ABSTRACT
As part of a larger grounded theory study investigating the process by which palliative care patients make everyday choices, a secondary analysis of data was conducted to investigate the ways nurses support or restrict patients' participation in their care. Constant comparative methods were used to generate a detailed, contextually grounded description of nurses' strategies that influenced patients' participation in making everyday choices about their personal and nursing care. Data consisted of field notes derived from observations of patients and their caregivers in two hospital-based palliative care units and from 23 transcripts of interviews with participating nurses and patients. Nurses' efforts to support patients' participation in decision making were described as a four-phase process: getting to know the patient, enhancing opportunities for choice, being open to patient choice, and respecting choice. Factors influencing nurses' use of supportive behaviors and behaviors that restricted patients' participation in everyday choices were identified. Given the importance patients attributed to making choices, these findings provide a foundation for the design of nursing interventions that hold great potential for directly influencing quality of life.
Subject(s)
Decision Making , Nurse-Patient Relations , Nursing Process , Oncology Nursing , Palliative Care/psychology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
A fundamental principle of palliative care is the provision of patient-centred care, an approach explicitly based on the patient's perspective. Although much attention has been given to determining patients' preferences for involvement in medical decisions, choices related to personal and nursing care routines have been largely ignored in the literature. Data from participant observations of nurse-patient interactions involving 16 palliative care patients and their nurses as well as 10 in-depth open-ended interviews with patients were analyzed using grounded theory methods. Although the choices made by patients appeared uncomplicated on the surface, the context of unfamiliarity, uncertainty, and unpredictability in palliative care increased the underlying complexity of decision making. Through a process of deliberation and trade-offs, patients attempted to regain or maintain some balance in their lives. This process of striving for balance consisted of three overlapping phases: weighing things up, communicating choice, and living with one's choices.
