauma patients. Prudent use of Dakin's solution (DS) for complex musculoskeletal wound management implies balancing antimicrobial efficacy and human tissue toxicity, but little empirical evidence exists to inform clinical practice. To identify potentially efficacious DS concentrations and application methods, we conducted two animal studies to evaluate the ability of DS to reduce bacterial burden in small and large animal models of contaminated musculoskeletal wounds. METHODS: An established rat (Rattus norvegicus) contaminated femoral defect model was employed to evaluate the antimicrobial efficacy of DS as a topical adjunctive treatment for Staphylococcus aureus infection. A range of clinically-relevant DS concentrations (0.00025%-0.125%) were tested, both with and without periodic replenishment during treatment. Next, an established goat (Capra hircus) musculoskeletal wound model, consisting of a Pseudomonas aeruginosa contaminated proximal tibia cortical defect, muscle crush, and thermal injury, was utilized to evaluate the antimicrobial efficacy of dilute DS (0.0025% and 0.025%) as a surgical irrigant solution. In situ reactive chlorine concentrations were monitored throughout each treatment using an automated iodometric titration approach. RESULTS: In a rat wound model, DS treatment did not significantly reduce S. aureus bioburden after 14 days as compared to saline control. Two treatment groups (0.01% single application and 0.025% multiple application) exhibited significantly higher bacterial burden than control. In a goat musculoskeletal wound model, neither 0.0025% nor 0.025% DS significantly altered P. aeruginosa bioburden immediately following treatment or at 48 h post-treatment. Overall, DS applied to exposed soft tissue exhibited rapid degradation, e.g., 0.125% DS degraded 32% after 5 s progressing to 86% degradation after 15 min following single application. CONCLUSIONS: We did not observe evidence of a therapeutic benefit following Dakin's solution treatment for any tested concentration or application method in two contaminated musculoskeletal wound models. Despite confirmation of robust bactericidal activity in vitro, our findings suggest DS at current clinically-used concentrations does not kill tissue surface-attached bacteria, nor does it necessarily cause host tissue toxicity that exacerbates infection in the setting of complex musculoskeletal injury.


Subject(s)
Pseudomonas aeruginosa/drug effects , Sodium Bicarbonate/pharmacology , Sodium Hypochlorite/pharmacology , Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects , Wound Infection/microbiology , Animals , Antibiotic Prophylaxis , Colony Count, Microbial , Drug Combinations , Goats , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Rats , Rats, Sprague-Dawley , Wound Healing
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...