Characteristics and management of pediatric medial subperiosteal orbital abscesses.

INTRODUCTION: Subperiosteal orbital abscesses (SPOA) are the most common suppurative complications of acute bacterial sinusitis. Medial SPOAs arise from infection of the ipsilateral ethmoid sinus and favor initial conservative management reserving surgical drainage for patients who do not demonstrate clinical improvement. No standard algorithm defining medical versus surgical treatment of medial SPOAs exist in the pediatric population. OBJECTIVES: To identify a size cutoff for medial SPOAs to predict the likelihood for surgical drainage. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of patients with medial SPOAs at a tertiary care center from 2003 to 2017. Diagnosis of SPOA was based on radiographic findings. Variables included are patient demographics, antibiotic therapy, surgical intervention, and length of stay. RESULTS: 82 patients with a medial SPOA were included with an average age at presentation of 6.27 (range 0-15) years were included in this study. 62 patients were male (75.6 %), and 20 were female (24.4 %). The average abscess length was 16.1 mm, range 4.5-30.7 mm. The average abscess width was 4.17 mm, range 1.5-14.6 mm. The odds ratio for surgical treatment with every 1 mm increase in abscess width was 1.89 (95CI:1.33-2.69, p < 0.001). Abscesses over 3.6 mm width were 6.65 times more likely to undergo surgical drainage than those less than 3.6 mm (OR:6.65, 95CI:2.52-17.54, p < 0.001). The average(SD) length of stay was 5.4(3.0) days for patients who underwent surgery and 4.0(0.9) days for patients treated with conservative measures, p < 0.001. CONCLUSION: Medial SPOAs greater than 3.6 mm were more likely to undergo surgical drainage; however there was no difference in the likelihood of drainage between anteriorly and posteriorly based medial abscesses. These findings help further characterize the landscape of pediatric subperiosteal abscesses that are managed with surgical drainage.

Neighborhood Deprivation and Symptoms, Psychological Distress, and Quality of Life Among Head and Neck Cancer Survivors.

Importance: Socioeconomic deprivation is associated with increased risk of poor health and quality-of-life (QOL) outcomes in head and neck cancer (HNC) survivors. However, there are few data on how neighborhood deprivation affects patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in HNC survivors. Objective: To investigate whether neighborhood socioeconomic deprivation is associated with symptom burden, psychological distress, and QOL among HNC survivors. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study used prospectively collected data from patients seen in a university-affiliated multidisciplinary HNC survivorship clinic between September 2018 and September 2021 who received radiotherapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, oropharynx, and larynx or hypopharynx. Exposure: Neighborhood socioeconomic deprivation, measured using the Area Deprivation Index (ADI). Main Outcomes and Measures: The PROMs pertaining to symptom burden and severity of psychological distress were measured using the Neck Disability Index, Insomnia Severity Index, the 10-item Eating Assessment Tool, the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale, and the 8-item Patient Health Questionnaire. Physical and social-emotional QOL were obtained using the University of Washington QOL questionnaire. Multivariable linear regression analysis adjusting for individual-level sociodemographic, comorbidity, and treatment characteristics investigated the association between ADI and PROMs. A subgroup analysis was performed to compare the lowest (most affluent areas: ADI, 0%-20%) and highest (most deprived areas: ADI, 80%-100%) ADI quintiles. Results: A total of 277 patients were included in the final analysis (mean [SD] age, 64.18 [9.60] years; 215 [77.6%] male). Cancer sites were the oral cavity (52 [18.8%]), oropharyngeal area (171 [61.7%]), and larynx or hypopharynx (54 [19.5%]). Multivariable analysis showed that for every 1-point increase in ADI, social-emotional QOL changed by -0.14 points (95% CI, -0.24 to -0.05 points), anxiety increased by 0.03 points (95% CI, 0.01-0.06 points), and neck disability worsened by 0.05 points (95% CI, 0.01-0.10 points). Compared with patients in the most affluent areas, those in the most deprived areas had significantly lower physical (-15.89 points; 95% CI, -25.96 to -2.31 points; Cohen d = -0.83) and social-emotional (-13.57 points; 95% CI, -22.79 to -3.49 points; Cohen d = -0.69) QOL and higher depression (2.60 points; 95% CI, 0.21-4.40 points; Cohen d = 0.52), anxiety (3.12 points; 95% CI, 1.56-4.66 points; Cohen d = 0.61), insomnia (3.55 points; 95% CI, 0.33-6.41 points; Cohen d = 0.54), and neck disability (5.65 points; 95% CI, 1.66-9.55 points; Cohen d = 0.66) scores. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study, a higher ADI score was associated with higher risk of increased psychological distress, higher symptom burden, and decreased QOL after treatment among HNC survivors. These findings suggest that proactive, patient-centered interventions are needed to address these disparities.

The Role of Nasal Endoscopy in the Preoperative Evaluation of Nasal Airway Obstruction.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the prevalence and nature of nasal endoscopic findings in patients referred for structural nasal obstruction, and analyze how such findings influence the preoperative evaluation or operative plan. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: University-based academic otolaryngology practice. METHODS: Nasal endoscopy was performed by a single surgeon and the exam findings were documented. Patient demographics, variables in the patient history, Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation scores, and an Ease-of-Breathing Likert Scale were tested for associations with findings on endoscopy. RESULTS: A total of 82 of 346 patients (23.7%) had findings on rigid nasal endoscopy not appreciable on anterior rhinoscopy. Prior nasal surgery (p = .001) and positive allergy testing (p = .013) were significantly associated with findings on nasal endoscopy. Endoscopic findings prompted additional preoperative studies in 50 (14.5%) patients, and a change in the operative plan in 26 (7.5%) patients. CONCLUSION: In patients referred for surgical management of nasal obstruction, findings on nasal endoscopy otherwise undetected with anterior rhinoscopy are most common in but certainly not limited to those with prior nasal surgery or allergic rhinitis. Routine nasal endoscopy should be considered for all patients being evaluated for nasal airway surgery. These results may benefit future updates of the clinical consensus statements regarding the role of nasal endoscopy in the evaluation of nasal valve compromise and septoplasty.