Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 11 de 11
Filter
1.
Med Sci Educ ; 34(2): 309-313, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38686145

ABSTRACT

This study focuses on a subset of medical students who participated in an anatomy dissection program and undertook an additional self-directed learning (SDL) project investigating incidental findings of cadaveric pathology. The value of SDL activity is explored as a means of enhancing medical student education, particularly its student perceived value in preparing and developing them as future medical educators. It was assessed whether the project advanced student interest in medical education by analyzing their motivations for participation. The results of the study highlight the potential of SDL as an experiential learning opportunity for medical students and the role of anatomic pathology in connecting multiple domains of medical education.

2.
J Affect Disord ; 354: 309-317, 2024 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38499070

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The gut-brain-axis has a role in mental health disorders. In people with generalized anxiety disorder, GAD,1 normal flora Escherichia-Shigella, are significantly elevated. Fecal microbiota transplant, FMT,2 has been used to alter the gut composition in unhealthy individuals. There may be a role for FMT in the treatment of GAD to improve the gut-brain-axis. METHODS: A systematic review of literature was conducted on articles published in PubMed, CINAHL Plus, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Wed of Science from 2000 to 2022 that analyzed FMT as a modality to alter the gut microbiome in which Escherichia-Shigella levels were quantified and reported. RESULTS: Of 1916 studies identified, 14 fit criteria and were included. Recipients undergoing FMT procedures had at least one enteric diagnosis and increased percentages of Escherichia-Shigella pre-FMT. Five studies on recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection, three irritable bowel syndrome, two ulcerative colitis, one ulcerative colitis and recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection, one acute intestinal and chronic graft-vs-host disease, one pouchitis, and one slow transit constipation. 10 articles (71.4 %) showed decreased levels of Escherichia-Shigella post-FMT compared to pre-FMT. Four studies claimed the results were significant (40 %). LIMITATIONS: Limitations include potential bias in study selection, study methods of analysis, and generalization of results. CONCLUSIONS: The gut-brain-axis has a role in GAD. Those with GAD have significantly higher Escherichia-Shigella compared to those without GAD. FMT has the potential to decrease Escherichia-Shigella in patients with GAD to positively alter the gut-brain-axis as a potential for future GAD treatment.


Subject(s)
Clostridium Infections , Colitis, Ulcerative , Humans , Fecal Microbiota Transplantation/methods , Feces , Anxiety Disorders/therapy , Clostridium Infections/therapy , Treatment Outcome
3.
Neurosurg Focus ; 55(4): E19, 2023 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37778039

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to demonstrate the safety and functional outcomes of antiplatelet use within 24 hours following mechanical thrombectomy (MT). METHODS: A retrospective review of prospectively collected data for consecutive patients who underwent MT for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) between 2016 and 2020 was performed. Patient demographics, comorbidities, Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS), antiplatelet use, neurological status, and tissue plasminogen activator use were collected. Patients were stratified into two groups, early (< 24 hours) or late (> 24 hours), based on when antiplatelet therapy was initiated post-MT. The primary outcome was safety, determined based on the rate of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) and inpatient mortality. The secondary outcome was functional independence (defined as modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score ≤ 2) at discharge and 30 days and 90 days postoperatively. The two cohorts were compared using univariate analysis. Multiple imputations were used to create complete data sets for missing data. Multivariable analysis was used to identify predictors for sICH and functional outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 190 patients met inclusion criteria (95 per group). Significant differences between the early and late groups included sex, preoperative intravenous thrombolysis, angioplasty, stent placement, and thrombectomy site. ICH (symptomatic and asymptomatic) and inpatient mortality were not significantly different between the groups. The mRS score was significantly lower at discharge (p < 0.001), 30 days (p = 0.011), and 90 days (p = 0.024) following MT in the early group. Functional independence was significantly higher in the early antiplatelet group at discharge (p = 0.015) and at 30 days (p = 0.006). Early antiplatelet use was independently associated with significantly increased odds of achieving functional independence at discharge (OR 3.07, p = 0.007) and 30 days (OR 5.78, p = 0.004). Early antiplatelet therapy was not independently associated with increased odds of sICH. CONCLUSIONS: Early antiplatelet initiation after MT in patients with AIS was independently associated with significantly increased odds of improved postoperative functional outcomes without increased odds of developing sICH.


Subject(s)
Brain Ischemia , Ischemic Stroke , Stroke , Humans , Tissue Plasminogen Activator/therapeutic use , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Ischemic Stroke/complications , Brain Ischemia/drug therapy , Brain Ischemia/surgery , Brain Ischemia/complications , Secondary Prevention , Treatment Outcome , Stroke/drug therapy , Stroke/surgery , Thrombectomy , Intracranial Hemorrhages/complications , Registries , Retrospective Studies
4.
Spine J ; 22(1): 8-18, 2022 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34506986

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Postoperative pain control following posterior lumbar fusion continues to be challenging and often requires high doses of opioids for pain relief. The use of ketorolac in spinal fusion is limited due to the risk of pseudarthrosis. However, recent literature suggests it may not affect fusion rates with short-term use and low doses. PURPOSE: We sought to demonstrate noninferiority regarding fusion rates in patients who received ketorolac after undergoing minimally invasive (MIS) posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Additionally, we sought to demonstrate ketorolac's opioid-sparing effect on analgesia in the immediate postoperative period. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: This is a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. We are reporting our interim analysis. PATIENT SAMPLE: Adults with degenerative spinal conditions eligible to undergo a one to three-level MIS transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). OUTCOME MEASURES: Six-month and 1-year radiographic fusion as determined by Suk criteria, postoperative opioid consumption as measured by intravenous milligram morphine equivalent, length of stay, and drug-related complications. Self-reported and functional measures include validated visual analog scale, short-form 12, and Oswestry Disability Index. METHODS: A double-blinded, randomized placebo-controlled, noninferiority trial of patients undergoing 1- to 3-level MIS TLIF was performed with bone morphogenetic protein (BMP). Patients were randomized to receive a 48-hour scheduled treatment of either intravenous ketorolac (15 mg every 6 hours) or saline in addition to a standardized pain regimen. The primary outcome was fusion. Secondary outcomes included 48-hour and total postoperative opioid use demonstrated as milligram morphine equivalence, pain scores, length of stay (LOS), and quality-of-life outcomes. Univariate analyses were performed. The present study provides results from a planned interim analysis. RESULTS: Two hundred and forty-six patients were analyzed per protocol. Patient characteristics were comparable between the groups. There was no significant difference in 1-year fusion rates between the two treatments (p=.53). The difference in proportion of solid fusion between the ketorolac and placebo groups did not reach inferiority (p=.072, 95% confidence interval, -.07 to .21). There was a significant reduction in total/48-hour mean opioid consumption (p<.001) and LOS (p=.001) for the ketorolac group while demonstrating equivalent mean pain scores in 48 hours postoperative (p=.20). There was no significant difference in rates of perioperative complications. CONCLUSIONS: Short-term use of low-dose ketorolac in patients who have undergone MIS TLIF with BMP demonstrated noninferior fusion rates. Ketorolac safely demonstrated a significant reduction in postoperative opioid use and LOS while maintaining equivalent postoperative pain control.


Subject(s)
Ketorolac , Spinal Fusion , Adult , Humans , Lumbar Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging , Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies , Spinal Fusion/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome
5.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976) ; 46(20): 1394-1401, 2021 Oct 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34559749

ABSTRACT

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of prospectively collected data at a single institution. OBJECTIVE: To compare perioperative and clinical outcomes in morbidly obese patients who underwent minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MiTLIF). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Obesity remains a serious public health concern. Obese patients who undergo lumbar fusion have historically thought to be at higher risk for complications and fare worse regarding quality-of-life outcomes. However, recent literature may demonstrate comparable risk and outcomes in obese patients. An increasing number of patients are categorized as morbidly obese (body mass index [BMI] ≥ 40 kg/m2). Perioperative and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are lacking in this patient population. METHODS: The authors retrospectively reviewed a prospectively collected database of all morbidly obese and non-obese patients that underwent MiTLIF between 2015 and 2018 for degenerative conditions who had minimum 1-year follow-up for outcome assessment. An inverse propensity/probability of treatment weighting was utilized to create a synthetic weighted sample in which covariates were independent of obesity designation to adjust for imbalance between groups. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) was used to estimate the association of morbid obesity and complications and 1-year PROs. RESULTS: A total of 292 patients were analyzed with 234 non-obese patients and 58 morbidly obese patients. Multivariate analysis failed to demonstrate any association between morbid obesity and achieving minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for Oswestry disability index (ODI), visual analog scale (VAS), or short form-12 (SF-12) physical component score. However, morbid obesity was associated with significant decrease in odds of achieving MCID for SF-12 mental component score (P = 0.001). Increased surgery duration was significantly associated with morbid obesity (P = 0.001). Morbid obesity exhibited no statistically significant association with postoperative complications, readmission, pseudarthrosis, or adjacent segment disease (ASD). CONCLUSION: Morbidly obese patients who undergo MiTLIF can achieve meaningful clinical improvement comparable to nonobese patients. Morbid obesity was associated with longer surgical times but was not associated with postoperative complications, readmission, or ASD.Level of Evidence: 3.


Subject(s)
Obesity, Morbid , Spinal Fusion , Humans , Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery , Obesity, Morbid/complications , Obesity, Morbid/surgery , Patient Readmission , Patient Reported Outcome Measures , Propensity Score , Retrospective Studies , Spinal Fusion/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome
6.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976) ; 46(6): 356-365, 2021 Mar 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33620179

ABSTRACT

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of a multi-institutional data registry. OBJECTIVE: The authors sought to determine the association between age and complications & patient-reported outcomes (PRO) in patients undergoing multilevel transforaminal interbody lumbar fusion (MTLIF). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Elderly patients undergoing MTLIF are considered high risk. However, data on complications and PRO are lacking. Additionally, safety of multilevel lumbar fusion in the elderly remains uncertain. METHODS: Patients ≥50-year-old who underwent MTLIF for degenerative lumbar spine conditions were analyzed. Ninety-day complications and PROs (baseline, 90-d, 1-y, 2-y) were queried using the MSSIC database. PROs were measured by back & leg visual analog scale (VAS), Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS), EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D), and North American Spine Society (NASS) Patient Satisfaction Index. Univariate analyses were used to compare among elderly and complication cohorts. Generalized estimating equation (GEE) was used to identify predictors of complications and PROs. RESULTS: A total of 3120 patients analyzed with 961 (31%) ≥ 70-y-o and 2159 (69%) between 50-69. A higher proportion of elderly experienced postoperative complications (P = .003) including urinary retention (P = <.001) and urinary tract infection (P = .002). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that age was not independently associated with complications. Number of operative levels was associated with any (P = .001) and minor (P = .002) complication. Incurring a complication was independently associated with worse leg VAS and PROMIS scores (P = <.001). Preoperative independent ambulation was independently associated with improved PROMIS, and EQ5D (P = <.001). Within the elderly, preoperative independent ambulation and lower BMI were associated with improved PROMIS (P = <.001). Complications had no significant effect on PROs in the elderly. CONCLUSIONS: Age was not associated with complications nor predictive of functional outcomes in patients who underwent MTLIF. Age alone, therefore, may not be an appropriate surrogate for risk. Furthermore, baseline preoperative independent ambulation was associated with better clinical outcomes and should be considered during preoperative surgical counseling.Level of Evidence: 3.


Subject(s)
Intersectoral Collaboration , Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery , Patient Reported Outcome Measures , Patient Satisfaction , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Spinal Fusion/trends , Age Factors , Aged , Databases, Factual/trends , Female , Humans , Male , Michigan/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Pain Measurement/methods , Pain Measurement/trends , Postoperative Complications/diagnosis , Predictive Value of Tests , Registries , Retrospective Studies , Spinal Fusion/adverse effects , Surveys and Questionnaires , Treatment Outcome
7.
BMJ Open ; 10(10): e036217, 2020 10 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33020083

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Delayed cerebral ischaemia (DCI) due to cerebral vasospasm (cVS) remains the foremost contributor to morbidity and mortality following aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (aSAH). Past efforts in preventing and treating DCI have failed to make any significant progress. To date, our most effective treatment involves the use of nimodipine, a calcium channel blocker. Recent studies have suggested that cilostazol, a platelet aggregation inhibitor, may prevent cVS. Thus far, no study has evaluated the effect of cilostazol plus nimodipine on the rate of DCI following aSAH. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a multicentre, double-blinded, randomised, placebo-controlled superiority trial investigating the effect of cilostazol on DCI. Data concerning rates of DCI, symptomatic and radiographic vasospasm, length of intensive care unit stay, and long-term functional and quality-of-life (QoL) outcomes will be recorded. All data will be collected with the aim of demonstrating that the use of cilostazol plus nimodipine will safely decrease the incidence of DCI, and decrease the rates of both radiographic and symptomatic vasospasm with subsequent improvement in long-term functional and QoL outcomes when compared with nimodipine alone. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was obtained from all participating hospitals by the Ascension Providence Hospital Institutional Review Board. The results of this study will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04148105.


Subject(s)
Brain Ischemia , Subarachnoid Hemorrhage , Brain Ischemia/drug therapy , Cilostazol/therapeutic use , Humans , Multicenter Studies as Topic , Nimodipine/therapeutic use , Prospective Studies , Quality of Life , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Subarachnoid Hemorrhage/complications
8.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976) ; 45(11): 735-740, 2020 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31860630

ABSTRACT

STUDY DESIGN: This was a single-institute retrospective study. OBJECTIVE: To describe perioperative and postoperative complications in elderly who underwent multilevel minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF) while identifying predictors of complications. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The number of elderly patients undergoing spinal fusion is rising. Spinal surgery in the elderly is considered high risk with high rates of complications. Perioperative and postoperative complications in elderly undergoing multilevel MIS TLIF is, however, not known. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on 467 consecutive patients who underwent multilevel MIS TLIF at a single institution from 2013 to 2017. Two cohorts, 70 years or older and 50 to 69 years old were analyzed. Multiple logistic regressions with minor and major complication rates as the dependent variables were performed to identify predictors of complication based on previously cited risk factors. A p-value of 0.008 or less was considered significant. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-two elderly and 315 nonelderly patients underwent multilevel MIS TLIFs. The average age was 76.4 and 60.4 years for the elderly and nonelderly cohorts. We observed 13 major (8.44%) and 72 minor (47.4%) complications in the elderly. No difference was noted in complication rates between the cohorts, except for urinary tract infection (P = .004) and urinary retention (P = .014). There were no myocardial infarctions; hardware complications; visceral, vascular, and neural injuries; or death. Length of stay, comorbidity, and length of surgery were predictive of major and minor complications. CONCLUSION: Elderly may undergo multilevel MIS TLIF with comparable complication rates. Age was not a predictor of complications. Rather, attention should focus on evaluation of comorbidity and limiting operative times. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.


Subject(s)
Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Spinal Diseases/surgery , Spinal Fusion/adverse effects , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications/diagnosis , Predictive Value of Tests , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Spinal Diseases/diagnosis
9.
World Neurosurg ; 133: e745-e750, 2020 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31605853

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive fusion of the sacroiliac (SI) joint has gained popularity for the treatment of refractory dysfunction. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of minimally invasive SI joint fusion between cylindrical threaded implants (CTIs) and triangular dowel implants (TDIs). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients who underwent SI joint fusions with either CTIs or TDIs. Data collected included patient demographics, perioperative data, and all patient-reported outcomes (PROs) including postoperative visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index, and Short Form-12 at 6 months and 1 year. The change from baseline PROs between the cohorts was analyzed as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included revision rates and time to revision between the two cohorts. A P value <0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-six consecutive patients underwent SI joint fusion, 74 patients with CTIs and 82 with TDIs. There was a significant difference in procedure length with CTI averaging 60.0 minutes (confidence interval: 55.7-64.3) and TDI averaging 41.2 minutes (confidence interval: 38.4-43.9, P < 0.0005). In both cohorts, there was a significant improvement in all PROs at 6 months when compared with preoperative values. However, when compared, there was no significant difference between the cohorts at 6-month follow-up or 1-year follow-up for either VAS-back, VAS-leg, Oswestry Disability Index, or Short Form-12. A 6.1% revision rate in the CTI cohort was observed compared with a 2.4% revision rate in the TDI cohort (P = 0.11). CONCLUSIONS: SI joint fusions with TDI or CTI offer a significant improvement in pain, disability, and quality of life. However, no difference was observed between devices to suggest superior clinical outcomes. Increased revision rates in the Rialto group warrants further investigation.


Subject(s)
Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/instrumentation , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/methods , Sacroiliac Joint/surgery , Spinal Fusion/instrumentation , Spinal Fusion/methods , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Reported Outcome Measures , Prostheses and Implants , Retrospective Studies , Titanium , Treatment Outcome
10.
Cureus ; 11(2): e4018, 2019 Feb 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31007976

ABSTRACT

Compression fractures are common among osteoporotic patients and can be a significant source of pain and disability. Patients who suffer a compression fracture at an instrumented level of a lumbar fusion are most often treated conservatively. Herein, we demonstrate a safe and effective treatment for a vertebral compression fracture (VCF) at a previous level with instrumented fusion and pedicle screw fixation. An 89-year-old female with a history of multiple osteoporotic compression fractures treated with previous kyphoplasties and a prior instrumented fusion at L4-L5 presented with debilitating lower back pain for one week. After failing conservative management, computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) study of the lumbar spine revealed an acute VCF of the previously instrumented L5 vertebral body. Under biplanar fluoroscopy, a balloon kyphoplasty was performed at the L5 vertebrae utilizing the Inflatable Vertebral Augmentation System (IVAS) from Stryker® (Kalamazoo, MI, USA). We were able to demonstrate that the treatment of an acute VCF with balloon kyphoplasty is feasible in patients who have a history of previous instrumentation with pedicle screws remaining at the fracture level.

11.
Cureus ; 11(2): e3996, 2019 Feb 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30989005

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) procedures are common and neck scar appearance is important aesthetically. This study compared subcuticular suture closure with staple closure regarding the aesthetics of the neck incision scar. METHODS: A single-blinded comparative prospective study with two cohorts involving one facility and multiple surgeons was done to study all consecutive patients who underwent one/two-level ACDF operations from 2015-2016. We excluded patients with corpectomies, postoperative wound infection, reoperations in the same admission, any previous ACDF operations, non-compliance in follow-up, and inability to give informed consent. We did single-layer skin stapling without platysma closure or subcuticular suture with platysma closure. Patients followed up between 1.5 and six months. We used the Stony Brook Scar Evaluation Scale (SBSES), range 0-5 with five being the best score. Digital images were taken in a standardized manner and saved in a secure database. A blinded plastic surgeon and a blinded neurosurgeon, not involved in the operation, evaluated the scars using SBSES. A priori sample size using a clinically significant difference of one was determined. Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used; a p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: We studied 93 staple and 66 suture closures. There is no significant difference between the groups regarding age, sex, the incidence of diabetes, smoking, obesity (body mass index (BMI) >30 kg/m2), chemotherapy or the length of the incision. There is no statistically significant difference regarding SBSES as evaluated by the plastic surgeon (staples vs. sutures, median 2 vs. 2, range 0-5, p = 0.32). There is a statistically significant difference as evaluated by the neurosurgeon (staples vs. sutures, median 4 vs. 3, range 0-5, p = 0.003). Post hoc power analysis was 0.90. CONCLUSION: Using the validated SBSES to assess the aesthetic outcome of ACDF scars, we demonstrated that staples and sutures provide equivalent aesthetic outcomes per plastic surgeon evaluation, and staple closure results in statistically significant better aesthetic outcomes per neurosurgeon evaluation.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...