Risk factors and outcome following salvage surgery for squamous cell carcinoma of the anus.

BACKGROUND: Chemoradiotherapy is the primary treatment for anal cancer. 15-33% of patients will have persistent or recurrent disease after treatment requiring salvage surgery. Relapse after surgery, postoperative complications, and mortality as well as possible risk factors are not fully understood due to the rareness of the disease. The aim of the study was to report outcomes after salvage surgery as well as evaluate risk factors for postoperative complications, cancer relapse and survival. METHODS: Data were retrospectively collected from electronical patients charts and pathology reports from all patients undergoing salvage surgery from July 1st, 2011 to July 1st, 2021 at the Department of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark. RESULTS: A total of 98 patients were included in the study. The 5-year overall survival was 61.8%. Relapse after surgery occurred in 36.7% of patients and was significantly associated with R1-resection (HR = 4.4) and preoperative nodal metastases (HR = 4.5). Negative prognostic factors for survival were found to be R1-resection (HR = 3.2), preoperative nodal metastases (HR = 2.9), and male gender (HR = 0.5). There was no association found between complications and survival (HR 1.2). None of the possible risk factors were associated with major postoperative complications. CONCLUSIONS: An acceptable overall survival after surgery was found. Survival and relapse-free survival was negatively associated with R1 resections and positive preoperative lymph nodes. Complications did not influence long-term survival.

Estimated dose to site of loco-regional recurrence after radiotherapy in anal cancer using point of origin methods.

Background and purpose: Loco-regional recurrence (LRR) dominates the failure pattern after curative radiotherapy in anal cancer. The aim of this study was to estimate dose of LRRs in anal cancer using a point of origin-based method. Method and materials: Of 321 patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the anus, 31 patients with LRR (29 local recurrences and 5 regional lymph node recurrences) were available for analysis. The recurrence volumes were delineated on recurrence magnetic resonance imaging (rMRI). Rigid and subsequent deformable co-registration of planning computerised tomography scans and rMRI were performed. Point of origin was estimated as the centre of mass (COM) and an observer-based point of origin (obs-PO). Doses to COM and obs-PO, as well as the full recurrence volume, were estimated and the relation to target volumes was extracted. Results: The median minimum dose to COM was 63.8 Gy (range 32.5-65.1 Gy) and 63.7 Gy (range 35.5-65.2 Gy) to obs-PO of local recurrences. COM was included in the high dose volume (64 Gy) in 86 % of cases, and obs-PO was included in 75 % of cases. There was no difference in minimum dose to COM and obs-PO, and the median distance between the two points was 3.3 mm (range 0.6-19.8 mm). No recurrences occurred in primarily boosted lymph nodes. Conclusion: The majority of LLRs were located within the high dose volume indicating radioresistance as the primary cause of recurrence in anal cancer. No difference between the use of COM and obs-PO was evident.

Mesorectal radiotherapy for early stage rectal cancer: A novel target volume.

With the introduction of population-based bowel cancer screening, rectal cancer is diagnosed at earlier stages, yet standard treatment still requires the same extensive surgery that is used for more advanced stages. Organ preserving treatment is rapidly developing and is subject of investigation in numerous clinical trials. The STAR-TREC trial is an international, multi-centre randomised trial investigating organ preservation using (chemo)radiotherapy. Patients with small mrT1-3bN0V0M0 tumours are randomized between three arms: standard TME, organ preservation with SCRT or with CRT. In this trial, the clinical target volume has been tailored to the early staged disease of the included patients. This mesorectal irradiation volume includes the mesorectum and pre-sacral lymph nodes at the level of the tumour, two centimetres below and cranially up to the S2-3 interspace level. In contrast to conventional irradiation volumes, the lateral lymph nodes and the nodes along the superior rectal artery are excluded. As a result, the dose to the bowel, bladder, anal sphincter and the neurovascular plexus in the lower pelvis is substantially decreased, especially when combined with modern irradiation techniques, such as dynamic arc therapy. These lower doses are expected to lead to decreasing acute and late toxicity and beneficial functional outcomes. The implementation of this novel target volume will be accompanied by an extensive quality assurance program in the STAR-TREC trial. We describe the rationale behind the novel, mesorectal only radiotherapy treatment used in the STAR-TREC trial specifically tailored for early stage disease, with the goal of organ preservation.

Can we Save the rectum by watchful waiting or TransAnal microsurgery following (chemo) Radiotherapy versus Total mesorectal excision for early REctal Cancer (STAR-TREC study)?: protocol for a multicentre, randomised feasibility study.

INTRODUCTION: Total mesorectal excision (TME) is the highly effective standard treatment for rectal cancer but is associated with significant morbidity and may be overtreatment for low-risk cancers. This study is designed to determine the feasibility of international recruitment in a study comparing organ-saving approaches versus standard TME surgery. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: STAR-TREC trial is a multicentre international randomised, three-arm parallel, phase II feasibility study in patients with biopsy-proven adenocarcinoma of the rectum. The trial is coordinated from Birmingham, UK with national hubs in Radboudumc (the Netherlands) and Odense University Hospital Svendborg UMC (Denmark). Patients with rectal cancer, staged by CT and MRI as ≤cT3b (up to 5 mm of extramural spread) N0 M0 can be included. Patients will be randomised to either standard TME surgery (control), organ-saving treatment using long-course concurrent chemoradiation or organ-saving treatment using short-course radiotherapy. For patients treated with an organ-saving strategy, clinical response to (chemo)radiotherapy determines the next treatment step. An active surveillance regime will be performed in the case of a complete clinical regression. In the case of incomplete clinical regression, patients will proceed to local excision using an optimised platform such as transanal endoscopic microsurgery or other transanal techniques (eg, transanal endoscopic operation or transanal minimally invasive surgery). The primary endpoint of this phase II study is to demonstrate sufficient international recruitment in order to sustain a phase III study incorporating pelvic failure as the primary endpoint. Success in phase II is defined as randomisation of at least four cases per month internationally in year 1, rising to at least six cases per month internationally during year 2. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The medical ethical committees of all the participating countries have approved the study protocol. Results of the primary and secondary endpoints will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN14240288, 20 October 2016. NCT02945566; Pre-results, October 2016.

The prognostic value of KRAS mutated plasma DNA in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Lung cancer is one of the most common malignant diseases worldwide and associated with considerable morbidity and mortality. New agents targeting the epidermal growth factor system are emerging, but only a subgroup of the patients will benefit from the therapy. Cell free DNA (cfDNA) in the blood allows for tumour specific analyses, including KRAS-mutations, and the aim of the study was to investigate the possible prognostic value of plasma mutated KRAS (pmKRAS) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients with newly diagnosed, advanced NSCLC eligible for chemotherapy were enrolled in a prospective biomarker trial. A pre-treatment blood sample was drawn and subsequently DNA was extracted and pmKRAS analysed. The patients received carboplatin (AUC5) i.v. day 1 and vinorelbine (30mg/m(2) i.v. day 1 and 60mg/m(2) p.o. day 8) for a maximum of six cycles. Response to chemotherapy was evaluated according to RECIST v.1.0 by CT scans of the chest and upper abdomen. The presence of pmKRAS at baseline was assessed by an in-house qPCR method. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary end-points were progression free survival (PFS) and overall response rate. RESULTS: The study included 246 patients receiving a minimum of 1 treatment cycle, and all but four were evaluable for response according to RECIST. Forty-three patients (17.5%) presented with a KRAS mutation. OS was 8.9 months and PFS by intention to treat 5.4 months. Patients with a detectable plasma-KRAS mutation had a significantly shorter OS and PFS compared to the wild type (WT) patients (median OS 4.8 months versus 9.5 months, HR 1.87, 95% CI 1.23-2.84, p=0.0002 and median PFS 3.0 months versus 5.6 months, HR 1.60, 95% CI 1.09-2.37, p=0.0043). A multivariate Cox regression analysis confirmed the independent prognostic value of pmKRAS in OS but not in PFS. The response rate to chemotherapy was significantly lower in the group of patients with a mutation compared to WT (p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: The presence of KRAS mutations in plasma may be a marker of poor prognosis and may also hold predictive value. Further validation in an independent cohort is highly needed.

Limitations of tissue micro array in Duke's B colon cancer.

Tissue micro array (TMA) is widely used in cancer research in search of new predictive and prognostic markers. Colon cancer is known to be heterogeneous and the present study addresses some methodological aspects using cores of different size and analysing markers with different cellular distribution. We selected 61 paraffin-embedded tissue blocks representing patients diagnosed with Dukes B colon cancer. Two 1 mm and two 2 mm cores were taken from both the centre and the invasive front of the tumour respectively. The immunostaining included MLH1, MSH2, PMS2, p53, COX-2, TIMP and Betacatenin. Twenty-five percent of the cores taken from paraffin blocks less than 0.5 cm was lost and the total loss was 8%. The homogeneous stains (MLH1, MSH2 and PMS2) all showed high agreement between TMA and whole tissue stains (kappa = 0.96,1 and 1 respectively). The COX-2, p53 and Betacatenin illustrated moderate to high agreement (kappa = 0.54-0.9) whereas TIMP-1 had the lowest score (kappa 0.19-0.25). The application of TMA in Dukes B colon cancer has several pitfalls and depends substantially on the immunohistochemical marker in question. Therefore a validation study seems justified before applying large scale TMA in this setting.

The predictive value of single nucleotide polymorphisms in the VEGF system to the efficacy of first-line treatment with bevacizumab plus chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: results from the Nordic ACT trial.

PURPOSE: Bevacizumab and chemotherapy is a common choice for first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). So far, no predictive markers have been identified. The aim was to investigate the possible predictive value of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) system in this setting. METHODS: Pre-treatment blood samples and response evaluations were available from 218 of the 249 included patients. All patients received bevacizumab and chemotherapy comprising fluorouracil and leucovorin or capecitabine combined with either oxaliplatin (FOLFOX or XELOX, n = 183) or irinotecan (FOLFIRI or XELIRI, n = 66). Germline DNA was isolated from whole blood, and five SNPs in the VEGF-A gene, one SNP in the VEGF receptor 1 (VEGFR-1) gene and three SNPs in the VEGFR-2 gene were analysed by polymerase chain reaction. Response was evaluated according to RECIST version 1.0, and the association to genotypes was analysed using Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: The VEGFR-1 319 C/A SNP was significantly associated with response. Objective response was observed in 36% of the patients with CC genotype, 40% with CA and 56% with AA, p = 0.048. The response rates also differed significantly between patients with C-allele containing genotypes (CC + CA) (39%) and patients homozygous for the A-allele (AA) (56%), p = 0.015. There was no correlation between response rates and the remaining SNPs. CONCLUSIONS: The VEGFR-1 319 C/A SNP is a potential predictive marker for bevacizumab plus chemotherapy in patients with mCRC. Patients with the A allele appeared to have increased response rates. The results call for validation.

Quantitative analysis of vascular endothelial growth factor receptors 1 and 2 in colorectal cancer.

Vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A) is a key regulator of angiogenesis that binds to the receptors VEGFR-1 and VEGFR-2. It is well known that VEGF-A levels are increased in colorectal cancer (CRC) tissue compared to normal colorectal tissue, but little is known regarding the expression of the VEGFR-1 and -2 receptors. The aim of the present study was to perform a quantitative analysis of VEGFR-1 and -2 at the mRNA and protein level in tumour and normal colorectal tissue from CRC patients. Tissues were collected from 110 patients who underwent surgical resection for CRC. Receptor status was analysed at the gene expression level by real time RT-PCR using ß-2-microglobulin and ß-actin as reference genes. Protein analysis was performed using the ELISA technique. Gene expression and protein concentrations of VEGFR-1 and -2 were significantly increased in CRC tissue compared to normal colorectal tissue (P<10-6 for both receptors). An association between the gene expression of VEGFR-2 in CRC tissue and disease stage was detected (P=0.055). Significant correlations were also found between the gene expression of VEGFR-1 and -2 in CRC tissue and normal colorectal tissue (P<10-4). The gene expression and protein concentrations of VEGFR-1 and -2 were increased in CRC tissue compared to normal colorectal tissue, indicating that both receptors are important in CRC. The clinical implications of these findings require further investigation.