Translation and cultural adaptation of the pectus excavatum evaluation questionnaire to Spanish and Catalan.

PURPOSE: Pectus excavatum (PE) is the most common congenital chest wall deformity. It can have a negative effect in exercise tolerance. However, cosmetic features are the most frequent concerns in these patients. The PE evaluation questionnaire (PEEQ) is a patient reported outcome (PRO) tool to measure the physical and psychosocial quality-of-life changes after surgical repair of PE. No specific tool has been developed in our languages to evaluate PRO in PE patients. Our aim is to translate and culturally adapt the PEEQ to Spanish and Catalan. METHODS: Guidelines for translation of PRO were followed. The PEEQ, consisting of 34 items, was translated from English to Spanish and to Catalan. Three forward translations and one back translation were performed for each language. Cognitive debriefing interviews were developed. RESULTS: The reconciliation of the forward translations revealed a 14.7% of inconsistencies for each language. The Spanish back translation showed a 64.7% of disagreement with the source, the Catalan 58.8%. Changes in each reconciled version were made to amend the diverting items. Cognitive debriefing: Catalan version: 15 participants, 10 males, 5 patients had been operated. 12 patients showed difficulties for understanding 4 of the items. Spanish version: 17 participants, 11 males, 5 had been operated. 13 patients showed difficulties for understanding 4 of the items. We made modifications of the problematic items, in order to make them easier to understand for our patients. We tested the last version in a new group of patients. Catalan: 7 patients, 5 males. One patient showed difficulties for understanding item 11, so we added a further clarification of this item. Spanish: 7 patients, all males. There were any difficulties for understanding. CONCLUSION: After a thorough process of translation and cultural adaptation, we reached a Catalan and a Spanish version of PEEQ. This work constitutes the first step to reach a specific PE PRO tool in our languages. However, it needs to be validated, with a higher number of patients, before being widely used in a clinical setting.

Postoperative vesicoureteral reflux after high-pressure balloon dilation of the ureterovesical junction in primary obstructive megaureter. Incidence, management and predisposing factors.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the incidence, predisposing factors and management of postoperative vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) after high-pressure balloon dilation to treat primary obstructive megaureter (POM). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We have reviewed patients that underwent endoscopic treatment for POM from May 2008 to November 2013. All patients were evaluated with renal ultrasound, voiding cystourethrography and diuretic renogram. Endoscopic treatment was done with high-pressure balloon dilation of the ureterovesical junction under general anesthesia; a double-J stenting was done in all patients. Follow-up was performed with ultrasonography, voiding cystourethrography and a diuretic renogram in all patients. RESULTS: Fifteen boys and five girls with a mean age of 14.18 months (3-103) were reviewed. A total of 22 ureters underwent HPBD to treat POM. Ureterohydronephrosis improves in 19 ureters. After endoscopic treatment, six ureters developed VUR. Four ureters were managed surgically, and in the other two, VUR disappeared in a second cystogram. The presence of parameatal diverticulum in the preoperative cystography and those patients with bilateral POM are factors related to postoperative VUR (p < 0.05). Urinary tract infection after HPBD was observed in four patients, but only one of them was affected with VUR.

Anderson-hynes pyeloplasty in patients less than 12 months old. Is the laparoscopic approach safe and feasible?

PURPOSE: The aim of our study is to compare the outcomes of open and laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children less than 12 months of age. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed all medical charts of patients less than 12 months old who underwent pyeloplasty from January 2007 to February 2013. We divided them in two groups: Open pyeloplasty (OP) and laparoscopic pyeloplasty (LP). The following data were analyzed: age, sex, weight, US measurements, operative time, hospital stay, complications, and success rate. Quantitative data were analyzed with the Student t test or Mann-Whitney U test, and chi-square test or Fisher test for qualitative data. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients (46 boys and 12 girls) with a mean age of 4.66 months (±3.05) were included. Mean age was 4.25 months and 5.15 months in OP and LP group respectively. Mean weight was 6.78 kg and 7.02 kg in OP and LP groups. There were no statistical differences in age, weight, and sex between OP and LP groups. There were no statistical differences in preoperative ultrasonography measurements. Mean posterior-anterior (PA) pelvis diameter was 28.57 mm and 23.94 mm in OP and LP groups, respectively. Mean calices diameter were 10.86 mm and 10.96 mm in OP and LP groups, respectively. Mean operative time was 129.53 minutes in the OP group and 151.92 minutes in the LP group with statistical differences (P=0.018). Mean hospital stay was 6.34 days in the OP group and 3.46 in the LP group with statistical differences (P<0.05). No intraoperative and postoperative complications were found in either group. Hydronephrosis improved in all patients, and no patient needed a repeated pyeloplasty. CONCLUSION: The laparoscopic approach of Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty in patients less than 12 months old is a safe procedure with the same outcomes as the open approach.