Efficacy and Safety of Two Different Flow Rates of Nasal High-Flow Therapy in Preterm Neonates ≥28 Weeks of Gestation: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of two different nasal high-flow rates for primary respiratory support in preterm neonates STUDY DESIGN: In this single-center, double-blinded randomized controlled trial, preterm neonates ≥28 weeks of gestation with respiratory distress from birth were randomized to treatment with either increased nasal flow therapy (8-10 L/min) or standard nasal flow therapy (5-7 L/min). The primary outcome of nasal high-flow therapy failure was a composite outcome defined as the need for higher respiratory support (continuous positive airway pressure [CPAP] or mechanical ventilation) or surfactant therapy. RESULTS: A total of 212 neonates were enrolled. Nasal high-flow failure rate in the increased flow group was similar to the standard flow group (22 vs. 29%, relative risk = 0.81 [95% confidence interval: 0.57-1.15]). However, nasal flow rate escalation was significantly more common in the standard flow group (64 vs. 43%, p = 0.004). None of the infants in the increased flow group developed air leak syndromes. CONCLUSION: Higher nasal flow rate (8-10 L/min) when compared with lower nasal flow rate of 5 to 7 L/min did not reduce the need for higher respiratory support (CPAP/mechanical ventilation) or surfactant therapy in moderately and late preterm neonates. However, initial flow rates of 5 L/min were not optimal for most preterm infants receiving primary nasal flow therapy. KEY POINTS: · Use of high nasal flows (8-10 L/min) did not reduce the need for higher respiratory support in moderately and late preterm infants.. · Nasal flow rate of 5 L/min was not optimal for most preterms with respiratory distress from birth.. · Careful patient selection and optimized flow settings could enhance nasal flow success in neonates..

Effects of blood sampling stewardship and erythropoietin administration in extremely low birth weight infants-a quality improvement non-controlled before-and-after retrospective study.

The majority of extremely low birth weight (ELBW) neonates receive red blood cell (RBC) transfusions; at least 50% receive multiple transfusions. Anemia care bundles could be the most effective approach to reduce transfusion rates. We conducted a quality improvement non-controlled before-and-after retrospective study involving 345 ELBW infants admitted over a 5-year period in two consecutive epochs before and after implementation of an anemia care bundle in January 2017. Bundle components included (a) prophylactic subcutaneous erythropoietin twice each week (600 IU/kg/week) from day 7 through 8 weeks of age and (b) blood sampling stewardship in the first five postnatal weeks. Early postnatal blood sampling losses were significantly reduced following the implementation of the care bundle (21.2 ml/kg vs 25 ml/kg, P < 0.001). We found a 50% reduction in the rate of multiple RBC transfusions (adjusted RR 0.45, 95% CI: 0.34-0.59) and a reduced odds of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) (4% vs 10%, adjusted OR 0.38 (95% CI: 0.15-0.78)) among infants that received the anemia care bundle (n = 182 infants). The overall transfusion rate, number and volume of transfusions, and multiple donor exposures were also significantly reduced.Conclusion: The combination of extended subcutaneous erythropoietin administration and reduced early postnatal blood sampling was associated with a significant reduction in the rate of multiple erythrocyte transfusions and NEC in ELBW neonates. What is known: • The majority of extremely low birth weight neonates continue to require blood transfusions despite advances in standardized transfusion practices; at least 50% require multiple transfusions. • Anemia care bundles, employing a combination of anemia prevention strategies, can effectively reduce the RBC transfusion rates in ELBW infants. What is new: • A combination of extended subcutaneous erythropoietin supplementation and blood sampling stewardship practices reduced the rate of multiple RBC transfusions in ELBW neonates by 50%. • Implementation of the anemia care bundle was associated with a significant reduction in the rates of necrotizing enterocolitis.

Systematic review seeking erythropoietin role for neuroprotection in neonates with hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy: presently where do we stand.

BACKGROUND: Hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) is one of the leading causes of neonatal mortality in developing countries and leads to some form of neuro-developmental disability in latter part of life. AIMS: The aim of this study is to evaluate the role of erythropoietin (EPO) in neuroprotection for term newborn having HIE. METHOD: The literature search was done for various trials by searching the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), PubMed, EMBASE, Web of science, Scopus, Index Copernicus, and other database. RESULTS: A total of nine studies fulfilled inclusion criteria. EPO has shown to cause reduction in death and disability, better long-term neuro-developmental outcome, improvement in EEG, and reduction in risk of cerebral palsy. CONCLUSION: EPO treatment has neuroprotective effects against moderate/severe HIE and improves long-term behavioral neurological developments in neonates.

Assessment of sickness severity of illness in neonates: review of various neonatal illness scoring systems.

Sickness severity scores are widely used for neonates admitted to neonatal intensive care units to predict severity of illness and risk of mortality and long-term outcome. These scores are also used frequently for quality assessment among various neonatal intensive care unit and hospital. Accurate and reliable measures of severity of illness are required for unbiased and reliable comparisons especially for benchmarking or comparative quality improvement care studies. These scores also serve to control for population differences when performing studies such as clinical trials, outcome evaluations, and evaluation of resource utilisation. Although presently there are multiple scores designed for neonates' sickness assessment but none of the score is ideal. Each score has its own advantages and disadvantages. We did literature search for identifying all neonatal sickness severity score and in this review article, we discuss these scores along with their merits and demerits.