Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 25
Filter
1.
Int J Gynecol Cancer ; 33(2): 271-277, 2023 02 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36600503

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Current gaps in knowledge limit clinicians from fully implementing patient-reported outcomes in routine post-operative care. METHODS: This prospective study assessed symptoms via the gynecologic module of the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI-PeriOp-GYN) in patients who underwent open laparotomy. RESULTS: At discharge, patient-reported moderate to severe (≥4 on a 0-10 scale) abdominal bloating or abdominal cramping, combined with length of stay of ≥4 days, were found to be associated with a higher risk of 30-day post-operative grade II-IV complications by the Clavien-Dindo system (all p values <0.01). Also, length of stay of ≥4 days and moderate to severe urinary urgency at discharge were found to be associated with the need for re-admission (all p values <0.01). CONCLUSION: This study defined the clinically meaningful symptoms that related to the risk of developing important complications after discharge from major open gynecological surgery.These findings support the integration of assessment of patient-reported outcomes into patient-centered post-operative care.


Subject(s)
Gynecologic Surgical Procedures , Patient Discharge , Humans , Female , Prospective Studies , Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/diagnosis , Patient Reported Outcome Measures , Length of Stay
2.
Eur J Oncol Nurs ; 52: 101959, 2021 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33964632

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Based on the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI), we developed a Patient-reported outcomes tool for hepatectomy perioperative care (MDASI-PeriOp-Hep). METHODS: To establish the content validity, we generated PeriOp-Hep-specific candidate items from qualitative interviews of patients (n = 30), and removed items that lacked clinical relevance on the basis of input from panels of patients, caregivers, and clinicians. The psychometric properties of the MDASI-PeriOp-Hep were validated (n = 150). The cognitive debriefing and clinical interpretability were assessed to confirm the ease of comprehension, relevance, and acceptability of the tool. RESULTS: Five symptoms specific to hepatectomy (abdominal bloating, tightness, or fullness; abdominal cramping; muscle weakness, instability, or vertigo; constipation; and incisional tightness) were identified as module items to form the MDASI-PeriOp-Hep. The Cronbach αs for symptoms and for interference were 0.898 and 0.861, respectively. The test-retest reliability was 0.887 for all 18 symptom severity items. Compared to other commonly used tools, correlation of MDASI-PeriOp-Hep scores to performance status (all, P < 0.001) and to the phase of perioperative care confirmed known-group validity. Convergent validity was excellent against other standard Patient-reported outcomes tools. Cognitive debriefing demonstrated that the MDASI-PeriOp-Hep was an easy to use and understandable tool. CONCLUSIONS: For integrating patient-reported outcomes in perioperative patient care, a procedure-specific tool is desirable. The MDASI-PeriOp-Hep is a valid, reliable, concise tool for measuring symptom severity and functional interference in patients undergoing liver surgery.


Subject(s)
Patient Reported Outcome Measures , Perioperative Care , Humans , Liver , Reproducibility of Results , Severity of Illness Index
3.
Support Care Cancer ; 29(10): 6099-6107, 2021 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33792800

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Patients with multiple myeloma (MM) experience substantial cancer/treatment-related symptom burden during maintenance therapy. This is a phase II randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial to examine the effect of minocycline for symptom reduction by its potential anti-inflammatory effect. METHODS: Eligible MM patients for maintenance therapy were randomized to receive minocycline (100 mg twice daily) or placebo. The MD Anderson Symptom Inventory for MM (MDASI-MM) was used to assess multiple symptoms weekly during the trial. Clinician-rated toxicities and blood samples were prospectively collected. The effect size, area under the curve (AUC), and t tests were used to determine the symptom burden between treatment groups and identify the 5 most-severe MDASI-MM symptoms. The longitudinal analysis compared the changes in symptom severity and associated inflammatory markers between groups over time. RESULTS: Sixty-nine evaluable MM patients (33 from the intervention group and 36 from the placebo group) were included. No grade 3+ adverse events related to study medication were noted. The AUCs for the 5 worst MDASI-MM symptoms (fatigue, pain, disturbed sleep numbness/tingling, and drowsiness) were not significantly different between two arms. Regardless of group assignment, pain reduction was positively associated with decreased serum levels of soluble tumor necrosis factor-α receptors 1 and 2 during therapy (all P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This pPhase II randomized study observed no statistically significant positive signal impact from minocycline on symptom reduction or inflammatory markers during maintenance therapy for MM, although using minocycline was feasible and had a low toxicity profile.


Subject(s)
Minocycline , Multiple Myeloma , Biomarkers , Double-Blind Method , Fatigue , Humans , Minocycline/adverse effects , Multiple Myeloma/drug therapy , Pain
4.
Gynecol Oncol ; 161(1): 83-88, 2021 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33536127

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the utility of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) to measure physical functioning in perioperative care for patients with gynecological (GYN) tumors. METHODS: 180 patients with GYN tumors undergoing open surgery participated in this longitudinal study. The physical functioning was measured by a subjective PRO tool, the Interference subscales of the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI-I); as well as by an objective tool, the Timed Up & Go test (TUGT), perioperatively. Longer time (>20 s) needed to complete the TUGT was defined as "Prolonged". Patients completed EuroQoL-5D as well. The association between the scores of MDASI-I items and TUGT was assessed via the Spearman correlation coefficient. The known-group validity was assessed using the t-test and Cohen's D effect size. RESULTS: Compliance rates at preoperative, discharge and postoperative time points of MDASI-I were 98%, 95%, 96%; while TUGT completion rates were 92%, 75%, and 80%, respectively. Patients who had refused TUGT at discharge reported a significantly worse "MDASI-general activity" score compared to patients who completed TUGT (mean score of 7.00 vs. 5.38, P = 0.020). Patient-reported "Walking" on MDASI-I significantly differentiated patients with prolonged vs. those with frail/normal TUGT at discharge (mean score of 4.89 vs. 2.79, Cohen's d effect size = 0.82, P < 0.001). MDASI-I demonstrated excellent known-group validity per performance status and for the EuroQoL-5D subscales. CONCLUSION: Patient-reported physical functioning impairment after GYN surgery correspond with observed worse scores of the objective functioning measure test (TUGT). MDASI-I assessment represents a feasible and valid tool to evaluate functional status and warrants further implementation in the perioperative setting.


Subject(s)
Genital Neoplasms, Female/physiopathology , Genital Neoplasms, Female/surgery , Symptom Assessment/methods , Female , Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/methods , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Middle Aged , Patient Reported Outcome Measures , Perioperative Period , Postoperative Period , Severity of Illness Index
5.
Support Care Cancer ; 29(1): 467-475, 2021 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32390093

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) is labeled "symptomatic" based on laboratory values, but not relevant to quantitative measure of patient's perspectives. This study aimed to describe symptom burden, health status, and quality of life in RRMM patients. METHODS: The cross-sectional study included 184 MM patients (141 RRMM cases and 43 MM patients on follow-up without diagnosis/treatment of RRMM disease as controls), while 64 RRMM patients also provided longitudinal patient-reported outcomes (PROs) data. Symptomatic status was based on clinical measures of disease activity. PROs included the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory multiple myeloma module (MDASI-MM), single-item quality of life (SIQOL), and EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D). Wilcoxon rank test and effect size were used for comparisons. Regression models were used to describe symptom trajectory and to identify predictors of high symptom burden during 3 months of RRMM therapy. RESULTS: Most patients were clinically identified as symptomatic (93%). RRMM patients tended to report more severe symptoms, with significantly lower QOL scores and more severe fatigue, poor appetite, and lower enjoyment of life compared with controls (all p < 0.05). In RRMM patients, lower hemoglobin and higher B-2 microglobulin levels significantly correlated with higher burdens of fatigue, pain, and muscle weakness and also with lower QOL and EQ-5D scores (all p < 0.05). During RRMM therapy, being female, with any comorbidity, ≥ 65 years old, and ≥ 5 years MM history, contributed to high symptoms burden and poor QOL status (each p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: MDASI-MM modules were sensitive to detect the RRMM-related symptoms burden, which correlated with objective clinical measures. RRMM patients reported a more compromised QOL.


Subject(s)
Multiple Myeloma/drug therapy , Patient Reported Outcome Measures , Quality of Life/psychology , Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male
6.
J Sex Med ; 17(10): 1995-2004, 2020 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32713807

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Cancer-related changes in sexual function (SF) negatively impact quality of life and intimate partner relationships. There is a lack of data regarding SF among patients who underwent radical cystectomy (RC). AIM: To comparatively evaluate perioperative SF among patients who underwent RC. METHODS: A prospective cohort of 150 patients undergoing RC for bladder cancer and participating in an internal validation study at a single institution from 2016 to 2019 were eligible for analysis. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Questionnaire-Bladder Cancer Muscle Invasive (EORTC QLQ-BLM 30) and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Bladder were administered; those completing the SF subscale of the EORTC QLQ-BLM 30 were included in final analysis. Analysis was performed using descriptive statistics and generalized linear modeling. OUTCOMES: The primary outcome was interest or engagement in sexual activity within 4 weeks of survey completion, whereas the secondary outcome was a mean score on the EORTC QLQ-BLM 30 SF subscale. RESULTS: Overall, 132 of 150 (88%) of patients were eligible, of whom 82% were male, and the median age was 68.5 years. 53% reported at least a little interest in sexual activity, and 40% endorsed sexual activity within the last 4 weeks. The mean SF subscale score was 61.5 ± 25.2. Women had significantly worse mean scores of 72.9 ± 27.1 versus 59.1 ± 24.2 for men (P = .02). On multivariate analysis, both age and female gender were independently associated with higher SF domain scores. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: A substantial portion of patients who underwent RC endorse being sexually active or express interest in sexually activity in the perioperative period. Given the recent increase in attention given to SF outcomes and quality of life, this work supports further efforts to explore this area and develop novel interventions to improve outcomes. STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS: Strengths include rigorously collected, cross-sectional data using standardized methodology. Limitations include a relatively small sample size of female patients and unknown meaningful clinical difference. CONCLUSIONS: A substantial portion of patients report sexual interest and activity in the perioperative period; however, female gender is associated with worse SF domain scores. These findings support further inquiry into this topic. Westerman ME, Kokorovic A, Wang XS, et al. Radical Cystectomy and Perioperative Sexual Function: A Cross-Sectional Analysis. J Sex Med 2020;17:1995-2004.


Subject(s)
Cystectomy , Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms , Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Cystectomy/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Male , Perioperative Period , Prospective Studies , Quality of Life , Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological/etiology , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/surgery
7.
JCO Oncol Pract ; 16(10): e1151-e1160, 2020 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32539654

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Symptom monitoring has demonstrated improved outcomes in patients with cancer, including quality of life, resource utilization, ability to continue treatment, and survival. The use of disease-specific patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures facilitates symptom monitoring. While the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory-Lung Cancer (MDASI-LC), a PRO measure of symptom burden in lung cancer, is psychometrically validated for use in patients with NSCLC, its content validity has not been verified through direct patient input. Our purpose is to describe the symptom experience of patients with NSCLC and to confirm that the MDASI-LC contains the key symptoms specific to NSCLC from the patient perspective. METHODS: Patients with NSCLC described their symptom experience in single qualitative interviews. Content analysis was used to define the content domain for a PRO measure of NSCLC symptom burden. RESULTS: Participants (N = 40) had a mean age of 66.1 years (standard deviation, 10.9 years); 60.0% were male, 77.5% were White, and 56.4% had stage IV disease. Thirty-two symptoms were described, with 6 reported by ≥ 20% of participants. Symptom variations were noted by treatment modality but not by stage of disease. Patients with NSCLC commonly reported shortness of breath, cough, distress, fatigue, pain, and constipation. In patients receiving chemotherapy, treatment-related symptoms, including neuropathy and sore mouth, were commonly noted. The presence of these symptoms resulted in interference with daily activities, relationships, life plans, treatment adherence, and mood. CONCLUSION: The symptoms included in the MDASI-LC are important components of the content domain of an NSCLC symptom burden measure. The presence of these symptoms affect daily life and, therefore, is of clinical consequence.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung , Lung Neoplasms , Aged , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/diagnosis , Female , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/diagnosis , Male , Middle Aged , Psychometrics , Quality of Life , Reproducibility of Results , Severity of Illness Index , Symptom Assessment
8.
J Pain Symptom Manage ; 59(5): 1052-1058.e1, 2020 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31982605

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: Although it is well known that patients with advanced pancreatic cancer (PC) experience significant symptom burden, few strategies for effective symptom intervention are available for them. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the efficacy of minocycline, an anti-inflammatory agent, for symptom reduction in patients with advanced PC. METHODS: We conducted Phase II, randomized, and placebo-controlled trial to obtain preliminary estimates of the effects on symptom reduction with 100 mg of minocycline or placebo given twice a day. Eligible patients had diagnosed advanced PC and were scheduled for standard chemotherapy. Patient-reported symptoms were measured weekly during the eight-week trial using the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI) module in patients with gastrointestinal cancer. The primary outcome measure was the area under the curve values of the five most severe symptoms in the two arms. RESULTS: Of the 44 patients recruited, 31 (71%) were evaluable for the primary efficacy analysis, with 18 received minocycline and 13 placebo. Fatigue, pain, disturbed sleep, lack of appetite, and drowsiness were the most severe symptoms reported by both groups. No significant differences in area under the curve values over time between the study arms were found for the composite MDASI score or single-item scores of the five most severe MDASI items. No treatment-related deaths were reported, and no Grade 3-4 toxicities were observed. CONCLUSION: Minocycline is safe for use in patients receiving treatment for PC. There is no observed symptom reduction with minocycline on the major symptom burden associated with advanced PC compared with placebo. Attrition because of rapid disease progression impacted the study significantly.


Subject(s)
Minocycline , Pancreatic Neoplasms , Double-Blind Method , Fatigue , Humans , Minocycline/therapeutic use , Pain/drug therapy , Pancreatic Neoplasms/drug therapy
9.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys ; 106(1): 100-107, 2020 01 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31627177

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: In patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CRT) exacerbates a cluster of difficult-to-manage symptoms, especially cancer-related fatigue. Minocycline is a readily available, low-cost antibiotic with antiinflammatory properties. We conducted a phase 2 randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial to investigate the effect of minocycline in reducing CRT-symptom burden in NSCLC. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with NSCLC scheduled to receive CRT provided consent and were randomized to receive either minocycline (100 mg twice daily) or a matching placebo during 6 to 7 weeks of CRT. Patient-reported fatigue and other symptoms were assessed on MD Anderson Symptom Inventory weekly from the start of CRT for 12 weeks. The primary outcome was 12-week (±2 days) area under the curve for symptom burden, which was compared between treatment groups. RESULTS: Forty of 49 enrolled patients (80%) were evaluable (19 on minocycline and 21 on placebo). There were no grade 3 + adverse events related to the study medication. Fatigue was significantly reduced in the minocycline group compared with placebo group during the 12-week trial period (area under the curve = 31.2 ± 14.2 vs 45.0 ± 20.9, P = .011), with a large effect size (Cohen's d = 0.77). Pain (Cohen's d = 0.54) and shortness of breath (Cohen's d = 0.55) were also significantly reduced in the minocycline group (all P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Minocycline during CRT for NSCLC was feasible, had a low toxicity profile, and yielded a clinically and statistically significant positive signal in reducing symptom burden related to NSCLC and CRT. This study is a proof of concept so a larger trial in CRT patients is warranted.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/radiotherapy , Chemoradiotherapy/adverse effects , Fatigue/drug therapy , Lung Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Minocycline/therapeutic use , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Area Under Curve , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/complications , Double-Blind Method , Dyspnea/drug therapy , Fatigue/etiology , Female , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/complications , Male , Middle Aged , Proof of Concept Study , Prospective Studies , Quality of Life
10.
J Pain Symptom Manage ; 58(4): 662-671, 2019 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31254639

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: The most debilitating symptoms during oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) are neuropathy and fatigue. Inflammation has been suggested to contribute to these symptoms, and the anti-inflammatory agent minocycline is safe and readily available. OBJECTIVES: This proof-of-concept study investigated minocycline's capacity to reduce treatment-related neuropathy and fatigue and its impact on inflammatory markers during chemotherapy in a Phase II randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. METHODS: Patients with locally advanced or metastatic CRC who were scheduled for oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy were randomly assigned to receive either minocycline (100 mg twice daily) or placebo over four months from started chemotherapy. Toxicity assessments and blood samples were prospectively collected monthly. The severity of fatigue and numbness/tingling was assessed weekly using the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory. The primary endpoint, area under the curve for numbness/tingling and fatigue over approximately four months, was compared between the two arms. RESULTS: Of 66 evaluable participants, 32 received minocycline and 34 placebo. There was no observed significant symptom reduction on both fatigue and numbness/tingling in either arm, nor was there a difference in levels of serum proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory markers between arms. No Grade 3 adverse events nor disparity mediating effects on intervention were observed. CONCLUSION: Minocycline treatment is feasible and has a low-toxicity profile. However, with 200 mg/day, it did not reduce numbness/tingling or fatigue nor moderate inflammatory biomarkers from this Phase II randomized study. Our results do not support further exploration of minocycline for fatigue or neuropathy symptom intervention in patients treated for CRC.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Colorectal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Fatigue/prevention & control , Minocycline/therapeutic use , Oxaliplatin/adverse effects , Adult , Aged , Colorectal Neoplasms/complications , Double-Blind Method , Fatigue/chemically induced , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Peripheral Nervous System Diseases/chemically induced , Peripheral Nervous System Diseases/prevention & control , Proof of Concept Study , Prospective Studies , Symptom Assessment
11.
Gynecol Oncol ; 152(3): 492-500, 2019 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30876494

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Using patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in perioperative care is increasingly common. We report the development, validation, and application of an MD Anderson Symptom Inventory version for use in patients undergoing surgery for gynecologic cancer or benign conditions (MDASI-PeriOp-GYN). METHODS: Our process included: (1) generating PeriOp-GYN-specific candidate items from qualitative interviews with patients, followed by input from an expert panel; (2) dropping items that lacked independent clinical relevance; (3) validating psychometric properties (reliability, validity) of the resulting MDASI-PeriOp-GYN; and (4) conducting cognitive debriefing interviews with patients to confirm ease of comprehension, relevance, and acceptability. RESULTS: Qualitative interviews with 40 patients generated 9 new PeriOp-GYN symptom items (bloating, abdominal cramping, constipation, hot flashes, dizziness, grogginess/confusion, urinary pain, difficulty urinating, and diarrhea) that, along with the core MDASI items, formed the new MDASI-PeriOp-GYN. A total of 150 patients (minimally invasive surgery (MIS) = 69, open surgery = 81) participated in the validation study; 121 patients also provided retest data. Cronbach alphas were 0.89 for symptoms and 0.86 for interference. Test-retest reliability was 0.88 for all symptom severity items. Known-group validity was supported by the detection of significant differences in symptom and interference levels by performance status (P < 0.01) and for all symptoms by surgery type (P < 0.01). Cognitive debriefing with 20 of the 150 patients demonstrated that the MDASI-PeriOp-GYN is an easy-to-use and understandable tool. CONCLUSIONS: The MDASI-PeriOp-GYN is a valid, reliable, concise tool for measuring symptom severity and functional interference in patients undergoing gynecologic surgery and can be useful in assessing postoperative symptom burden via PROs.


Subject(s)
Genital Neoplasms, Female/diagnosis , Genital Neoplasms, Female/surgery , Patient Reported Outcome Measures , Cognition Disorders/diagnosis , Cognition Disorders/etiology , Female , Genital Neoplasms, Female/psychology , Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/methods , Humans , Middle Aged , Perioperative Period , Psychometrics/methods , Reproducibility of Results , Severity of Illness Index , Tumor Burden
12.
Support Care Cancer ; 27(3): 1021-1028, 2019 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30094731

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Treatment-induced peripheral neuropathy (TIPN) is a difficult problem experienced by patients with cancer that can interfere with their ability to receive optimal therapy. The Treatment-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy Scale (TNAS) is a patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure developed to assess TIPN symptom burden. However, PRO validation is an ongoing process. The aim of this qualitative study was to define the conceptual model, establish content domain validity, and refine items for the TNAS based on patient input. METHODS: Patients who received bortezomib, oxaliplatin, or platinum-taxane combination therapy reported their experience of TIPN in single qualitative audiotaped interviews. Themes of the TIPN experience were identified by descriptive analysis of the transcribed interviews. RESULTS: Three groups of 10 patients each who had received bortezomib, oxaliplatin, or platinum-taxane combination therapy, for a total of 30 patients, reported their experiences. Two themes reported by patients were TIPN sensations and functional interference. Five sensations (numbness, tingling, pain, heat or burning, and coldness) and five functional impacts (using hands, walking, maintaining balance or falling, wearing shoes, and sleeping) were reported by at least 20% of patients and were selected for inclusion in the TNAS v3.0 for additional psychometric testing. CONCLUSIONS: The assessment of TIPN must be convenient, reliable, and practical for patients, who are the most reliable source of information about symptoms. The TNAS, developed with direct patient input, provides an easily administered and conceptually valid method of patient report of TIPN burden for use in research and practice.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Patient Reported Outcome Measures , Peripheral Nervous System Diseases/chemically induced , Peripheral Nervous System Diseases/diagnosis , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Bortezomib/adverse effects , Bridged-Ring Compounds/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Oxaliplatin/adverse effects , Psychometrics , Taxoids/adverse effects
13.
Arch. bronconeumol. (Ed. impr.) ; 51(9): 440-448, sept. 2015. graf, tab
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-144092

ABSTRACT

Antecedentes: La enfermedad pulmonar intersticial (EPI) es una complicación frecuente en la esclerosis sistémica (ES) progresiva, presente en el 25-90% de los pacientes. Objetivo: Evaluar si los niveles séricos de propéptido aminoterminal de procolágeno tipos i y iii (PINP y PIIINP) se correlacionan con la gravedad de la EPI en mujeres mexicanas con ES. Métodos: En 33 pacientes con ES se evaluaron las características de la enfermedad, anticuerpos antitopoisomerasa (topo i), pruebas de función pulmonar y tomografía computarizada de alta resolución (TCAR). Diecinueve pacientes tenían ES + EPI y 14 no presentaban afectación pulmonar (ES sin EPI). Se compararon con 45 controles sanos. Se evaluaron PINP y PIIINP en los 3 grupos. Resultados: El grupo ES tuvo mayores niveles de PINP y PIIINP que el control (p = 0,001 y p < 0,001, respectivamente). Las pacientes ES + EPI habían presentado la enfermedad más años que las ES sin EPI (p = 0,005), tenían mayor puntuación en el índice modificado de Rodnan (p < 0,001), puntuación alta en el índice de evaluación de discapacidad (p < 0,001), mayores niveles de antitopoisomerasa i (p < 0,001), PINP (49,28 ± 28,63 vs. 32,12 ± 18,58 μg/l, p = 0,05), y PIIINP (4,33 ± 1,03 vs. 2,67 ± 1,26 μg/l, p < 0,001). La gravedad de la EPI en TACAR se correlacionó con los niveles de PINP (r = 0,388, p = 0,03) y PIIINP (p = 0,594, p < 0,001). En el análisis ajustado, la gravedad de la EPI se asoció con la duración de la enfermedad (p = 0,037) y con los niveles de PIIINP (p = 0,038) y de antitopoisomerasa i (p = 0,045). Conclusiones: El PINP y el PIIINP son marcadores útiles para la ES + EPI grave. Esto apoya su uso clínico para el seguimiento de esta complicación


Background: Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a frequent complication in progressive systemic sclerosis (SSc), being present in 25% to 90% of cases. Objectives: To evaluate whether serum levels of procollagen type i and iii aminoterminal propeptide (PINP and PIIINP) correlate with severity and patterns of ILD in Mexican women with SSc. Methods: Thirty three SSc patients were assessed for disease characteristics and anti-topoisomerase antibodies (topo i), and also underwent pulmonary function tests and high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT). Nineteen patients had ILD + SSc, and 14 had no lung involvement (no ILD-SSc); data were compared with those from 45 healthy controls. PINP and PIIINP were assessed in all 3 groups. Results: Patients with SSc had higher PINP and PIIINP vs controls (P = .001, P < .001, respectively). Compared to no ILD-SSc patients, those with ILD + SSc had longer disease duration in years (P = .005), higher modified Rodnan skin score (P < .001), higher Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability-Index scores (P < .001), higher topo i U/mL (P < .001), PINP (49.28 ± 28.63 vs. 32.12 ± 18.58 g/L, P = .05), and PIIINP (4.33 ± 1.03 vs. 2.67 ± 1.26 g/L, P < .001) levels. ILD severity based on total HRCT correlated with PINP (r = .388, P = .03) and PIIINP (P = .594, P < .001). On adjusted analysis, ILD severity was associated with disease duration (P = .037), PIIINP (P = .038), and topo i (P = .045). Conclusions: PINP and PIIINP are useful markers for severe ILD + SSc, suggesting they could play a role in the follow-up of this complication in SSc


Subject(s)
Adult , Female , Humans , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/diagnosis , Scleroderma, Systemic/complications , Scleroderma, Systemic/diagnosis , Pulmonary Fibrosis/diagnosis , Procollagen , Collagen Type I/blood , Collagen Type III/blood , Epidemiological Monitoring/trends , Lung/physiology , Hypertension, Pulmonary/diagnosis , Biomarkers , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Respiratory Function Tests , Severity of Illness Index , Quality of Life , Prognosis , Cross-Sectional Studies , Mexico/epidemiology
14.
Cancer ; 121(11): 1882-90, 2015 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25711974

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Minority patients with breast cancer are at risk for undertreatment of cancer-related pain. The authors evaluated the feasibility and efficacy of an automated pain intervention for improving pain and symptom management of underserved African American and Latina women with breast cancer. METHODS: Sixty low-income African American and Latina women with breast cancer and cancer-related pain were enrolled in a pilot study of an automated, telephone-based, interactive voice response (IVR) intervention. Women in the intervention group were called twice weekly by the IVR system and asked to rate the intensity of their pain and other symptoms. The patients' oncologists received e-mail alerts if the reported symptoms were moderate to severe. The patients also reported barriers to pain management and received education regarding any reported obstacles. RESULTS: The proportion of women in both groups reporting moderate to severe pain decreased during the study, but the decrease was significantly greater for the intervention group. The IVR intervention also was associated with improvements in other cancer-related symptoms, including sleep disturbance and drowsiness. Although patient adherence to the IVR call schedule was good, the oncologists who were treating the patients rated the intervention as only somewhat useful for improving symptom management. CONCLUSIONS: The IVR intervention reduced pain and symptom severity for underserved minority women with breast cancer. Additional research on technological approaches to symptom management is needed.


Subject(s)
Black or African American , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Breast Neoplasms/ethnology , Hispanic or Latino , Pain Management/methods , Pain Measurement/methods , Pain/ethnology , Automation/methods , Breast Neoplasms/complications , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Pain/etiology , Poverty , Telemedicine/methods , Vulnerable Populations
15.
Arch Bronconeumol ; 51(9): 440-8, 2015 Sep.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25301411

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a frequent complication in progressive systemic sclerosis (SSc), being present in 25% to 90% of cases. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether serum levels of procollagen typei and iii aminoterminal propeptide (PINP and PIIINP) correlate with severity and patterns of ILD in Mexican women with SSc. METHODS: Thirty three SSc patients were assessed for disease characteristics and anti-topoisomerase antibodies (topoi), and also underwent pulmonary function tests and high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT). Nineteen patients had ILD+SSc, and 14 had no lung involvement (no ILD-SSc); data were compared with those from 45 healthy controls. PINP and PIIINP were assessed in all 3 groups. RESULTS: Patients with SSc had higher PINP and PIIINP vs controls (P=.001, P<.001, respectively). Compared to no ILD-SSc patients, those with ILD+SSc had longer disease duration in years (P=.005), higher modified Rodnan skin score (P<.001), higher Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability-Index scores (P<.001), higher topoi U/mL (P<.001), PINP (49.28±28.63 vs. 32.12±18.58µg/L, P=.05), and PIIINP (4.33±1.03 vs. 2.67±1.26µg/L, P<.001) levels. ILD severity based on total HRCT correlated with PINP (r=.388, P=.03) and PIIINP (P=.594, P<.001). On adjusted analysis, ILD severity was associated with disease duration (P=.037), PIIINP (P=.038), and topoi (P=.045). CONCLUSIONS: PINP and PIIINP are useful markers for severe ILD+SSc, suggesting they could play a role in the follow-up of this complication in SSc.


Subject(s)
Collagen Type I/blood , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/blood , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/etiology , Peptide Fragments/blood , Procollagen/blood , Scleroderma, Systemic/blood , Scleroderma, Systemic/complications , Cross-Sectional Studies , Disease Progression , Female , Humans , Mexico , Middle Aged , Severity of Illness Index
16.
Blood ; 122(5): 641-7, 2013 Aug 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23777764

ABSTRACT

We developed a module of the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI) for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). To develop the MDASI-CML, we identified CML-specific symptoms from qualitative interviews with 35 patients. A list of candidate symptoms was reduced by a panel of patients, caregivers, and clinicians to the 13 core MDASI symptom items and 6 CML-specific items; these items were subsequently administered to 30 patients. Cognitive debriefing confirmed that the items were clear, relevant, and easy to use. One additional CML-specific symptom item was added, for a total of 7. The refined MDASI-CML was administered to 152 patients once every 2 weeks for 1 year. The content, concurrent, known-group, and construct validity of the MDASI-CML were evaluated. The internal consistency and test-retest reliabilities of the module were adequate. Longitudinal analysis showed relatively stable symptom severity scores over time. The most severe symptoms were fatigue, drowsiness, disturbed sleep, muscle soreness and cramping, and trouble remembering things. Approximately one-third of the patients who completed the MDASI-CML reported persistent moderate-to-severe symptoms. The MDASI-CML is a valid and reliable symptom assessment instrument that can be used in clinical studies of symptom status in patients with CML.


Subject(s)
Cost of Illness , Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive/therapy , Surveys and Questionnaires , Adult , Aged , Cognition/physiology , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive/psychology , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Reproducibility of Results , Research Design
17.
Arthritis Rheum ; 65(6): 1421-9, 2013 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23728826

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To quantify adherence to oral therapies in ethnically diverse and economically disadvantaged patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), using electronic medication monitoring, and to evaluate the clinical consequences of low adherence. METHODS: A total of 107 patients with RA enrolled in a 2-year prospective cohort study agreed to have their oral RA drug therapy intake electronically monitored using the Medication Event Monitoring System. Adherence to disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and prednisone was determined as the percentage of days (or weeks for methotrexate) on which the patient took the correct dose as prescribed by the physician. Patient outcomes were assessed, including function measured by the modified Health Assessment Questionnaire, disease activity measured by the Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28), health-related quality of life, and radiographic damage measured using the modified Sharp/van der Heijde scoring method. RESULTS: Adherence to the treatment regimen as determined by the percentage of correct doses was 64% for DMARDs and 70% for prednisone. Patients who had better mental health were statistically more likely to be adherent. Only 23 of the patients (21%) had an average adherence to DMARDs ≥80%. These patients showed significantly better mean DAS28 values across 2 years of followup than those who were less adherent (3.28 versus 4.09; P = 0.02). Radiographic scores were also worse in nonadherent patients at baseline and at 12 months. CONCLUSION: Only one-fifth of RA patients had an overall adherence to DMARDs of at least 80%. Less than two-thirds of the prescribed DMARD doses were correctly taken. Adherent patients had lower disease activity across the 2 years of followup.


Subject(s)
Antirheumatic Agents/therapeutic use , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy , Methotrexate/therapeutic use , Monitoring, Physiologic/methods , Patient Compliance/statistics & numerical data , Prednisone/therapeutic use , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cohort Studies , Cultural Diversity , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Quality of Life , Severity of Illness Index , Surveys and Questionnaires , Vulnerable Populations , Young Adult
18.
Cancer ; 117(5): 1070-9, 2011 Mar 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20960510

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The growing diversity of the population of the United States and the high burden of cancer-related symptoms reflect the need for caregiver research within underserved groups. In this longitudinal study, the authors assessed changes in symptom severity in caregivers and underserved minority patients diagnosed with advanced solid tumors who were being treated at public hospitals. METHODS: A total of 85 matched patient-caregiver dyads completed the M. D. Anderson Symptom Inventory 3 times during 20 weeks of chemotherapy. At each time point, symptom severity and interference with daily activities were assessed. Group-based trajectory modeling was used to classify caregivers into high-symptom or low-symptom burden groups. RESULTS: Sadness and distress were more prevalent among caregivers (P = .005). Symptom burden remained stable among caregivers in the high-symptom group (40%), whereas the low-symptom group (60%) demonstrated a statistically significant decrease over time. Multivariate analysis found being a family-member caregiver (adjusted odds ratio [ADJ-OR], 4.1; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.4-11.6) and caring for a highly symptomatic patient (ADJ-OR, 8.0; 95% CI, 1.5-41.4), rather than race, ethnicity, or sociodemographic characteristics, were significant predictors of the caregiver's membership in the high-symptom burden group. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 40% of the caregivers in the current study were found to be at an increased risk for moderate to severe sadness and distress, which remained severe throughout the patient's treatment course at public hospitals. To the authors' knowledge, this study marks the first time that the concept of symptom burden has been used to measure caregiver burden, and the first time that symptom burden has been measured and documented in dyads of caregivers and underserved minority patients. Cancer 2011. © 2010 American Cancer Society.


Subject(s)
Caregivers/psychology , Cost of Illness , Health Services Accessibility , Neoplasms/therapy , Adaptation, Psychological/physiology , Adult , Aged , Caregivers/statistics & numerical data , Depression/epidemiology , Depression/etiology , Disease Progression , Female , Humans , Male , Medically Underserved Area , Middle Aged , Neoplasms/pathology , Neoplasms/psychology , Risk , Severity of Illness Index , United States
19.
J Clin Rheumatol ; 15(3): 120-3, 2009 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19300289

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the characteristics of physician-patient communications in Mexican patients with rheumatic diseases. METHODS: We prospectively recruited 200 consecutive patients with chronic rheumatic diseases from a rheumatology clinic affiliated with a secondary care hospital in Mexico. All participants completed face-to-face interviews and surveys to determine their perceptions of the medical interaction with the physician at the clinic. Patients were assessed immediately before and after their visits. The Perceptions of Involvement in Care Scale was used to examine 3 factors: the doctor's facilitation of involvement, the level of information exchange, and the patient's participation in decision making. The Medical Outcomes Study scale was used to evaluate the patient satisfaction with the visit. A Patients' Trust in Physicians instrument was also administered. RESULTS: No differences in communication, satisfaction, or trust were observed across diseases. Most patients indicated they wanted to play a passive role, with the physicians making the decisions. However, concordance between preferred and actual roles was small (weighted kappa = 0.3), suggesting that not all patients played their preferred role. CONCLUSION: This is the first study to evaluate doctor-patient communication in Mexican patients with rheumatic diseases. In general, patients preferred to play a passive role in their medical interaction. In addition, they often did not attain their preferred communication style when interacting with their physicians. The effect of these findings in subsequent health outcomes is unknown but deserves further investigation.


Subject(s)
Physician-Patient Relations , Rheumatic Diseases , Adult , Cohort Studies , Data Collection , Female , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Male , Mexico , Middle Aged , Outpatient Clinics, Hospital , Patient Participation , Patient Satisfaction
20.
Clin Rheumatol ; 27(7): 883-9, 2008 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18185905

ABSTRACT

This study assessed self-reported adherence in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) from underserved healthcare settings. We conducted a cross-sectional survey of 102 ethnically diverse patients--70 with RA and 32 with SLE--attending rheumatology clinics at publicly funded hospitals in Houston, Texas; 43% were Hispanic, 32% African-American, and 25% White. Treatment adherence was evaluated using the compliance questionnaire rheumatology (CQR; 0, low adherence and 100, high adherence) and the questionnaire of the Adult AIDS Clinical Trials Group (AACTG). The patients were also asked how often they forgot to take their prescribed medications or discontinued them on their own. Mean patient age was 48.5 years; 75% were female, 32% were African-American, 43% Hispanic, and 25% White. Only one third reported never forgetting to take their medications; 40% reported having stopped their medications on their own because of side effects, and 20% because of lack of efficacy. Mean CQR score was 69.1 +/- 10.5, suggesting moderate adherence overall. Differences were also observed across ethnic groups: 23% of ethnic minority patients had problems taking their medications at specified times compared to 11% of Whites (p = 0.03). Lower education and side effects were associated with lower adherence. No differences were observed between RA and SLE patients. Many patients with RA and SLE report problems with treatment adherence. These appear to be more prevalent in African Americans and Hispanics than Whites; the impact of decreased adherence on outcomes could be significant and should be considered when treating patients with RA and SLE.


Subject(s)
Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/drug therapy , Patient Compliance/ethnology , Adult , Black or African American , Aged , Antirheumatic Agents/adverse effects , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/ethnology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Educational Status , Female , Hispanic or Latino , Humans , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/ethnology , Male , Medically Underserved Area , Middle Aged , White People
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...