Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 11 de 11
Filter
1.
Cancer Treat Rev ; 90: 102102, 2020 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32947121

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease in 2019 (COVID-19) caused by Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has emerged as a global pandemic. Published data suggests that patients with a history of or active malignancy are at increased risk of infection and developing COVID-19 related complications. To date, the published data has analyzed the seroprevalence of COVID-19 infection in the general population, but not in cancer patients. Here we present the results of prevalence of IgG and IgM antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 in cancer patients from the University Hospital of Torrejón (Torrejón de Ardoz, Madrid, Spain). METHODS: SARS-CoV-2 IgG and IgM antibodies was assessed using a commercially available rapid test (Testsealabs® IgG/IgM Rapid Test Cassette) and collect the result from cancer outpatients who attended the medical oncology consult at University Hospital of Torrejón between June 1st and June 19th, 2020. FINDINGS: We analyzed the serological test results of 229 cancer patients. We estimated an overall seroprevalence (IgG or IgM positive) of 31.4%. The probability of SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity was similar between men and women, type of treatment and cancer stage. The probability of seropositivity was significantly higher in cancer patients with pneumonia compared with cancer patients without pneumonia (Odds Ratio (OR) 7.65 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1,85-31,58]). INTERPRETATION: Our results show a higher rate of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in cancer patients than in the general population. The role of those antibodies in the immune response against the virus infection is unclear.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Viral/blood , COVID-19/immunology , Neoplasms/immunology , Neoplasms/virology , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Antibodies, Viral/immunology , Antibody Specificity , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/virology , Cohort Studies , Humans , Immunoglobulin G/blood , Immunoglobulin G/immunology , Immunoglobulin M/blood , Immunoglobulin M/immunology , Neoplasms/blood , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Pandemics , Prospective Studies , Seroepidemiologic Studies , Spain/epidemiology
4.
Med. clín (Ed. impr.) ; 151(5): 198-206, sept. 2018. tab, graf
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-173884

ABSTRACT

Durante medio siglo los antagonistas de la vitamina K han sido la única opción disponible para la terapia anticoagulante oral. En los últimos años se han desarrollado anticoagulantes orales directos: un inhibidor directo de la trombina (dabigatrán etexilato) y 3 inhibidores directos del factor X activado (rivaroxabán, apixabán y edoxabán). Todos ellos han demostrado un beneficio-riesgo favorable, comparables en eficacia y seguridad a los anticoagulantes tradicionales antagonistas de la vitamina K, en la prevención del ictus y la embolia sistémica en pacientes con fibrilación auricular no valvular, la profilaxis y el tratamiento del tromboembolismo venoso y el síndrome coronario agudo. En 2008 la Agencia Europea del Medicamento aprobó el primer anticoagulante oral directo, dabigatrán. Posteriormente, rivaroxabán, apixabán y edoxabán fueron autorizados. En este artículo se revisa la experiencia acumulada con cada uno de estos fármacos


Vitamin K antagonists were the only choice for chronic oral anticoagulation for more than half a century. Over the past few years, direct oral anticoagulants have emerged, including one direct thrombin inhibitor (dabigatran etexilate) and three factor Xa inhibitors (apixaban, edoxaban and rivaroxaban). In randomised controlled trials comparing direct oral anticoagulants with traditional vitamin K antagonists, the direct oral anticoagulants all showed a favourable benefit-risk balance in their safety and efficacy profile, in prevention of thromboembolic events in patients with atrial fibrillation and in the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism and acute coronary syndrome. In 2008, dabigatran was the first direct oral anticoagulant approved by the European Medicine Agency. Subsequently, rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban were also authorised. This article reviews the evidence related to the use of these drugs


Subject(s)
Humans , Dabigatran/therapeutic use , Rivaroxaban/therapeutic use , Factor Xa Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Venous Thromboembolism , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Administration, Oral , Vitamin K/antagonists & inhibitors , Cardiovascular Diseases
5.
Med Clin (Barc) ; 151(5): 198-206, 2018 09 14.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29295790

ABSTRACT

Vitamin K antagonists were the only choice for chronic oral anticoagulation for more than half a century. Over the past few years, direct oral anticoagulants have emerged, including one direct thrombin inhibitor (dabigatran etexilate) and three factor Xa inhibitors (apixaban, edoxaban and rivaroxaban). In randomised controlled trials comparing direct oral anticoagulants with traditional vitamin K antagonists, the direct oral anticoagulants all showed a favourable benefit-risk balance in their safety and efficacy profile, in prevention of thromboembolic events in patients with atrial fibrillation and in the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism and acute coronary syndrome. In 2008, dabigatran was the first direct oral anticoagulant approved by the European Medicine Agency. Subsequently, rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban were also authorised. This article reviews the evidence related to the use of these drugs.


Subject(s)
Antithrombins/therapeutic use , Stroke/prevention & control , Acute Coronary Syndrome/prevention & control , Administration, Oral , Anticoagulants/administration & dosage , Anticoagulants/adverse effects , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Antithrombins/administration & dosage , Antithrombins/adverse effects , Atrial Fibrillation/complications , Clinical Trials as Topic , Dabigatran/administration & dosage , Dabigatran/therapeutic use , Factor Xa Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Factor Xa Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Hemorrhage/chemically induced , Hemorrhage/therapy , Humans , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Pyrazoles/administration & dosage , Pyrazoles/therapeutic use , Pyridines/administration & dosage , Pyridines/therapeutic use , Pyridones/administration & dosage , Pyridones/therapeutic use , Rivaroxaban/administration & dosage , Rivaroxaban/therapeutic use , Secondary Prevention , Thiazoles/administration & dosage , Thiazoles/therapeutic use , Venous Thromboembolism/prevention & control , Withholding Treatment
8.
World J Oncol ; 6(6): 485-490, 2015 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28983351

ABSTRACT

Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is a rare and heterogeneous malignancy, with an incidence of approximately 0.72 per million cases per year leading to 0.2% of all cancer deaths in the United States. Metastatic ACC has a dismal prognosis with an overall survival of less than 1 year. We present a case of a 37-year-old man with metastatic ACC with unusual good prognosis and review the therapeutic options in the literature.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...