ABSTRACT
Purpose. To analyze long-term outcomes and prognostic factors in patients with paraaortic lymph-node oligometastases (LNO) from gynecological malignancies treated in a multimodal protocol. Methods. Patients with a histological diagnosis of LNO gynecological cancer [uterine cervix (n = 14, 40 %), endometrial (n = 18, 51 %), ovarian (n = 3, 9 %)] who underwent surgery with radical intent and intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT), median dose 12.5 Gy) were considered eligible for participation in this study. Additionally, 51 % received external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT). Results. From 1997 to 2012, a total of 35 patients from a single institution were analyzed. With a median follow-up time of 55 months (range 2148), 5-year loco-regional control (LRC), disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were 79, 44 and 49 %, respectively. On multivariate analysis, no EBRT treatment to the LNO (p = 0.03), and time interval from primary tumor diagnosis to LNO <24 months (p = 0.04) remained significantly associated with locoregional recurrence (LRR). We found on multivariate analysis that only R1 margin status (p = 0.01) was significantly associated with OS. Conclusion. From the current series of patients with gynecological LNO, it emerges the fact that EBRT promotes local control. Future prospective studies might be designed according to the predicted risk of LRR focusing on different subgroups (AU)
No disponible
Subject(s)
Adult , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Uterine Neoplasms/diagnosis , Uterine Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Ovarian Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Combined Modality Therapy/methods , Lymphatic Metastasis/physiopathology , Lymphatic Metastasis/radiotherapy , Para-Aortic Bodies , Para-Aortic Bodies/pathology , Retrospective Studies , Follow-Up Studies , Kaplan-Meier EstimateABSTRACT
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To analyse the programme activity and clinical innovation and/or technology developed over a period of 17 years with regard to the introduction and the use of intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) as a therapeutic component in a medical-surgical multidisciplinary cancer hospital. MATERIAL AND METHODS: To standardise and record this procedure, the Radiation Oncology service has an institutional programme and protocols that must be completed by the different specialists involved. For 17 years, IORT procedures were recorded on a specific database that includes 23 variables with information recorded on institutional protocols. As part of the development and innovation activity, two technological tools were implemented (RADIANCE and MEDTING) in line with the standardisation of this modality in clinical practice. RESULTS: During the 17 years studied, 1,004 patients were treated through 1,036 IORT procedures. The state of the disease at the time of IORT was 77% primary and 23% recurrent. The origin and distribution of cancers were 62% gastrointestinal, 18% sarcomas, 5% pancreatic, 2% paediatric, 3% breast, 7% less common locations, and 2% others. The research and development projects have generated a patent on virtual planning (RADIANCE) and proof of concept to explore as a professional social network (MEDTING). During 2012, there were 69 IORT procedures. There was defined treatment volume (target or target region) in all of them, and 43 were conducted by the virtual planning RADIANCE system. Eighteen have been registered on the platform MEDTING as clinical cases. CONCLUSION: The IORT programme, developed in a university hospital with an academic tradition, and interdisciplinary surgical oncology, is a feasible care initiative, able to generate the necessary intense clinical activity for tending to the cancer patient. Moreover, it is a competitive source for research, development, and scientific innovation.
ABSTRACT
No disponible
