Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Rev Calid Asist ; 30(6): 302-9, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26547108

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The aim of the clinical laboratory is to provide useful information for screening, diagnosis and monitoring of disease. The laboratory should ensure the quality of extra-analytical and analytical process, based on set criteria. To do this, it develops and implements a system of internal quality control, designed to detect errors, and compare its data with other laboratories, through external quality control. In this way it has a tool to detect the fulfillment of the objectives set, and in case of errors, allowing corrective actions to be made, and ensure the reliability of the results. OBJECTIVE: This article sets out to describe the design and implementation of an internal quality control protocol, as well as its periodical assessment intervals (6 months) to determine compliance with pre-determined specifications (Stockholm Consensus(1)). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 40 biochemical and 15 immunochemical methods were evaluated using three different control materials. Next, a standard operation procedure was planned to develop a system of internal quality control that included calculating the error of the analytical process, setting quality specifications, and verifying compliance. RESULTS: The quality control data were then statistically depicted as means, standard deviations, and coefficients of variation, as well as systematic, random, and total errors. The quality specifications were then fixed and the operational rules to apply in the analytical process were calculated. Finally, our data were compared with those of other laboratories through an external quality assurance program. DISCUSSION: The development of an analytical quality control system is a highly structured process. This should be designed to detect errors that compromise the stability of the analytical process. The laboratory should review its quality indicators, systematic, random and total error at regular intervals, in order to ensure that they are meeting pre-determined specifications, and if not, apply the appropriate corrective actions.


Subject(s)
Chemistry Techniques, Analytical/standards , Immunochemistry/standards , Laboratories/standards , Quality Assurance, Health Care/organization & administration , Quality Control , Chemistry Techniques, Analytical/statistics & numerical data , Clinical Laboratory Services , Guideline Adherence , Humans , Immunochemistry/statistics & numerical data , Reproducibility of Results
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...