Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 18 de 18
Filter
Add more filters










Publication year range
2.
Allergol Immunopathol (Madr) ; 35(6): 225-7, 2007.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18047811

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To study the relationship between the primary sensitization to wasp venoms and the geographical and seasonal circumstances of the anaphylaxis-induced sting. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 115 patients (age 10-80) who suffered a systemic reaction to a wasp sting. Season and type of locality (urban or rural) at the moment of the sting were recorded. Serum specific IgE levels to venoms from Vespula and Polistes were measured, and a primary sensitization was determined to whichever genus of wasp for which the highest class of specific IgE was observed. The primary sensitization in relation to the type of locality and the season was assessed using the chi-square test. RESULTS: Most reactions occurred in urban areas (67.8 %), and in the summer season (63.4 %). Most patients were sensitized to Vespula venom (94.8 %). Primary sensitization was to Vespula in 56.5 %, to Polistes in 10.4 %, and undetermined in 33 %. The distribution of geographical areas did not show significant differences in relation to primary sensitization (p > 0.05). Most patients with primary sensitization to Vespula suffered the anaphylaxis-induced sting after the spring season, with a statistically significant result (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: In our population, the probability of Vespula sting is higher than Polistes sting when the reaction occurs after spring. This finding can help us to identify the responsible vespid when the diagnostic tests do not provide an accurate result.


Subject(s)
Hypersensitivity, Immediate , Immunization , Insect Bites and Stings/epidemiology , Insect Bites and Stings/immunology , Wasps/immunology , Wasps/metabolism , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Animals , Child , Female , Geography/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Hypersensitivity, Immediate/epidemiology , Hypersensitivity, Immediate/immunology , Hypersensitivity, Immediate/parasitology , Immunoglobulin E/blood , Immunoglobulin E/immunology , Immunoglobulin E/metabolism , Male , Middle Aged , Probability , Retrospective Studies , Seasons , Spain , Wasp Venoms/immunology , Wasp Venoms/metabolism
3.
Allergol. immunopatol ; 35(6): 225-227, nov. 2007. ilus
Article in En | IBECS | ID: ibc-058244

ABSTRACT

Objective: To study the relationship between theprimary sensitization to wasp venoms and the geographicaland seasonal circumstances of the anaphylaxis-induced sting.Methods: We performed a retrospective review of115 patients (age 10-80) who suffered a systemicreaction to a wasp sting. Season and type of locality(urban or rural) at the moment of the sting wererecorded. Serum specific IgE levels to venoms fromVespula and Polistes were measured, and a primarysensitization was determined to whichever genus ofwasp for which the highest class of specific IgE wasobserved. The primary sensitization in relation to thetype of locality and the season was assessed usingthe chi-square test.Results: Most reactions occurred in urban areas(67.8 %), and in the summer season (63.4 %). Mostpatients were sensitized to Vespula venom (94.8 %).Primary sensitization was to Vespula in 56.5 %, toPolistes in 10.4 %, and undetermined in 33 %. Thedistribution of geographical areas did not show significantdifferences in relation to primary sensitization(p > 0.05). Most patients with primary sensitization toVespula suffered the anaphylaxis-induced sting afterthe spring season, with a statistically significant result(p < 0.05).Conclusion: In our population, the probability ofVespula sting is higher than Polistes sting when thereaction occurs after spring. This finding can help usto identify the responsible vespid when the diagnostictests do not provide an accurate result


No disponible


Subject(s)
Male , Female , Child , Adolescent , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Humans , Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Hypersensitivity/immunology , Wasp Venoms/analysis , Wasp Venoms/immunology , Wasp Venoms/poisoning , Allergy and Immunology/trends , Retrospective Studies , Anaphylaxis/epidemiology , Anaphylaxis/immunology , Poisons/analysis , Poisons/immunology
4.
Allergol Immunopathol (Madr) ; 35(1): 10-4, 2007.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17338896

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to analyze the frequency of clinical features and the severity of systemic reactions to wasp stings, and to establish their relationship with mean age, sex, and atopy. METHODS: We studied 115 patients who suffered an anaphylactic reaction to wasp sting and showed specific IgE to venoms from Vespula and/or Polistes. In all patients, age, sex and personal history of atopy were registered. Cutaneous, respiratory, cardiovascular and gastrointestinal involvement during the course of the reaction was investigated. Each patient was assigned a severity grade according to a simple two-grade classification based on Müller's criteria. Bivariable analysis was performed to analyze the associations among mean age, sex and atopy and the symptoms and severity of the reaction. RESULTS: The mean age was 40.2 years. There were 60 males (52.2 %) and 55 females (47.8 %). Twenty-six patients (22.6 %) were atopic. The percentages of involved systems were as follows: skin 90.4 %, respiratory 54.8 %, cardiovascular 33.9 %, and gastrointestinal 21.7 %. Reactions were mild in 40.8 %, and severe in 59.1 %. The mean age was higher in patients without cutaneous symptoms (p < 0.05). Cardiovascular involvement was more frequent in males (p < 0.05). No other significant differences were found. CONCLUSION: The symptoms of systemic reactions to wasp venom most frequently involved the skin, while reactions without cutaneous involvement were more frequent in older patients. Cardiovascular involvement was more common in males. The clinical pattern was not determined by atopy and the variables studied were not related to severity.


Subject(s)
Anaphylaxis/etiology , Hypersensitivity, Immediate/complications , Insect Bites and Stings/complications , Wasp Venoms/adverse effects , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anaphylaxis/epidemiology , Animals , Cardiovascular Diseases/etiology , Child , Humans , Immunoglobulin E/immunology , Middle Aged , Respiration Disorders/etiology , Severity of Illness Index , Sex Factors , Species Specificity
5.
Allergol. immunopatol ; 35(1): 10-14, ene. 2007. ilus, tab
Article in En | IBECS | ID: ibc-053140

ABSTRACT

Background: The aim of this study was to analyze the frequency of clinical features and the severity of systemic reactions to wasp stings, and to establish their relationship with mean age, sex, and atopy. Methods: We studied 115 patients who suffered an anaphylactic reaction to wasp sting and showed specific IgE to venoms from Vespula and/or Polistes. In all patients, age, sex and personal history of atopy were registered. Cutaneous, respiratory, cardiovascular and gastrointestinal involvement during the course of the reaction was investigated. Each patient was assigned a severity grade according to a simple two-grade classification based on Müller's criteria. Bivariable analysis was performed to analyze the associations among mean age, sex and atopy and the symptoms and severity of the reaction. Results: The mean age was 40.2 years. There were 60 males (52.2 %) and 55 females (47.8 %). Twenty-six patients (22.6 %) were atopic. The percentages of involved systems were as follows: skin 90.4 %, respiratory 54.8 %, cardiovascular 33.9 %, and gastrointestinal 21.7 %. Reactions were mild in 40.8 %, and severe in 59.1 %. The mean age was higher in patients without cutaneous symptoms (p < 0.05). Cardiovascular involvement was more frequent in males (p < 0.05). No other significant differences were found. Conclusion: The symptoms of systemic reactions to wasp venom most frequently involved the skin, while reactions without cutaneous involvement were more frequent in older patients. Cardiovascular involvement was more common in males. The clinical pattern was not determined by atopy and the variables studied were not related to severity


Fundamento: El propósito de este estudio es analizar la frecuencia de manifestaciones clínicas y la gravedad de las reacciones sistémicas a picadura de avispa, así como establecer su relación con la edad media, el sexo y la atopia. Métodos: Estudiamos 115 pacientes que han sufrido una reacción anafiláctica a picadura de avispa y que muestran IgE específica frente a venenos de Vespula y/o Polistes. En cada caso re registra la edad, el sexo y los antecedentes personales de atopia. Se investigó la presencia de afectación cutánea, respiratoria, cardiovascular y gastrointestinal en el curso de la reacción, y se asignó un grado de severidad mediante un sistema de clasificación en dos grados a partir de los criterios de Müller. Se realizó un análisis bivariante para relacionar la edad, el sexo y la atopia con los síntomas y la gravedad de la reacción. Resultados: La edad media fue de 40,2 años. Los varones eran 60 (52,2%) y las mujeres 55 (47,8%). Veintiséis pacientes (22,6%) eran atópicos. El porcentaje de afectación por sistemas fue como sigue: cutánea 90,4%; respiratoria 54,8%; cardiovascular 33,9%; gastrointestinal 21,7%. Las reacciones fueron leves en un 40,8% y graves en un 59,1%. La edad media fue superior en pacientes sin síntomas cutáneos (p>0,05) y la afectación cardiovascular resultó mas frecuente en varones (p>0,05). No se observaron otros hallazgos significativos. Conclusión: Se concluye que los síntomas más frecuentes de las reacciones sistémicas a veneno de avispa son los cutáneos, siendo las reacciones sin afectación cutánea más típicas de personas de edad avanzada. La presencia de síntomas cardiovasculares es más común en varones. La atopia no determina el cuadro clínico y la gravedad no se relaciona con las variables estudiadas


Subject(s)
Animals , Child , Adolescent , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Humans , Anaphylaxis/etiology , Hypersensitivity, Immediate/complications , Insect Bites and Stings/complications , Wasp Venoms/adverse effects , Age Factors , Anaphylaxis/epidemiology , Cardiovascular Diseases/etiology , Immunoglobulin E/immunology , Respiration Disorders/etiology , Sex Factors , Severity of Illness Index
6.
Allergol Immunopathol (Madr) ; 34(5): 224-7, 2006.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17064652

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The use of opioids as analgesics is becoming increasingly widespread, which may have repercussions in patients with urticaria or asthma, as these agents frequently cause adverse reactions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We present three patients who developed allergic reactions after receiving codeine: two patients who developed acute urticaria, and a third asthmatic patient receiving specific immunotherapy who developed bronchospasm. Skin prick-testing (SPT) and intradermal reaction (IDR) tests with various opioids were performed, followed by controlled oral challenge. Prick tests and IDR were also carried out in 20 controls. RESULTS: Similar SPT and IDR results were recorded in the three patients and in the controls. In the case of controlled oral challenge with codeine, patient 1 suffered bronchospasm, while patient 2 developed generalized urticaria. The test was not performed in the third patient. All of the patients tolerated tramadol 50 mg without problems. We advised the use of tramadol as analgesic and fentanyl or remifentanil as anesthetics. DISCUSSION: In these types of manifestation, the pharmacological properties of the opioids used are highly important, particularly as regards their histamine-releasing potential. Codeine, morphine and pethidine present the greatest histamine-releasing capacity, while tramadol, fentanyl and remifentanil do not release histamine and their use is thus recommended in pulmonary disease requiring opioid administration. Cutaneous symptoms are more frequently caused by opioids than by respiratory symptoms, since these drugs act on the MTC mast cell population, which is more prevalent in the skin than in the lungs. Some of this action is inhibited by naloxone. CONCLUSIONS: In most patients, these reactions are not IgE-mediated. Consequently, SPT and IDR are of little diagnostic value, and controlled oral challenging with the suspect drug or with one of the non-histamine releasing agents should be used. The patch test is useful in occupational contact dermatitis.


Subject(s)
Asthma/chemically induced , Bronchial Spasm/chemically induced , Codeine/adverse effects , Drug Eruptions/etiology , Narcotics/adverse effects , Urticaria/chemically induced , Adult , Analgesics, Non-Narcotic/pharmacology , Analgesics, Non-Narcotic/therapeutic use , Anesthetics/adverse effects , Anesthetics/pharmacology , Animals , Antigens, Dermatophagoides/administration & dosage , Antigens, Dermatophagoides/adverse effects , Antigens, Dermatophagoides/therapeutic use , Desensitization, Immunologic/adverse effects , Female , Fentanyl/adverse effects , Fentanyl/pharmacology , Histamine Release/drug effects , Humans , Intradermal Tests , Mast Cells/drug effects , Mast Cells/metabolism , Meperidine/adverse effects , Mites/immunology , Morphine/adverse effects , Narcotics/pharmacology , Piperidines/pharmacology , Remifentanil , Skin Tests , Tramadol/pharmacology , Tramadol/therapeutic use
7.
Allergol. immunopatol ; 34(5): 224-227, sept. 2006. ilus, tab
Article in En | IBECS | ID: ibc-051251

ABSTRACT

Background: The use of opioids as analgesics is becoming increasingly widespread, which may have repercussions in patients with urticaria or asthma, as these agents frequently cause adverse reactions. Material and methods: We present three patients who developed allergic reactions after receiving codeine: two patients who developed acute urticaria, and a third asthmatic patient receiving specific immunotherapy who developed bronchospasm. Skin prick-testing (SPT) and intradermal reaction (IDR) tests with various opioids were performed, followed by controlled oral challenge. Prick tests and IDR were also carried out in 20 controls. Results: Similar SPT and IDR results were recorded in the three patients and in the controls. In the case of controlled oral challenge with codeine, patient 1 suffered bronchospasm, while patient 2 developed generalized urticaria. The test was not performed in the third patient. All of the patients tolerated tramadol 50 mg without problems. We advised the use of tramadol as analgesic and fentanyl or remifentanil as anesthetics. Discussion: In these types of manifestation, the pharmacological properties of the opioids used are highly important, particularly as regards their histamine-releasing potential. Codeine, morphine and pethidine present the greatest histamine-releasing capacity, while tramadol, fentanyl and remifentanil do not release histamine and their use is thus recommended in pulmonary disease requiring opioid administration. Cutaneous symptoms are more frequently caused by opioids than by respiratory symptoms, since these drugs act on the MTC mast cell population, which is more prevalent in the skin than in the lungs. Some of this action is inhibited by naloxone. Conclusions: In most patients, these reactions are not IgE-mediated. Consequently, SPT and IDR are of little diagnostic value, and controlled oral challenging with the suspect drug or with one of the non-histamine releasing agents should be used. The patch test is useful in occupational contact dermatitis


Introducción: Como fármacos analgésicos, cada vez está más extendido el uso de opiáceos y éstos pueden tener repercusiones sobre pacientes con urticaria o asma. La mayoría de las veces la causa es un efecto secundario. Material y Métodos: Presentamos dos pacientes que han tenido una urticaria tras la toma de codeína y otra paciente asmática que está recibiendo inmunoterapia y tiene crisis de broncoespasmo tras la toma de éste fármaco. Se realizan prick-test e IDR con varios opiáceos, y tras esto se realiza exposición oral controlada. También se realizan pricks e IDR a 20 controles. Resultados: En los tres casos y en los controles se obtienen resultados similares de los pricks y de las IDR. En la exposición oral controlada con codeína, la paciente 1 sufre un broncoespasmo, la 2 una urticaria generalizada y la 3 no se realiza. Las tres toleran tramadol 50mg sin problemas. Se recomienda el uso de tramadol como analgésico y fentanilo o remifentanilo como anestésicos. Discusión: En este tipo de cuadros las propiedades farmacológicas de los opiáceos son muy importantes, puesto que van a venir marcados por la potencia de liberación de histamina. La codeína, la morfina y la petidina, son los mayores liberadores y por el contrario, el tramadol, el fentanilo y el remifentanilo no lo son y están recomendados en patología pulmonar que necesiten opiáceos. Los opiáceos suelen producir en mayor número de ocasiones cuadros cutáneos por que actúan sobre todo sobre los MTC que son más numerosos en la piel que en el pulmón. La Naloxona inhibe en parte ésta acción. Conclusiones: La mayoría de reacciones de este tipo no son IgE mediadas, por lo que los pricks e IDR no tienen ningún valor, y se debe de recurrir a la exposición controlada con el fármaco implicado o con uno de los no liberadores de histamina. Las pruebas del parche si que tienen utilidad en las dermatitis de contacto ocupacionales


Subject(s)
Female , Adult , Humans , Asthma/complications , Asthma/drug therapy , Asthma/immunology , Urticaria/chemically induced , Urticaria/complications , Asthma/chemically induced , Narcotics/adverse effects , Codeine/adverse effects , Morphine/adverse effects , Tramadol/adverse effects , Meperidine/adverse effects , Fentanyl/adverse effects , Anaphylaxis/complications
9.
Trib. méd. (Bogotá) ; 80(3): 147-60, sept. 1989.
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: lil-84046

ABSTRACT

La obstruccion reversible de las vias aereas como consecuencia de estimulos diversos exige tratamiento inmediato y un profundo y concienzudo estudio de su etiologia, patogenia y factores agravantes, para poder conducir adecuadamente una terapia que mejore el pronostico a largo plazo y la calidad de vida del paciente


Subject(s)
Humans , Asthma , Asthma/diagnosis , Asthma/physiopathology , Asthma/prevention & control , Asthma/therapy
10.
Trib. méd. (Bogotá) ; 80(1): 31-42, jul. 1989. ilus, tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: lil-68692

ABSTRACT

Urticaria y angioedema son un problema clinico muy frecuente, cuyos mecanismos patogenicos pueden ser o no inmunologicos y precisan de un diagnostico cuidadoso para identificar las causas desencadenantes.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Urticaria/diagnosis , Urticaria/etiology , Urticaria/therapy , Angioedema/diagnosis , Angioedema/etiology , Angioedema/therapy , Risk Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...