Ontogeny and effect of activity on proenkephalin mRNA expression during development of the chick spinal cord.

Numerous studies have shown in the adult nervous system that mRNA expression can be regulated by neuronal activity. To examine the effect of activity during embryogenesis, the ontogeny of proenkephalin mRNA expression and expression following activity blockade was investigated during development of chick spinal cord. A cDNA fragment (ca. 0.5 kb) coding for chick proenkephalin was cloned and sequenced. With this cDNA, a cRNA probe was made to examine proenkephalin mRNA expression in the spinal cord during embryogenesis. Proenkephalin mRNA was expressed in spinal cord in clusters of cells located in the developing dorsal horn and intermediate lamina at the earliest stages examined (stage 22; E4). Proenkephalin-positive cells in the intermediate lamina were located immediately adjacent to the ventricular zone. At stage 28 (E6) an additional cluster of proenkephalin mRNA-positive cells was seen at the lateral border of the developing intermediate lamina. At stage 33 (E7.5-5-8) the pattern of hybridization positive cells was similar to earlier stages, but individual cells could be identified. At stage 39 (E13) densely labeled cells were seen throughout the dorsal horn and intermediate laminae including the column of Terni. To determine whether neural activity affects proenkephalin mRNA expression, d-tubocurarine (an inhibitor of neural activity) was injected into developing embryos. Following administration of d-tubocurarine a dramatic decrease was seen in proenkephalin mRNA hybridization in the dorsal horn and intermediate lamina of the spinal cord. This study demonstrates in vivo that changes in the level of neural activity can alter gene expression during embryogenesis and suggests that activity is required for expression of nervous system-specific genes.

Axonal sprouting and frank regeneration in the lizard tail spinal cord: correlation between changes in synaptic circuitry and axonal growth.

In our previous studies, we found that the number of supraspinal neurons projecting to the level of tail spinal cord increases by 74% during tail regeneration and that the number of local spinal neurons with descending projections increases 233%. However, only a small fraction of the supraspinal axons (less than 4%) and half of the local spinal axons actually enter the regenerated spinal cord. We suggested that this may be the result of "synaptic capture" in which regrowing axons make synapses on denervated targets rostral to the transection, aborting further regeneration. To examine this hypothesis, morphometric analysis of electron microscope (EM) photomontages was used to test for changes in synaptic distribution on ventral horn neurons rostral to regenerating tail spinal cord. In addition, 3H-thymidine and retrograde markers were used to determine whether the regenerate axons arose from cut axons, neurogenesis, or sprouting from uninjured neurons. 3H-thymidine injections during regeneration, combined with retrograde HRP pathway tracing, did not reveal the production of new neurons in the tail spinal cord. To test whether cut axons regenerate, fluorescein isothiocyanate conjugated latex beads were applied to the exposed end of the tail spinal cord. After tail regeneration, HRP was applied to the new spinal cord in the regenerated tail. Examination of local spinal neurons (the primary source of axons that enter the regenerated tail spinal cord) revealed that 28% of the neurons contained both labels. This indicated that cut axons successfully regrew into the new tail spinal cord. The regenerated axons that fail to enter the new tail spinal cord can be found in the normal spinal cord immediately rostral to the regenerated tail. To determine whether these axons were making synaptic contacts, lamina IX ventral horn neurons were examined. EM photomontages of the spinal cord rostral to the regenerate tail revealed the following properties: (1) neurons rostral to regenerated tails are larger in area compare to non-regenerates (mean increase = 112%); (2) axosomatic contacts cover a greater percentage of the neuronal soma following regeneration compared to normal (mean increase = 23%); and (3) this increased innervation is the result of an increase in the number of synaptic boutons rather than larger boutons. The number of synaptic contacts in regenerated lizards returned to normal following lumbar transection, indicating that supraspinal and/or long descending propriospinal afferents were the major source of the increased synaptic contacts.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)