ABSTRACT
Objetivo: Evaluar el efecto de la suplementación con vitamina D en las complicaciones musculoesqueléticas relacionadas con el tratamiento con inhibidores de la aromatasa (IA) en pacientes con cáncer de mama. Material y métodos: Estudio observacional prospectivo de mujeres en tratamiento con IA, reclutadas en la cohorte B-ABLE. Las pacientes con niveles séricos iniciales de 25(OH)D (25-hidroxivitamina D) <30 ng/ml recibieron una dosis de 16.000 UI de calcifediol oral cada 2 semanas. La artralgia y la pérdida ósea relacionadas con los IA se evaluaron a los 3 meses y al año de seguimiento, respectivamente. Los análisis de asociación del status de vitamina D a los 3 meses con eventos musculoesqueléticos se realizaron mediante modelos de regresión lineal multivariante ajustados. Además, se evaluó la asociación del dolor incidente, definido como pacientes sin dolor articular inicial, pero con una escala visual analógica (EVA) >0 a los 3 meses, mediante regresión logística. Resultados: La suplementación con vitamina D al inicio del tratamiento con IA disminuyó el riesgo tanto de artralgia incidente como de su empeoramiento. El umbral efectivo de 25(OH)D en suero para reducir el dolor articular se estableció en 40 ng/ml. Sin embargo, este umbral no se relacionó significativamente con los cambios óseos al año de seguimiento. No obstante, los niveles de vitamina D se correlacionaron inversamente con la pérdida ósea de la columna lumbar (CL) (β=0,177% [IC 95%: 0,014 a 0,340]). Conclusiones: La administración de suplementos de vitamina D con el objetivo de alcanzar niveles séricos de 25OHD de al menos 40 ng/ml es protectora para la artralgia. Los niveles de vitamina D a los tres meses podrían predecir el riesgo de pérdida ósea en CL al año de tratamiento con IA. Por lo tanto, se recomiendan dosis altas de vitamina D en estas pacientes, que son más propensas a sufrir afecciones musculoesqueléticas. (AU)
Objetive: To assess the effect of vitamin D supplementation on musculoskeletal complications related to aromatase inhibitor (AI) treatment in patients with breast cancer. Material and methods: Prospective observational study of women undergoing AI treatment, recruited in the B-ABLE cohort. Patients with baseline serum 25 (OH) D (25-hydroxyvitamin D) levels <30 ng/ml received a 16,000 IU dose of oral calcifediol every 2 weeks. Arthralgia and bone loss related to AIs were assessed at 3 months and 1 year of followup, respectively. The association analyzes of vitamin D status at 3 months with musculoskeletal events were carried out using adjusted multivariate linear regression models. In addition, the association of incident pain, defined as patients without initial joint pain, but with a visual analog scale (VAS) >0 at 3 months, was evaluated using logistic regression. Results: Vitamin D supplementation at the start of AI treatment decreased the risk of both incident arthralgia and its worsening. The effective threshold of 25 (OH) D in serum to reduce joint pain was established at 40 ng/ml. However, this threshold was not significantly related to bone changes at one year of follow-up. However, vitamin D levels were inversely correlated with lumbar spine bone loss (LS) (β=0.177% [95% CI: 0.014 to 0.340]). Conclusions: Vitamin D supplementation aimed at achieving serum 25(OH)D levels of at least 40 ng/ml is protective for arthralgia. Vitamin D levels at three months could predict the risk of bone loss in LS at one year of AI treatment. Therefore, high doses of vitamin D are recommended in these patients, who are more prone to musculoskeletal conditions. (AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Vitamin D/administration & dosage , Dietary Supplements/adverse effects , Aromatase Inhibitors/pharmacology , Prospective Studies , Aromatase Inhibitors/adverse effects , Bone DensityABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Antibodies to M-type phospholipase A2 receptor (a-PLA2R) have been identified in most patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy, but the prevalence in membranous lupus nephritis (MLN) is still unclear. The objective of this study was to assess the prevalence of a-PLA2R antibodies in a large cohort of patients with lupus nephritis. METHODS: a-PLA2R antibodies were measured by ELISA in serum from patients with systemic lupus erythematosus ( n = 190), of whom 37 had a biopsy-proven MLN. Positive samples were confirmed by commercial ELISA kit, Western blot and immunohistochemistry in renal tissue. RESULTS: A total of 10 from 190 patients (5.3%) with systemic lupus erythematosus had circulating a-PLA2R measured by in-house ELISA assay. The antibodies were detected in 7 patients with MLN (18.9%) and 3 patients with non-renal lupus disease (3.2%). PLA2R staining was detected in the kidney biopsy of 5 of the 7 (71.4%) patients with MLN. a-PLA2R levels were associated with active disease but not proteinuria levels. Presence of a-PLA2R antibodies at baseline was associated with worse remission rates and longer time to remission compared to those patients serologically negative. CONCLUSIONS: a-PLA2R antibodies can be detected with low prevalence in MLN patients, but their detection is associated with a worse renal prognosis.
