What Are the Ready-to-Use Endoscope Channels Hiding?: Unraveling the Risks of Safe Reuse.

Contamination due to failures or omissions in the reprocessing steps of gastrointestinal endoscopes is common in clinical practice. Ensuring the proper execution of each step is a challenge for reprocessing personnel. This cross-sectional study was conducted in an endoscopy setting between March and May 2021. We performed interviews about reprocessing practices, analyzed the life history of the equipment, and performed inspections through a borescope video of gastrointestinal endoscope channels that were stored and ready for use. A borescope is a complementary tool used to validate endoscope reprocessing, evaluate the internal visualization of channels, and identify changes that can compromise the safety of its use, which are often not detected in the leak test. Thirteen biopsy channels from stored gastrointestinal endoscopes were inspected. We found that 85% had stains and grooves, 69% contained moisture, and 46% had debris. There was at least one noncompliance issue in all of the channels inspected.

Criteria for the Use, Processing, and Disposal of Flexible Endoscope Cleaning Brushes.

Objectives: To ensure effectiveness in the endoscope channel cleaning process, using functional brushes that are in good condition is necessary. This study sought to identify the criteria for acquiring, using, and disposing of cleaning brushes at endoscopy facilities in Brazil. We further sought to evaluate the conditions of the cleaning brushes in use in the facilities. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted between July 2021 and January 2022. Personnel responsible for processing endoscopes were interviewed regarding the use, processing, and disposal of flexible endoscope cleaning brushes. In addition, the brushes used to clean the equipment were inspected. Results: All participants interviewed reported the practice of brushing endoscope channels. Of them, 60% noted the use of disposable brushes, with 40% using reusable brushes. None of the facilities interviewed reported discarding disposable brushes after use. The protocols for disposal of brushes included disposing due to bristle wear (70%), disposal at the end of the day (20%), and an absence of disposal protocols (10%). In addition, 30% of facilities did not clean the bristles before reintroducing them into the channel/lumen, and no facility had an established routine for cleaning brushes between uses. Inspection of brushes revealed that only 20% of facilities had new brushes with no signs of wear or damage. Conclusion: The use of inappropriate brushes/sponges for cleaning endoscope channels and the lack of criteria for the reuse and disposal of brushes increases the risk of cross-contamination, internal damage to channels, and biofilm formation.

Storage of gastrointestinal endoscopes: when is the safe time for re-use?

OBJECTIVES: to identify the safe storage time for the use of flexible gastrointestinal endoscopes after high-level disinfection, as well as the defining criteria for this time. METHODS: an integrative literature review was carried out in the Virtual Health Library, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, considering original articles published since 2000. RESULTS: eleven articles were selected, whose storage times ranged from 1 to 56 days, with a predominance of one to seven days (73%). Several criteria were used to define this time, predominantly the premise of efficient processing (100%), use of alcohol flush (64%), use of drying cabinets (18%), among others. CONCLUSIONS: the criteria for determining the storage time did not show a consensus for clinical practice. Expanding the discussion of this theme with the definition of the minimum necessary conditions is of fundamental importance for the reduction of risks and safety of the procedure and the patient.

Storage of gastrointestinal endoscopes: when is the safe time for re-use? / Almacenamiento de endoscopios gastrointestinales: ¿cuál el tiempo seguro para la reutilización? / Armazenamento de endoscópios gastrointestinais: qual o tempo seguro para o reúso?

ABSTRACT Objectives: to identify the safe storage time for the use of flexible gastrointestinal endoscopes after high-level disinfection, as well as the defining criteria for this time. Methods: an integrative literature review was carried out in the Virtual Health Library, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, considering original articles published since 2000. Results: eleven articles were selected, whose storage times ranged from 1 to 56 days, with a predominance of one to seven days (73%). Several criteria were used to define this time, predominantly the premise of efficient processing (100%), use of alcohol flush (64%), use of drying cabinets (18%), among others. Conclusions: the criteria for determining the storage time did not show a consensus for clinical practice. Expanding the discussion of this theme with the definition of the minimum necessary conditions is of fundamental importance for the reduction of risks and safety of the procedure and the patient.

RESUMEN Objetivos: identificar el tiempo de almacenamiento seguro para utilización de endoscopios flexibles gastrointestinales después de la desinfección de alto nivel, así como los criterios definidores de ese tiempo. Métodos: realizado una revisión integrativa de la literatura en la Biblioteca Virtual en Salud, PubMed, Scopus y Web of Science, considerando artículos originales publicados desde 2000. Resultados: fueron seleccionados 11 artículos, cuyos tiempos de almacenamiento variaron entre 1 y 56 días, con predominio de uno a siete días (73%). Utilizados diversos criterios para definición de ese tiempo, siendo predominantes la premisa del procesamiento eficiente (100%), uso de flush de alcohol (64%), armarios de secado (18%), entre otros. Conclusiones: los criterios para determinación del tiempo de almacenamiento no evidenciaron un consenso para práctica clínica. Ampliar la discusión de esa temática con definición de las condiciones mínimas necesarias es de fundamental importancia para la reducción de riesgos y seguridad del procedimiento y del paciente.

RESUMO Objetivos: identificar o tempo de armazenamento seguro para utilização de endoscópios flexíveis gastrointestinais após a desinfecção de alto nível, bem como os critérios definidores desse tempo. Métodos: realizou-se uma revisão integrativa da literatura na Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde, PubMed, Scopus e Web of Science, considerando artigos originais publicados desde 2000. Resultados: foram selecionados 11 artigos, cujos tempos de armazenamento variaram entre 1 e 56 dias, com predomínio de um a sete dias (73%). Utilizaram-se diversos critérios para definição desse tempo, sendo predominantes a premissa do processamento eficiente (100%), uso de flush de álcool (64%), uso de armários de secagem (18%), entre outros. Conclusões: os critérios para determinação do tempo de armazenamento não evidenciaram um consenso para prática clínica. Ampliar a discussão dessa temática com definição das condições mínimas necessárias é de fundamental importância para a redução de riscos e segurança do procedimento e do paciente.

Effectiveness of manual versus automated cleaning on Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilm removal from the surface of surgical instruments.

BACKGROUND: Biofilm removal is a challenge during surgical instrument processing. We analyzed the time required for Staphylococcus epidermidis to form biofilms on surgical instruments, and how cleaning methods removed them. METHODS: Different areas (ratchet, shank, and jaw) of straight crile forceps were contaminated by soaking in Tryptic Soy Broth containing 106 colony forming units (CFU)/mL of S epidermidis for 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 12 hours. S epidermidis adhesion and removal, after manual or automated ultrasonic cleaning, was evaluated by microbiological culture and scanning electron microscopy. RESULTS: Microbial load increased with time (101-102 CFU/cm2 after 1 hour; 104 CFU/cm2 after 12 hours). Exopolysaccharide was detected after 2 hours and gradually increased thereafter. Bacterial load was reduced by 1-2 log10 after manual cleaning and 1-3 log10 after automated cleaning, but biofilms were not completely eliminated. In general, bacterial load was lower in shank fragments. This difference was significant at 6 hours. CONCLUSIONS: Rapid adhesion of S epidermidis and exopolysaccharide formation was observed on surgical instruments. Automated cleaning was more effective than manual cleaning, but neither method removed biofilms completely. The precleaning conditions and the forceps design are critical factors in processing quality.