ABSTRACT
Glioblastoma (GBM) represents one of the deadliest tumors owing to a lack of effective treatments. The adverse outcomes are worsened by high rates of treatment discontinuation, caused by the severe side effects of temozolomide (TMZ), the reference treatment. Therefore, understanding TMZ's effects on GBM and healthy brain tissue could reveal new approaches to address chemotherapy side effects. In this context, we have previously demonstrated the membrane lipidome is highly cell type-specific and very sensitive to pathophysiological states. However, little remains known as to how membrane lipids participate in GBM onset and progression. Hence, we employed an ex vivo model to assess the impact of TMZ treatment on healthy and GBM lipidome, which was established through imaging mass spectrometry techniques. This approach revealed that bioactive lipid metabolic hubs (phosphatidylinositol and phosphatidylethanolamine plasmalogen species) were altered in healthy brain tissue treated with TMZ. To better understand these changes, we interrogated RNA expression and DNA methylation datasets of the Cancer Genome Atlas database. The results enabled GBM subtypes and patient survival to be linked with the expression of enzymes accounting for the observed lipidome, thus proving that exploring the lipid changes could reveal promising therapeutic approaches for GBM, and ways to ameliorate TMZ side effects.
Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms , Glioblastoma , Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating/pharmacology , Brain Neoplasms/metabolism , Cell Line, Tumor , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm , Fatty Acids, Unsaturated/pharmacology , Glioblastoma/drug therapy , Glioblastoma/genetics , Glioblastoma/metabolism , Humans , Lipids/pharmacology , Temozolomide/pharmacology , Temozolomide/therapeutic useABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: 5-Aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) has become an important assistant in glioblastoma (GB) surgery. Unfortunately, its price affects its widespread use. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare commercial 5-ALA with the pharmacy-compounded solution. METHODS: Using first an in vitro experimental approach, different concentrations of the pharmacy-compounded solution and commercial 5-ALA were tested in U87MG, LN229, U373, and T98G commercial glioblastoma cell lines. Fluorescence intensity was compared for each concentration by flow cytometry. Mean fluorescence of culture supernatant and lysate samples were analyzed. In a second phase, both preparations were used for surgical glioblastoma resection and tumor samples were analyzed by confocal microscopy. Mean fluorescence intensity was analyzed for each preparation and compared. RESULTS: There was a high variability of fluorescence intensity between cell lines, but each cell line showed similar fluorescence for both preparations (compounded preparation and commercial 5-ALA). In the same way, both preparations had similar fluorescence intensity in glioblastoma samples. CONCLUSION: Both, compounded and commercial 5-ALA preparations produce equivalent fluorescent responses in human glioblastoma cells. Fluorescence intensity is cell line specific, but fluorescent properties of both preparations are undistinguishable.
